zotero/storage/59RWMB9X/.zotero-ft-cache

455 lines
7.1 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

2024-08-27 21:48:20 -05:00
arXiv:physics/9710001v2 [physics.gen-ph] 13 Nov 2006
Farewell to General Relativity
Kenneth Dalton
email: kxdalton@yahoo.com
Abstract The kinematical successes of general relativity are legendary: the perihelion precession, the gravitational red-shift, the bending of light. However, at the level of dynamics, relativity is faced with insurmountable difficulties. It has failed to define the energy, momentum, and stress of the gravitational field. Moreover, it offers no expression of energy-momentum transfer to or from the gravitational field. These are symptoms of a far graver malady: general relativity violates the principle of energy conservation.
1
In general relativity, the equation of planetary motion is derived by means of the geometric variation
δ ds = δ gµν dxµdxν = 0
(1)
This yields the geodesic equation
duµ ds
+
Γµνλuν
=
0
(2)
The equation of motion can be recast in terms of kinematics, by introducing a vector basis eµ and the velocity four-vector u = eµuµ. The infinitesimal change of the basis is expressed in terms of connection coefficients
deµ = eλ Γλµν dxν
(3)
which enables the calculation
du ds
=
duµ eµ ds
+
deµ ds
=
duµ ds
+
Γµνλuν
(4)
This shows that du/ds = 0 along any geodesic path.
How do these formulae relate to the observed planetary motion? Expanding u = e0u0 + eiui we have
d(e0u0) ds
+
d(eiui) ds
=
0
(5)
This shows that, during geodesic motion, the rate of change of three-velocity eiui is equal and opposite to that of speed e0u0 . The rates are determined by (2) and (3)
d(e0u0) ds
=
d(eiui) ds
=
e0Γ0iν uiuν
+ eiΓi0ν u0uν
(6)
In flat spherical coordinates, the right-hand side of this equation is zero:
both speed and velocity are constant. In Schwarzschild coordinates, the
right-hand side is not zero: the speed and velocity continually change. Thus,
according to the geodesic hypothesis, the changes which we observe in a
planets speed and velocity are due to the curved geometry of space-time.
The success of the geodesic formula was one of the great triumphs of
twentieth-century physics. Yet, we know that a planet possesses dynamical
2
properties of energy and momentum. What is taking place at this, the dynamical level? The energy-momentum vector of a planet is
p = mu
= eµpµ = e0p0 + eipi
(7)
The first term is the (rest + kinetic) energy e0p0 while the second term is the momentum eipi . During geodesic motion, the energy-momentum of the
planet is conserved
dp ds
=
m
du ds
=
meµ
duµ ds
+ Γµνλuν
=0
(8)
Therefore, the rates of change of energy and momentum are equal and opposite
d(e0p0) ds
=
d(eipi) ds
(9)
Neither the planets energy nor its momentum is conserved; rather, one
continually transforms into the other. During orbital motion, the non-
conservation of linear momentum is to be expected. What surprises is that
energy conservation is violated. The energy principle forces us to abandon
the geodesic hypothesis of planetary motion.
The treatment of light-rays is similar to that of particle motion, in that
the bending of light and the gravitational red-shift are determined by the
kinematics of curved space-time. The red-shift can be expressed in terms of
the null four-vector
k = e0k0 + eiki
(10)
where e0k0 is the frequency of light, and eiki is its wave vector. Along any light ray dk/dλ = 0 and we obtain
d(e0k0) dλ
=
d(eiki)
=
e0Γ0iν kiuν
+ eiΓi0ν k0uν
(11)
Therefore, in the presence of space-time curvature, the frequency and wave-
length will vary from point to point along the light ray. This is the gravita-
tional red-shift.
3
The energy-momentum vector of a light complex is given by the quantum formula
p = h¯k
(12)
Once again, energy-momentum is conserved dp/dλ = 0 and
d(e0p0) dλ
=
d(eipi)
(13)
Thus, as frequency and wavelength change, the energy and momentum trans-
form into one another; neither is conserved.
—————————-
The above examples illustrate the violation of energy conservation during geodesic motion. We will now make use of the field equations to show that this problem is intrinsic to the theory, and stems from the fact that the gravitational field is incapable of exchanging energy-momentum with any physical field. The field equations are given by
ν
1 2
ν
R
=
−κ
T µν
(14)
where T µν is the stress-energy-momentum tensor of matter and electromag-
netism. The covariant divergence of the left-hand side is identically zero,
therefore
T;µνν
=
1 √g
∂√g T µν ∂xν
+ ΓµνλT νλ
=0
(15)
Let us investigate this equation, by way of three examples from classical
physics.
Consider a free electromagnetic field, with the energy tensor
Teµνm
=
F µαF αν
+
1 4
ν
Fαβ
F
αβ
(16)
A lengthy but straightforward calculation yields
T;µννe m
=
1 √g
g F ∂xν
αν
F
µ α
+
1 2
ν
F
αβ
∂Fβν ∂xα
+
∂Fνα ∂xβ
+
∂Fαβ ∂xν
(17)
We note that the term ΓµνλT νλ must be included, in order to obtain this covariant expression. Maxwells equations for charge-free space are
4
1 ∂√g F ανg ∂xν
=0
(18)
∂Fβν ∂xα
+
∂Fνα ∂xβ
+
∂Fαβ ∂xν
=0
(19)
and we obtain
T;µνν em = 0
(20)
This result is especially significant, because it shows that there is no mech-
anism whatsoever for the exchange of energy-momentum between the elec-
tromagnetic and gravitational fields. The energy-momentum of electromag-
netism alone is conserved. Secondly, consider the matter tensor
Tmµν = ρuµuν
(21)
A simple calculation yields the covariant expression
T;µνν m
=
ρuν
∂uµ ∂xν
+
1 √g
∂√g ρuν ∂xν
+ Γµνλ ρuν
(22)
The second term is zero, if rest mass is conserved, leaving
T;µνν m = ρ
uν
∂uµ ∂xν
+
Γµνλ
uν
(23)
The hydrodynamical form of the geodesic equation then gives
T;µνν m = 0
(24)
The energy-momentum of matter alone is conserved. Finally, consider the case of charged matter together with electromag-
netism
T µν = Tmµν + Teµνm
(25)
Here, coupling occurs via Maxwells equation
1 ∂√gF ανg ∂xν
=
jα
(26)
and we obtain
5
T;µνν = ρ
uν
∂uµ ∂xν
+ Γµνλ uν
jαF
µ α
=
0
(27)
The Lorentz force is covariant and describes the exchange of energy-momentum between matter and the electromagnetic field.
These examples show that whether space-time is curved or not, i.e., whether a gravitational field exists or not, the energy-momentum of matter and electromagnetism is conserved. It follows that any change wrought by curvature—in speed, velocity, frequency, and wavelength—will violate the principle of energy conservation. A gravitational exchange term is needed in order to account for the changes in energy and momentum. The theory of relativity neither provides such a term nor defines the energy, momentum, and stress of the gravitational field. If we adhere to the energy principle, then general relativity cannot be the answer to the question of gravitation.
6