52 lines
5.2 KiB
Plaintext
52 lines
5.2 KiB
Plaintext
|
Twitter Pres - Special Relativity Fundamentals Title
|
||
|
|
sub title
|
||
|
|
Contact info:
|
||
|
|
Notes:
|
||
|
|
Notes: The state of physics and heliocentrism measurements of velocities, none 30 km/s
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Knew they could measure translation velocity Supposes Earth's rotations and/or velocity is somehow canceling out the ability to make the measurements
|
||
|
|
Notes: Stellar Abe. = Kinematics != Experimental verification Airy's failure to obtain a velocity correction with a water-filled telescope Doppler Prince Apparent freq shift in waves relative to the velocity between emitter and observer => medium for the waves to be relative to for observers to make their apparent freq measurements Fizeau & MMX Translational velocity measured in moving material media (water)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Notes:
|
||
|
|
Arago; half-covered telescope; crystal prism; correction angle independent of medium; ie no motion; already comes in at an angle Ketteler's; attempting to use aether dragged in material media to see if the water held the 30 km/s in it. Not familiar with Klinkerfues' sodium vapor experiment; noted the effect was small, could be in error; not a make or break
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Notes: Biggest concern w/ moving v_aether and v_earth is it cannot explain stellar aberration If you take the 5 - 6 km/s as is and make wrt a stationary earth instead of a co-moving Earth, you immediately solve all the problems you can acknowledge aberration's for what it is; a drift in the sky relative to a fixed Earth Experimentally shown by Airy, Arago, et al; List of 10 experiments from Wilhelm Wien
|
||
|
|
Notes: Quick rundown on Airy's explanations; corpuscle & undulatory Math derivation 2D v^2/V^2 = Exact => They knew exactly what they were looking for and this was the last attempt to measure the Copernican principle
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Notes:
|
||
|
|
Orthogonal setup, MMX-style, right angle interferometer Control = Known wavelength & refractive index of medium (air) IV = Orientation wrt to time DV = Fringe of x amount (predicted by ratio v/c)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Notes:
|
||
|
|
Predicted dotted line; measured solid line Needed .05 fringes for 30 km/s Measured 5 - 6 km/s Conclusion: slower velocity than expected Should do more experiments throughout the year (equinoxes) The same failures to explain Airy's applies to MMX; Event Lorentz's You have to assume the measurement is error to make Lorentz's (Einstein's) theory tenable
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Notes:
|
||
|
|
No velocity measured velocity Undermines the Newtonian and Kelper equivalence of the solar system Reveals the dynamic solution is just a proportionality based off a ratio wrt "universal" constants; the same way Kelper did it
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Notes:
|
||
|
|
Postulates 1 and 2
|
||
|
|
Notes: Where the equations apply Important for identifying how the theory can be falsified Need to know the rules of the game before you can call a foul Infinitely extended polygon; LINEAR rotation
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Absolute space and how it works White X's = Absolute space != NOT arbitrary interferometry measurements are made wrt absolute space and time if c = c for inertial lads & a uniformly rotating polygon is inertial => no fringe can be measured Speed = distant/time Ein says c = c for inertial lads and we can't use absolute space to assign vectors where EM prop once occurred. What's a Young Relativist to do?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Notes:
|
||
|
|
Key factor in maintaining the deception re: light's ability to measure motion is orthogonal vs closed loop MMX-style = linear Closed loop = Angular != Angular & Tangential, translation, etc Later we'll go over an experimental that shows all motion can be detected irrespective of the configuration => MGP, GINGER, etc can't be measuring Earth rotation as the min/max of the translation fluctuations is in the thousands of miles per hour = Can't ignore the translation speed
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Notes:
|
||
|
|
Rule book, postulates, The Relative Simu = Raid Boss LC and TD depend on Relative Simu No Relative Simu, no justification for applying the postulates
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Notes:
|
||
|
|
Einstein's thought experiment that lead him to LC and TD as consequences of Relative Simu No cohesive timeline Never experimentally verified; this is from Einstein's dome Directly contradicted by GPS
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Notes:
|
||
|
|
GPS built off in classical mechanics Relativity "cancels out" We promise to add them later Biggest issue; no Relative Simu corrections. GPS works off a cohesive timeline of multiple events happening for co-moving and stationary observers
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Notes:
|
||
|
|
Core tenant of the theory not present in reality Apologetics: "GPS Time" is local to the Earth; Relative Simu exists in all other ref. frames. Earth's g-field locks in a local aether that shield's us from measuring Relativistic velocities and allows for pseudo-absolute time and space (locally) LOL ^
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Note:
|
||
|
|
Measurement of linear motion made wrt absolute space Lab time and moving apparatus time = same Fringe pattern produced in an inertial frame Effective length i.e. not wrt the loop or gyro coil Relativity makes the wrong prediction in c ∓ v = c for the conveyor and loop Excuse wrt gyro coil
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Notes:
|
||
|
|
Generalized Sagnac = all interferometry stands as is First-order measurements of a velocity gradient Attenuation in the wrong direction (inward instead of outward) Periodicity measured falsifies mechanism as Earth's rotational speed Min/max peaks plotted against sidereal time for closed loop experiments to match Earth rotation Min/max peaks in a orthogonal match sidereal time and show a velocity of 5 - 6 km/s @ 200ft above sea level Translation velocity is as is; can't be Earth rotation
|
||
|
|
|