341 lines
7.5 KiB
Plaintext
341 lines
7.5 KiB
Plaintext
|
THE FAILURE OF EINSTEIN’S E=MC2
|
|||
|
|
CHAN RASJID KAH CHEW 18 May 2017
|
|||
|
|
[English with Chinese translation]
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1. OPEN LETTER TO THE WORLD PHYSICS COMMUNITY
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Dear scientists,
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
For almost a hundred years, Einstein’s formula E = mc2 (the fa-
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
mous energy mass equivalent equation) has been the cardinal equa-
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
tion of physics as it introduced the concept of total energy of matter;
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
all dynamics involves energy of particles and matter. The author has
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
discovered very recently (April 2016) that the formula E = mc2 is
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
invalid; energy is fictitious in the formula. The proof is simple and
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
involves no high mathematics.Any good high school students taking
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
physics as a subject could easily come to a definite understanding of
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
the analysis and decides for himself whether the author’s claim is cor-
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
rect; there is no need to rely on the words of any physics professor to
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
know whether the formula E = mc2 is valid or invalid. The author
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
has the relevant paper in his website:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
"The Relativistic Mechanics of E=mc2 Fails",
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
http://www.emc2fails.com
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The short paragraphs below are sufficient to convince any physics
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
students that the formula E = mc2 is invalid.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
The formula for kinetic energy in classical Newtonian mechanics
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
is:K E
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1 2
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
mv2
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
This
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
formula
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
is
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
derived
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
from
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
the
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
application
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
of
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
New-
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
ton’s second law together with the definition of momentum p as:p =
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
mv, where m=mass of particle with velocity v. Energy in classical
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Newtonian mechanics is based on the definition of work(energy) =
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
f orce × distance. Newton’s second law is:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Force is proportional to the rate of change of mo-
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
mentum
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
d
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
dv
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
It gives force F as:F = (mv) = m × = ma. This is the well
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
dt
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
dt
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
known definition of force as mass times distance: F = ma. The unit
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
for force in the SI system is the newton (symbol N); with work =
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
f orce × distance, the unit for energy is the Joule (symbol J).
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
THE FAILURE OF EINSTEIN’S E=MC2
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
2
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
On the other hand, the formula E = mc2 is derived from Einstein’s special theory of relativity together with a new relativistic definition of momentum p as: p = √ mv , where m = rest mass, c=constant
|
|||
|
|
1−v2/c2
|
|||
|
|
speed of light. With a new definition of momentum, force in special relativity would be different from the classical mechanics definition of F = ma; it is now:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
dp d mv
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
F= = (
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
(1)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
dt dt 1 − v2/c2
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
As any physics students can see, equation (1) is different from the
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
rather simple F = ma. F = ma is the basis of the SI definition for
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
the unit of force, the newton N. There is no way equation (1) may be
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
used in any manner to define a unit of force. The truth is that special
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
relativity has no real unit for force; the physics community assumes
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
equation (1) too evaluates force also in the same units as with clas-
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
sical Newtonian mechanics - it does not. Only in classical Newtonian
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
mechanics that the SI unit of force, the newton N, may be used. The
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
relativistic force as defined in equation (1) evaluates to only a real
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
number with no association with any real unit of force. As force does
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
not have a real unit, so does work and energy in special relativity
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
have no real units. Energy in special relativity is only fictitious. The
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
formula E = mc2 is derived directly from equation (1) and therefore
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
energy in the formula, too, is fictitious (the only exception may be
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
when a particle is at rest where E = mc2 may apply).
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
All figures of energy in relativistic physics, including high energy
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
particle physics, is based on the fundamental formula E = mc2; when
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
energy is fictitious, all of particle physics breaks down. The European
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Organization for Nuclear Research, CERN, that operates the Large
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Hadron Collider (LHC) has purportedly accelerated protons to levels
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
of energy as high as 7 TeV (tera electron-volt, 1012). As the energy
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
was computed from the formula E = mc2, the figure was just a fic-
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
titious value. The only kinetic energy formula that computes energy
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
in
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
real
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
units
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
is
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
the
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
simple
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
classical
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
formula:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
KE
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1 2
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
mv2
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
With
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
this
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
formula, the proton’s energy within the LHC would only be about 470
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
MeV (106); the CERN’s reported figure being overstated by a factor of
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
15,000.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
All of high energy particle physics fails.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
2. 对物理学界的公开信：爱因斯坦的 E=MC2 物理学无效.
|
|||
|
|
亲爱的科学家们， 近一百年来，爱因斯坦的公式E = mc2着名的能量质量等效方程） 一直是物理学的主要方程，因为它引入了物质总能量的概念; 所有动 力学都涉及粒子和物质的能量。 作者最近发现（2016年4月），公 式E = mc2无效; 能量在公式中是虚构的。 证明很简单，不涉及高数
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
THE FAILURE OF EINSTEIN’S E=MC2
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
3
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
学。 任何以物理学为主题的高中生，都可以轻而易举地了解证据，
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
如果作者的说法正确，可以自己决定; 没有必要依赖任何物理教授的
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
话来知道公式 E=mc 是有效还是无效。 作者在他的网站上有相关文
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
章：
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
E = mc2的相对论力学失败，
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
http://www.emc2fails.com
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
下面的短段足以说服任何物理学生的公式E = mc2无效。
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
经典牛顿力学中的动能公式为：K E
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1 2
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
mv2
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
;
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
该公式来自牛顿第二
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
定律的应用以及动量p的定义：p = mv; 其中m =具有速度v的粒子质
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
量。经典牛顿力学中的能量基于以下定义：工作（能量）=力x距
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
离。 牛顿的第二定律是： 力量与动量变化率成比例。 它给出
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
力F：F
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
d dt
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
(mv)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
m×
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
dv dt
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
ma;
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
这是众所周知的作为质量乘积
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
距离的力的定义：F = ma。 SI系统中的力单位是牛顿（符号N）; 与
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
工作=力x距离，能量的单位是焦耳（符号J）。
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
另一方面，公式E = mc2是从爱因斯坦的特殊相对论得出的，
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
动量的新的相对论定义如下：p = mv/ 1 − v/c; 其中 m=静止质
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
量，c=光的恒定速度。 有了动量的新定义，狭义相对论的力量与
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
F = ma 的经典定义不同;就是现在：
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
dp d mv
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
F= = (
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
(2)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
dt dt 1 − v2/c2
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
任 何 物 理 学 学 生 都 可 以 看 到 ， 方 程 （2） 不 同 于 相 当 简 单 的F =
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
ma。 F = ma是 SI 系统对力的定义的基础，牛顿N.无法以任何方
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
式使用方程(2）来定义力单位。事实是狭义相对论没有真正的力量
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
单位;物理学学界只假设方程 (2）也是在牛顿力学的相同经典单位中
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
评估力 - 它不是。 只有在古典力学中，可以使用力单位牛顿N。方程
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
（2）中定义的相对论力量仅评估与任何实际的力单位无关的实数。
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
由于力量没有真正的单位，在狭义相对论中的工作和能量也没有真
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
正的单位。狭义相对论的能量只是虚构的。由公式E=mc2直接从等
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
式(2）得出，公式中的能量也是虚构的（唯一的例外可能是当粒子处
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
于静止时，E = mc2 可能适用）。
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
所有能量数字在相对论物理学中，包括高能粒子物理学，都是基
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
于公式 E = mc2;当能量是虚构的，所有的粒子物理学都会崩溃。 欧
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
洲核研究组织（CERN）运营大型强子对撞机（LHC），据称将质子
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
加速至高达7 TeV（tera电子伏特，1012）的能量水平。 由于能量是
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
从公式E = mc2计算的，这个数字只是一个虚构的值。 计算实际能
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
量的唯一动能公式是简单的经典公式：
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
KE
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
=
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
1 2
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
mv
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
2。
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
使用这个公
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
式，LHC内的质子能量将仅为470MeV（106）; CERN的报告数字被
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
夸大了15000 倍。
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
所有高能粒子物理是失败的。
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
作者:陈家钊拉希德.
|
|||
|
|
E-mail address: chanrasjid@emc2fails.com URL: http://www.emc2fails.com
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
THE FAILURE OF EINSTEIN’S E=MC2
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
4
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
SINGAPORE
|
|||
|
|
|