zotero/storage/UHNHCX3U/.zotero-ft-cache

THE EDUCATION OF
ACONSERVATIVE
RmiOP.OilVtR
ABOUT T H E AUTHOR: Dr. Revllo
Pendleton Oliver, Professor of the Classics
at the University of Illinois for 32 years, is a
scholar of International distinction who has
written articles In four languages for the
most prestlgous academic publications in
the United States and Europe.
During World War 11, Dr. Oliver was
Director of Research In a highly secret agen
cy of the War Department, and was cited for
outstanding service to his country.
One of the very few academicians who
has been outspoken In his opposition to the
progressive defacement of our oivillzation.
Dr. Oliver has long insisted that the fate of
his countrymen hangs on their willingness
to subordinate their doctrinal differences to
the tough but idealistic solidarity which Is
the prerequisite of a Majority resurgence.
SOME QUOTABLE QUOTES FROM
AMERICA'S DECLINE:
On the 18th A m e n d m e n t (Prohibition): "Very few Americans, were sufficiently
sane to perceive that they had repudiated the American conception of government
and had replaced'lt with the legal principle of the 'dictatorship of the proletariat,'
which was the"theoretical Justification of the Jews' revolution in Russia."
On Race: "We must further understand that all races naturally regard themselves
as superior to ail others. We think Congolds unintelligent, but they feel only con
tempt for a race so stupid or craven that it fawns on them, gives them votes, lavish
ly subsidizes them with its own earnings, and even oppresses Its own people to
curry their favor. W e are a race as are the others. If we attribute to Ourselves a s u 
periority. Intellectual, moral, or other. In terms of our own standards, we are s i m p 
ly Indulging in a tautology. The only objective criterion of superiority, a m o n g h u m a n
races as a m o n g all other species. Is biological; the strong survive, the weak perish.
The superior race of mankind today is the one that will emerge victorious-whether
by its technology or Its f e c u n d l t y - f r o m the pro){|mate struggle for life on an over
crowded planet."
AMERICA'S DECLINE
Order No. 1007-$a.50 376 pp., pb.
pius$1.60 for postage and handling. ORDER FROIM:
LIBERTY BELL PUBLICATIONS, Box 21, Reedy WV 25270 USA
Liberty Bell
ISSN: 0145 -7667 SINGT.K COPY $5.(M)
Heretical Verities
Mathemalical Themes in Physical Description
Reviewed by
Professor Ben KTiegh
page 33
ALSO IN THIS ISSUE:
Professor R.P. Oliver
POSTSCRIPTS:
KILLING KENNEDY
page 1
"The Mountain Has Fallen..."
hy Winston Smith
Page 45
Letters to the Editor
page 47.
VOL. 20 - NO. 2 OCTOBER 1992
Voice Of Thinking Americans


LIBERTY BELL
The magazine for Thinking Americans, has been published monthly since
September 1973 by Liberty Bell Publications. Editorial office: P.O. Box 21 Reedy
WV 25270 USA. Phone: 304-927-4486.
Manuscripts conforming to our editorial policy are always welcome and may
be submitted on IBM-, Apple //e-, or Apple/Madntosh-compatible diskette, or in
double-spaced, neatly typed format. Manuscripts can not be returned unless
accompanied by stamped, self-addressed envelope. Manuscripts accepted for
publication become the property of Liberty Bell Publications.
© Copyright 1991
by Liberty Bell Publications.
Pennission granted to quote in whole or part any article except those subject to
author's copyright. Proper source, address and subscription Intormation must be
given.
ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION RATES:
SAMPLE COPY $ 5 00
THIRD CLASS-BULK RATE-USA only ' $ 4 o ' o o
FIRST CLASS-USA $50'oo
FIRST CLASS-all other countries lL.!l!".'.$6o!oo
AIR MAIL-Europe, South America .!!$70.00
Middle East, Far East, South Africa $75.00
Sample Copy $ 6.50
BULK COPIES FOR DISTRIBUTION:
10 copies $ 22.00
50 copies ; $ 90.00
100 copies $150.00
500 copies $600.00
1000 copies '. $900.00
FREEDOM OF SPEECH — FREEDOM OF THOUGHT
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION
The editor/publisher of Liberty Bell (ioe$ not necessarily agree with each and
every article in this magazine, nor does he subscribe to all conclusions arrived at
by various writers; however, he does endeavor to permit the exposure of ideas
suppressed by the controlled news media of this country.
It is, therefore, in the best tradition of America and of free men everywhere
that Liberty Bell strives to give free reign to ideas, for ultimately it is ideas which
rule the world and determine both the content and structure of our Western
culture.
We believe that we can and will change our society for the better. We
declare our long-held view that no institution or governnient created by men, for
men, is inviolable, incorruptible, and not subject to evolution, change, or replace
ment by the will of an informed people.
To this we dedicate our lives and our work. No effort will be spared and no
idea will be allowed to go unexpressed if we think it will benefit the Thinking
People, not only of America, but the entire world.
George P. Dietz, Editor & Publisher
KILLING KENNEDY
Given the interest that readers of Liberty BellhzYC expressed in my
article in the July issue, pp. 1-12, I now reluctantly return to the
hackneyed subject of the assassination of Jackanapes Kennedy in
Dallas on 22 November 1963, to clarify two points that I mentioned
obiter in July.
I
M y article dealt with the T^merican Medical Association, which
had mobilized two squads of tame physicians to discredit the widely
shown cinema "J.F.K." and an almost concurrently published book by
one of the physicians who had been on duty in the Parkland Hospital
in Dallas when Kennedy s body was brought into the hospital. It was
a desperate attempt to cover up the patent absurdity of the report on
the assassination that had been contrived by a commission over which
presided Earl Warren, one of the participants in the conspiracy that
had expunged a President who had become a political liability.
The book in question is JFK: Conspiracy of Silence, by Dr, Charles
A . Crenshaw, assisted by Jens K. Hansen, a professional writer and
Vice Chairman of a Research Foundation, and J. Gary Shaw, the
director of the J F K Assassination Information Center in Dallas,
published in N e w York by the New American Library (a subsidiary of
Penguin Books) in April 1992.
T h e core of the book is the personal observations of D r .
Crenshaw, then a man of thirty, who, although subject to his seniors,
could be described, by analogy to military practice, as the executive
officer of the hospital, since he was in charge of interns (among whom,
by the way, his insistence on absolute accuracy gained him a reputation as
a martinet) and of the treatment of persons critically injured in accidents
or by gunfire. H e was on duty when the bodies of Kennedy and of
Oswald, the supposed assassin, were brought to the Parkland Hospital
and he witnessed everything that was done medically while the bodies
Liberty Bell I October 1992 — 1


were in the hospital, participating himself in much of the work. H i s
account is printed in a distinguishing typeface (Helvetica).
M r . Shaw supplied, from the data accumulated in the
Assassination Information Center over a period of twenty-seven
years, the information concerning events o f which D r . Crenshaw
had no personal knowledge, which are succinctly summarized in
strict chronological order and limited to essentials.' M r . Hansen's
contribution, I suppose, was stylistic, so I think h i m responsible for
the passages in which the writing descends to crude journalese.
The book cannot in any sense be regarded as inspired by the "right
wing." D r . Crenshaw, who is now Clinical Professor o f Surgery at the
University of Texas's Southwestern Medical School and Director of
the Department of Surgery in the affiliated Smith Hospital in Fort
Worth, is undoubtedly a highly skilled physician and surgeon, but his
political naivet^ is astonishing, almost astounding, when one
remembers that he, by the time that Oswald was dead, was i n a
position to knowxhax. the assassination of Kennedy had been contrived
by some part of the government in Washington. Nevertheless, even
today, he denounces "extreme [!] political factions, like the John Birch
Society," and reports that, on the morning of 22 November he was
1. He, for example, does not mention the reports that the corpse, pre
sumably Kennedy's, was taken to the Walter Eeed Hospital i n Wash
ington before it was transferred to the naval hospital i n Bethesda.
There had obviously been hanky-panky after the corpse left Dallas, i f
its condition when it reached the hospital in Bethesda was truthfully
reported, and it does not really matter where the mischief was done.
Nothing categorically excludes a possible substitution of cadavers, but
an attempt to patch up the corpse to conceal vital evidence is much
more likely. A t Bethesda the physicians who conducted a rather per
functory autopsy found the entry wound of a bullet i n Kennedy's back,
thus ostensibly showing that he had been shot from the rear—but by a
bullet from a comparatively low-powered gun, since there was no corre
sponding exit wound i n his chest—unless, of course, the enchanted bul
let climbed up and exited from his throat, where the entry wound ob
served i n Dallas had been enlarged to make it appear an exit wound.
Kennedy's back had not been inspected i n Dallas, since, i n the absence
of bleeding and an exit wound i n the chest, there was no reason to
suppose there was a wound there. M r . Shaw does not speculate about
the possibility that the wound i n the back was added when the cadaver
was worked over i n Washington to provide some indication that Ken
nedy had been shot from the rear by that poor, lorn critter, Oswald, as
the official cover-up required.
2 — Liberty Bell I October 1992
(and presumably still is) shocked by a full-page article in a newspaper
that "viciously attacked the integrity of President Kennedy" and
described h i m as a Communist and traitor. Unless he is referring to
some handbill or fugitive publication that has not come to m y
attention, he must have in mind the full-page paid advertisement that
appeared that morning in the Dallas Morning News and occupied page
14 of the first.section, an advertisement of which a drastically reduced
photograph appears on an adjacent page herewith. T h e big
advertisement did not expHcidy make the charges remembered by D r .
Crenshaw, but implied them in a series of questions which are here
reprinted on pages 5 and 6.
Evidendy M r . Shaw neglected to tell D r . Crenshaw that, although
the advertisement, which was entirely correct in its implication, was
paid for by patriotic Americans In Dallas, that was done on the
initiative o f an ambiguous Individual who Is suspected of having been
an agent provocateur. It would thus have been a preparation for an
assassination that could be blamed on patriotic Americans, as was
obviously part of the original plan.
D r . Crenshaw thinks that Kennedy was so generally disliked i n
Dallas because he "came across [I.e., was regarded] as royalty with his
money, his llfest)'le, his family, and his charisma." H e does not even
guess why Dallas was selected as the site for the assassination, and he
thinks Kennedy could have been assassinated just as well In Chicago or
anywhere else.
That so Intelligent a man as D r . Crenshaw could believe all that
even today Is an emphatic lesson for everyone who still hopes to break
somehow the stupor o f the A m e r i c a n populace as Jt is herded to
the precipice over w h i c h nations and races disappear from
history.
D r . Crenshaw is on solid ground when he explains, on the basis of
his own knowledge, why he and the other medical men who knew
what had happened at Parkland Hospital so long condoned by their
silence the lies that were imposed on the public. A physician Is
particularly dependent on his reputation for survival in a highly
competitive profession, and had he or any other physician disclosed
what he knew about the assassination, he would have been deluged i n
slime from the Jews' llepapers and boob-tubes, excommunicated from
Liberty Belli October 1992 — 3


WELCOME MR. KENNEDY
TO DALLAS.,.
. . . A C ! f ^ , " 7 I 7 . ; , j I , < I I " " ' >"<>• >">rnpf iV.rir, tilti.M V.M i-il A e l . J I - * C*-iifT.ll.. *jj^<;ti^ it ^.Wk . I f A .
. . . A C I T Y lui u.t...*k - - . t i M t hirttU'i^t^u it.,.^v „ M » * . i . - j k t ; . . . . p . « i u . i ,
. . . A C I T Y I . p . „ p , . v „ p n , V , , . i . . J . ; - . M t ' , i « I. ^ . . r « . n U i i t " H i . F . w i i n ^ "
. . . A CITY w , u . „ ^ , ..J 1.1,„ . . J I , „ i , n _ . . — , „ ^ „ ^ . , , ,1,,
MR. KENNEDY, J . l p l l . " n l . i i l i o n i o n t h . p.rio(your.dmWil..lion, Ih. S I . U D . p . H m . n l . l l . Mlyor
of Q i l l . l , tht D I I I M City C o u n t i l . . n d m . m b . r l o( yout p . t l y . w . ( . . . . I h i o l m , . n J A m . l l c J - l K W i n , c l l l i . u o l D . l l . l
ilill h * v i , IhiDugK * C o n i f l i u l i o n largely I g n o i . d by you. [ U f i g M lo * d d r * l i ow gfi»v*nc«l. )o q u t i l l o h you, lo d i l 
* g r * i wUh you. *nd (o crilicii* you.
In *»»f)!iig iKil c o n i l l l u i l o n u l n g d l . wlih to a l l y o u publicly l U following q u e i i l o i . i - i n d t . t f , i^untioiK of p » f * m o u n f
I m p o r l i n c . . n J I n l . r . i l l o all l i . t p . o p l a l . . . r y w b . l . - w l i l c h w . Iluvl you v i l U n l w . r . . .'lo public, w l l h o u l l o p h l l l t y .
TTi«J« qutvtlom * r » :
WHY i t furnlnq tHhar i n l i . A m e r l c a n or C o m m u n i l l l c , of b o l h . d e i p l i a incf »Al«d U.S. for.Ign *Id, S U I «
LUJJ. D i p a r l m s n l policy, a n / y o u r own I v y J o w e r pfonouncamanft?
WU\I do y o u i . y w . h a , , bulll a "wall of f f o . d o m " a i o u n d C u b a w l i . n l U r . i l no f r a . d o m In C u b a l o d a y ? Bacaula
° ' policy, Ihoulandi of C o b a n i fiave baan impilioned, ara ilarving and baing pafiacuiad—wlffi ffioutandj
alfaady m u f d e r e d .and Ihouvandl m o i a aw,»HIng a,«culIon a n d . In addition. Iha ant'„a population of a l m o l l 7,W»,000
C u b a n l at* living In llai-ary.
WHY ' " M * P P ' < " " ' "•'•"I «nJ corn l o our anemlai v h . n you Inow lha C o m m u n l l l
. l l i ' - L loldiari "Iravtl on Ihalr l l o m a c l i i " (uil ai ouM do7 Communlil loldlari ara dally wounding and/or llinng
A m t i l c a n l o l d l a r l In Soulk Ylaf N a m , 1 1 1
WUV did y o u h o i l , l a l u l a and a n U r l a I n Tito - M o l c o w ' i Tioian H o i i a - l u l l a i k o i l lima a f l a r o u f ' i w o r n
- ' ' ' anemy, Kkrujlicliav, embraced lha Yugoilav diclalor at a great kafo and leader of Commonlim?
WHY " • " ' " r f . / a c o g n l l l o n and u n d . r . l a n d i n g for Y u g o l l a v i a , Poland, Hungary, a n d
WHY ':""''»'''' "=V'" °"' °' ''' P TM ' " * " ' " ' V « ° *^«!on Dollar, of aid Into If, ultra
' " ' lalfitl govarnmenf?
WHY a " '^•I' °' 'V . f ' f l y Pfal<ed almoit avary ona of your J.i.ilcla, and announced that
i U J J . Ike parly will andoila and lupporl your ra-alccllon in H M ? 1 1 r
WHY ! ! . " * ^""".i "-^^ "^""f ' i l ' " " O p e r a t i o n A b o l I t i o n " - t k . m o v l . b y H i . H o u i .
i U J J . Commillee on Un-Amarican A c l i . i l l e l e.pollng Communilm in AmeileaJ
WHY \""y"' " P " " ' I I I « ' y ° " r b r o l k . r Bobby, tka A l l o r n e y General, lo go l o f l on C o m m u n l i l i , fellow.
>'ll'' L" "''<'' p a " " : i l l " 9 (•Im lo p e r i a c u l . l o y . l A m e r i c a n , » k o c r i l i c i . . you,your
admimitration, and your laadenklp? , j ' ^ ^ f i T " *
WHY •"*.''°."'"JT v",* "nT''^ ^ ' s ' " " " ' . ' P i l ' ° f iHal fact liiat Arg.nlina k a ,
J l L L L i fi,t laiiad almoit « 0 Million Dollar! of American private properly?
w.,
h"*- '^Si^fP'^' " °' " " " ^ ' ' l " « • D E M A N D aniwer, to tkaie gueitloni, and w , want
th«m N O W .
THE A M E R I C A N F A C T - F I N D I N G COMMITTEE
" ^ n U B o f f l l l o l e d o n J n o n - p o r - l i l b n j r o u p of c i l i r a n i wlio wllfi f r u f k "
BERNARD WEISSMAN,
Ckalrman
• P.O. Bot l ; 9 2 - D a l l a i 21, T a . a , ,
lave you i c r a p p e d Ike M o n r o e Doelrlne In favor of tke "Splr'it of M o l c o w " ?
4 — Liberty Bell I October 1992
M R . K E N N E D Y , despite the contentions on the part of your
adminstration, the State Department, the Mayor of Dallas, the Dallas
City Council, and members of your party, we free-thinking and
American-thinking citizens of Dallas still have, through a Constitution
largely ignored by you, the right to address our grievances, to
question you, to disagree with you, and to criticize you.
In asserting this constitutional right, we wish to ask you
publicly the following questions—indeed, questions of paramount
importance and interest to all free people everywhere—which we
trust you will answer...in public, without sophistry. These questions
are:
\AAHV ^^^''^ America turning either anti-American or
VV n Y Communistic, or both, despite increased U . S . for
eign aid. State Department policy, and your own Ivy-Tower pro
nouncements?
\AAI-4V ^^y^ ^® ^ave built a "wall of f r e e d o m "
VV n Y around C u b a when there is no freedom in C u b a
today? Because of your policy, thousands of Cubans have
been imprisoned, are starving and being persecuted—with
thousands already murdered and thousands more awaiting exe
cution and, in addition, the entire population of almost
7,000,000 C u b a n s are living in slavery.
\ A / U V ^^^^ y^*^ approved the sale of wheat and corn to
VV r l Y our enemies when you know the Communist sol
diers "travel on their stomachs" just as ours do? Communist
soldiers are daily wounding and/or killing American soldiers in
South Vietnam.
\AAHV '^^^ y^*^ ^^'"^'^ ^"^^ entertain Tito—Moscow's
VV M Y Trojan Horse—just a short time after our sworn
enemy, Khrushchev, embraced the Yugoslav dictator as a great
hero and leader of C o m m u n i s m ?
\ A / H V ^^"^^ urged greater aid, comfort, recognition,
" " r l Y and understanding for Yugoslavia, Poland, Hung
ary, and other Communist countries, while turning your back on
the pleas of Hungarians, East German, Cuban and other anti
Communist freedom fighters?
Liberty Belli October 1992 — 5'


\A/L_|Y ^'^ Cambodia kick the U.S. out of its country after
' ' we poured nearly 400 Million Dollars of aid into its
ultra-leftist government?
U V A L j Y has Gus Hall, head of the U.S. Communist Party,
' ' praised almost every one of your policies and an
nounced that the party will endorse and support your re-election
in 1964?
W H Y ^ ^ ^ ^ banned the showing at U.S. military
bases of the film "Operation Abolition"—the movie
by the House Committee on Un-American Activities exposing
Communism in America?
\ A / L _ | Y ^^^^ ordered or permitted your brother Bobby,
' ' ' the Attorney General, to go soft on Communists,
fellow-travelers, and ultra-leftists in America, while permitting
him to persecute loyal Americans who criticize you, your admin
istration, and your leadership?
W H Y ^'^^ '"^ °^ continuing to give eco
* ' ' ' nomic aid to Argentina, in spite of the fact that Ar
gentina has just seized almost 400 Million Dollars of American
private property?
W H Y Foreign Policy of the United States degen
' ' ' erated to the point that the C.I.A. is arranging
coups and having staunch Anti-Communist Allies of the U.S.
bloodily exterminated?
W H Y '^^^^ scrapped the Monroe Doctrine in favor of
the "Spirit of Moscow"?
MR. KENNEDY, as citizens of these United State of America,
we DEMAND answers to these questions, and we want them NOw!
6 — Liberty Bell I October 1992
the occupation that was his only livelihood, reduced with his wife
and child to indigence, and, if that did not suffice, murdered (probably
suicided by a competent technician from the Secret Service, F.B.I., or
C.IA.)^ D r . Crenshaw begins by showing us the grinding routine of a
resident surgeon in Parkland, which was not an ordinary hospital but
instead an "academic hospital," operating in' conjunction with the
Southwestern Medical School and devoted to teaching and research.
Two members o f its staff have won the Nobel Prize in Medicine, and
D r , Crenshaw himself, i n his first year at Parkland, "made medical
history" with research directed by D r . Shires which discovered "that
death from haemorrhagic shock (blood loss) can be due primarily to
the body's adjunctive depletion o f salt water into the cells." T w o
other physicians discovered a means of averting irreparable damage to
the kidneys of a patient i n trauma—a "medical breakthrough" so
important that, i n the opinion of persons competent to judge, it
deserved a Nobel Prize.
A t the time o f the assassination, D r . Crenshaw was i n charge o f
the four "trauma rooms" i n the hospital, to which persons who had
been smashed up i n automobile accidents or critically wounded by
gunfire were brought from all over the area around Dallas, since the
hospital was specially equipped to treat such cases. It is sometimes
2. In this. Dr. Crenshaw is absolutely correct. Immediately after the
assassination, when the information that appeared in the censored
press made it seem certain that Oswald had killed both Kennedy and a
policeman named Tippet, it was nevertheless obvious to anyone who
considered the question objectively that the assassination had been the
work of a conspiracy that had used Oswald as its tool. I accordingly
stated that fact publicly i n an issue of American Opinion, and since I
had participated in the foundation of the John Birch Society and was a
member of its National Council, my statement attracted attention; dis
eased pus spurted from almost every editorial office in the country and
was lapped up by millions of nitwits. Cf. America's Decline, pp. 163 f.
Since the Warren Commission ascertained that I had no personal
knowledge of the facts and had only reasoned from published informa
tion, it was not thought necessary to murder me. The episode was an
unpleasant experience, but I now regret it only because it preserved
the Birch Society by forcing the panic-stricken Welcher to face facts.
Had I remained silent, the Birch business would probably have disinte
grated in 1964 or 1965, and I would not have had to resign from it in
1966, after I succeeded in discovering who then controlled it and super
vised Robert Welch.
Liberty Bell I October 1992 — 7


forgotten that .Governor Connally o f Texas, who was riding with
Kennedy, was critically wounded by a bullet that entered his chest and
pa.'iscd through his body (and so necessarily had been fired by a
marksman ahead oi xh.e. automobile). H e was treated in a "trauma
room" o f Parkland by a second surgical- team, but D r . Crenshaw was
told in detail what was done. It is his opinion chat i f Connally had
been taken to any other hospital, he would have died. As it was, he
survived and recovered from his wounds, but was politically ruined by
his enemy, Lyndon Johnson, who had acquired the powers of the
Presidency.,
D r . Crenshaw gives an orderly and precise account, sometimes
minute by minute, o f what happened in the Parkland Hospital while
the bodies of Kennedy and, later, Oswald were there. H i s report makes
obvious how muzzy, incomplete, and evasive was the story told by
the three physicians who obediently recited for the Medical
Association and tried to bolster Earl Warren's hoax by such
disingenuous claims as that they had been too busy to notice
whether or not the bullet that entered Kennedy's throat and the
bullet that blew part of his brain out of the back of his skull had
come from behind him.
For the details o f the condition of the body and the efforts o f the
physicians, see D r . Crenshaw's book, and see the book also for a listing
of important but long suppressed contributory evidence about the
assassination, presumably compiled by M r . Shaw.^ I shall here call
attention only to points that clarify or correct what I reported in my
article.
3. He reports ascertained facts, but you should appraise them criti
cally. Identifications made by persons not personally acquainted with
the person identified are notoriously inconclusive when not corrobo
rated by other evidence. As for the puzzling report by Rubenstein's
former employee, Rose Cheramie, in Louisiana, remember that expert
technicians planning an assassination in Dallas might well have taken
the precaution of providing evidence of a seemingly independent con
spiracy (e.g., by agents of Castro) that could be used to cover up their
own, if something went wrong. The young woman, who seems to have
been known only by what was probably a "professional" name, may
have invented the story she told two days before the assassination.
That she was in some way implicated is shown by the fact that it was
deemed expedient to murder her later.
8 — Liberty Bell I October 1992
Kennedy, for all practical purposes, died instantly when the
assassin's second bullet destroyed the entire right half o f his brain.
W h e n he was brought into the hospital, "the entire right hemisphere
of his brain was missing, beginning at the hairline and extending all
the way behind his right ear. Pieces of skull that had not been blown away
were hanging by blood-matted hair." D r . Crenshaw and the other
physicians knew, of course, that Kennedy was dead, but the action of the
heart had not entirely ceased, and they made an effort to keep alive, not
Kennedy, but his corpse. H a d they succeeded, they would have
performed a medical miracle and produced a living but mindless hulk of
insentient tissue, somediing much more horrible than a zombie.
Jacqueline Kennedy did not wander in incipient hysteria
around the room while the physicians worked. She was doubtless
shocked, but she never lost self-control and remained composed at
all times. A t D r . Crenshaw's suggestion, she left the room before
the efforts to preserve a semblance of life i n her husband's body
began and waited outside the room until she accompanied the priest
who had been summoned to administer the rite o f extreme
unction.^
T h e disturbance i n the trauma room was occasioned, not by
Jacqueline Kennedy, but by an agent of the Secret Service, who ran about,
4. If I remember correctly, there is on record the remarkable instance
of a man who survived a bullet that had passed through his head from
one temple to the other, but had not destroyed any large or vital part
of the brain. I feel certain that there would have been no precedent for
maintenance of life in Kennedy's corpse, but I have not tried to go
through the pertinent medical textbooks. This fact evidently gave rise
to a theory about the assassination of which I had not heard before I
saw it mentioned by Dr. Crenshaw: that Kennedy's cadaver is still kept
obscenely alive in some subterranean vault under the Parkland Hospi
tal!
5. Despite her composure, Dr. Crenshaw, who seems to have had a
kind of sentimental admiration of the Kennedys, was convinced by her
conduct that she was really consumed with grief and love for her hus
band. That is not impossible. The terrible finality of death excites
strong emotions, belated regret for what can never come again, and an
awed perception of the insignificance and evanescence of all human
hfe. When Mrs. Kennedy returned with the priest, she kissed the big
toe of one of Kennedy's feet, thus grotesquely imitating what obhgatory
etiquette had required of a concubine or odalisque of the Sultan of
Turkey when summoned to serve her lord.
Liberty Bell I October 1992 — 9


"waving a cocked and ready-to-fire .38 caliber pistol." H e may have
been distraught, as he seemed to be, or he may have been detailed to make
certain that Kennedy could not live or that agents of the F.B.I, were not
allowed to see the wounds. H e was persuaded to withdraw. There was an
unexplained hostility, between the Secret Service and the F.B.I. As
Kennedy's body was being brought into the hospital, an agent of the
Secret Service, armed with a sub-machine gun, used his weapon as a
club to smash the face o f an agent o f the F.B.I., perhaps because the
latter had wanted to accompany the body to the trauma room.
When Kennedy was officially pronounced dead, the agents o f die
Secret Service did not rash away with the wheeled table on which the
body lay, presumably to have it packed for shipment elsewhere, as the
American Medical Association's physicians implied in their recitation. O n
the contrary, a bronze coffin (not the wooden one in which the body was
delivered i n Bethesda) had been obtained, and Kennedy's body was
properly and decendy placed in it by the hospital's staff. The trouble arose
when the physicians and then the Dallas County Coroner, Dr. Ead Rose,
tried to prevent removal of the body before the requirements of the laws
of Texas had been met, as could have been done, D r . Rose esrimated, in
three-quarters of an hour. The Secret Service men were determined to
prevent such examinadon of the body. They used their guns to intimidate
the physicians, and finally their chief, a man named Kellerman, raised his
sub- machinegun, pointed it at D r . Rose's chest, and promised to
pull the trigger i f he did nor step aside. T h e thug's cohorts were
ready to draw their guns from their holsters. D r . Crenshaw was
convinced that they would have murdered D r . Rose and then
killed all the witnesses, had D r . Rose not yielded to their violence.
A Justice of the Peace named W a r d , either intimidated by the
gunmen or politically corrupt, signed a lying certificate that an
autopsy had been performed and an inquest held before the body
6. Obviously not a .38 Colt Cobra, the weapon preferred for shoulder
holsters, but presumably a revolver. The word 'pistol' is ambiguous,
but .38 caliber automatic pistols Were rare, and the .358 and .40 had
not yet been introduced. The numerous agents of the Secret Service
and F.B.I, at the hospital appear to have been armed with .38 or .45
caliber weapons that they carried in holsters at their hips, partly con
cealed by the coat-tails of their fashionable suits. Some also carried
sub-machineguns.
10 — Liberty Bell I October 1992
was removed. T h e Warren Commission,, however, did not dare to, us.e
that blatant falsification.
It is n o w virtually certain that one o f the principals i n the.
assassination was a petty crook named Lyndon Johnson, who,,
doubdess counselled by his wife, a wealthy Jewess, had slithered up to
the post of V i c e President^ The death o f Kennedy saved h i m from loss
of that position in 1964^ and boosted h i m into the Presidency,, a
position which he managed to retain until 1968. It is not remarkable
that the Secret Service men guarded h i m sedulously, even the night
before the assassination, when the men detailed to guard Kennedy
went out on a glorious drunk.
While Johnson was flying to Washington widi Kennedy's corpse, he
was informed from Washington (i.e., by McGeorge Bundy or Commander
Hallet in the White House) that "no conspiracy" was concerned in the
assassination—^diis at a time when no investigation had been made (Osv^ald
had just been arrested and was being questioned, but denied that he was the
assassin). Obviously, Johnson was being informed that the high command
had decided to make the assassination the work of a 'loner'—and had
probably also decided that Oswald was a suitable patsy and rnust be
eliminated before he had a chance to make a formal statement.
The morning after the assassination, Johnson, apparently not
trusting the efficiency of the conspiracy's agents and itching with
7. The best characterization of Johnson is A Texas Looks at Lyndon, by
J. Evatts Haley, a real Texan, and published by his Palo Duro Press,
Canyon, Texas, in 1964. It is said that about two million copies of this
book were sold, but, so far as I know, it is now out-of-print. It is to be
regretted that the book was not revised i n a second edition which
would have included the crook's disgusting performances in the White
House.
8. On the pohtical situation in November 1963, see the appendix below.
9. Oswald prudently refused to make a statement before he had a law
yer to advise him. It is probable that he was also awaiting instructions
from his employers, who may or may not have been agents of the F.B.I.
He was in touch with a local agent of that organization named Hosty,
and about two weeks before the assassination had left with the Special
Agent in Charge in Dallas a memorandum or report that was torn up
and flushed down a sewer after the event. He was in any case acting
for some covert agency of the Federal government. There is an unsub
stantiated but not implausible theory that he was thus employed while
in Russia. However that may be, it is likely that his activities on behalf
Liberty Bell / October 1992 — 11


worry lest crucial facts be somehow ascertained and divulged,
telephoned Captain W i l l Fritz, chief of the homicide detail of the
Dallas police, and ordered h i m to stop all investigation o f the
assassination. It is proof of the distance we have descended into
dictatorship while the boobs were led to believe that the parts of the
Constitution that had not been rescinded in 1865 were still in
effect, that Captain Fritz d i d not reply, " Y o u have no
Constitutional authority to otder me to violate the laws o f Texas,
you son-of-a-bltch." Instead he obeyed, and told his friends, "When
the President o f the U n i t e d States called, what could I do?"
The Dallas police, however, did continue to interrdgate Oswald
and arraigned him, not for the assassination of Kennedy, but for the
murder o f a policeman. Tippet, who was killed shortly after the
assassination for reasons still unknown.
When Oswald, still barely alive, was brought to the Parkland
Hospital and physicians were trying to save his life,^° Johnson himself
had D r . Crenshaw, who was in charge, called to the telephone, and
of Fidel Castro's Soviet outpost in Cuba were carried out while he was
in the employ of some agency of the government in Washington, and
that he was directed to make his attempt to murder General Edwin A.
Walker, the most prominent anti-Communist in Dallas, (Had the at
tempt succeeded, it could have been argued that American patriots in
Dallas assassinated Kennedy in revenge for the murder of Walker.) His
role in the assassination, like that of Rubenstein, alias Ruby, with
whom he seems to have acted in concert, is still undetermined. A possi
ble element in the puzzle is the fact that the C.I.A. is legally forbidden
to operate within the United States, so that its domestic agents com
monly operate as, and may actually be, agents of the F.B.I. All these
speculations may seem far-fetched to persons who have no knowledge
of the secret operations of intelligence agencies.
10. As is well known, Oswald, while handcuffed between two detec
tives, was murdered by a gangster from Chicago named Jacob
Rubenstein, alias Jack Ruby, who thus acquired the distinction of
being the first man to commit murder while being photographed by
several television cameras. Rubenstein, who operated night clubs in
Dallas, had been associated with Oswald in some transactions of which
the nature is still uncertain. He had a criminal record and was a paid
employee of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, but Earl Warren nat
urally covered up for him in his report. Rubenstein had obviously been
instriacted to eliminate Oswald before he could make a formal statement.
12 — Liberty Bell I October 1992
told him that he, the new President, wanted a "deathbed confession"
of guilt from Oswald, and that his agent, a typical thug from the Secret
Service, sartorially disguised in then fashionable clothing that
emphasized the impressive pistol In his holster, was waiting to take
that confession. The confession, needed to bolster the propaganda that
Oswald was the real assassin, would doubtless have been faked in some
way, but Oswald died soon after Johnson's telephone call, and the
frustrated thug with his gun departed.
The only alternative to taking the nervous crook's telephone calls
as tantamount to a confession of guilt is a desperate hypothesis that
Johnson was impersonated on the telephone by some other member o f
the conspiracy.
M r . Shaw believes that J. Edgar Hoover withheld evidence
obtained by his Bureau because he was a friend o f Lyndon Johnson.
Informed opinion in Washington was to the effect that Hoover
withheld incriminating evidence to prevent Johnson and "Bobby Sox"
Kennedy from retiring h i m as head of the F.B.I. After Johnson was
elected In November 1964, he replaced Kennedy with a Jew,
Katzenbach, who had been officially Deputy Attorney General and, i n
all likelihood, actually Kennedy's supervisor, but Hoover remained the
Director of the F.B.I, until his death i n 1972. T h e evidence that he
used to protect himself by political blackmail has not been revealed. It
may be disclosed in 2039, when the files sealed by order of Lyndon
In Dr. Crenshaw's opinion, it might have been possible to save Oswald's
life, if, within three minutes after he was shot, he had been given the
treatment he received in the trauma room at Parkland; that, of course,
would not have been possible, and the delay of fifteen minutes made
death inevitable. Had Oswald lived, Johnson and his fellow conspirators
would have had to devise some means of silencing him before he could
talk. Mr. Shaw's summary does not mention the significant fact that
Rubenstein in prison evidently decided to disclose some of the crucial
facts to a female journalist, Dorothy Kilgallen, who delightedly told her
friends that she was going to "blow sky high" the official story of the
assassination, but was murdered before she could do so. Rubenstein was
eliminated soon thereafter; the oflicial story was that he had died of
sudden cancer. It has been estimated that a total of some forty to fifty
persons, witnesses to one or another crucial incident, were murdered to
prevent them fi-om contradicting the Warren Report. There are still
many naively opinionated Americans who refuse to understand the
character of the government that rules them.
Liberty Bell / October 1992 — 13


Johnson may be opened^—-if, at that time, die rulers o f the territoiy
that is n o w the U n i t e d States arc intcresred in events o f what will then
be a dead past.
II
In my article I indicated the major motive for the assassination o f
Kennedy: the need to abort the growing dissatisfaction of the
American people with a government that was obviously acting in the
interests of our enemies, the masters of C o m m u n i s t Russia—a
dissatisfaction that had been brought close to the boiling point by the
Indignation Meetings held throughout the country, which were
sponsored by patriotic Americans in Dallas.
This purpose was achieved and the pro-American movement
liquidated by the assassination, followed by a spectacular funeral for
which the A r m y detachment had been diligently rehearsed in advance
and at w h i c h Jacqueline K e n n e d y gave a brilliant performance. A
well-contrived deluge o f wildly irrational bathos in the press and over
television sufficed to reduce the majority o f Americans to the status o f
savages w h o beat their breasts and h o w l w h e n their big chief dies.
Very many—perhaps the majority of anti-Communists exposed
themselves as p o l t r o o n s . O n the m o r n i n g o f the twenty-second o f
November they had talked loudly of impeaching "that son-of-a-bitch"
for high treason. T h a t aft:ernoon they should have said, or at least
thought, " G o o d riddance!" But the next day they were tearfully
protesting they had always respected and loved "our martyred
President" and had only differed from h i m about some minor matters
o f p o l i c y , as was permissible i n " o u r great d e m o c r a c y . " T h e y were a
nauseating spectacle.
T h e assassination o f Kennedy was thus a crucial event in American
history, canceling what was the last reasonable hope that the American
people could escape the d o o m prepared for them by their implacable
enemies.
Various other motives have been suggested, all o f which are trivial
in comparison with what was accomplished. I did mention in my
article the least nugatory^, a report that has been widely current i n
" r i g h t - w i n g " circles i n recent years. I quote it f r o m w h a t is p r o b a b l y
the last issue o f Racial Loyalty ( M a y 1 9 9 2 ) , w h i c h quotes the C a n a d i a n
Intelligence Service, which in turn cited other sources:
14 — Liberty Bell I October 1992
Kennedy...bypassed the Jewish Federal Reserve and issued
government notes...as did President Abraham Lincoln a hundred
years earlier and for which he, too, paid the ultimate price. ... On
June 30, 1965, Kennedy signed Executive Order No. 11110, and
further amended E.O. No. 10289 of September 19, 1952, thereby
giving the President authority to issue the currency. He thereupon
ordered the Issue of $4,292,893,875.00. This was almost ten times
as much as the $450,000,000.00 ["greenbacks"] printed by Lincoln
during the Civil War. He evidently forced the then Secretary of tfte
Treasury, C. Douglas Dillon, another name-changing Jew
(LapowskI?), to sign the United States notes. Shortly
thereafter...Kennedy paid the ultimate price and was shot, as was
Lincoln.... The first thing President Johnson did when he flew back
to Washington was to reverse this order.
N o w E x e c u t i v e O r d e r N o . 11110 is i n d e x e d i n the Federal Register
as p e r t a i n i n g to treasury notes a n d silver certificates, a n d the reported
tenor of it was quite plausible. It was even possible, though unlikely,
that the amount mentioned had been printed, although not put into
circulation.'' The report therefore was not invalidated by a mistake
about Kennedy's intent and about the effect of Lincoln's issue of
'greenbacks.'
It must be remembered that i n the autumn of 1963, Kennedy's
popularity had been greatly impaired and he could not have been
reelected in 1964 without some heroic efforr to regain the favor he had
lost. (See the appendix below). It w o u l d have been reasonable for h i m
to try some spectacular manoeuvre that w o u l d be c o m m e n d e d by
many of the intelligent Americans w h o m his conduct in office had
alienated and angered-—especially a manoeuvre that seemed to avert
national bankruptcy and to limit the looting of the country by the
Federal Reserve. H i s administration, furthermore, was riddled by
fighting for p o w e r w i t h i n it, a n d such a n order, even i f never carried
out, would have sufficed to intimidate some factions.
1. A mistake about the issuance of the notes was facilitated by the fact
that part of Lincoln's issue of'greenbacks' was never withdrawn, and a
very small part of that part is kept in circulation, as required by law.
When the pieces of paper are worn out, they are replaced by freshly
printed notes, which, of course, are signed by the Secretary of the
Treasury in office at the time.
Liberty Bell I October 1992 — 15


T h e r e appeared Co be a real rift within the organization o f our
rulers (as distinct from dissent simulated to entertain the populace). A
coirespondent kindly informs me that he clearly remembers that, not
long before Kennedy was expunged, Eisenhower appea:red on
television irately to denounce Kennedy for plans to tamper with the
sacrosanct Federal Reserve, going so far as to regret that he had not
campaigned for N i x o n and thus assured his election in place'of
Kennedy. Since I almost never watch the Jews' picture-shows, I did
not see that program. I do have vague recollections o f very adverse
criticism o f Kennedy by rhe Super-Sheeny, Avraham ben FJazar, alias
Dr. Henry Kissinger, who was probably the Jewish satrap in charge of
supervising the government in Washington. This seemed to indicate
an internal struggle among our rulers, possibly a struggle between two
factions of the ruling race.
The issue, which still divides the "right-wing," can by
summarized, i f stripped to its barest essentials. Money in the strict
sense of the word appears to have been an Aryan invention made in
the seventh century b . c , when coins replaced barter in commercial
transactions. It consisted of coins of gold, silver, and electrum (an alloy
of the rwo), with tokens of bronze and copper for fractions of a coin o f
2. The real name of Kissinger was disclosed by the Supreme Rabbinic
Court of America when he was excommunicated from Jewry on 20
Jun6 1976. The real reason for the excommunication has not been dis
closed, and it would be a waste of time to consider conjectural explana
tions.
3. We must remember that although God's Race presents a united
front against our race, which they both despise and hate, there are
often violent disagreements about the expediency of some policy and
consequently frequent, i f not constant, quarrels between factions
within the Self-Chosen People. For a good example, see Lenni Brem
mer, The Iron Wall: Zionist Revisionism from Jabotinsky to Shamir
(London, Zed Books, 1984). Needless to say, the "revisionism" men
tioned i n the title has nothing to do with the "revisionism" of honest
historians who are now trying to expose the Jews' great Holohoax. Z i 
onist "revisionism" deals with changes i n policies for putting and keep
ing the goyim i n their servile place. Breramer particularly reprehends
Shamir and his party of Zionists for attempts to enter into a mihtary
alliance with Adolf Hitler to expedite his "ultimate solution" of the
Jewish problem in Germany by ti-ansferring the Jews i n Germany to
Palestine. Cf. Liberty Bell, March 1991, pp. 1-3; April-May 1991, pp.
108-114. f J >
16 — Liberty Bell I October 1992
precious metals. It was supplemented by credit, that is to say, promises
to pay a specified number of coins at a specified date or on demand.
The precious metals thereafiier served as a fixed measure of value.
In rhe later M i d d l e Ages, when coins of precious metal were stored
with goldsmiths (most of them Sheenies) for safe-keeping, the
goldsmiths issued certificates of deposit for money stored with them,
and soon learned that they could issue many more certificates than the
gold they had on hand, since only a fraction of the certificates would
be brought for redemption at any one time. W i t h unimportant and
ephemeral exceptions, the basis of all currency was coins of precious
metal, and financial crises were caused by the issue of more certificates
of deposit (bank notes) than the coins available to redeem them. The
first serious attempt to replace the precious metals was made by the
criminals of the French Revolution, who issued assignats i n such
quantities that the paper became worthless. The papet money issued
by the Continental Congress during the American Revolution coined
only the phrase " N o t worth a Continental" and gave an impressive
lesson in the use of currency that could be printed and multiplied by
legislatures with the dishonesty that is normal in democracies.
The Constitution, therefore, contemplated only the issue of coins
of precious metals, and until the Northern states attacked the
Confederacy in 1861, the currency consisted o f precious metals and
the notes issued by private banks, tedeemable on demand in real
money, which were in general use because the weight of any fairly large
sum of money (gold or silver) was more than an individual could
conveniently carry on his person.
Since the latter part of the Nineteenth Century Americans have been
faced with a choice between several kinds of currency, viz.; (a) gold coins
and bank or treasury notes certifying that their face value in coins were on
deposit and could be obtained on demand; (b) coins of both gold and
silver issued on some fixed ratio of value between the two and similarly
represented by bank or treasury notes; (c) the National Banks' paper
currency based on debt, i.e., government bonds held by banks that collect
interest on them, the bonds, however, being theorerically exchangeable for
real money, so that the paper currency could likewise be converted to real
money when desired; (d) 'greenbacks,' i.e., fiat "money," paper currency
representing no real money and having value only by unconstitutional
~, Liberty Bell I October 1992 — 17


legislation compelling individuals to accept it in the payment of aJl
debts, but having the advantage that the Federal governmentican issue
them instead of borrowing from banks and paying interest to them; (e)
the present system, perfected after Kennedy's time, whereby the
Federal Reserve issues notes that are actually greenbacks' but collects
interest on them as though they represented real money.
Americans who hope to regain po.ssession of the country that once
was theirs recognize, of course, that (e) is simply an outrageous system
for exploiting slaves, but they differ greatly about the expediency of (a),
(b), (c), and (d). That debate is irrelevant to our interests here, where
we need only to consider Kennedy's reported intent to resort to (d) on
a large scale, as was done by Lincoln's administration in 1862.
Abraham Lincoln, a shrewd backwoods politician though not
without some principles,'^ was put in the White House by a scabrous
gang of hate-crazed fanatics or degenerates, such as Thaddeus Stevens,
and a pack of politicians greedy for loot, who called themselves the
Republican Party, having stolen even their name from the American
Republican Party, which the Abolitionists had been used to disrupt.
Lincoln, who is reported to have said that he was bought and sold
several times at the Republican convention that nominated h i m , came
to Washington knowing that his function was to destroy the American
Constitution, for which he had little respect, and to end the American
Republic by attacking the South.
Part of the deal was that he was to make a scabrous politician
named Salmon P. Chase the Secretary of the Treasury in the interests
of the then great banking house of Jay Cooke, who ensured Chase's
obedience by giving him for "expenses" $100,000 (in real money; the
4, The "Great Emancipator" seems to have had one real principle, dis
like of niggers, whom he wished to export from American territory. In
the "emancipation proclamation" he made provision for shipping the
niggers back to Africa or some more convenient place in the Caribbean
or Central America, and he did export at least five thousand of them to
Haiti. That is the number exported, at a cost of $50.00 a head, under
contract by Leonard Jerome, a financier, thought to have been partly
Jewish, whose daughter married Lord Randolph Churchill and became
the mother of the notorious Winston Churchill. On Lincoln's character,
see especially the article by Sam G. Dickson, "Shattering the Icon of
Abraham Lincoln," in the Journal of Historical Review, VII (1986), pp.
319-344.
18 — Liberty Bell I October 1992
equivalent of at least $20,000,000 in the Federal Reserve's pieces o f
printed paper that the W h i t e Slaves now use as a substitute for
money). In return, Chase gave Cooke's banking house the extremely
lucrative monopoly of underwriting the entire Federal debt. N o one
objected because everyone was delighted when Chase began to deface
our currency with the silly motto, "In G o d W e Trust."^
Chase suspended payment in specie (i.e., real money) at the Treasury,
and the banks in the Northern states had to do likewise. W i t h the way
dius prepared, Lincoln, in 1862, obtained Congressional permission for
Chase to issue $150,000,000 worth of paper currency which was made
legal tender in open violation of the Constitution (whicli the suckers
thought still in force), and after that first splurge it was easy to increase the
fiat currency by increments of $150,000,000 every few months.
Was this, as naive persons believe, a threat to the banking interests
headed by Cooke? Far from it. T h e enormous cost of the invasion and
conquest of the South was more than could be conveniently absorbed
by credit from Cooke, Rothschild, and associates. The 'greenbacks'
were simply preparation for two brilliant coups de bourse.
First, the looters gained control of most of the independent banks
in the United States by inaugurating the bizarre scheme of basing
currency on debt. As explained by D r . Murray Rothbard, "Cooke and
Chase then managed to use the virtual Republican monopoly in
Congress during the war to transform the American commercial
banking system from a relatively free market to a National' Banking
System centralized under W a l l Street control. A crucial aspect of this
system was that national banks could only expand credit in proportion
to the Federal bonds they owned—bonds which they could only buy
from Jay Cooke." Neat, wasn't it?
Second, in addition to destabilizing the independent banks and
thus bringing them under the control of Cooke and the Rothschilds,
the 'greenbacks' provided the financiers with gorgeous loot. It nmst be
temembered that in the 1860s, the Northern Americans, although
crazed with homicidal righteousness, were not so befuddled that they
would have tolerated the present system, by which the international
bankers, through their Federal Reserve swindle, issue 'greenbacks' and
5. Cf. Liberty Bell, September 1984, pp. 2-3, 6.
6. MoneyWorld, Winter 1988, p. 24.
Liberty Bell I October 1992 — 19


(iiilcct cumulative interest on them. The 'greenbacks' had to be issued as
I leasury Notes, which the populace, crazed by their unholy war, were
I'orccd to accept as legal tender, and which were not even backed by a
pledge they would ever be redeemed in money. Naturally, the tesult wa.s
that there were three quite difFcrcnt kinds o f currency; intrinsically
worthless 'greenbacks,' the notes of private banks which promised
redemption in real money (gold or silvei-) and might be so redeemed after
the end of the war, and gold and silver coins, which had intrinsic value
and were obviously safe and preferable to paper notes, so that cautiou.s
persons invested their savings in them. As was to be expected, the
'greenbacks' rapidly depreciated in value. The Southerners defended
themselves effectively until they were finally overcome by attririon, and
the outcome of the Northern states' war of aggression remained doubtEil
until 1865. H a d the South succeeded in defending its independence, the
'grcenbacb' would have become worthless, and they soon dropped to
fractions of their face value in real money, i.e., gold and silver. Their value
eventually fell to 35'}-. The conspirators bought the trash wholesale, and
when paper for which they had paid $0.35 was eventually redeemed for
$1.00 in real money, they realized a modest profit-—^modest by the
standards of international finance.
In 1963, the boobs had not yet been completely reduced to their
present statms as a helpless and enslaved proletariat. Although the American
Ix:nin, soon after he began ihc systematic destruction of America in 1933,
had forbidden his subjects to have gold money, they were still permitted to
own silver coins that had intrinsic value, and which were also represented by
silver certificates issued by the Treasury and still honestly redeemed on
demand in 1963. Their mastets intended, of course, to take those bits of real
money from dicm, but the procedure by which that was to be done may
not have been definitely determined. Furthermore, the publication of
Gertude Coogan's The Money Creators in 1935 and several books derived
from it had permitted any literate person to understand the Federal Reserve
swindle,*^ but almost no one understood the great 'greenback' coup in
7. Some business men foresaw that the enormous quantity of trading
stamps i n circulation could never be redeemed i n money. One man, who
dealt i n player pianos, each of wWch sold for several thousand dollars,
offered his customers a 15% discount for payment in real money, i.e., sil
ver, since the American serfs were forbidden to possess gold.
20 — LibeHy Bell I October 1992
Lincoln's day, which was not mentioned even in college courses in
(censored) American History.
The time was ripe, therefore, for a new 'greenback' swindle, which
could also be used to revive the waning popularity of Jackanapes. The
widely circulated report, which I quoted from Racial Loyaliy above, was
endreiy plausible. A n d everyone knew, of course, of the sinister Exccurive
Orders by which preparations have been made for the impositions of a
Lenin-style dictatorship whenever it is deemed expedient to beat the White
boobs into their styes. (What may be the worst of these. Executive Order
12l48, issued by Jimmy "thejctk" Carter on 20 July 1979, is reproduced
in Rill, with apposite commentary, in a special twelve-page supplement to
the Spotlight xh-ax was distributed widi the issue dated 25 May 1992).
The apparently documented attribution of an Executive Order for
fiat currency to Kennedy was so plausible that many intelligent
Americans, ignoring the more obvious motive for the highly successftil
assassination that 1 have mentioned above, leaped to the conclusiori that
Kennedy had been assassinated to prevent the issuance o f currency on
which the country would not have to pay usury to the Federal Reserve.
A n d the supposed purport of Executive Order 11110 is mentioned in the
campaign speeches of the American candidate for the Presidency, Colonel
James "Bo" G r i a , who, although you would never know it fi-om the
Jcwspapers and boob tubes, is on the ballot in some twenty states as the
candidate of a Populist Party and could receive 'write-in' votes in all but
seven of the remaining stares. In his speeches he elaborates on what he
said in Called to Serve, that Kennedy "prepared his own death warrant"
because, inter alia, "he actually minted [!] non-debt money."
8. The quotation comes from p. 512. In my review of Colonel Gritz's
Called to Serve in Libery Bell, May 1992, I noted that his book contains
a perceptive critique of the official lies about the assassinations of both
Kennedys and what appeared to be an attempt to assassinate Reagan.
This section (pp. 512-553) is well worth reading, and you will find it
worthwhile to take a magnifying glass and read the document? photo
graphed on the seventh, ninth, and eleventh unnumbered pages that
follow p. 554, I wish Colonel Gritz could have had the benefit of Dr.
Crenshaw's book, but he leaves no doubt but that the evidence for con
spiratorial dirty work in all those incidents is overwhelming and incon
trovertible. (There is a slight discrepancy between what is said about
the position of Oswald at the time of the assassination on p. 525 and
the statement on p. 531, resulting from an unresolved conflict i n evi
dence.) M y i-eview warns you to discount the author's naiVe acceptance
Liberty Bell I October 1992 — 21


Unfortunately, the plausible report is a hoax. The person vs'ho
contrived it was ingenious. H e gave the numbers of [executive Orders
chst did deaJ with currency, and he provided the seemingly precise
figure of $4,292,893,815,00 as the amount o f greenhacb'autliorized
by Kennedy.^ •
Executive Order 10289, is.sucd by Sheeny Truman, 17 September
1951, consists o f three long sections, called "paragraphs," each
containing a number of "subparagraphs." All authori/.c the Secretary of
the Treasury to perform specified functions without further
authorization from the President, Paragraph 1, which has eight
subparagraphs, (a) to (h), deals exclusively with the collection o f
customs duties, port duties, American yachts, and hospital ships.
Paragraph 2 has three subparagraphs pertaining to currency: (c)
authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury "to issue rules- and regulations
(with respect to silver bullion) tiecessary or proper to carr)' out the
of Judaeo-Communist propaganda about the loveliness of "democracy,"
the horrors of "Fascism," and the Satanic work of "Hitler's mad dogs,"
which gravely becloud his inferences; in addition, he, like Dr.
Crenshaw, has a sentimentally uncritical admiration of Kennedy, But
when he discusses the mechanics of the assassinations, he speaks as
an expert. He has used all the weapons employed in such work; he has
himself killed many men and observed the killing of many others. He
knows, better than any phy-sician, how men react to the bullets that
b'll them, and he knows how to organize covert operations and am
bushes. I am sure that i f Colonel Gritz and his Green Berets had dis
posed of Kennedy, they would have done a perfect job and left nothing
for Earl Warren to cover up. His scenario of the assassination of Jacka
napes is more complex than my summary account, which, using
Occam's razor, I reduced to the bare essentials, and incorporates much
cogent evidence that I did not mention. — I wish we could hope that
Colonel Gritz, a true American and a national hero, would win a num
ber of Electoral votes i n November. Needless to say, i f there were any
chance whatsoever of his attaining the Presidency, we would have al
ready had another "puzzling" assassination, covered up in what has
become the Occupation Government's habitual way.
9. In what follows, I am deeply indebted to Dr. Walter P. Claussen,
who generously undertook research i n libraries in which I no longer
have the stamina to work, and who had the patience to look through the
enormous and numerous volumes, consisting principally of congealed
hogwash, of the Federal Register and its derivatives to find the text of
the Executive Orders and of Congressional legislation relative to them.
22 — Liberty Bell I October 1992
purposes" of §1805 of the Internal Rcvnue Code, (d) authorizes him
"to issue regulations prescribing the conditions under which gold may
be acquired and held, transported, melted or treated, imported,
exported, or earmarked for certain purposes." (f) authorizes h i m "to
investigate, regulate, or prohibit, by means of licenses or otherwise, the
acquisition, Importation, exportation, or transportation of silver and o f
contracts or other arrangements made with respect thereto, and to
require the filing of reports in connection therewith."
T o give 3'-ou an example o f the incoherence o f many Executive
Orders, I remark that (e), sandwiched between (d) and (f), denls with
the anchorage and movement of vessels In American ports
This order was first amended to affect currency by Kennedy's
Order 11110, 4 June 1963, of which §1 added to the first paragraph
of 10289 (which had nothing to do with currency) a subparagraph (j)
which authorized the Secretary of the Treasury "to issue silver
certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars In
the Treasury not then held for redemption o f any outstanding silver
certificates, to prescribe the denomination of such silver certificates,
and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for
their redemption.
Not a word about greenbacks'!'^
Kennedy's executive order is to be understood In connection with
the Public Law 88-36 o f the same date, 4 June 1963, found on p. 66
of the Congressional Record and expounded at some length on pp.
678-686. Silver certificates for $5.00 and $10.00 had already been
replaced by Federal Reserve notes, but certificates for $1.00 and $2.00,
redeemable In real money, remained In circulation. The net effect o f
the Act of 4 June 1963 was to provide for the gradual'replacement o f
all silver certificates with notes of the Fedetal Reserve—a replacement
which, It was said, would not devalue the.dollar or be Inflationary
10. §2 revoked subparagraphs (b) and (c) of Paragraph 2 of 1028J.
11. And so, needless to say, it was not revoked by Johnson after the
assassination made him President. Kennedy's last Executive Order
11127, 9 November 1963, concerned a strike on the Flori,da East Coast
Railway. Johnson's first orders were 11128, giving Federal employees a
holiday on Monday, 25 November; 11129, extolling Kennedy and re
naming the Atlantic Missile Range i n his honor; and 11130, appointing
the WaiTen Commission,
Liberty Bell I October 1992 — 23


because the Federal Reserves notes were chcorerically backed by
suppositious reserve o f ' 2 5 % gold (which no lowly American could
obtain)-and actually based on die Federal debt, i.e., bonds on which
the taxpayers pay interest to the Federal Reserve! This law, however,
still permitted the boobs to have bits of real money, half-dollars,
quarters, and dimes o f alloyed silver.
(At this point we must bear in mind a fundamental distinction.
Real money, silver coins and certificates that .such coins are on deposit
in the 'i'rcasury, naturally create no public debt. The international
bankers who own the Federal Reserve operate their swindle by printing
Fedctal Reser\'e notes and using them to obtain interest-bearing
g o v e r n m e n t bonds,- and the interest is then p a i d by more
interest-bearing bonds, so that the interest is really compounded each
year. A n d no matter how grievously the taxpaying animals are afflicted,
the inevitable result of the swindle mu.st eventually be bankruptcy o f
the Federal governmment and domestic chaos.)
Now Kennedy's Executive Order 11110, by authorizing the
Secrctar)' of the Treasury to continue i.ssuing silver certificates and
minting silver coins, including silver dollars, could be construed as
countering the Act of Congress of the same date, for, on its face, it
certainly docs not; conform to the policy of gradually taking silver
certificates and silver dollars from the boobs. If that was his purpose, it
was certainly commendable. But we mast note that the actual issuance
of real money was left to the discretion of the Sectetary of the
Treasury, a. Jew who called himself Dillon, and one cannot be certain,
of the intended effect of the order without a detailed knowledge of the
secret tensions and intrigues within the Administration.
The final despoilment o f the boobs was effected by Johnson on 22
July 1965 with the Coinage Act, Public Law 89-91 (pp. 270-275,
2299-2313), which, coated with a lot of persiflage about a need to
"conserve" silver, instructed' the Treasuiy gradually to replace the bits
of real, money still in the hands of the boobs with counterfeits made of
copper and nickel.
That did' it. That enablfed: the: Den- of Thieves in the Capitol to
steal ad libitum from every American who owned bonds, had' a.
pension or insurance, or any equity payable in, dbllars, while
squandering the revenue they extorted from taxpayers to drive the
2i — Liberty Bell I October 1992
country into banruptcy so that the consortium o f international
bankers, Jews and their White stooges, could multiply their
worthless 'greenbacks' while collecting usury for them. The
American boobs were at last launched on the last stage of their
toboggan slide into the ecological niche prepared for them, where
taxpaying animals will be raised in pens, likq their intellectual peers,
thoroughly domesticated cows.
Such are the facts about the fiction that credited Jackanapes
with the issuance of usury-free 'greenbacks.' The contriver of the
hoax was, as I have said, clever. I do not k n o w his motive. H e
may have been one of the fairly numerous "right-wingers" who
think that such hoaxes will enable them to attract a following
and become "leaders," or who imagine that a clever hoax will
call the boobs' attention to some crucial fact, such as the Federal
Reserve's great swindle.^^ They do not perceive—or perhaps do
not care—what damage they do to the cause they presumably
wish to further.
APPENDIX
The political situation in November 1963 may be summarized as
follows. Kennedy would probably demand to be renominated by his
"Democratic" Party, but would jettison Johnson, whom he disliked
12. There will be an intermediate stage i n which each animal Vflll be
given a computer card, such as is now being tried out and perfected in
Southest Asia and elsewhere, whTch will record their serial numbers,
their vital statistics, and the credit they are each week allowed for
work, from which will be deducted the 'cost' of the trinkets they will be
allowed to Tsuy.' When it is discovered that the cards oan be lost, the
data will be imprinted on their skulls with radioactive particles, which
will have the same function as the 'chips' in your computer.
13. One of the most audacious hoaxes was devised when the tilthy
mongrel called Eisenhower was President. The hoaxer printed letter
heads of a Mamie Stover Foundation, headed by the Communist l i ' k e
on the Supreme Court, Felix Frankfurter, and sent out on that letter
head form letters that solicited contributions to establish a memorial
for the mulatta who was Eisenhower's mother. The hoaxer thought
that a good way to call public attention to the fact that "dear old Ike"
was part nigger (as well as part Jew). Although he covered his track so
well that the F.B.I, could find no valid evidence against him, he very
seriously embarrassed the publisher with whom he was then associated.
Liberty Bell I October 1992 — 25


and perhaps hated/ and replace h i m w i t h a less despicable candidate.
In any event, it was most unlikely that Kennedy would be reelected In
1964.
Kennedy had been elected In I960 by a very narrow margin (less
then two-tenths of one percent o f the popular vote) over Richard
Nixon, and had owed chat election to his wit, youthful appearance,
and visage that many women thought handsome. H e may have owed
that narrow margin specifically to Nixon's blunder in engaging in
debates with h i m over television. Kennedy's cosmeticians made him
seem more youthful than he was, and his ready wit enabled h i m to give
immediate replies, often sophistry or mere verbiage, but he had the
advantage that even persons who perceived something wrong with his
answer did not have time to think about it before they had to watch
and listen to what followed. N o one ever thought N i x o n handsome,
but his cosmeticians made him seem older than he really was, and the
producers of the show manipulated the lighting to his disadvantage.
H e was a man who does not think quickly and who considers every
statement before he utters It, so that he appeared hesitant and
embarrassed."^
Kennedy In office quickly lost much of his narrow margin of
populariry. For one thing, he was of Irish ancestry, the first president
since Herbert Hoover who was not sanctified by a large admixture of
Another hoax involved quotations from a book supposedly written by a
Jew, but of which no trace could be found. W h e n the hoaxer was con
fi-onted w i t h this fact, he defended h i m s e l f by pleading that " A n y stick
is good enough to beat a Jew." H e evidently could not understand that
a stick that breaks i n one's h a n d is not only useless, but dangerous
and likely to wound the h a n d that wields it. To the extent that he was
believed by persons on our side, he had done—unintentionally I hope—•
the work of an agent provocateur.
1. The antagonism between the two m e n was so notorious that some
months after the assassination a wag on the staff of one of the small
'off-beat' newspapers that "intellectuals" enjoy, devised an obscenely l u 
dicrous account of the way i n which Johnson, whose sexual proclivities
were well known, abused Kennedy's corpse when it was on the air
plane en route to Washington.
2. A t the request of some stalwart Republicans, I witnessed on televi
sion a debate between Kennedy and Nixon. When the show was over, I
told my hosts, "Gentlemen, you have just lost an election."
26 — Liberty Bell I October 1992
Jewish ichor in his veins, and consequently the jewspapers were not
zealous in protecting his reputation. H i s betrayal o f the and-Castro
Cubans was not outweighed by an obviously phoney 'confrontation'
with the Soviets.^ H i s cheap grandstand ploy when he visited Berlin
and made the patently absurd statement, "Ich bin ein Berliner,"
seemed contemptible to many. His shipment of American troops to
Vietnam in preparation for another fake "war," such as the one In
Korea i n which so many American lives had been wasted to disgrace
the United States, alarmed even persons who had no conception of the
Judaeo-Communisr conspiratorial drive for "One W o r l d , " and he was
considered responsible for the assassination of the Americans'
supposed ally, N g o D i n h D i e m , which was so badly managed that It
quickly became apparent that It was the work o f "our" C.I.A. There
was great sympathy for the widow, Madame N h u , a very attractive and
highly intelligent Oriental woman, during the twerity days chat elapsed
between the C I . A . ' s murder o f her husband and its deletion o f
Jackanapes Kennedy In Dallas.
Kennedy's boyish charm was evanescent. H e , like all of his clan,
was wealthy, but the wealth has been acquired by his father, a parvenu
enriched by financing bootleggers during the Prohibition Era, and his
superfically civilized manners often wore thin and revealed a
"low-brow, shanty-Irish politician from Boston." His notorious
3. K h r u s h e v obligingly h a d a few rockets, or cardboard models of them,
loaded on a ship for Americans to photograph from the air, but i t was
soon known from reconnaissance flights over Cuba that all of the bal
listic missiles with nuclear warheads, which had a range of about 1800
miles, were still i n place and ready for action against the United
States, only ninety miles away.
4. One of the last American journalists, Westbrook Pegler, with whom
I am proud to have been associated, sent a public telegram of condo
lence to Madame N h u : "Please accept my sad apology for the murder of
your husband and your bi-other-in-law by the corrupt, Pro-Communist
government of the United States, probably directed by the Central In
telligence Agency. ... The President is an uncouth double-crosser and
his treachery to Senator M c C a r t h y was a betrayal comparable to the
kiss of Judas. We, too, are having a revolution attended by bloodshed
i n the Southern States which the Kennedys' Communist henchmen fo
mented. Loyal American generals and others in the Pentagon may yet
mount a coup and storm the White House. ... You have won many
friends in the United States whose unspoken support may hearten you
in this dark hour."
Liberty Bell I October 1992 — 27


philandering was widely di,sapproved and a tape recording of his
session i n bed with one of his numerous females was in circulation. H e
scnmed, at best, a lascivious playboy. Jacqueline Kennedy and Princess
RadziwiU were nototious leaders of what was called the "Jet Set,"
among whom "[marital] faithfulness was simply not playing the
game." Jacqueline's cruises on the yacht of the Onassis whom she later
married aroused comment, but Americans especially disapproved o f
her widely reported affaire w i t h her husband's brother, Robert
Kennedy, known as "Bobby Sox," whom the C.I.A. deleted some years
later, but not in time to save the life of the two brothers' common
playgirl, an actress known as M a r i l y n M o n r o e . T h e regime o f
"beatified adultery" was freely reported in the press and gossip
magazines under such headlines as "The Night Jackie Almost Lost Her
Husband." M a n y Americans disapproved of the "Jet Set" and their
morals. A n d , furthermore, it was reported that, despite all that
fashionable permi,ssivcne,s,s, Jack and Jackie hated each other. That
gave rise to the quip that circulated in Washington immediately after
the assassination: "Christmas has come early this year. Jacqueline
already has her present, a Jack-in-the box." A widely circulated booklet
of cartoons portrayed the Kennedy clan as avian raptores, e.g., Mrs.
Kennedy was portrayed as a chicken hawk, called the "high-flying
Jackie bird," whose cry was "Gimme! Gimme!"
The Kennedys' notorious 'lifestyle' alienated many Americans who
had no perception of political realities.
5, I use this unfortunately polysemous word i n the sense in which it is
most commonly used today, i.e., as a literary allusion to Ariosto's Or
lando furioso. The word i n its less common but etymologically correct
sense would imply that Kennedy was a homosexual, and that certainly
was not the case. According to the then prevalent gossip, he appears to
have been compulsively concupiscent, and to have been like the hero of
Choderlos de Laolos's Liaisons dangereuses, who lost interest i n a
woman soon after he seduced her, but prided himself on the number of
his seductions. It is doubtful, however, whether any of Kennedy's
bedmates needed to be seduced.
6. For a report on the tenor of life in the White House, see the article
by A . F . Canwell, "Those White House Guests," i n American Opinion,
December 1963, pp. 43-49. He distinguishes between the "Jet Set", who
were wealthy, profligate, and thoughtless, and the "Rat Pack," which
consisted of Communists (Jews and traitors), thieves, and degenerates
who hated Americans.
Kennedy's domestic policies alarmed intelligent Americans. He
sent hordes o f vicious goons, dressed as Federal Marshals, into
Louisiana and Arkansas to pollute American universities with niggers.
H e appointed his brother, Robert, Attorney General and so head of
i, . 1 the Department of Justice, a post for v/hich he had no qualifications,
I and Robert ("Bobby Sox") used his authority over J. Edgar Hoover to
I • begin to fill the F.B.I, with thugs, many with criminal records, known
as "Bobby's Boys." They were detested by the older agents, who had
some pride and belief in the integrity of the F.B.I. If you asked a
veteran agent with whom you were acquainted about "Bobby's Boys,"
he usually made a grimace of pain and disgust and replied, "Well, I'll
be able to retire in another two (or three or four) years."
Kennedy's foreign policy, based on a supposed "cold war" with the
Soviets, always resulted in another Communist triumph, most
' commonly because "Foreign A i d " (and the C.I.A.) had been used to
I overthrow civilized or semi-civilized governments and replace them
j with barbarous outposts of the Soviets' ever more formidable military
machine. Americans capable of distinguishing between a politician's
screen of verbiage and his acts asked the questions that were posed, the
very morning of the assassination, in the advertisement of which the
essential patt is reprinted on pages X X X f above.
(In 1983 there were a great many Americans who had not been
narcotized by the Jews' press and schools, and who remembered what
the United States had once been. Most of them have died in the
almost thirty years that have passed since the assassination, and have
been largely replaced by typical products of the tax-supported
boob-hatcheries.)
For these various reasons Kennedy had become unpopular in
i many circles before the Indignation Meetings throughout the country,
organized by patriotic Americans in Dallas, awakened bitter
\t at his stripping of our A i r Force to supply our latest and
[ best aircraft to the Communists in Yugoslavia.''
(!•'• 7. It is not impossible that these planes are still in service and are
[ being used i n the slaughter in Hertzogovina, Croatia, and Slovenia
now i n progress. Serbia is, of course, still controlled by the Commu
; nists put i n power by Tito, and it is not a coincidence that their acts
were endorsed publicly by the notorious Holohoaxer, Wiesenthal, and
i some of his fellow tribesmen.
28 — LibeHy Bell / October 1992 Liberty Bell I October 1992 — 29


I do not know whether moral or political considerations were
paramount in the mind of the senior physician at Parkland Hospital
who echoed the sentiments of many Americans when, on the morning
of the assassination, he was asked whether he would go to see Kennedy
parade through the streets o f Dallas, and replied, by a prophetic
coincidence, that he would see "that son-of-a-bitch" only i f he came to
the back door of the hospital (i.e., in an ambulance, as Kennedy was
brought that very afternoon).
In November 1963 it seemed highly unlikely that Kennedy could
devise anything to regain the popular approval he had lost, and the
"Republican" faction was anticipating an almost certain victory in
1964. W h a t was much worse, there was a rising tide of American
patriotism which had to be stopped—and was stopped by the simple
device of putting a bullet through Kennedy s skull.
ADDENDUM
Since the foregoing was written, the issue of the Journal of the
American Medical Association for 7 October has come to hand. The cover
reproduces a portait, drawn with mediocre skill,, of a hairy hook-nosed
man in an Oriental costume, sitting with his hands on his thighs. It is
entided "The Praying Jew," and a full page of the magazine is devoted to
a lavish encomium o f Moyshe Shagal, known as Chagall, and his
wonderful paintings, usually "crowded with colorful images that obey
neither the laws o f space nor those of time." Chagall's incoherent
parodies of art, like the daubs of his fellow Sheeny, Picasso, are
collected by wealthy suckers who are devoid of an aesthetic sense.
T h e cover is therefore appropriate for an issue in which the
Medical Association continues to certify the truth of Earl Warren's
famous hoax. The editor, D r . Chades D . Lundberg, loudly proclaims
again (pp. 1736-1738) that there is no possible doubt whatever that
the Watren Report is ultimate truth. (He admits, incidentally, that the
autopsy on the body delivered at Bethesda disclosed no evidence of the
severe and potentially fatal Addison's disease from which Kennedy was
known to have been suffering, but he offers no explanation of a fact
that is medically incredible.)
In the articles I discussed above, I noted that D r . Pierre Fink, the
only trained forensic pathologist present at the autopsy, had not been
consulted, and that precautions had been taken to discredit his
30 — LibeHy Bell / October 1992
restiinony as unreliable, should he dissent. The Medical Association
sent a D r . Dennis L . Brco to Switzerland to interview D r . Fink, who
decided to sing in the chorus and was rewarded with three large
photographs of his withered countenace and five pages of flattety (pp.
1748-1754), embodying his a.ssertion that the autopsy in Bethesda
confirmed the transcendental verity of the Warren Report, which
proved, for all eternity, that "Lee Harvey Oswald, a political fanatic
and the lone gunman" assassinated Kennedy all by his lonesome.
The disgrace of the Medical Association is somewhat alleviated by
the publication (pp. 1681-1684) of letters from six alert physicians
who refused to be bluffed by Dr. Lundberg and his chorus, and who
pointed out fallacies and inconsistencies in the official fiction. I wish I
could quote all of them, for each pointed out some damning
discrepancies in the testimony in Warren's hoax, but I dare not add
much to an article that is already excessively long. I can only heartily
congratulate D r . Wayne S. Smith o f the School for Advanced
International Studies of the Johns Hopkins University for his cogent
letter, which begins by remarking, apropos of the articles in the earlier
issue of the Medical Association's Journal, "I do not recall ever having
seen so many erroneous statements in so few pages." H e concludes his
able critique with a fact that is conclusive in itself
The articles note that panels of experts, basing their analysis
on the autopsy photographs and roentgenograms, have
consistently upheld the Warren Report. Yes, but the two naval
medical technicians who took those roentgenograms and photos
have now revealed (in a press conference on May 29) that the
photos and roentgenograms sent to the Warren Commission and
examined by all subsequent panels were not the ones they took.
They are fakes! So much for the conclusions of the panels of
experts and the irrefutable nature of the evidence.
A n d so much for frantic effotts to repair a thoroughly demolished
imposture on the public! The British expert. D r . Cyril Wecht, who
made a thorough study of the the Warren Report, concluded that
libraries should put the twenty-six volumes in the fiction section of
their stacks, alongside Huckleberry Finn Gulliver's Travels. I suggest
that the poisonous trash should be shelved with "Hitler's Diaries" and
the "Diary of Anne Frank." •
Liberty Bell I October 1992 — 31


FOR MY LEGIONARIES. Th« L*-j:on,ir/ Mov.n.ont in Romn
n n corninor'> known a j tl,e Iro" C.ij;irtJ, - porlLips the oldp.-t r.nti
Corpmurtiet movement in the world, still afiya—wa& loanded by
rkirnmiu O.xiroJ.nu in 1 ° , ' - f oi My Loy<onJnos iJ'J3 pp , pn
?o "0 4 J,1 "bO for (w-jtago A hDndlinfi). Codrnanu't stsir.ng wotk, is a
complete and Authoritative account of the ideals ^nd principles of
the Legfonary Movement wtiich shaped the character of young Ro
mart!an$ before WWII. Control ov^r the c;omrtunlc$tton$ m^dia and
the normal channels of book distribution by our Internatfonal ene
mies maK^e it impo$sibl0 to reach the broad market thi$ grtiqu^
book deserves. We are certain that For My Legionaries wilt soon
bfioomo a coll^tof$ itom. JU$ took af$o prwid^fe the 'ml$$bg :
pieces' of the drastically censored The Suhide vf Butofm by Prince i
M, Sturd?a; the ideritity of those who masterminded Borpania's.take
over and Wtio are noW ertfiaged trt partying out th$ same program in
tho U^$. Witt no longor be \Jnkrtown to youv fSofehenitsyn woyfcf ^ - i
p$ar to have not slightest inklir^ ot who conqiwr^ His countiyr'-- i
e.G.) FOfi W IBGtOmmS, Ofder #Q6003, shgle copy $1Q.OO, 3
cop,f.& $25 .-^0, 5 copies $35 00
THE ANTI-HUMby D. Bacu (307 pp., hb. $7.00 + $1.50
for postage & handling) describes what V/as done to the young men
whorn Corneilu 2. Opdreanu, the founder of the Ugbnary Move
ment in ftemanlai inspired, Wh^n seVen years after his bfljtai mUr* :
der, Romania was delivered to the Bolsheviks, They were subjected i
to what is tho most fully dooumontod "Pavtoviart ^xpertmeAf on a \
large number oi human bangs, it fs likely that the same techniques :
ware i^od on many Amerioan prisonar* in Koroa and Vietnam, f/ja ;
Anti-Humans is a well-written document of great historical and psy- \
ohological importano<fr, fl$adin^ it wilt ba ar> amotional exportenca
you will not forget. sequel to Orwell's f S a 4 " ~ R , S , H . searing
expos6 of Red bestialityP — O r . A J . App). ANTI-HUKfANS,
Order #01013, Single copy $7.00» 3 for $15.00, 5 for $20.00,
Por po$f90e and handftng add; On domestic orders, $i>50 fori
orders under $10.00, 15% of order total for orders over $10.00. On
orc{$r$ from abroad, $2.00 or 20% fospootivaty. Sample oopy of our i
monthly magazine Uberty Bell and copy of our huge book list con
taining hundreds of "eye-Openers;" $5.00, Subscription for 12 hard-;
hitting, fact-packed issues $35.00 (U.S. only)+ Order from:
LIBERTY BELL PUBLICATIONS
Box 21, Reedy WV 25270 USA
32 — Liberty Bell I October 1992
HERETICAL VERITIES:
Mathematical Themes in Physical Description
reviewed by
Professor Ben Kriegh
T h e readers o f Liberty Bell are w e l l aware o f "establishment"
orthodoxy i n s u c h fields as history, sociology, economics, etc. B u t ,
they may be surprised to learn that there is a similar "establishment"
orthodoxy (perhaps it should be called "politically correct thinking")
in the hard sciences, particularly in Physics and to some extent in'
M a t h e m a t i c s . T h e ogre b e h i n d this o r t h o d o x y i n physics is the
so-called theory of relativity.
T h e point is dramatically illustrated i n a remarkable book by
T h o m a s E . P h i p p s , Jr., HERETICAL VERITIES: Mathematical Themes
in Physical Description, (Classic N d n f i c t i o n L i b r a r y , B o x 926, U r b a n a ,
Illinois 61801). M r Phipps studied nuclear physics at Harvard, a n d
w o r k e d i n various research groups in^ the N a v y D e p a r t m e n t , the
Pentagon, a n d Department o f Defense. In his book o f some 630 pages
of text, much of which requires of the reader a^substantial background
in physics and mathematics, he undertakes the rather startling task, o f
examining in detail some of the logical and practical difficulties
inherent in Einstein's special theory of relativity and then shows how
those difficulties might be overcome by laying the groundwork for
what he calls a "true theory of relativity."
In M r . P h i p p s ' words, " T h e purpose o f thls>book is ... to develop
alternative physics leading to confrontations w i t h existing theory,
resolvable by experiment." I n particular he is referring to Einstein's
special theory of relativity which he terms "the holiest of holies." In
addition, he Introduces a profound modification of the equations
w h i c h are at the foundation of electromagnetic theory (Maxwell's
equations), a n d suggests some n e w Ideas In the field o f mathematics,
while chastising both physicists and mathematicians for their failure to
teject theories w h i c h lead' to illogical Impasses and seek logically sound
alternatives.
M r . Phipps writes, "Increasingly, physics has come to depend' on:
mathematics. T h e mathematlzation- o f physics has gone ridiculously
Liberty Bell I October 1992 — 33


coo far. The subject has been taken over by unfrocked mathematicians
as their 'private property'. Traditionally, the fresh breeze of amateur
criticism is required ro expose big mistakes (the failure of theory to
conform to observation). Mathematically honed experts, though
bounteously provided with imagination, seem to have what in music is
called a 'tin ear' for physical description. Innovative physics is a calling,
not a profession. It requires a special ralent—call it intuition—not
among constitutionally guaranteed rights of the citizen. Nevertheless,
people who lack this talent fill the literature with wonderful
imaginings-—their mathematical hobby horses clattering and neighing off
key and out of tune, stampeding after each fad, producing such a
thunderous cacophony that any real 'signal' present is sure to be drowned
out and the signaler trampled beyond archaeological excavation."
W h i l e M r . Phipps' work is too significant to be dismissed lighdy
by the theoretical physicist, even the nontechnical reader can grasp its
significance with the aid of a little preliminary groundwork. To
prepare the way, we need to review briefly,the classic motivation for
the theoretical physicist, a task which M r . Phipps includes in the
beginning sections of his book.
The goal of the theoretical physicist is to find mathematical
equations which describe natural events as accurately as possible and
substantiated by experimental observation. For example, Sir Isaac
Newton found that the equation F = kmM/r"^ describes the
gravitational force of attraction between two masses, m and M , at a
distance r from each other, where k is a consrant determined by
experiment. 5uch a formula is said to describe a physical law.
However, the physicist seeks more than the mere expression of a
physical law as a mathematical formula. His description of a physical
law should be as "universal" as possible. That is, if the law is properly
described, the description (formula) should be independent of the
reference frame; i.e., it should be the same for someone on a rotating
earth as it is for an astronaut in a spaceship or for someone on the
nloon. W h e n a formula reflects this property, it is said to be invariant
under a transformation, from one reference frame to another. O n the
other hand, i f a formula transforms in such a way that each of its terms
is altered in the same way, the formula is said to be covariant These
34 — Liberty Bell I October 1992
two concept.')' play an' important role in M r . Phipps' demonstration of
inadequacies in Einstein's theory of'relativity and in the development
of his own new approach to relativity.
There are several types of reference frames, For example, one
frame might be related to another by a translation, that is, a change
from one reference, poin't?, or origin,, to another reference point. O r ,
one frame might be speeding away from another (where the observer is
located) with a constant velocity; or it may be accelerating or rotating
relative to the observer's reference frame.
Sometimes, the formulation of a physical law is invariant under a
transformation from the observer's reference frame to another which is
moving with a constant velocity relative to the observer, but is not
invariant under a transformation to an accelerating frame (it might be
covariant, for example, or neither invariant nor covariant). W h e n this
occurs the physicist should feel that the expression of the natural law is
inadequate and seek a new f o r m u l a t i o n that w i l l be more
comprehensive, that is, that will remain invariant under a wider class
or group of transformations.
When'Einstein put forth his special theory of relativity in 1905, It
appeared to explain certain physical phenomena that Newtonian
mechanics could not explain, e.g., the advance of the perihelion of
Mercury, For that reason, relativity rapidly became accepted, after
several years, as a great advance in physics, even though it created
logical paradoxes. Furthermore, it abandoned the classical physics
concept of seeking descriptions of physical laws that were invariant
under transformations, with the contention that since all physical
relations wete relative the best that could be hoped for was that
physical laws could only transform covariantly.
In his Introdtiction, M r . Phipps demonstrates "the central role the
invariants play in the physical description." It is therefore of primary
importance to correcdy identify the invariants of kinematics, for
example. Because of the overwhelming importance Einstein's theory
gives to covariance, it might appear that thete are no invariants i n
relativity. But, as M r . Phipps shows, both "proper time" intervals and
"proper space" intervals are invariant in the special theory. W h y , then,
docs the relativist not seek invariant formulation of the laws of nature?
Liberty Bell I October 1992 — 85


M r . Phipps' answer is that "manifestly .invariant formulation o f
physical laws has never so much as crossed the mind of the special
relativist ... all relativists have chosen the path, of covariance. ... The
reason (is that they) have incorrectly identified the invariants o f
kinematics. Having chosen the wrong invariants, the relativists need a
compensatory mistake at the methodological level—and this is
provided by the ideology of covariance." As M r . Phipps shows, "proper
time" intervals and "proper space" intervals are not suitable invariants
on which to base kinematics. Instead, M r , Phipps' development of
kinematics is based on the invariance under arbitrary changes o f state
of relative motion of object length and particle proper time:
While some physicists questioned the validity of the assumptions
of relativity because o f the paradoxes which arose, they seemed to be
overwhelrned, by the mathematical theoretical physicists who often
tried to explain away paradoxes with arguments which often ignored
the details of logic or which led.to more obscure paradoxical situations.
In order to understand M r . Phipps's criticism of relativity and his
proposed remedy, we need to understand the principles which provide
the basis for:his ideas. T o begin, he realizes that there is often a
vagueness or confusion arising from poorly stated concepts or
definitions and that some problems in an existing theory originate in
semantics.. Accordingly, he is meticulous with definitions of such terms
as inertial system, covariance, invariance, field, etc. Then, as suggested
by the foregoing discussion, he has stated his guiding principles. They
are: •
(1) SUCCESSIVE APPROXIMATIONS. Theoretical physical
science is the mathematical description of nature which is never final
or exact but is a progressive process typically achieved through a
succession of ever more finely honed approximations.
, (2) FORM INVARIANCE. The aim of fundamental physics is the
discovery.of ^mathematical relationships that rigorously preserve their
forms under an ever wider class of reinterpretations of the physical
meanings of their symbols.
(3) COVERING THEORY. A theory is sought to Insure the
adequacy of parametrization (the variables in terms of which the
fundamental equations are stated). Whenever difficulties arise in
36 — Liberty Bell / October 1992
applying the form invariance principle, one should suspect the
inadequacy o f the parametrization and examine the operational
procedures by w h i c h the symbols o f the theory are defined and then
determine, consistent w i t h the form invariance principle, a suitable
"covering theoiy" that yields all the results of the uiLsatisfactory theor>'
from w h i c h one starts and w h i c h also yields additional results subject
to observational resting.
W i t h these principles in mind we shall .see how he applies them in
tackling some of the problems of the theoiy of relativity.
To illustrate the type of difficulties which the special theory of
relativity encounters, M r . Phipps cites the Ehrenfest Paradox. One of
the results predicted by relativity is the so-called Lorentz contraction of
a rigid rod or measuring stick moving in the direction of its length.
When informed of this consequence of the theory, Paul Ehrenfest, a
German physicist, posed a quastion (Phys. Zeits. 10, 918 (1909)).
Consider a citcular disc rotating about an axis perpendicular to the
disc through its centet. Each small segment of the rim of the disc
constitutes an idealized rigid rod which should undergo a Lorentz
contraction when set in motion. Therefore, what happens to the disc?
Does the rim contract?
So fragile is the theory of relativity that, accotding to M r . Phipps,
at least six different "explanations" of the paradox have been offered by
the physicists. Some said the disc buckles'into the third dimension.
Others said the geometry of the disk becomes non-Euclidian, i.e., its
flat space becomes curved. (But how can a curvature of space arise in a
flat space?) Still others said it cannot contract. In fact, this contention
indicates that the Lorentz contraction is not as universal as claimed.
M r . Phipps says, "The Ehrenfest paradox suggests that since the
Lorentz contracrion of extended structures cannot occur universally, it
may not occur at all." Indeed, this is one point which leads M r . Phipps
into a reevaluation of premises upon which relativity theory is based.
This illustration is but one o f several which M r . Phipps discusses
in illustrating his contention that paradoxes or logical inconsistencies
arising from relativity theory are usually explained away by
"explanations" that give rise to other paradoxes. H e asks, "Should not
any theory that lives by logic be allowed to die by it?" H e continues
Liberty Bell I October 1992 — 37


with the observation that "The type of mind to which contemporary
relativity appeals is characterized as 'ancient Greek/ a type well
represented among us today, particularly in academia. T h e ancient
Greeks were giants; they could readily have stood on each others
shoulders had they had a clear inkling o f the humbling idea o f
'progress/ But they believed i n the stroke of genius, the leap to 'truth'
with minimal need to crib from observation. They had plenty o f time
to make it work i f it were going to work. It didn't for them and it
won't for us."
A second illustration o f the problems which arise within the scope
of Einstein's theory of relativity concerns Maxwell's equations which
are the foundation o f electromagnetic theory. In M r . Phlpps' words,
"they are considered sacrosanct because they are an elegandy compact
mathematical summation of everything about electromagnetism that
had been observed In the laboratory during the previous half
century..." (The equations led to the discovery o f electromagnetic
waves.) Unfortunately, two o f the four equations proved to be
noninvariant under a Galilean transformation, a troublesome fact for
the relativists because this meant that the equations were valid only in
a "preferred" absolute reference frame.
According to Phlpps, only one physicist, Heinrich Hertz
(German) realized that If Maxwell's equations were not Invariant
under a Galilean transformation, and If a relativity of some type was an
experimental fact, then Maxwell's equations were in conflict with
experimental fact and needed to be changed. Hertz then discovered the
modifications needed to make Maxwell's equations Invariant under a
Galilean transformation and published his own version of Maxwell's
theory. In fact. It was Hertz who saw that Maxwell's equations implied
the existence of a wave equation, hence the physical existence of
electromagnetic waves, and confirmed this prediction in the
laboratory. It is one of the sad stories of science that Hertz's discovery
of electromagnetic waves elevated Maxwell's equations to a position of
deification in the minds o f other physicists who chose to Ignore
Hertz's own Improvements on them.
The correction to Maxwell's equations discovered by Hertz was
really a simple matter of reparametrizing the equations, I.e., changing
38 — Liberty Bell / October 1992 ~
one of the variables, a process M r . Phipps shows in detail. He further
illustrates the strange logic o f the "establishment" physicists by noting,
"When Maxwell's equations made definite numerical predictions that
were experimentally disconfirmed, the interpretation that led to this
result was discarded and the equations preserved. W h e n Hertz made
definite numerical predictions that were experimentally disconfirmed,
nobody thought of preserving his equations and discarding his (ether
based) interpretation that led to this result." Yet, Hertz's equations are
far more significant than Maxwell's because they provide a "covering"
theory that Includes the valid results of Maxwell's theory while
extending that theory to include invariance under Galilean
transformations.
These examples are but two of several which M r . Phipps discusses
in detail. H e writes, "...the terrible cost to physics that relativity's
narrow channelization of the human Imagination has exacted in terms
of lost gains and missed oppottunitles for alternative development" is
like "the dominance of a single species that kills off all others..." H e
continues, "Newton's third law the equality of action and reaction
throughout the universe Is one of the grandest conceptions of the
human mind... It can be said that no physicist has ever gone into a
laboratory and failed to confirm Newton's third law. That is, there
exists not a shred of evidence against it." Yet, "The third law has long
since been junked by theorists, ... because the failure of Maxwell's
equations ... to exhibit Galilean invariance, and related peculiarities o f
the Lorentz force law. Introduced into physics velocity-dependent and
delayed-acting forces, which caused action-reaction force vectors to
become theoretically nonparallel, thereby 'disproving' Newton's third
law. ... From start to finish, nobody contemplated the alternative that
Newton's third law and empiricism are still and eternally right, and
that the disability of Maxwell's equations In respect to first order
Galilean Invariance, the shrinkage of the mechanical invariance group
ushered i n by special relatlvit)', etc., are all parts of one grand unified
package properly labeled D E F I C I E N T T H E O R Y . "
M r . Phipps' discussion "has emphasized the sabotage of physics
wrought by space-time symmetry and the Lorentz transformation, ...
they have destroyed freedom o f concept ... In respect to distant
Liberty Bell / October 1992 — 39


simultaneity. ... In short, relativity has swept through physics like a
forest fire, leaving only blackened stumps of concepts. By cutting off
physics from its past, it has left it without a future. ... Can physics, as
a social enterprise, ever recover from the holocaust of 1905?"
Up to this point, we have considered some of the problems
inherenr in Einstein's theory of relativity. Mr. Phipps does not intend
to "suggest that there are no valid consequences of the theory. Instead,
he is suggesting that the theory is not well founded on observational
concepts. Furthermore, he is not content with merely pointing out
flaws in the theory; he offers a viable alternative which we shall now
examine briefly.
In accordance with his stated guiding principles, M r . Phipps
suspects that the paradoxes of relativity and the failure of Maxwell's
equations to be invariant under Galilean transformations indicates
deficiencies in the foundational concepts of the theory. He therefore
goes back to examine the principles on which relativity if founded,
with the intention of investigating their logical consistency, uniqueness
(are there other possible alternatives?) and the parametrization of its
equations. The consequences of his investigation are truly surprising.
In order to convey the significance of his ideas, we shall have to
use a litde mathematical symbolism, primarily to provide a basis for a
"visual" comparison of his ideas with those of relativity theory. In Mr.
Phipps' words, "Let us review the situation with respect to Einstein's
theory. Because of the overweening significance it accords to
covariance, one might suppose that theory contains no invariants. Not
so. Both timelike ("proper time" interval), dT, and spacelike ("proper
space" interval, dS, invariants are present in the special theory. Given
this information the attentive reader ... will ask at once why the
relativist does not seek invariant formulations of the laws of nature,
i.e., expressions having the functional form F(dT,dS) = 0 ."
The mathematical expression for the Einsteinian invariants are, for
the "proper time" interval
(dT)^ = (dt)2 - {(dx)2 + {dyf + (dz)2}/c2
and for the "proper space" interval,
(dS)^ = (dx)^ + (dy)^ + (dz)^ - c^(dt)^.
40 — Liberty Bell / October 1992
(The quantities appearing in these equations designate "infinitesimal
differences" or differentials between the space time coordinates of two
points on the worldline (trajectory) of a single particle.)
Mr. Phipps proceeds with the observation that "The central
problem of kinematics overlooked by Einstein and his followers is how
to transfer the metric standard ... from S (a Galilean inertial system) to
S' (a Galilean inertial system in motion relative to S) while
maintaining its integrity as a metric standard. ... He (Einstein) missed
a tempo through deriving coordinate transformation equations before
specifying a means of calibtating coordinate axes in relative motion. ...
The resulting motion group omitted the acceleration essential for
intersystem transfer of material metric standards ... an omission fatal to
both logic and physics."
(As far as I can ascertain, Mr. Phipps gives the first kinematic
definition of "inertial system" as "any material collective all constituent
parts of which share the same state of motion and in undergoing any
changes of state do so at equal proper times." For example, a train
speeding down a straight track would represent an "inertial system,"
but a rotating disc would not. He then defines a Galilean inertial
system as "any closed (inertial) system in which Newton's mechanical
equations are valid to first order in all velocity dimensional
parameters." These concepts have an important bearing on the
consequences of Mr. Phipps' version of relativity.)
Mr. Phipps continues with an extensive argument to show that
observational evidence supports the physical invariance of dT but not
dS. His analysis leads to the conclusion that object length must be an
invariant under arbitrary changes of state of relative motion. This
surprising result is a significant departure from Einsteinian relativity
which predicts the contraction of length in the direction of motion.
He says, "The choice of objects rather than events as the basic
descriptive elements of kinematics is no accidental feature, but will
turn out to be perhaps our most profound departure from the Einstein I
world formulation." It is significant that in Phipps' system, the
Ehrenfest paradox disappears.
Thus, as a result of his deliberations, Mr. Phipps postulates, "the
invariants of kinematics for arbitrary physically permissible relative
Liberty Bell I October 1992 — 41


motions are object length and particle proper time." The mathematical
expressions are, for object length,
{cLf = {ckf + {dyf + {dL)\
and for particle proper time,
(dT)^ = {Ckf - {{Ckf + {Cfyf + {dLfVc"- _
where <^ denotes the differential o f a quantity delimited by points
lying on two separate particle trajectories. Note that care must be
taken to distinguish between "the length of an object" and "the dis
tance between events." For example, one of M r . Phipps' theorems is
"The length or distance o f separation between two events is invariant
under inertial transformations i f and only i f the events are simulta
neous."
Relative simultaneity is an important part of Einsteinian
relativity, so naturally it comes under the scrutiny of M r . Phipps.
H e says, "Having discarded the metric half of Einstein's kinematics,
we must reappraise all his deductions" including "his most famous'
qualitative perception, the relativity of simultaneity. ... According
to this perception as quantified by the equations of the Lorentz
transformation, the synchronization o f distant clocks cannot be so
defined as to be an invariant property for all inertial observers. Such
a sweeping claim of-impotence invites refutation by
counterexample, of w h i c h only one need be given." A n d give a
counterexample he does, by what he calls the V*transport method
(which is too elaborate to be detailed here). In so doing, he gives
meaning to "distant simultaneity of events" a concept not realizable
in Einsteinian theory.
Einstein rejected all environmental effects on the propagation of
light in a vacuum, a simplistic view which leads to complexities in the
treatment of matter (notably, the Lorentz contraction). M r . Phipps
takes the opposite view, postulating simple matter (length invariance)
and complicated light (environmentally influenced). The two
theoretical approaches, he contends, submit to crucial experimental
testing which, in the final analysis, determines the viability of any
theory. As a result of this approach, M r . Phipps shows that the speed of
light is not always constant! H e calls this "the most important single
theoretical result" j n his book. (Recall that the cornerstone of
Einsteinian relativity is the assumed constancy of the speed of light.)
42 — LiheHy Bell t October 1992
One other significant consequence of M r . Phipps' theory
shotild be mentioned. Ic concerns the "twin paradox" of Einsteinian
theory. Suppose a stationaty observer on earth has a twin who
boards a spaceship and travels away from earth at nearly the speed
of light and then returns after an earth time lapse of, say, twenty
years. Einsteinian relativity predicts that because a clock going with
the "travelling twin" slows down, he will not age as fast as the "stay
at h o m e " t w i n . B u t , s i n c e r e l a t i v e m o t i o n is c o n s i d e r e d
symmetrical, the "travelling twin" might be considered stationary
while the "stay at home" twin, along with the earth and the solar
system, is travelling away at gteat speed. In that case, the "stay at
home" twin should "return" younger than his "travelling"
councetpart. So, which is it to be?
N o w it has been confirmed by various laboratoty experiments
that a group o f radioactive mesons moving in a circidar orbit at
high speed decay much more slowly than a group maintained "at
rest." That is, the stationary group decays 29 times faster than the
moving group. This phenomenon indicates that the slowing of a
clock i n motion relative to a stationary one must be an experimental
fact. (This tesult apparently has been confirmed by flying a clock in
a jet for a length of time and finding that it actually does slow
down.) Hence Einstein's prediction is confirmed. Yet the theoiy
must be deficient since it docs not explain away the symmetrical
relationship between the relatively moving systems. The deficiency
appears to be in the theory's failure to properly define "inertial
systems."
W i t h i n the context of his definition of "inertial system," and as
a consequence of his definition of "distant simultaneity" M r . Phipps
concludes that all "genuinely inertial clocks go at the same rate."
Hence, i f the "traveling" twin is in an Inertial system, his clock will
be going at the same late as that of the "stay at home" twin and
when he returns home, he will be at the same age as his "stay at
home" counterpart. But, does this conclusion contradict the
expetimental evidence? N o , because, as M r . Phipps concludes,
noninertial clocks go slower than inettlal clocks, a fact supported by
the meson experiment, and one which telatlvlsts have failed to
LiheHy Bell I October 1992 — 43


identify because they failed to distinguish between inertial and
noninertial systems. (Refer back to M r . Phipps' definition of "inertial
frame".) It turns out that a reference frame associated with a rotating
(or orbiting) object is not an inertial frame. Thus, i f the "traveling"
twin tcould journey to a distant star and return without accelaration,
his age would remain the same as that of his "stay at home" twin.
(From the practical point of view, one can orbit the earth at only a
fixed speed far less than that o f light, so we would not be able to
detect a difference in aging between astronauts and earthbounders.)
A substantial portion o f M r . Phipps' book is devoted to the
development of the mathematical consequences of his basic ideas.
There are detailed discussions o f experiments on which he relies to
support his thesis, which amounts to a new approach to the theory o f
relativity, one which is not plagued by the logical difficulties inherent
in Einsteinian relativity. Moreover, M r . Phipps' theory is a "covering
theory" of relativity in the sense that valid consequences of Einsteinian
relativity are preserved i n the new approach.
There are several chapters devoted to the development of some
original ideas i n mathematics which may prove to be useful i n
extending the theoretical results further. However, there are certain
points in his mathematical discussion which need clarification, i f
unfortunate misunderstandings are to be avoided.
It is an unfortunate fact of life that the community of physicists,
for the most part, are so taken with Einsteinian relativity that they do
not appear interested in exploring new approaches. It is clear that M r .
Phipps has encountered great difficulty In having his case heard.
Nevertheless, i n the final analysis, the test of any theory is how well it
conforms to experimental fact as well as to logic. In that sense, M r .
Phipps' theory seems far more coherent than Einstein's and, in time, I
believe M r . Phipps will be vindicated. "I love it!" •
44 — LiheHy Bell I October 1992
''The Mountain Has Fallen....''
hy Winston Smith
On August 16th, 1992, a giant departed from among
us w h e n Robert M i l e s d i e d at the age of 67, three months
to the d a y after the death of his beloved wife, Dorothy.
The gap which he has left i n our ranks will not easily be
filled.
For over forty years. Bob Miles played a leading role i n
the White resistance movement i n North America, his cour
age and vision earning h i m worldwide renown among every
friend and foe alike of Aryan man. Bob endured repeated as
sault; a life of grim poverty and unremitting hardship; six
years of false imprisonment on perjured testimony i n the
worst hellhole of America's prison system as w e l l as a dis
graceful attempt i n 1987 to imprison h i m yet again on bogus
sedition charges; decades of spying and harassment; the i m 
prisonment and murder of friends and family members; and
an avalanche of media abuse and defamation without parallel
in the annals of gutter journalism.
They never broke him. Bob Miles met and overcame
every attack, every ordeal which this evil regime inflicted on
him, and he d i d so with a calm courage, a quiet dignity, and
an irrepressible charm ai-id humor which, more than anything
else Bob d i d or said or wrote, drove the Jews and their lick
spittle lackeys i n the United States government to enraged
distraction.
Bob Miles clearly understood something which many in
our movement have lost sight of, which is that death is no big
deal. It is an inevitable fact of existence, to be accepted philo
sophically and met with dignity when the time comes. Wliat
matters is h o w one lives, what one leaves behind i n the w a y
of accumulated knowledge, experience, and moral example.
For all of us today and for comrades of the future, role mod
els don't come any stronger or more admirable than Bob
Liberty Bell I October 1992 — 45


Miles. More than any White racial nationalist patriot in con
temporary times. Bob lived his simple, powerful philosophy,
which he sometimes referred to by the Irish Gaehc name of
Sinn Fein, " O u r s e l v e s A l o n e . " T o B o b i t w a s a l l v e r y
straightforward. Aryan man is the pinnacle of God's cre
ation; we d o n ' t need a n y t h i n g w h i c h any other race or c u l 
•ture can offer us i n exchange for admixture. A l l that is nec
essary to preserve our race and ensure a future for our seed
among the stars is a simple recognition of who we are, and
the spiritual willpower to "just say n o " to every poisoned
chalice, every rotten sweetmeat of which the Jew urges us
to partake.
Bob understood the one basic principle which holds the
key to our entire struggle, yet which seems so incredibly diffi
cult for many of us to crasp; which, indeed, some of us never
succeed i n grasping. The Jews are not the problem, nor are the
blacks or the Hispanics or the politicians or the interntational
bankers or the Communists or any other grouping of our ra
cial adversaries. WE are the problem. O u r weakness, our lazi
ness, our profound moral cowardice, our craven unwilling
ness to place our physical bodies and our creature comforts at
risk, as Bob himself d i d without fear or hesitation. W h e n we
look i n a mirror, there we see our enemy. But if we look hard
enough, we can see Bob Miles standing behind us, a smile on
his face and his hand on our shoulder to guide and uplift and
strengthen us, as ever he d i d when he was with us here i n
life.
In ancient Celtic times, when a High King of Tara died,
messengers were despatched in swift chariots riding the
length and breadtli of all Ireland, from Anh-im i n the north to
Kerry in the southwest. A t each village and crossroads and
castle they came to, these couriers cried out, "The Mountain
has fallen!" O u r mountain has fallen, but his spirit lives on,
and it is strong.
46 — LibeHy Bell I October 1992
LETTERS
to the
EDITOR
RE:, Further U p d a t e on North Idaho; A
Peep Through the Keyhole of the New
World Order.
Dear Editor:
Having followed Bo Gritz's and
Jack McLamb's respective accounts
about the murderous atrocities
committed on the Weaver family, I have another report for your
readers. Bo Gritz announced that an eyewitness came forward and
gave h i m a sworn affidavit which confirmed Weaver's statement
about what h a p p e n e d . G r i t z is g o i n g to have the witness take a
polygraph exam.
The 14-year-old boy, Samuel, was shot i n the arm. The shot
spun h i m around screaming and crying i n pain as he started run
ning back toward the cabin. The Marshals then shot h i m in the
back with automatic weapons fire. The boy was hit FOUR times in
the back! H e fell dead along w i t h his dog, also shot in the back.
Only machine-gun fire could hit the boy i n the back four times be
fore he fell dead.
The next afternoon, both Weaver and Harris were wounded by
sniper fire after going out to a shed to pray over the boy's body. A s tliey
scrambled through the door of the cabin, a government sniper shot
Vicki Weaver between the eyes from 50 feet away! The Marshals have
even admitted ttiis. It was a non-white American who saw every fea
ture on her face when he pulled the trigger of a .308 sniper rifle, proba
b l y even seeing the baby i n her arms. The 10 and 16 year old girls
watched this happen. This was the giris' testimony. The shot blew
Vicki's brain out. The girls dressed their mother's body with herbs and
placed it under the kitchen table where she laid for the next 10 days.
The family didn't have enough water to cleanse her body for burial.
The new eyewitness stated that he saw Marshal Deagan shot
twice from behind and then shot in the back of the head.
Sarah, the 16 year o l d girl, gave a statement to the Spokane pa
pers. I quote her: "They'd come on real late at night and say, ' M r s .
Weaver, how's the baby, M r s . Weaver?' " A l s o , 'Good morning
Randall. H o w ' d you sleep? We're having pancakes. What are you
having?'" The Marshals did this knowing that Vicki was dead and
laying inside the cabin with the children. They even named the
military compound " C a m p V i c k i . " A l l this after the government
knew Vicki's head was b l o w n off and her body was still inside the
cabin w i t h the children. They used loudspeakers late at night to
torture them psychologically.
This means that T H E M A R S H A L S A N D G O V E R N M E N T
AGENTS DELIBERATELY TORMENTED THE CHILDREN WITH
Liberty Bell I October 1992 — 47


T H E I R DEAD MOTHER'S BODY!
Have you ever heard of such a cruel, inhumane, and disgust
ing act as this? They taunted the family whose mother laid dead
under the kitchen table, i n f u l l v i e w of the children, for 10 days
with a 10 month o l d baby girl to feed, without her mother.
If this isn't tyranny, what is? The Weaver f a m i l y has no re
course against the monsters who murdered these two innocents.
Have you seen the pictures of those thugs who pointed their ma
chine-guns at Bo Gritz's back? Beasts. H o w would you react if you
saw your mother's brains blown out?
N o w the U.S. Attorney has indicted the 10 month old baby and
the two girls for aiding and abetting murder. They have literally
charged a 10 m o n t h old baby girl w i t h murder! Is this insanity or
what? Do I detect the hand of Judah behind this insane fury of
frenzied hatred? Could this happen in America?
It is tyranny, nothing else. Absolute tyranny. What does the
Declaration of Independence and the underpinnings of the Consti
tution say about tyranny? It is our duty, and n o w i t is time.
The shot that murdered V i c k i Weaver is the opening r o u n d of
what y o u k n o w must happen. A r e you ready?
Publicus Prudentls
ea» «
Dear Landsmann;
I don't know if tlie media has been carrying the news nationwide,
so I'll mention a bit of background. Last month a white cop shot and
killed a Dominican druggie during a violent struggle. Naturally this
was used as an excuse for another riot by colored vermin. The black
racist mayor of Jew York rushed to the scene to commiserate with the
family of the druggie and to promise them that the guilty policeman
w o u l d be punished just the w a y Bush promised that tlie four cops
who beat Rodney K i n g would be punished, no matter what local
courts found. Unlike Bush, Dinkins could not overrule the Grand Jury
which found the policeman irmocent of all charges of murder, but he
could and d i d use city money, stolen from whites via taxation, to fly
the druggie back to Dominica and to fly his family there (and back)
for his funeral. The N Y C cops, smarting under Dinkins black racist
badmouthing, then held an off duty demonstration at City Hall where
some cops had a few beers and got a little noisy and rowdy. A minor
affair, but the Jewsmedia were aghast! Some 10,000 cops, mostly
white, had dared to protest a black racist media campaign! After a pe
riod of shock that white pigs would dare assert themselves, the
Jewsmedia pulled themselves together to start their usual hate cam
paign and demand the policemen be punished for their temerity. Peo
ple here have polarized along racial lines. Coloreds support
48 — LibeHy Bell I October 1992
Dinkins while whites generally support the cops.
There is a lot of talk about how blacks are the main victims of
black crime. This is true, but it doesn't stop blacks and other col
oreds from nearly unanimous support of colored criminals. To col
oreds, law and civilization are alien things imposed upon them b y
white police, and revulsion against these thirigs is universal.
In this case, investigation proved that colored witnesses deliber
ately lied about the k i l l i n g h o p i n g to spark a riot so they could do
their drugs freely in a "liberated" area. Tliis is mayor Dinkins constit
uency and he is acting in accordance with their desire when he prom
ises to punish white cops, make the police force majority colored, and
set u p a civilian review board staffed by liberals and colored racists to
further cripple such law enforcement as remains i n N Y C .
White police, however, have found a deadly way to strike
back. The N Y C government exists m a i n l y to collect revenue for
Jewish usurers. One of the ways they get it is through use of fines
to rob people. Out-of-towners may not k n o w it, but simply parking
in the wrong spot can cost them a $200 fine. Police steal your car and
hold it for ransom. To get back at Dinkins, police have slowed down
or stopped issuing summons. This will cut into the Jews' income
stream and thus should produce results in short order.
Another famous incident i n this area is the A m y Fisher case.
A m y is an under-age Jewish prostitute who used her sex to exploit
various men and make them do what she wanted. She was suppos
edly having an affair with a white man and decided to kill his wife
because she was i n her way. After trying to get various men to do
her dirty work, she shot the wife i n the face. The wife was crippled
but didn't die and A m y was arrested and charged with attempted
murder. N o w I don't k n o w what the facts are of this case except
that A m y is proven to have done the shooting. 1 can, however,
pretty well predict the outcome of the case. A m y is a member of
three over-privileged minorities: she is Jewish, female, and a
minor. The husband of the injured woman is a white man, a mem
ber of the lowest class of Americans. H i s wife is a white woman, al
most as l o w i n status. It can thus be taken for granted that the
J e w / L i b e r a l (in)justice system a n d the Jewsmedia w i l l try to get
A m y off and punish the white husband and wife.
I hate the murdering thief. Bush, with a passion but the vile
Clinton and his evil, Jewish wife is no improvement. The one can
didate who stands out since the attempted murder of Randy
Weaver i n Idaho is "Bo" Gritz. It is clearly the intervention by
Gritz that prevented the murder of Weaver and his whole family
by Federal marshals. Gritz's action i n arriving on the scene and fac
ing the Federal murder gang shows that his medals i n Vietnam
Liberty Bell I October 1992 — 49


were no fluke. This is virtually the first time I can remember that
any politician stood u p to the Feds while they were making an "ex
ample" of a white daring to resist Jewish policies. A s in N Y C , the
white public i n the area actually dared to protest rather than taking
their beating quietly as usual. But too many whites seem to be
happy that Weaver was just arrested rather than murdered like his
wife and child. The Feds plan to send Weaver to jail for life and his
under-age children too! N o t only should Weaver and the others at
tacked by the Federal murder gang be released with apologies,
they should be awarded millions in compensation and the seven
marshals and the officials who sent them should be tried for mur
der. If Randy Weaver and his friends and family are sent to jail and
the marshals who murdered his wife and child are not punished,
whites should riot i nevery city and town in America. What! Are
blacks to be allowed to b u r n d o w n entire cities i n racist temper tan
trums while whites suffer oppression and murder i n silence?
The Jewsmedia have been denouncing the N Y C police demon
stration for blocking traffic, and rowdiness. What they should have
done was b u m Grade Mansion to the ground and tar and feather, the
racist Dinkins and his moronic staff. That is the sort of things colored
mobs have been doing with impunity. Don't white have equal rights?
PS: The unspeakable Jew, Congress thief Weiss, died last week
of a "heart attack." Every faggot on the lower east and west sides
of Manhattan was i n tears over him. A n d well they should be!
A I D S has probably spread to most of them. Weiss was the author
of the N Y C " G u n C o n t r o l " l a w that disarmed the public a n d
turned N Y C over to armed criminals. H e was also the creator of
the idea of a " C i v i l i a n Review Board" which seems to have been
designed to cripple the police so criminals could operate more
freely. This was necessary so that the colored morons could steal
enough money to buy drugs which guess who was selling tliem.
Sincerely
S.R., New York State
««*
Dear Mr. Dletz:
In tlie July issue of Liberty Bell there is an article b y G.S. from N e w
Mexico. I'm p....d off again at some jerk writing i n Liberhj Bell trying to
tell me not to listen to rock-n-roU music. Let me tell you G.S., rock-n-roll
is not a "monstrous music fad," i f s been around since the fifties and
will probably continue well into tlie next century.
A t first, rock-n-roll was nigger music until Elvis came along and
made it popular with White people. Since then, the niggers have been
all but driven out of rock-n-roll, with a couple of exceptions. Whether
you like it or not, G.S., rock is now White man's music.
SO — LiheHy Bell I October 1992
N o w , G.S., you think rock music fills my head "with Satanism
and individualism." Welt, if Satanism is against Christianity, then I
must be satanic. I have absolute total contempt for Christians and
Christianity. If listening to rock-n-roll helps destroy Christianity,
then I'm turning my stereo up! You're right about individuahsm. 1
am a rare individual, a National Socialist i n the heart of Nigger
land. If I wasn't an individual thinker, 1 wouldn't have been able to
take the pressure of parents, preachers, tcaclicrs, and the jewsme
dia to think and act like the rest of the herd. I wouldn't be racially
aware and I w o u l d n ' t be reading Liberty Bell. I'm enough of an i n 
d i v i d u a l to pick and choose w h i c h rock bands 1 want to listen to
and which ones I don't want to listen to.
W h e n I Hsten to Metallica or V a n H a l e n or Bad Company I get
fired up! The music makes me feel good. W h e n I go to a rock con
cert I see a couple of niggers or gooks and thousands of White peo
ple. Nice percentage.
I thought by waiting a month before writing this letter my
anger at G,S. and other anti-rockers w o u l d have subsided; it hasn't.
So what do y o u d i g , G.S., Card W ? Is Charlie Pride your favorite
musician? Maybe Liberachi is more your type? Perhaps the b i g
band sound of Benny Goodman is your preference? H o w about
Bach or Beethoven performed b y the N e w York Philharmonic, con
ducted by Leonard Bernstein? So, y o u anti-rockers, get the point
I'm h-ying to make? N o t h i n g is black or white, bad or good, i n the
music industry today. If it was u p to me, I w o u l d outlaw jazz,
disco, and rap. This is the most un-White music yet recorded. I a m
not saying that rock-n-roll is all good, but it's not all bad either.
There are many tunes that get airplay that are pro-White or anti
government, just listen to the lyrics. I ' m sure a Skin reader c o u l d
send in lyrics from Skrewdriver, N o Remorse, Bound for Glory,
Haken Kreuz, or the M i d - T o w n Boot Boys that would silence the
pens of these a n t i - r o c k e r s (1 d o n ' t have a n y tunes f r o m these
groups). So, all of you old people that don't like rock-n-roll, don't
listen to it. But don't tell me to get off m y rock!
Sleg Hell!
W.J.C., Connecticut
«**
Gentlemen:
Greetings...I am writing this letter for I am in dire need of your
help. I am currently confined in Z.O.G.'s military prison. I have
been i n this particular prison for two and a half years. During this
time I have seen 1500 people come and go. Yet even so, there is one
thing incessantly common amongst the many young Aryans which
arrive here. ZOG has f i n a l l y i m b e d d e d a message of u n i t y a n d
Liberty Bell I October 1992 — SI


equality into the minds of these impressionable young men. Tlie guilt
complex instilled upon them since childhood is rcenforced here.
The establishment here offers some type of program to every
minority imaginable. A l l that is except the most deserving "minor
ity" of all—the vanishing White M a n ! Whites here had to take this
discriminating institution to court in the hopes of being allotted the
same privileges given to the "oppressed" minorities. Of course, the
government sided with itself.
• That is w h y we're asking the help of your organization. If the
government won't help us in being proud of our heritage, then we
need to fii\ others, such as yourself, that w i l l . Unfortunately, sol
diers sentenced to confmement here are stripped of all "pay and a l 
lowances," thus leaving us devoid of money. The need to educate
these y o u n g A r y a n s , as w e l l as older A r y a n s , still exists however;
and if anything, it becomes more urgent with each passing year.
Some of the men coming to us are unaware of basic facts such
as the usurious "Federal Reserve System", and the "Kosher Food
Racket".
We're currently receiving reading materials from contributors
like the Noontide Press and Church of the Creator. We fully under
stand our undesirable position, and do not wish to become too bur
densome to any one of the fine, patriotic groups which assist in our
education by giving us literature. Obviously, it is not the want of
the White m a n to ask for a "handout". It is better, however, to ask
for help than to leave a potential source of information left u n 
tapped.
Please help us i n our quest for complete racial awareness by
sending any publications you can—Imperfect copies, damaged ma
terials, or just plain overstocks—the condition does not matter. Ra
cial awareness does!
Our thirst for this knowledge of the plots and plagues facing
the beautiful White Race today is unquenchable. I assure y o u , sir,
that any and all materials you are able to send to us w i l l be readily
absorbed by many. With this knowledge we will become better
prepared for the upcoming troubles ahead.
Sincerely,
Shannon G. Michael, Box #75242
Drawer 'A', Ft. Leavenworth KS 66027-7140
*a «
Dear Mr. Dletz
It seems to me that the tables can easily be himed on those who
enjoy talking about " H u m a n Rights," M y suggestion is that Whites
begin to vigorously advance the concept of Hunmn Rights Number One
(the most basic of all h u m a n rights)—The right to live i n a society
52 — Liberty Bell I October 1992
comprised of, and dctcrmincxi by, O N E ' S O W N P E O P L E .
E.H., Washington DC
w» «
Dear Georgo:
H a v i n g f i n i s h e d m y first r e a d i n g of the September Liberty
Bell—as always, it was excellent—I feel compelled to offer this re
sponse to a fellow L.B. reader's not-so-prudent remarks concerning
the Christian Identity faith.
In one of his two September letters to the editor. P u b l i c
Prudentis referred to Identity as "a creeping cancer" and labeled
the religion's adherents "ignorant" white "dupes." N o w I myself
a m not a believer i n the Identity doctrine, nor am I a Christian of
any sort or variety, but I am nonetheless offended when any of my
Brothers are p u b l i c l y insulted. To refer to Identity Christians as
"dupes" is to insult the majority of the best leaders and soldiers our
race has produced i n the last twenty years. If one feels the need to i n 
tellectually oppose a religion then so be it. But when the religion
being argued is the religion of such stout-hearted men as Robert Mat
thews, Gordon and Yorie Kahl, Randy Weaver, Ernst Ziindel, Robert
Miles, William Potter Gale, Richard Butler, and countless others, I be
lieve the argument should be put forth with due respect.
Furthermore, whether we like it or not, the White militia
needed to fight w h e n at last the s t o r m breaks w i l l be made u p
largely of Identity Christian patriots. We are hardly in a position
where we can afford to risk any further factionalism w i t h i n the
White Right. If a White man is i n favor of an all-White homeland, a
Folkstate, and is w i l l i n g to sacrifice all for the folkstate, and con
ducts himself in an honorable fashion, then that man is my Brother
no matter how much we may differ i n other areas.
A s responsible Aryans we would be wise, to avoid further dissen
sion, by adopting a policy of respectful speech when addressing or re
ferring to fellow K i n d r e d regardless of h o w strongly we may feel
concerning their personal beliefs. To do otherwise would make hon
est and productive interaction impossible.
PS: I am glad to inform you that I w i l l soon be economically
able to p u l l m y o w n weight. I am n o w receiving a donated sub
scription which provides me with much high quality food for
thought. Being in prison, I cannot reach the type of funds I would
like to contribute. Please accept $10 bimonthly starting later this
month as m y subscription dues.
For Race Nation
J.B., Bellefbnte, PA
« » «•
Liberty Bell I October 1992 — 53


Racial Greetings,
I am a White, racially conscious female. I read about your organi
zation in Now the Tnith and it said to write to you for a catalogue of
books, etc. I would appreciate it if you could send me one.
If there is anyone i n your organization or anyone y o u k n o w
who would like to correspond with a White Power Chelsea, please
forward m y address to them.
White Proud
C.L.W., British Columbia
«««
Dear Landsmann:
I was disturbed to see the violent letter and accusations against
" B o " G r i t z i n the recent Liberty Bell [see L i b e r t y Bell, September,
page 37]. So what if Gritz pinned on a marshal's badge arid took a
deputizing oath? He previously took the oath of a commissioned
officer in the U S A r m y , which is a much more serious matter. N e i 
ther the A r m y nor the Marshals Service are inherently evil. It de
pends on what use they are put to and how their members behave.
I am not among those who are thrilled by the surrender of
Weaver and his family, but what alternative was there? The normal
practice of the Feds i n these sieges is to b u m tlie building and kill ev
eryone inside, especially if one of the police has been killed. This is
what was done at Whitbey Island, Annendale, and, to be fair, at the
siege of the Symbionese Liberation gang, and the Philadelphia Move
cult. This is what would have been done at the Weaver house as well
had not Gritz intervened. N o otlier candidate even mentioned the trag
edy; Gritz took a big chance appearing at the scene because the Feds are
looking for the opportunity to kill h i m too, and the confusion and gun
fire at the site provided a good chance to do so. The only thing that pre
vented the planned murder of Weaver and the rest of his family was the
glare of publicity upon the planned crime and that is what Gritz's inter
vention provided. Thus, I can hardly see his action in getting Weaver to
surrender as anything but defusing the confrontation.
The surrender of Weaver and Harris is a victory i n that their
planned murders were aborted. The Jew flunky government cleariy
intents to jail them for the rest of their lives. There are only two ways
this can be prevented. First by having enough political, financial and
inilitary power to force the government to back down. This is no op
tion. Whites have no power in this Jew owned country whatever. We
are lower than p i g tracks. A l l financial and political power is i n the
hands of the Jew. There are not even 200 Whites in this whole counby
willing to fight government racism with arms. Whites even tremble at
defending themselves from nigger mobs! Thus, the only chance for
Weaver and Harris is to bring a glare of publicity on the frame-up trial
54 — Liberty Bell I October 1992
the Fcxls arc planning. Naturally, die Jcwsmcdia will black out the trial
the same way they are blacking out Bo Gritz's candidacy, so it remains
to be seen if the feeble White nationalist movement can muster enough
outrage to bypass the media monopoly and make die Feds' crime a na
tional issue. Tliis wasn't done in the trial of Gordon Kahl's son and his
friends, who got 120 years i n prison merely for being targets when the
Feds opened fire at a police roadblock.
The things the government is doing are outrageous by any
standard of law or justice. The Jew control over their American cat
tle depends on their keeping hidden and not openly oppressing
their victims enough to stir u p real hostility.
If the pathetic white nationalist movement can reach enough of
the public w i t h the facts of this outrageous government action, the
Zionist Occupation Government w i l l have to back d o w n and let
the Weavers and Harris go. We w i l l see if this can be done, and this
should be our agenda for the immediate fubjre.
As for horror and the warriors of our race, non-stop hate pro
paganda has turned them against their o w n race and people. In
W W II Americans had no trouble w i t h murdering SS prisoners, ci
vilians and P O W s after the war, They were just told such people
were evil and must be destroyed. A whole bunch of imaginary
crimes were concocted and b l a m e d o n the designated victims to
stir hatred against them. Y o u saw it again i n the Gulf War where
Americans massacred fleeing Irakis on the roads, and buried alive
thousands of Irakis trying to surrender. They then went home with
a clear conscience and the public received them with cheers!
The A m e r i c a n people accepted that Hussein was evil to take
over his lost province of Kuwait but that Bush was virtuous i n i n 
vading Panama! Such nonsense simply strengthens the conclusion
that average people have no critical faciliries and that we Ameri
cans lost control of our country w h e n w e permitted alien Jews to
come i n and steal our country and buy u p its media. N o w we are
paying for our weakness and foolishness, and the cost will mount
constantly until there is a change. Right now the main change we
can make is to embarrass the Jew government by spreading the
truth about their murder plot against Randy Weaver and keeping
them from railroading him and Harris into prison for life.
Sincerely, S.R., New York State
» w«
Dear George:
I feel compelled to respond to the letter tliat appeared i n the
S e p t e m b e r i s s u e of Liberty Bell o v e r the n a m e of " P u b l i c u s
Prudentis" which was highly critical of Bo Gritz for methods he al
legedly used in saving lives of the surviving members of the Randy
Liberty Bell I October 1992 — 65


Weaver household in Idaho. Either Mr. Prudent has a very fertile
imagination or is, himself, a highly placed federal functionary.
H o w else could he have been i n a position to witiiess behavior that
others closest to the scene were unable to see?
Because I had friends near the Weaver siege line throughout the
entire affair I was able to receive first hand reports from the area on a
regular basis. M y friends, Identity Christians who were also ac
quainted w i t h the Weavers, had nothing but praise for the w a y i n
which Bo Gritz and Jack McLamb defused the murderous situation. I
can agree with M r . Prudent to the extent that sooner or later many of
us may be forced to face our maker for unpopular beliefs but, hope
fully, the issues wiW be clear and the women and children will be well
to the rear. D y i n g as glorious A r y a n warriors for a worthwhile cause
is one thing, but to expect or, indeed, allow wounded men, teen-age
girls and a nursing baby to be murdered by a hyped u p mob of brain
washed law enforcement officers for no good reason is quite another.
I don't k n o w who is representing himself as M r . Prudent but
his message is one I hear all too often: This or that White patriot is
a liar, a crook, an opportunist, a profiteer, a traitor, a con man, a
CIA agent, a spy or, if nothing else, just a plain old son of a bitch.
To all such destructive criticism I say, " D a m n the torpedoes, full
speed ahead." W e must stop g i v i n g aid and comfort to the enemy
by publicly criticizing our own, would-be leadership and by
spreading damaging rumor and innuendo among ourselves.
Whatever else may be his faults. Bo Gritz is making a valuable
contribution to the cause by reaching thousands of people with a
message that needs to be told. If and when we ever get our o w n act
together then will be the time to take care of crooks, opportunists and
traitors, if indeed they do exist. But for now, we must seek reconcilia
tion and solidarity among ourselves. We must adopt the rule, if we
can't say sometliing good about another White man, lef s not say any
t h i n g at a l l . W e must stop fighting each other and concentrate on
fighting an enemy who demonstrates daily that he is one hell of a lot
smarter, better organized and more determined than we are.
For a lesson o n h o w to do it, I strongly urge everyone to read
Ivor Benson's book, The Zionist Factor. In it he describes a group of
people who have their o w n racial religion; do not air their dirty
laundry i n public; train, try, educate and discipline their own, and
generally set themselves apart from the rest of humanity. We could
learn a few^ lessons f r o m a people w h o place success above every
thing else i n life. Unless we succeed i n learning h o w to work to
gether, we w i l l die as a race. If we die as a race, then civilization
will die with us.
^ ^ ^ ^ Sincerely, J.M., West Virginia
56 — Liberty Bell I October 1992
KEEP THE LIBERTY BELL RINGING!
Please remember: Our Fight is Vour fight! Donate whatever you
can spare on a regular—monthly or quarterly-basis. Whether it is
$2., $5., $20., or $100. or more, rest assured it is needed here and
will be used in our common struggle. If you are a businessman,
postage stamps in any denomination are a legitimate business ex
pense-and we need and use many of these here every month
and win be gratefully accepted as donations .
Your donations wilt help us spread the Message of Liberty and
White Survival throughout the land, by making available additional
copies of our printed material to fellow Whites who do not yet know
what is in store for them.
Order our pampWets, booklets, and, most Importantly, our
reprints of revealing articles which are ideally suited for mass dis
tribirtion at reasonable cost. Order extra copies of L/berty Bell for
distribution to your circle of friends, neighbors, and relatives, urging
them to subscribe to our unique publication. Our bulk prices are
shown on the inside front cover of every issue of Liberty Bell.
• Pass along your copy of Liberty Bell, and copies of reprints you
obtained from us, to friends and acquaintances who may be on our
"wave length," and urge them to contact us for more of the same.
Carry on the fight to free our White people from the shackles of
alien domination, even if you can only join our ranks in spirit. You
can provide for this by bequest. The following are suggested forms
of bequests which you may include in your Last Will and Testament:
1.1 bequeath to Mr. George P. Dietz, as Trustee for Liberty Bell
Publications, P.O. Box 21, Reedy WV 25270 USA, the sum of $ , . .
for general purposes.
2.1 bequeath to Mr. George P. Dietz, as Trustee for Liberty Bell
Publications. P.O. Box 21, Reedy WV 25270 USA, the following
described property for general purposes.
DO YOUR PART TODAY-HELP FREE OUR WHITE
RACE FROM ALIEN DOMINA TION!