zotero/storage/3KVTBZEL/.zotero-ft-cache

PHYSICAL REVIEW A 75, 053807 ͑2007͒

Ultrahigh enhancement in absolute and relative rotation sensing using fast and slow light

M. S. Shahriar, G. S. Pati, R. Tripathi, V. Gopal, M. Messall, and K. Salit Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA
͑Received 18 December 2006; revised manuscript received 21 February 2007; published 8 May 2007͒

We describe a resonator-based optical gyroscope whose sensitivity for measuring absolute rotation is enhanced via use of the anomalous dispersion characteristic of superluminal light propagation. The enhancement is given by the inverse of the group index, saturating to a bound determined by the group velocity dispersion. We also show how the offsetting effect of the concomitant broadening of the resonator linewidth may be circumvented by using an active cavity. For realistic conditions, the enhancement factor is as high as 106. We also show how normal dispersion used for slow light can enhance relative rotation sensing in a specially designed Sagnac interferometer, with the enhancement given by the slowing factor.

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.053807

PACS number͑s͒: 42.50.Ct, 42.50.Gy, 42.60.Da

I. INTRODUCTION
Recent experiments have demonstrated very slow as well as superluminal group velocities of light using many different processes ͓1–5͔. Extreme dispersion in a slow-light medium has recently been considered to boost the rotational sensitivity of optical gyroscopes via the relativistic Sagnac effect ͓6͔. However, the mechanism by which strong material dispersion affects the Sagnac effect has not been analyzed extensively. It is commonly perceived that the Sagnac time delay or phase shift in the presence of a dielectric medium is independent of the refractive property of the medium ͓7,8͔. Although this is true for a comoving medium and absolute inertial rotation, it is not true if the medium is moving with respect to the inertial frame of rotation. Recently, Leonhardt and Piwnicki ͓6͔ proposed a slow-light-enhanced gyroscope; however, they did not point out that this enhancement cannot be achieved when measuring absolute rotation. Later, Zimmer and Fleischhauer ͓9͔ refuted, incorrectly, the idea of any slow-light-based sensitivity enhancement in rotation sensing, and proposed an alternative hybrid light and matter-wave interferometer, based on slow-light momentum transfer from light to atoms.
Matsko et al. ͓10͔ proposed a model where they consider the use of microresonators instead of atoms to provide the positive dispersion. The analysis in this paper makes use of a classical ͑nonrelativistic͒ model, which yields results that are incorrect when a material medium of nonunity index is present. The authors published an Erratum ͓11͔ in which they point out this mistake ͓11͔. However, the Erratum still claims that the rotation sensitivity is enhanced by the group index. This conclusion is correct, although potentially misleading. When a single loop used in an interferometric Sagnac rotation sensor is replaced by a cavity, the sensitivity is enhanced by a factor equaling its ﬁnesse. This factor also equals the ratio of the phase velocity to the group velocity in the cavity. Therefore, it can be represented as an effective group index, or, equivalently, a slowing factor. Physically, this enhancement results from the fact that the counterpropagating beams travel through the cavity a number—which equals the ﬁnesse—of times before interfering with each other. Thus, this result makes no statement about the effect of positive dispersion in the propagation medium on the sensitivity of

Sagnac-effect-based rotation sensing ͓12͔. Essentially the same conclusion applies to the microresonator-based rotation sensing architecture proposed by Scheuer et al. ͓13͔.
In this paper, we ﬁrst present a systematic but brief review of the role of positive dispersion in the propagation medium in measuring rotation via the Sagnac effect. This allows us to put the various claims regarding potential enhancement of the sensitivity of a Sagnac gyroscope using the slow-light effect in clear perspective. Speciﬁcally, we establish that there are no known conﬁgurations under which a positive dispersion in the propagation medium can enhance the sensitivity of measuring absolute rotation. We then identify an explicit conﬁguration where such a positive dispersion leads to a strong enhancement ͑by a factor matching the group index͒ in measuring relative rotation between the propagation medium and the rest of the gyroscope. This is a manifestation of the fact that, in an interferometric optical gyroscope that allows relative motion between the medium and the interferometer, the dispersive drag coefﬁcient ͓8,14͔ can inﬂuence the Sagnac fringe shift.
For most practical applications such as inertial navigation and fundamental studies in astrophysics ͑e.g., precision measurement of the Lens-Thirring rotation͒ and geology, the measurement of relative rotation is of no use. What is needed
for these applications is an ability to measure the absolute
rate of rotation of the whole gyroscope, including the propa-
gation medium. As the primary contribution of this paper, we
show here that dispersion in the propagation medium can
indeed be used to enhance the sensitivity of measuring ab-
solute rotation. Speciﬁcally, we show that the enhancement
occurs if the dispersion is anomalous, characteristic of super-
luminal light propagation, in a resonator-based gyroscope
where the Sagnac effect manifests itself in the form of the
frequency splitting of cavity modes. Unlike in an interferom-
eter, frequency splitting in a resonator gyroscope is governed
by optical path lengths that are always dependent on the refractive property of the medium ͓14–16͔. We discuss the effect of dispersion on such a resonator-based gyroscope, and
show that the rotation sensitivity can be increased by as much as 106 by using what we call critically anomalous dispersion ͑CAD͒, corresponding to the group index approaching a null value. Such a sensor can be implemented using bifrequency-pumped Raman gain in an atomic medium ͓17͔, for example. We also show how the offsetting effect of the

1050-2947/2007/75͑5͒/053807͑10͒

053807-1

©2007 The American Physical Society

SHAHRIAR et al.

PHYSICAL REVIEW A 75, 053807 ͑2007͒

concomitant broadening of the resonator linewidth can be circumvented by using an active cavity.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II, we present a brief summary of the role of medium dispersion in the Sagnac effect, using the axioms of special relativity ͑SR͒. We establish that there are no known conﬁgurations under which a positive medium dispersion can enhance the sensitivity of measuring absolute rotation, and identify an explicit conﬁguration where such a positive medium dispersion leads to enhancement in measuring relative rotation. The published claims regarding the use of such a dispersion in enhancing the sensitivity of a gyroscope are then summarized and critiqued in this context. In Sec. III, we present the key idea of this paper, by describing how a resonator-based Sagnac gyroscope with an intracavity negative dispersion ͑i.e., fast-light͒ medium near the CAD condition leads to a strong enhancement in the sensitivity of measuring absolute rotation. In Sec. IV, we establish the effective equivalence between rotation sensing and measurement of mirror displacement in a ring resonator, and use this model to present a simple and transparent interpretation of the fast-lightenhanced rotation sensing. This model is also used to show how this enhancement is naturally accompanied by the socalled white light cavity ͑WLC͒ effect, whereby the linewidth of the cavity is broadened without affecting its storage time. In Sec. V, we show how, in a passive ring resonator gyroscope loaded with a negative dispersion medium near the CAD condition, the enhancement in sensitivity to rotation is counterbalanced by the concomitant linewidth broadening ͑i.e., the WLC effect͒, so that there is virtually no improvement in the minimum measurable rotation rate. In Sec. VI, we show how this offsetting effect of linewidth broadening can be overcome by using a fast-light-enhanced ring laser gyroscope. In Sec. VII, we outline an explicit scheme for realizing fast-light-enhanced gyroscope, and present numerical estimates for the prospect of measuring the Lens-Thirring rotation using such a gyroscope. We also refer brieﬂy to recent experimental work we have done to establish key aspects of this gyroscope. Finally, we conclude with a summary and acknowledgments in Sec. VIII.

II. ENHANCEMENT OF THE SAGNAC EFFECT IN THE PRESENCE OF POSITIVE DISPERSION
IN THE PROPAGATION MEDIUM

Let us consider ﬁrst waves in a Mach-Zehnder interferometer ͑MZI͒, as shown in Fig. 1, that are constrained to propagate in a circular path ͑for convenience in analysis͒ with a radius R ͑the effect occurs for paths that are rectilinear as well, as shown in the diagram͒. In general, the wave could
be of any kind: optical, matter, or acoustic. For the clockwise CW ͑+͒ and counterclockwise CCW ͑−͒ directions, the relativistic velocities VR± of the phase fronts ͑PFs͒, the time T± taken by the PFs to travel between the two beam splitters ͑BS1 and BS2͒, and the effective distances L± from BS1 to
BS2 are related as follows:

VR±

=

1

VP ± v ± VPv/C02

,

L± = ␲ R ± vT±,

T±

=

L± VR± ,

͑1͒

where VP is the velocity of each PF in the absence of rotation, C0 is the velocity of light in vacuum, v = ⍀R is the

BS2 Det

CW Ω

Source BS1
Ω

CCW

FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of a Mach-Zehnder-type Sagnac interferometer with counterpropagating beams in a circular optical path ͑the actual paths shown are rectilinear for simplicity͒.

tangential velocity of rotation, and ⍀ is the rotation rate. Thus, the time delay between the propagating waves and
their relative phase shift at the detector are given by

ͩ ͪ ⌬t0 = T+ − T− = ␲R

͑VR− − VR+͒ + 2v ͑VR− + v͒͑VR+ − v͒

ͩ ͪ 2A⍀

2A⍀

= C02͑1 − ␤2͒ Ϸ C02 ,

␤ ϵ v Ӷ 1, C0

⌬␾0

=

␻⌬t0

=

4␲A⍀ ␭0C0

,

͑2͒

where A = ␲R2 is the enclosed area, ␻ is the angular frequency, ␭0 is the vacuum wavelength of the wave, and ␤ Ӷ 1 is the boost parameter. The form of the time delay in Eq. ͑2͒ due to the Sagnac effect attests to the fact that the time
delay is simply a geometric effect, attributable to relativistic
time dilations, and does not depend at all on the velocity of
the wave. It involves only the free space velocity of light,
even if acoustic or matter waves are used. The familiar result of the matter-wave Sagnac phase shift, ⌬␾ = 4␲mA⍀ / h, can be obtained from Eq. ͑2͒ by inserting the Compton frequency ␻ = ͑mc02 / ប͒. Note that the Sagnac effect can be explained fully within SR, without invoking general relativity, if the
degree of space-time curvature is insigniﬁcant, which is the
case for optical loops typically used in Sagnac interferometers ͓8͔.
For the case of optical waves in a Sagnac interferometer consisting of a refractive medium, the phase shift ⌬␾0 in Eq. ͑2͒ is independent of the refractive index n. This result is
somewhat counterintuitive, since it is expected that the light
beams experience index-dependent drag in the moving me-
dium. Thus, the travel time delay around the optical circuit
could be expected to depend on n. However, this is not true
for a corotating medium in the Sagnac interferometer. One can explicitly show this by reexpressing the velocities VR± of the CW and CCW phase fronts in terms of the Fresnel drag:

053807-2

ULTRAHIGH ENHANCEMENT IN ABSOLUTE AND …

PHYSICAL REVIEW A 75, 053807 ͑2007͒

LLaasseerr

Ω

VVMM

Det

CWCW

VVMM

VMM

VMM

LLaaser

Ω

Det

Frame & source stationary; medium rotating b

Ω

Ω

Flexible Fiber Clamp

CCW CCW

Laserr

stationary

Det

a

Frame & source rotating; medium stationary cC

FIG. 2. Interferometric setup for rotation sensing using Doppler effect. ͑a͒ Generalized case corresponding to uniform medium translation, ͑b͒ stationary source and frame, rotating medium, and ͑c͒ corotating source and frame, stationary medium.

ͩ ͪ VR±

=

C0 n

±

v␣F,

␣F =

1 1 − n2

,

͑3͒

where C0 / n is the velocity VP of the phase fronts in the absence of rotation, and the term ␣F is the Fresnel drag coefﬁcient. Using Eq. ͑2͒, one can write the time delay and the
phase shift in a generalized form,

⌬t Ϸ ͓n2͑1 − ␣F͔͒⌬t0, ⌬␾ = ͓n2͑1 − ␣F͔͒⌬␾0. ͑4͒
Substituting ␣F from Eq. ͑3͒ in Eq. ͑4͒, one gets the same results as in Eq. ͑2͒. This is because the derivation using SR already includes the effect of the medium motion on light propagation. However, the magnitude of this effect is independent of the Fresnel drag coefﬁcient, as well as the refractive index, for a Sagnac interferometer that uses a common frame of rotation for the light source, the interferometer, and the medium. Such a system does not possess ͑to ﬁrst order͒ Doppler shift of any kind between the medium and the source or the interferometer, since they are all corotating at the same rate ⍀.
One can relax this constraint and allow several modiﬁcations of the Sagnac interferometer where relative motion between the frame and the medium introduces a Doppler shift. As we will show, under this condition, light drag resulting from dispersion affects the ﬁnal fringe shift. Such a system, however, can only be used in relative rotation sensing. Figure 2͑a͒ shows another MZI considered for Sagnac interferometry, allowing relative motion of the medium with respect to the interferometer. Note ﬁrst that in this model the connection with the ﬁrst BS is established using a ﬂexible ﬁber, thus making it possible to make the MZI rotate without rotating the source. If the source is stationary while the frame and the medium corotate, a Doppler shift is produced at the ﬁrst BS. However, this shift does not affect the phase shift, since the BS effectively serves as the source for both arms. Therefore, the fringe shift described in Eq. ͑2͒ still holds. Next, consider the case where the medium inside the MZI paths is allowed to move at a velocity VM with respect to the MZI frame ͑i.e., the mirrors and beam splitters͒. As seen by the medium, the CW ͑+͒ and CCW ͑−͒ beams are now Doppler shifted by equal and opposite amounts, given by ⌬␻± = ± ␻VM / C0. Expressions for relativistic velocities can be given by including ﬁrst-order dispersion in n͑␻͒ as

ͩ ͪ VR±

=

C0 n0

⌬␻± ‫ץ‬n 1−
n0 ‫␻ץ‬

ϯ v␣F

=

C0 n0

ϯ

VM n02

␻

‫ץ‬n ‫␻ץ‬

ϯ

v␣F

=

C0 n0

ϯ

VM

͑ng − n0͒ n02

ϯ

v␣F,

͑5͒

where n0 is the phase index at the input frequency of ␻, ␣F = ͑1 − 1 / n02͒ is the Fresnel drag coefﬁcient, and ng͑=n0 + ␻ ‫ ץ‬n / ‫ ͒␻ץ‬is the group index, deﬁned as the ratio of the free space velocity of light to the group velocity at ␻. As a
speciﬁc example, consider a situation where the medium is noncomoving, as illustrated in Figs. 2͑b͒ and 2͑c͒, giving rise to VM Х ͑−v͒. The relativistic velocities in this case are given by

ͩ ͪ VR±

Ϸ

C0 n0

±

v␣L,

␣L =

1

−

1 n02

+

͑ng − n0͒ n02

͑6͒

where ␣L is the so-called Laub drag coefﬁcient ͓18͔. The expressions for time delay and phase shift are obtained as ⌬t Ϸ ͓n2͑1 − ␣L͔͒⌬t0, ⌬␾ Ϸ ͓n2͑1 − ␣L͔͒⌬␾0.
Unlike the Doppler-shift-free situation, the coefﬁcients of
time delay and phase shift now depend on the refractive
property of the medium. Of course, in the absence of dispersion ͑i.e., ng = n0͒, one recovers the same results as in Eq. ͑2͒. In the presence of a highly dispersive medium with ng ӷ n0 ͑i.e., ‫ץ‬n / ‫ ␻ץ‬ӷ n0 / ␻͒, characteristic of extreme normal dispersion in a medium that produces slow light, the time delay and the phase shift are given by ⌬t Ϸ ng⌬t0 , ⌬␾ Ϸ ng⌬␾0.
Thus, the rotation sensitivity of a slow-light-based gyro-
scope scales directly with the group index ng. Experimental observation of slow light reported in atomic and solid media using electromagnetically induced transparency ͑EIT͒ ͓1,2͔ have shown the group index ng to be as large as 108. Thus, one can conceivably design an ultraprecise rotation sensor
for sensing relative rotation of a local system using a uni-
formly spinning slow-light medium in the interferometric
beam path. Finally, we note that the experiment outlined here
for detecting the relative rotation between a dispersive me-
dium and the rest of the gyroscope is fundamentally equivalent to the Fizeau experiment ͓19͔.

053807-3

SHAHRIAR et al.
diff.

V1

Σ

Ω VCO1

diff.

Beat ∆f Det

PHYSICAL REVIEW A 75, 053807 ͑2007͒

͑the effect occurs even when the paths are rectilinear, as shown in the diagram͒. In the absence of rotation, the light in the cavity resonates in both directions with a frequency ␻0 given by ␻0 = ͑C0 / n0͒͑2␲N / P͒, where N is an integer and P = 2␲R is the perimeter. In the presence of rotation, the resonance frequencies are different for the CW ͑+͒ and CCW
͑−͒ directions, and are given by

␻±

Х

VE±

2␲N P

,

VE± = VR± ϯ v,

AOM2 Laser

AOM1

VCO2

Σ

V22

FIG. 3. Schematic of a passive resonator gyroscope showing detection mode for beat frequency measurement and active closedloop control for compensating random drift.
We now summarize brieﬂy some of the ideas that have been presented in the literature regarding the use of slow light for enhancement of rotation sensing. First, note that the result we presented above for using slow light to enhance the sensitivity of measuring relative rotation is essentially equivalent to what was presented in Ref. ͓6͔. However, as we noted earlier, Ref. ͓6͔ does not point out that this enhancement cannot be achieved when measuring absolute rotation. This result also shows the claim by Zimmer and Fleischhauer ͓9͔ that slow light cannot enhance the sensitivity of rotation sensing to be inaccurate. Finally, as discussed in the Introduction, the results presented by Matsko et al. ͓10͔ do not deal with any potential enhancement of rotation sensing via the use of positive dispersion in the propagation medium. Rather, it is essentially a restatement of the well-established fact that, when a single loop used in an interferometric Sagnac rotation sensor is replaced by a cavity, the sensitivity is enhanced by a factor equaling its ﬁnesse. Essentially, the same conclusion applies to the microresonator-based rotation sensing architecture proposed by Scheuer and Yanv ͓13͔.

III. ENHANCEMENT OF THE SAGNAC EFFECT IN A RING RESONATOR IN THE PRESENCE OF NEGATIVE DISPERSION
As mentioned earlier, one of the drawbacks of the slowlight-enhanced interferometric conﬁguration above is that it cannot be employed in sensing absolute rotation. This constraint can be overcome by considering the Sagnac effect in a ring cavity or resonator. Unlike the interferometer where the frequency of light remains unchanged by rotation, the resonant frequencies of the cavity modes in a resonator get modiﬁed as a result of rotation. Figure 3 shows the schematic of a passive ring cavity ͑PRC͒ along with the necessary detection mode and servo mechanism to be used in a gyroscope. For analytic convenience, we assume the light path in the resonator to be circular with a radius R and an enclosed area A

␦␻0͑ϵ ␻−

−

␻+͒

=

␻0 ͑2⍀R͒ C0n0

=

␻0 C0n0

4⍀A P

,

͑7͒

where VR± are the relativistic velocities given in Eq. ͑3͒, VE± are the effective velocities, and A = ␲R2 is the area enclosed by the resonator. The frequency difference ⌬␻0, which is proportional to the rotation rate ⍀, can be experimentally
measured from the heterodyne beat note of transmitted sig-
nals by adjusting the frequency of acousto-optical modulation 1 ͑2͒ to maximize the cavity transmission in the CCW ͑CW͒ direction. It is important to emphasize that the appearance of 1/n0 in the expression for ␦␻0 in Eq. ͑7͒ results from the combination of the facts that ͑1 − ␣F͒ = 1 / n02 and that, in the absence of rotation, the effective velocity of light in the
medium is C0 / n0. Note that, even though we have calculated the difference
between the resonant frequencies in each direction, we could
also simply calculate the frequency offset in each direction independently. Let us deﬁne ⌬␻0− = ͑␻− − ␻0͒ and ⌬␻0+ = ͑␻+ − ␻0͒, so that ␦␻0 = ͑⌬␻− − ⌬␻+͒. Using the expressions for ␻± from Eq. ͑7͒, we can show that

⌬␻0−

=

␻0 C0n0

2⍀A ,
P

⌬␻0+

=

−

␻0 C0n0

2⍀A P

.

͑8͒

Therefore, for the passive ring cavity gyroscope ͑PRCG͒, one can measure the rotation rate by monitoring the shift in the resonance frequency for one direction ͑CW or CCW͒ alone. Experimentally, both directions are measured in order
primarily to eliminate common-mode effects. The same is true for the ring laser gyroscope ͑RLG͒ as well.
Thus, in measuring absolute rotation, the PRCG ͑as well as the RLG͒ differ fundamentally from the MZI-based gyroscope ͑MZIG͒. For the MZIG, one must have beams propagating in both directions, and the Sagnac effect is manifested
only as the difference between the phase shifts due to a rotation. In contrast, for the PRCG ͑and the RLG͒, the Sagnac effect is manifested through the actual phase shift in either direction ͑CW or CCW͒. This is partly the reason that, for the MZIG case, the measurement signal is independent of the index, while for the PRCG ͑and the RLG͒ it depends explicitly on the index.
In this derivation, we have implicitly assumed the refractive index to be independent of frequency ͑i.e., no dispersion͒. When the effect of dispersion is taken into account, the result changes signiﬁcantly. Without any loss of generality,
one can write

053807-4

ULTRAHIGH ENHANCEMENT IN ABSOLUTE AND …

PHYSICAL REVIEW A 75, 053807 ͑2007͒

␻± = ␻0 ± ␦␻/2 = VE±͑2␲N/P͒,

͑9͒

where ␦␻ is a parameter whose amplitude is to be determined. The effective velocities VE± can be written as

ͩ ͪ VE±

=

VR±

ϯ

v

=

C0 n͑␻±͒

v 1 ± C0n͑␻±͒

.

͑10͒

Expanding the value of n͑␻͒ around n0, we get

ͩ ͪ VE±

=

C0 n0

v

␦␻

1 ± ϯ nЈ

C0n0

2

,

nЈ ϵ ͓‫ץ‬n/‫͔␻ץ‬/n0. ͑11͒

Substituting Eq. ͑11͒ in Eq. ͑9͒, one gets a self-consistent expression involving ␦␻ that yields ͓20͔ ⌬␻− = ␰⌬␻0− , ⌬␻+ = ␰⌬␻0+ , ␰ = 1 / ng , ␦␻ = ⌬␻− − ⌬␻+ = ␦␻0␰, where we deﬁne an enhancement factor ␰ ϵ 1 / ng. For a medium that exhibits slow light, ng ӷ 1, the result in Eq. ͑11͒ implies a reduction in rotational sensitivity. On the other
hand, it is equally possible to achieve a condition where 0 Ͻ ng Ӷ 1, characteristic of the anomalous dispersion ͑‫ץ‬n / ‫␻ץ‬ Ͻ 0͒ that leads to superluminal pulse propagation in the medium ͑of course, without violating SR͒ ͓4͔.
One way this process can be understood physically is in terms of an effective positive feedback ͑later on, we discuss another physical way to interpret this effect͒. Consider, for example, the frequency shift in the CCW direction, ⌬␻−, given by ␦␻0/2 in the absence of dispersion. Imagine that the anomalous dispersion is now turned on. As the frequency of
the CCW beam is moved to ﬁnd the new resonance condi-
tion, it will experience an index that is smaller than n0. This leads to an increase in the value of ⌬␻− needed for ﬁnding the resonance. As ⌬␻− is increased further, the CCW beam
experiences an even smaller value of the index. This positive
feedback type process can be represented by an equation of the form ⌬␻− = ␦␻0 / 2 + G⌬␻−, where a simple analysis shows that the effective “feedback loop gain” G is given by −͑␻0 / n0͒͑‫ץ‬n / ‫͑ = ͒␻ץ‬1 − ng / n0͒, which is positive for anomalous dispersion. The steady-state solution of this system is ⌬␻− = ͓␦␻0 / 2͔͓1 / ͑1 − G͔͒. Exactly the same process leads to an increase in the frequency shift of the CW beam, so that the net frequency difference is ␦␻0͓1 / ͑1 − G͔͒. The CAD condition ͑ng = 0, which implies nЈ = −1 / ␻0͒ corresponds to the feedback gain approaching unity ͑G → 1͒.
However, the enhancement factor ␰ diverges as we ap-
proach this limit. This is because we have neglected higher-
order effects. In order to take the higher-order effects into
account, it is necessary to consider an explicit model of a
medium that can be used to realize the requisite negative
dispersion. We now consider the negative dispersion associ-
ated with an absorptive resonance in a material medium that
can be described in simple mathematical form for our analy-
sis. Here, one should keep in mind that it is not feasible to
use this kind of medium with undesirable intracavity absorp-
tion in actual experiments. Instead, one can consider using
bifrequency Raman gain in a real experiment to produce a similar dispersion effect without absorption ͓4͔. However,
the conclusions drawn from our discussion using an absorp-
tive resonance model remain equally valid for the Raman

gain. The expression for the dispersive index n͑␻͒ associated with an absorptive resonance in a two-level system can be modeled as

n͑␻͒ = 1 − ͑A⌫͒͑␻ − ␻0͒/͓⌫2 + ͑␻ − ␻0͒2͔ ͑12͒

where 2⌫ corresponds to the linewidth ͓full width at half maximum ͑FWHM͔͒ of the absorptive resonance. The mag-

nitude of A corresponds to the peak value of the imaginary
part of the susceptibility i.e., A = ͑␹I͒␻=␻0. Thus, the value of the parameter A depends on medium properties such as the

density and the strength of the resonant excitation. For our analysis, we can assume the above form of n͑␻͒ and express it as a Taylor expansion around ␻ = ␻0, containing higherorder terms only up to ͑⌬␻͒3:

ͯ ͯ n͑␻͒ = 1 + n1⌬␻ + n3͑⌬␻͒3,

dn

n1 =

d␻

,
͑␻=␻0͒

ͯ ͯ1 dn

n3 =

. 6 d␻ ͑␻=␻0͒

͑13͒

Note that in this model n0 = 1 and n2 = 0, since n͑␻͒ in Eq. ͑12͒ is antisymmetric around ␻ = ␻0. The dispersion coefﬁcients n1 and n3 can be calculated by evaluating the derivative of n͑␻͒ at ␻ = ␻0, and are given by n1 = −A / ⌫ and n3 = −n1 / ⌫2. Substituting the series form of n͑␻͒ given by Eq. ͑13͒ in Eq. ͑10͒, and solving Eq. ͑9͒, we again obtain a
self-consistent solution for the enhanced frequency splitting,
for the case of ng = 0 or n1 = −1 / ␻0, to be given by

⌬␻− = ␩⌬␻0−, ⌬␻− = ␩⌬␻0+, ␦␻ = ⌬␻− − ⌬␻− = ␩␦␻0,

␩ = ͑4⌫/␦␻0͒2/3.

͑14͒

The enhancement factor ␩ is nonlinear. It does not diverge for ﬁnite values of ␦␻0, and saturates to a value close to unity as ␦␻0 approaches the extrema of the dispersion ͓21͔.

IV. EFFECTIVE EQUIVALENCE BETWEEN ROTATION SENSING AND MEASUREMENT OF MIRROR DISPLACEMENT USING A RING RESONATOR
The derivation of these results so far has been perhaps less than transparent, especially given the presence of relativistic addition of velocities, and the apparent complexity of the Sagnac effect. As such, the physical interpretation of these results may not be obvious. Therefore, we now consider an analogous system where physical intuitions should be more easily applicable. Speciﬁcally, we establish here a simple analogy between the rotational frequency shift in a PRCG to the frequency shift in cavity resonance caused by the mirror displacement in a cavity. The latter process can be considered to be a device where the frequency shift is used to measure the mirror displacement caused by a perturbation. For simplicity, let us also assume, as we have done above, that the cavity is entirely ﬁlled with a dispersive medium. The resonance condition for the cavity with a free-space length L is given as

053807-5

SHAHRIAR et al.

PHYSICAL REVIEW A 75, 053807 ͑2007͒

L = m␭ = 2␲mc0/͓n͑␻0͒␻0͔

͑15͒

where ␻0 is the cavity resonance frequency, n͑␻͒ characterizes the dispersion due to the medium, and m is a large
integer number. In the absence of intracavity dispersion, one
can easily calculate the shift in the cavity resonance frequency for a small change ⌬L in length for an empty cavity, which is given by ⌬␻ec= −⌬L␻0 / L. It is instructive to compare this expression with the ﬁrst expression in Eq. ͑9͒, for
example, which can be rewritten as

⌬␻0− = ͓␻0/͑C0n0͔͓͒2⍀A/P͔ = − ͓␻0/Leff͔␦Leff, Leff ϵ P,

− ␦Leff ϵ P⍀R/͑n0C0͒ = Leffv/͑n0C0͒.

͑16͒

Thus, within a proportionality constant, the effect of rotation can be equated to an effective change in the length of the cavity. Therefore, it is possible to interpret the mechanism behind the enhancement in a simpler fashion by considering the actual change of length in a PRC, as modeled by Eq. ͑15͒ above.
In the presence of a change in the cavity length, ⌬L, and assuming that the index is dispersive, we can write the generalized form of Eq. ͑15͒ as

L + ⌬L = m␭ = 2␲mc0/͓n͑␻0 + ⌬␻͒͑␻0 + ⌬␻͔͒, ͑17͒

where ␻ = ␻0 + ⌬␻ is the new cavity resonance frequency due to the change ⌬L in the cavity length. If the index is assumed to be of the form n͑␻0 + ⌬␻͒ = 1 + n1⌬␻, corresponding to
linear dispersion, one can easily ﬁnd a solution to the above
equation to determine the frequency shift ⌬␻dis in terms of the empty cavity frequency shift ⌬␻ec as

⌬␻dis = ⌬␻ec/ng, ng = 1 + n1␻0,

͑18͒

where ng corresponds to the value of the group index at ␻ = ␻0. Note that here we have assumed the mean refractive index n͑␻0͒ of the medium to be unity. Equation ͑18͒ suggests that at extremely small values of ng, for example, ng = 0.001, ⌬␻dis can be 103 times larger than ⌬␻ec.
This is essentially ͓22͔ the same result as derived above
for the PRCG, if we set n0 = 1. In the current case, however, the explanation for the enhancement is very simple. Due to the linear dispersion in the cavity, the wavelength ␭ inside the medium is changing very slowly with the frequency ␻. Thus, for a given change in cavity length, ⌬L, one has to change the frequency ␻ by a signiﬁcantly larger amount ͑compared to the empty cavity case͒ in order to ensure that
the new length matches an integer number of wavelengths, thus establishing resonance. Therefore, ⌬␻dis has to be much larger than ⌬␻ec. If this argument is extended to the case when ng = 0, which occurs when the dispersion slope n1 = −1 / ␻0, the wavelength inside the cavity becomes completely insensitive to any change in ␻. This implies that ⌬␻dis has to be “inﬁnitely large” in order to compensate for any cavity length change ⌬L. In other words, the cavity cannot compen-
sate for the length change by any ﬁnite change in the ﬁeld
frequency. This, obviously, corresponds to an unphysical
situation since the linear dispersion model cannot exist over
an inﬁnite bandwidth for a true material medium. In reality,
for any real physical medium, one has to consider linear

dispersion over a small ͑or restricted͒ frequency range and

therefore include the higher-order dispersion effects in order

to predict what exactly happens for ng = 0. Using the explicit model summarized in Eqs. ͑12͒ and ͑13͒, we obtain ⌬␻dis͑1 + n1␻0͒ + n3␻0͑⌬␻dis͒3 = ⌬␻ec. The solution to the
above equation for the case ng = 0 or n1 = −1 / ␻0 yields

⌬␻dis = ␩⌬␻ec = ͑2⌫/⌬␻ec͒2/3⌬␻ec.

͑19͒

This suggests that at ng = 0 the shift in cavity resonance ⌬␻dis for the change ⌬L is ﬁnite and enhanced by a factor ␩ with respect to the empty cavity shift ⌬␻ec. This result is essentially ͓23͔ the same as what is presented for the PRCG in Eq. ͑14͒. A large enhancement factor can be observed under the condition ⌫ ӷ ⌬␻ec, which can be satisﬁed experimentally for extremely small values of ⌬␻ec ͑or ⌬L͒ caused by length change ͑or inertial rotation for the PRCG or the RLG͒. As mentioned after Eq. ͑18͒, note that ␩ has a nonlinear dependence on ⌬␻ec. Speciﬁcally, ␩ decreases with increasing ⌬␻ec, approaching a value of the order of unity as the frequency shift becomes comparable to the width of the
dispersion proﬁle.
A major feature of the dispersion condition ng = 0 is that the enhanced shift is also accompanied by an almost equally
large broadening of the cavity resonance linewidth. Before
we consider the effect of this broadening on the ability to measure very small length change ͑or, equivalently, the abil-
ity of the PRCG or the RLG to measure very small rotations͒, it is instructive ﬁrst to discuss the mechanism behind
this broadening. To this end, let us consider ﬁrst the situation when ⌬L = 0. The linewidth of the cavity can be calculated by considering the dephasing ⌿ experienced by the light
beam for a single pass through the resonator, under the condition where ␻ ␻0. It is easy to show that this is given by ⌿ = n͑␻͒␻L / c0 − ␻0L / c0. It is also easy to show that if ␥ represents the linewidth ͑FWHM͒ of a cavity, the half-width frequency ͑␻0 + ␥ / 2͒ will correspond to a value of ⌿ = ␲ / F, where F is the ﬁnesse of the cavity. Using this fact and assuming again a simpler linear dispersion model, i.e., n͑␻͒ = 1 + n1⌬␻, one can obtain the linewidth of the dispersive cavity as ␥dis= ␥ec/ ng, where ␥ec= 2␲c0 / ͑LF͒ is the empty cavity linewidth in the absence of dispersion. This shows
that, just like the frequency shift needed to compensate for a
change in the cavity length, the linewidth of the cavity also
depends inversely on ng. Again, for a small value of ng = 0.001, for example, ␥dis will be a thousand times broader than ␥ec. This can be understood by the same physical argument as earlier, in terms of the insensitivity of the wave-
length as a function of frequency under this particular dis-
persion condition. Therefore, it suggests that the cavity can
be nearly resonant over a large range of frequencies. For an
ideal linear dispersion medium exactly at ng = 0, the cavity will resonate at all frequencies, since the medium wave-
length is now completely independent of the frequency. Of
course, this will imply an unphysical, inﬁnitely large line-
width for the cavity. One can extend the analysis for a real-
istic situation by considering a medium with a limited range
of linear dispersion. Choosing again the explicit model summarized in Eqs. ͑17͒ and ͑18͒, we ﬁnd ␥dis= ␥ec/ ͓ng + n3␻0͑␥dis͒2͔. When ng = 0, the broadened cavity line-

053807-6

ULTRAHIGH ENHANCEMENT IN ABSOLUTE AND …

PHYSICAL REVIEW A 75, 053807 ͑2007͒

400 estimated simulated
300

ξ, the enhancement factor

200

100

00

100 200 300 400 500 600

empty cavity frequency shift (kHz)

FIG. 4. Comparison of the analytical estimates and the numeri-
cal simulations of the enhancement factor.
width is given by ␥dis= ͑⌫2␥ec͒1/3. This condition is also referred to as the white-light cavity. Note, however, that while the cavity linewidth is broadened due to the negative dispersion, the cavity decay rate ͑and, therefore the quality factor and the buildup factor͒ remain unchanged ͓24–26͔. One can similarly estimate the linewidth for the case of ⌬L 0 to be ␥dis= ␥ec/ ng͉␻=␻0+⌬␻ec Ӎ ͑␩ / 3͒␥ec, where ␩ is deﬁned in Eq. ͑19͒. This equation shows that, for ⌬L 0, the shifted, dispersion-enhanced cavity linewidth is inversely proportional to the local value of the group index, ng͉␻=␻0+⌬␻ec, and therefore will get narrower as the shifted resonance moves further away from ␻ = ␻0 for increasing ⌬L.
The analysis presented here involves minor approximations. In order to conﬁrm the validity of these approximations, we have also simulated the behavior of the resonator in the presence of a dispersive medium. Figure 4 shows the enhancement factor ␩ as a function of the empty-cavity frequency shifts needed to compensate for a real or effective ͑rotation induced͒ change in the cavity length. As can be seen, the simulation agrees well with the analytical estimate. Figure 5 shows explicitly a representative case where the frequency shift in the absence of the dispersive medium is only 300 kHz, while the enhanced shift is about 9.5 MHz.
Note that in real experiments it may be necessary to ﬁll only a part of the cavity with the dispersive medium. For this

1.5 1
0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

1 0 -0.5

0

0.5

∆L = λ/1000 ∆f = 300 kHz

cavity response

0.5

0

-10

-5 frequen0cy(MH5z)

10

FIG. 5. Illustration of enhancement of frequency shift due to negative dispersion. The ﬁgure in the inset shows the shift without dispersion.

scenario, one can carry out a similar analysis, considering the medium length ᐉ to be smaller than the cavity length L. In this case, we ﬁnd all our conclusions reached here to remain
valid, except that the dispersion condition ng = 0 for linewidth broadening and sensitivity enhancement gets modiﬁed to a value of group index corresponding to ng = 1 − L / ᐉ.

V. COUNTERBALANCING EFFECTS OF ENHANCEMENT IN SENSITIVITY AND LINEWIDTH BROADENING IN A FAST-LIGHT-ENHANCED RING RESONATOR

Consider now the situation where our goal would be to measure the change in the cavity length ⌬L caused by any
physical process or due effectively to a rotation. We now
explicitly show how the cavity linewidth broadening in the case of a dispersive cavity affects our ability to measure ⌬L with a higher sensitivity ␩, predicted earlier at ng = 0. The change ⌬L is indirectly determined by measuring the shift in the cavity resonance frequency ⌬␻. For the case of no dispersion, the minimum measurable change in length ͓⌬L͔min is related to the minimum measurable ͓⌬␻͔min as

͓⌬Lec͔min = ͓⌬␻͔min͑L/␻0͒,

͑20͒

where ͓⌬␻͔min for an empty cavity is given by

͓⌬␻͔min = ␥ec/S

͑21͒

where S is the signal-to-noise ratio. Our previous discussion also suggests that the minimum measurable change in length for the dispersive cavity is

͓⌬Ldis͔min = ͓͑⌬␻dis͔min/␩͒͑L/␻0͒.

͑22͒

For the dispersive cavity with a broadened linewidth ͓⌬␻dis͔min is given by

͓⌬␻dis͔min = ͉ ␥dis ␻=␻0+⌬␻ec/S = ͑␩/3͒͑␥ec/S͒. ͑23͒

Substituting Eq. ͑23͒ in Eq. ͑22͒ and Eq. ͑21͒ in Eq. ͑20͒, one ﬁnds, assuming S to be the same in each case, that ͓⌬Ldis͔min= ͓⌬Lec͔min/ 3. Therefore, the minimum measurable ͓⌬L͔min remains nearly unchanged for a dispersive cavity due to cavity linewidth broadening. The factor of 3 improve-
ment is perhaps not signiﬁcant enough to warrant the addi-
tional complications and sources of drifts and noise that may
come into play when the dispersive element is introduced.

VI. TRUE REDUCTION IN THE SMALLEST MEASURABLE ROTATION RATE USING A FAST-LIGHT-ENHANCED RING LASER GYROSCOPE
The conclusion reached at the end of the previous section is drastically altered if we consider a situation where, instead of the cavity being fed by an external laser, the dispersive cavity itself contains an active gain medium. Let us also assume that the gain spectrum associated with the gain medium is very broad compared to the cavity resonance, so that the effect of the dispersion due to the gain medium itself on the cavity response can be ignored. In the context of rotation measurement, such a cavity already exists in the RLG. Of

053807-7

SHAHRIAR et al.

PHYSICAL REVIEW A 75, 053807 ͑2007͒

course, the RLG can also be used to measure an actual

change in the length of the cavity. In simple terms, as the

cavity resonance frequency shifts due to ⌬L ͑actual, or ef-

fective due to rotation͒, the lasing process inside the cavity

will move to the new cavity resonance frequency. As a result,

one can directly measure the frequency shift ⌬␻ correspond-

ing to the ⌬L by simply beating the laser beam outside the

cavity with a reference laser beam. In the case of a RLG, the

beat between the CW and the CCW beams outside the cavity

gives a direct measure of the frequency shift, which is pro-

portional to the rotation rate. The minimum measurable ⌬L,

i.e., ͓⌬L͔min, for the RLG is decided by the measured linewidth of the laser beam ͓16,27͔. The fundamental quantum-

noise-limited linewidth of the laser in such a case is given by
͓27͔ ͑⌬␻͒laser= ͓1 / ␶c͔ / ͱPout␶m / ប␻ ͓27͔, where ␶c is the de-
cay time of the photon ͑or ﬁeld͒ inside the cavity, which is

the inverse of the empty cavity linewidth,␥ec= 1 / ␶c, and we have assumed a unity quantum efﬁciency for the detector.

Here, time.

Pout The

is the output power
quantity ͱPout␶m / ប␻

and ␶m in the

is the measurement denominator simply

corresponds to the square root of the number of photons

observed during the measurement time ␶m. For a laser in a coherent state, this is therefore the uncertainty ⌬n in the

number of photons measured. Note further that ⌬␻␶c represents the uncertainty ⌬␾ in the phase of the laser ﬁeld, ac-

cumulated over its lifetime inside the cavity. As such, this

expression for the laser linewidth can simply be interpreted

as a manifestation of the number-phase uncertainty relation

⌬␾⌬n = 1. Other derivations of the laser linewidth also re-

duce to this expression when the measurement time is taken

into account ͓28–32͔. Given this expression for the laser

linewidth, one ﬁnds ͓⌬L͔min to be

͓⌬LeRcLG͔min = ͓⌬␻͔minL/␻0 = ͑⌬␻͒laserL/␻0

= ͓͑1/␶c͒/ͱPout␶m/ប␻͔L/␻0.

͑24͒

For comparison, consider a situation where one uses a PRCG instead of a RLG, with the output power of the cavity being the same as the output power of the RLG. It can be easily shown that ͓⌬L͔min for an active cavity shown here is the same ͓16,27͔ as the one for a passive cavity:
͓⌬Lepcassive͔min = ͓⌬␻ec͔minL / ␻0 = ͑␥ec / ͱN͒L / ␻0 = ͓⌬LeRcLG͔min,
where N is the number of photons observed during the measurement time in each case, with unity quantum efﬁciency.
In the case of a cavity loaded with a negative dispersive medium, although ␥dis at ng = 0 is much broader than ␥ec, it is important to note that the decay time of the ﬁeld inside the dispersive cavity remains unchanged and is determined purely by the external properties of the cavity such as losses and mirror reﬂections, etc. Therefore, if one constructs a RLG loaded with an additional negative dispersive medium, as described above, the quantum-noise-limited laser linewidth ͑⌬␻͒laser will remain unchanged. In this case, the minimum measurable ⌬L is found to be ͓⌬LdRiLsG͔min = ͓⌬LeRcLG͔min / ␩ = ͓⌬Lepcassive͔min / ␩. This represents a real improvement in sensitivity of measurement by a factor ␩. Therefore, equivalently, the minimum measurable rotation is

given by ͓⌬⍀dRiLsG͔min = ͓⌬⍀eRcLG͔min / ␩ = ͓⌬⍀epcassive͔min / ␩. Thus, the sensitivity in rotation measurement can be improved by using an active gain medium inside the dispersive cavity. For proper choice of parameters, the enhancement in sensitivity ␩ = ͓2⌫ / ⌬␻ec͔2/3 can be made very large.
VII. EXPERIMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS, NUMERICAL
ESTIMATES, AND THE PROSPECT OF MEASURING
THE LENS-THIRRING ROTATION
Experimentally, a fast-light-enhanced ring laser gyroscope may be realized as follows. Consider a ring cavity incorporating a broadband gain medium such as a Ti:sapphire crystal pumped by an argon laser. We also assume that it incorporates mode-selective elements such as a birefringent ﬁlter and an etalon, so that the laser operates in only two degenerate, counterpropagating longitudinal modes. Such a device would work as a ring laser gyroscope, in the presence of rotation perpendicular to the cavity plane. We assume that the operating frequency is tuned close to the D2 transition in 85Rb. We now place a vapor cell containing 85Rb inside this cavity, with antireﬂection-coated windows. The vapor is optically pumped to produce a population inversion between the F = 2 and 3 hyperﬁne ground states. A dual-frequency Raman pump, detuned from the P manifold, is the applied. In the presence of this pump, a probe beam will experience two gain peaks, each corresponding to the condition where the probe is two-photon resonant with one of the pump frequencies. This is precisely the scheme that was employed in demonstrating loss-free generation of fast light ͓4͔. The optical pumping beam as well as the dual-frequency pump beams will be inserted into the cavity using a polarizing beam splitter ͑PBS͒, and extracted from the cavity using another PBS. The lasing modes inside the cavity will play the role of the probe beam, with its frequency chosen to be at the center of the two gain peaks, so that it experiences the steepest negative dispersion.
Recently, in an experiment the details of which are being reported elsewhere ͓33͔, we demonstrated the key aspects of such a device. In particular, we inserted a Rb vapor cell in a passive ring cavity ͑without the Ti:sapphire gain medium͒, and generated negative dispersion using the dual-pumped Raman gain outlined above. An external probe was made to resonate in the cavity, and its behavior was studied with and without activating the Raman gain doublet-induced negative dispersion. As expected from the discussions presented above, the cavity displayed the white-light behavior: the resonance linewidth of the probe became broadened in the presence of the dispersion.
In this experiment, it was difﬁcult to demonstrate the enhanced sensitivity directly for the following reason. The enhancement factor is nonlinear: it decreases with increasing values of the empty-cavity frequency shift ⌬␻0 ͑corresponding to ⌬L, or equivalently a rotation rate͒. Furthermore, in order for the enhancement to be evident, the value of the loaded-cavity frequency shift ⌬␻0Ј ͑i.e., the enhanced shift͒ must be less than the dispersion bandwidth. Thus, for the limited dispersion bandwidth realized in this experiment, one must use a very small value of ⌬L in order to observe an

053807-8

ULTRAHIGH ENHANCEMENT IN ABSOLUTE AND …

PHYSICAL REVIEW A 75, 053807 ͑2007͒

enhancement. This in turn requires the use of a resonator that has a much higher ﬁnesse than the one used in Ref. ͓19͔, and a more precise voltage supply for the piezoelectric transducer. The required modiﬁcations are nontrivial, and efforts are underway in our laboratory to implement these changes to the apparatus.
Given this constraint, we modiﬁed the experimental conﬁguration in order to demonstrate the enhancement effect indirectly ͓34͔. As can be seen from the theory presented above, the modiﬁcation factor of the sensitivity depends on the inverse of the group index, independent of its value. For negative dispersion corresponding to a nearly null value of the group index, the factor is greater than unity, and corresponds to enhancement of sensitivity. For positive dispersion, the factor is less than unity, corresponding to reduction in sensitivity. While the former is hard to observe using our current apparatus, the latter is much easier to demonstrate. This is for two reasons. First, the modiﬁcation factor can be tuned to be close to unity by controlling the slope of the positive dispersion. Second, since the loaded-cavity frequency shift is less than the empty-cavity frequency shift, it is easy to keep its value within the dispersion bandwidth. We demonstrated this reduction in sensitivity by using two alternative modiﬁcation of the scheme for exciting the vapor cell. In one version, we simply replaced the dual-frequency Raman pump with a single-frequency pump, and tuned the probe to be at the center of the corresponding Raman gain. In another version, we turned off the optical pumping beam, thus eliminating Raman gain, and tuned both the ͑singlefrequency͒ pump and the probe to resonance with the P manifold, while maintaining the two-photon resonance condition. This produced an electromagnetically induced transparency for the probe. In either case, the probe experiences positive dispersion corresponding to slow light. As expected, we observed reduction in sensitivity proportional to the inverse of the group index, which was measured independently. This experiment conﬁrmed that the sensitivity modiﬁcation varies in a manner that agrees with our theory, thus establishing conﬁdence in the claim that negative dispersion near the CAD condition will yield enhancement.
In most experiments involving EIT in a vapor cell, it is impossible to achieve a very high degree of transparency, primarily because of uncontrolled optical pumping into Zeeman sublevels. As such, there is always some absorption present, and experiments purporting to make use of the EIT process suffer from deleterious effects of this absorption. The situation for the doubly pumped Raman gain system is quite different. With proper choice of parameters, as evidenced in Refs. ͓4,33͔, the probe experiences true gain. Furthermore, since the probe is positioned between the two gain peaks, the gain seen by it can be tuned very close to zero if desired, or adjusted to compensate for residual losses from the vapor cell windows and the PBSs. Thus, the role of the intracavity medium can be tailored to produce purely dispersion, without any deleterious effect of any residual loss or gain.
One may also think that, since the cavity becomes very sensitive to rotation near the CAD condition, any noise in the system is also likely to be ampliﬁed, thus offsetting any real advantage. However, this is not the case. To see why, note ﬁrst that, in designing any apparatus for ultimate perfor-

mance, stabilization schemes have to be in place in order to reduce the systematic noise sources to such a level that one is limited only by quantum noise. For the fast-light-enhanced gyroscope, the same rule would apply. The enhanced sensitivity to systematic sources of noise in this case simply means that the stabilization schemes have to be more robust. Since the fundamental quantum noise, which affects the linewidth of the ring laser, is not affected by the fast-light enhancement of sensitivity, as discussed earlier, it is possible to achieve true enhancement in the capability for measuring very small rotations.
As a numerical example, let us consider a table-top size RLG, with a value of P / A = 2 m−1 ͑for an equivalent circular shape, the radius is 1 m͒. Let us assume that the operating mean frequency is about 5 ϫ 1014 Hz, the cavity ﬁnesse is about 103, and the output power is 1 mW. A quick estimate then shows that, in the absence of fast-light enhancement, the minimum measurable rotation rate for an observation time of 1 s is about 1.5ϫ 10−5 ⍀, where ⍀ is the Earth’s rotation rate. Suppose now we insert a negative dispersion medium in the cavity, ﬁlling only a part ᐉ of the path. As shown in detail in Ref. ͓26͔, this can still yield the same degree of enhancement as formulated above, as long as the value of ng is chosen to equal ͑1 − P / ᐉ ͒. For a realistic dispersion linewidth of ⌫ = 2␲ ϫ 106 s−1, the enhancement factor corresponding to the minimum measurable frequency shift ͑without the dispersion enhancement͒ is about 1.8ϫ 106, and the minimum measurable rotation rate then becomes about 10−11 ⍀, for an observation time of 1 s. Of course, this number can be improved further by increasing the observation time, or by increasing the area of the RLG. Note that this number is already smaller than the Lens-Thirring rotation rate of 5.6 ϫ 10−10 ⍀ expected on an earth-bound experiment, according to Einstein’s theory of gravity. This resolution should also therefore be high enough to distinguish between the predictions made by different theories of gravity ͑Einsteins’ theory, the Brans-Dicke-Jordan theory, and the Ni theory͒ for the magnitude of the Lens-Thirring effect ͓15,35,36͔.
VIII. CONCLUSION
To summarize, we have described a ring-resonator-based optical gyroscope whose sensitivity for measuring absolute rotation is enhanced via the presence of an intracavity dispersive medium. Speciﬁcally, we show that the enhancement occurs if the dispersion is anomalous, characteristic of superluminal light propagation. Under an idealized model where the index varies linearly over all frequencies, the enhancement factor is given by the inverse of the group index, and is maximum when the group index is null, corresponding to the so-called critically anomalous dispersion condition ͑i.e., where the group velocity becomes inﬁnite͒. For a realistic medium, the anomalous dispersion has a limited bandwidth. When this constraint is taken into account, the divergence at the CAD condition is eliminated, while still yielding a very large enhancement. For realistic conditions, the enhancement factor is as high as 106. We also show how the offsetting

053807-9

SHAHRIAR et al.

PHYSICAL REVIEW A 75, 053807 ͑2007͒

effect of the concomitant broadening of the resonator linewidth can be circumvented by using an active cavity. In addition to this fast-light-based effect, we have shown how normal dispersion used for slow light can enhance relative rotation sensing in a specially designed Sagnac interferometer. In this case, the enhancement is given by the slowing factor.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We acknowledge useful discussions with Professor S. Ezekiel of MIT. This work was supported in part by the Hewlett-Packard Co. through DARPA and the Air Force Ofﬁce of Scientiﬁc Research under AFOSR Contract No. FA9550-05-C-0017, and by AFOSR Grant No. FA9550-041-0189.

͓1͔ L. V. Hau et al., Nature ͑London͒ 397, 594 ͑1999͒. ͓2͔ A. V. Turukhin, V. S. Sudarshanam, M. S. Shahriar, J. A.
Musser, B. S. Ham, and P. R. Hemmer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 023602 ͑2001͒. ͓3͔ E. Podivilov et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 083902 ͑2003͒. ͓4͔ L. J. Wang, A. Kuzmich, and A. Dogariu, Nature ͑London͒ 406, 277 ͑2000͒. ͓5͔ M. S. Bigelow, N. N. Lepeshkin, and R. W. Boyd, Science 301, 201 ͑2003͒. ͓6͔ U. Leonhardt and P. Piwnicki, Phys. Rev. A 62, 055801 ͑2000͒. ͓7͔ E. J. Post, Rev. Mod. Phys. 39, 475 ͑1967͒. ͓8͔ G. B. Malykin, Phys. Usp. 43, 1229 ͑2000͒. ͓9͔ F. Zimmer and M. Fleischhauer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 253201 ͑2004͒. ͓10͔ A. B. Matsko et al., Opt. Commun. 233, 107 ͑2004͒. ͓11͔ A. B. Matsko, A. A. Savchenkov, V. S. Ilchenko, and L. Maleki, Opt. Commun. 259, 393 ͑2006͒. ͓12͔ A. B. Matsko ͑private communication͒. ͓13͔ J. Scheuer and A. Yariv, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 053901 ͑2006͒. ͓14͔ G. E. Stedman, Rep. Prog. Phys. 60, 615 ͑1997͒. ͓15͔ W. W. Chow, J. Gea-Bancloche, L. M. Pedrotti, V. E. Sanders, W. Schleich, and M. Scully, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 61 ͑1985͒. ͓16͔ S. Ezekiel and S. R. Balsamo, Appl. Phys. Lett. 30, 478 ͑1977͒. ͓17͔ P. Kumar and J. Shapiro, Opt. Lett. 10, 226 ͑1985͒. ͓18͔ G. A. Sanders and S. Ezekiel, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 5, 674 ͑1988͒. ͓19͔ I. Lerche, Am. J. Phys. 45, 1154 ͑1977͒. ͓20͔ More exactly, the value of ␰ is slightly different for the CCW
and the CW cases. In the CCW case, it is modiﬁed by a factor of n0 / n͑␻0 + ⌬␻−͒, and in the CW case, it is modiﬁed by a factor of n0 / n͑␻0 + ⌬␻+͒. However, in a realistic dispersive medium, especially under the CAD condition, these factors
remain very close to unity. ͓21͔ Again, more exactly, the value of ␩ is slightly different for the
CCW and the CW cases. In the CCW case, it is modiﬁed by a factor of n0 / n͑␻0 + ⌬␻−͒, and in the CW case, it is modiﬁed by a factor of n0 / n͑␻0 + ⌬␻+͒. However, in a realistic dispersive medium, especially under the CAD condition, these factors
remain very close to unity.
͓22͔ Recall that in the case of the PRCG, the enhancement factor is

slightly different for the CCW and the CW case, as summarized in Refs. ͓20,21͔ by factors that are determined by the values of the index at resonance. The difference between the
model where there is actual change in the length and the case
of rotation-induced effective length change is also embodied in
these factors. This difference arises from the fact that the ef-
fective values of a length change corresponding to an actual
rotation depends inversely on the value of the index, as can be seen from Eq. ͑20͒. However, since these factors remain very close to unity ͑with a maximum deviation of the order of 10−7 in a typical medium such as atomic vapor, near the CAD condition͒, the analogy is accurate for all practical purposes. ͓23͔ Note that the expression for ␩ in Eq. ͑14͒ can be expressed as ͓2⌫ / ͑␦␻0 / 2͔͒2/3. The expression ⌬␻ec in Eq. ͑19͒ corresponds to ͑␦␻0 / 2͒ in Eq. ͑14͒. ͓24͔ A. Wicht, K. Danzmann, M. Fleischhauer, M. Scully, G. Miiller, and R. H. Rinkleff, Opt. Commun. 134, 431 ͑1997͒. ͓25͔ R. H. Rinkleff and A. Wicht, Phys. Scr., T 118, 85 ͑2005͒. ͓26͔ A. A. Savchenkov, A. B. Matsko, and L. Maleki, Opt. Lett. 31, 92 ͑2006͒. ͓27͔ T. A. Dorschner, H. A. Haus, M. Holz, I. W. Smith, and H. Statz, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. QE-16, 1376 ͑1980͒. ͓28͔ C. H. Townes, in Advances in Quantum Electronics, edited by J. R. Singer ͑Columbia University Press, New York, 1961͒, pp. 1–11. ͓29͔ Murray Sargent III, Marlan O. Scully, and Willis E. Lamb, Jr., Laser Physics ͑Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1974͒. ͓30͔ M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics ͑Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1997͒. ͓31͔ Marlan O. Scully and Willis E. Lamb, Jr., Phys. Rev. 159, 208 ͑1967͒. ͓32͔ A. L. Schawlow and C. H. Townes, Phys. Rev. 112, 1940 ͑1958͒. ͓33͔ G. S. Pati, M. Messal, K. Salit, and M. S. Shahriar, e-print arXiv:quant-ph/0610022. ͓34͔ G. S. Pati, M. Messal, K. Salit, and M. S. Shahriar, e-print arXiv:quant-ph/0610023. ͓35͔ M. O. Scully, M. S. Zubairy, and M. P. Haugan, Phys. Rev. A 24, 2009 ͑1981͒. ͓36͔ C. W. Meisner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation ͑Freeman, San Francisco, 1973͒.

053807-10