zotero/storage/MXB78LJP/.zotero-ft-cache

Influence of Microbial Biofilms on the Preservation of Primary Soft Tissue in Fossil and Extant Archosaurs
Joseph E. Peterson1*, Melissa E. Lenczewski2, Reed P. Scherer2
1 Department of Geology, University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh, Oshkosh, Wisconsin, United States of America, 2 Department of Geology and Environmental Geosciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois, United States of America
Abstract
Background: Mineralized and permineralized bone is the most common form of fossilization in the vertebrate record. Preservation of gross soft tissues is extremely rare, but recent studies have suggested that primary soft tissues and biomolecules are more commonly preserved within preserved bones than had been presumed. Some of these claims have been challenged, with presentation of evidence suggesting that some of the structures are microbial artifacts, not primary soft tissues. The identification of biomolecules in fossil vertebrate extracts from a specimen of Brachylophosaurus canadensis has shown the interpretation of preserved organic remains as microbial biofilm to be highly unlikely. These discussions also propose a variety of potential mechanisms that would permit the preservation of soft-tissues in vertebrate fossils over geologic time.
Methodology/Principal Findings: This study experimentally examines the role of microbial biofilms in soft-tissue preservation in vertebrate fossils by quantitatively establishing the growth and morphology of biofilms on extant archosaur bone. These results are microscopically and morphologically compared with soft-tissue extracts from vertebrate fossils from the Hell Creek Formation of southeastern Montana (Latest Maastrichtian) in order to investigate the potential role of microbial biofilms on the preservation of fossil bone and bound organic matter in a variety of taphonomic settings. Based on these analyses, we highlight a mechanism whereby this bound organic matter may be preserved.
Conclusions/Significance: Results of the study indicate that the crystallization of microbial biofilms on decomposing organic matter within vertebrate bone in early taphonomic stages may contribute to the preservation of primary soft tissues deeper in the bone structure.
Citation: Peterson JE, Lenczewski ME, Scherer RP (2010) Influence of Microbial Biofilms on the Preservation of Primary Soft Tissue in Fossil and Extant Archosaurs. PLoS ONE 5(10): e13334. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013334
Editor: Anna Stepanova, Paleontological Institute, Russian Federation
Received June 15, 2010; Accepted September 17, 2010; Published October 12, 2010
Copyright: ß 2010 Peterson et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: Funding was provided by Goldich Fund, Northern Illinois University Department of Geology and Environmental Geosciences; Student Travel Fund, American Association for Microbiology. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
* E-mail: jpeterson0204@gmail.com
Introduction
Recent reports of the preservation of non-biomineralized proteins and tissues such as blood vessels in fossil bone has had a major impact on our understanding of fossil preservation processes [1,2,3]. Previous research results have claimed the presence of primary soft tissues, in the form of vessels, blood cells, bone cells by acid demineralization of a Tyrannosaurus rex femur [1], with subsequent reports of the preservation of protein sequences in Tyrannosaurus rex and Mammut americanum [2] and in the Campanian hadrosaurid Brachylophosaurus canadesis [3]. An alternative hypothesis for these findings has been presented, suggesting that pliable demineralized extracts from fossil bone more likely represents nonmineralized microbial biofilms rather than primary soft-tissues [4]. This study investigates the role of microbial biofilms on the preservation of primary soft-tissues. Presented here are the results of a controlled experiment in which modern biofilms were grown in extant archosaur bone under distinctly different environmental conditions. The aim of this experiment was to explore variation in microbial communities in decomposing bone, and the impact of
microbial communities on soft tissue preservation. The main objectives of this study were to identify the characteristics of biofilms that develops as extant archosaur bone decays, and to identify the structures that are present in fossil dinosaur bone before and after demineralization. Most biostratinomic process studies on vertebrate fossils have focused on mechanical transport of vertebrate remains, and have shown that variability of fossil dispersal is related to a variety of factors, notably hydrodynamic properties of the remains and preservation potential [5–9]. These factors directly affect the distribution of fossils in a stratum [5]. Similarly, the rate at which a submerged or subaereally exposed vertebrate carcass will fully decompose is greatly influenced by numerous physical and chemical factors including predation, ambient temperature and humidity, and a variety of other environmental conditions that influence rates of decay [10]. In most well-aerated soils, organic material biodegrades very rapidly. However, due to the high mineral content and relatively low permeability of bone, microbial decomposition of collagen within the bone is initially inhibited [10]. In order to biodegrade
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 1 October 2010 | Volume 5 | Issue 10 | e13334


bone, microbes must be able to obtain energy from the mineral and collagen components of bone, which is achieved by demineralizing the bone or growing in an environment where demineralization naturally occurs, such as low pH soils [10]. Microorganisms penetrate the outermost surface of the bone itself through the natural permeability of the bone surface, especially via blood vessels and nerve lacunae, and microorganisms may form biofilms along the walls of these foraminae [10]. Biofilm is a general term applied to a variety of matrix-enclosed bacterial populations adherent to each other and/or to wet or moist surfaces or interfaces [11]. This includes microbial aggregates and floccules and also adherent populations within the pore spaces of porous media. In an aqueous environment,
planktonic bacterial cells land on a surface and phenotypically react to the conditions of the medium; in high-nutrient conditions reverting to a sessile morphology and excreting an exopolysaccharide (EPS) which allows the bacteria to stick to its’ substrate and other cells as it reproduces. Biofilms may consist of one or many species of microorganisms, all incorporated into the community. As the biofilm matures, it continues to reproduce. Biofilm growth is influenced by the available nutrients at the attachment site. As microorganisms metabolize their base, they change the environmental conditions by raising or lowering pH, which may cause the microorganisms to produce mineral precipitates such as calcium phosphate (hydroxyapatite) and calcium carbonate, depending on the composition of the substrate
Figure 1. Location of Xcolak Cenote where samples were placed for biofilm growth. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013334.g001
Figure 2. Interpretive sketch showing geological setting and variation in salinity with depth. Illustration courtesy of Gene Perry and Mark Howland. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013334.g002
Biofilms and Soft Tissues
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 2 October 2010 | Volume 5 | Issue 10 | e13334


[12]. An example of this process occurs in Foley urinary catheters, where encrusting calcium-phosphate crystalline biofilms can develop [13]. In many cases this biofilm encrustation occurs to such severity as to cause complete blockage of flow through the catheters. The identification of biomolecules with vertebrate signatures [2,3] in the extracts from fossil vertebrates provides compelling evidence countering the argument that these structures are simply microbial biofilm [4]. Many of these reports have proposed a variety of potential preservation mechanisms [14–16]. The data presented here provides another potential mechanism for allowing enhanced soft-tissue preservation by exploring the role of microbial biofilms in sealing off and preserving primary soft tissues, a process we call ‘‘microbial masonry’’.
Materials and Methods
To investigate the impact of microorganisms on the preservation of soft-tissues in dinosaur bone, modern bone samples were obtained as substrates for biofilm development. To more accurately model dinosaur bone, Witmer’s Extant Phylogenetic Bracket method of inference [17] was applied, leading to the choice of extant samples of archosauria as experimental media. These include both birds and crocodilians, in this case the bones of Gallus gallus (Domestic Chicken) and Alligator mississipiensis (American Alligator). Bones chosen for the experiment consisted of long bones, such as femora and tibiae from both species. To specifically observe the growth of biofilm on bone and to expedite the process, bones were stripped of a majority of muscle and connective tissues, and placed in traps made of 250mL Nalgene bottles with holes drilled to allow water to move freely in and out of the bottle, but inhibit larger
Table 1. Categorization of observed pore sizes in extant archosaur bones and associated biofilm growth.
Classification Pore Size (mm)
1 0–25
2 26–50
3 51–75
4 76–100
5 101–125
6 126–150
7 151–175
8 176–200
9 201–225
10 226-up
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013334.t001
Table 2. Degree of biofilm infiltration into observed pores in extant archosaur bones.
Pore Infiltration
0 No biofilm infilling pore
1 Biofilm coating inner pore walls
2 Thick biofilm coating or infilling
3 Complete/Near complete biofilm infilling
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013334.t002
Figure 3. Examples of biofilm infiltration classes for extant archosaur bone. A) Class 0: a pore on a fractured bone sample from A. mississippiensis showing no biofilm infilling; B) Class 1: a pore on a fractured bone sample from A. mississippiensis showing a biofilm coating the inner pore wall; C) Class 2: pores from a whole bone sample of A. mississippiensis showing a significant biofilm coating on the inner pore walls; D) Class 4: a pore from a fractured bone sample of G. gallus showing a complete infiltration or covering of the pore. All images shown at 3006 magnification. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013334.g003
Biofilms and Soft Tissues
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 3 October 2010 | Volume 5 | Issue 10 | e13334


organisms from interacting with the specimens. Both a complete and bisected long bone was placed in each trap. This differentiation was intended to investigate differences in bone condition prior to microbial interaction. While freeze-thaw cycles may have an influence on bone degradation, sample chambers were frozen and stored at 270uC until deployment in order to
minimalize rapid decomposition of the samples and minimize microbial cross-contamination. The sample chambers were placed in Sinkhole (locally known as a Cenote) Xcolak, located in the northern Yucatan Peninsula [Figure 1], for 3 to 4 months. Deep cenotes (sinkholes) are common in the northern Yucatan due to the Late Cretaceous Chicxulub
Figure 4. Results of PC-ORD statistical analysis. Testing for significant differences in the amount of PLFA assemblages in each sample, these results show a significant difference between samples of whole bone from aerobic conditions (2W) and fractured bone from aerobic conditions (2H), suggesting a difference in microbial communities due to bone condition prior to placement in the cenote. Axis 1 is based on variation in cenote environmental conditions, while Axis 2 is based on whole or fractured bones. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013334.g004
Table 3. Bone samples and PLFA results.
PLFA
Samples i16:0cis9 4:0 17:0 18:0 21:0 23:0 10:0 11:0 14:cis9 14:0 i16:0
Freshwaterwhole 0.4839 ND ND 0.45699 ND ND ND ND ND 0.591 ND
Freshwaterfractured 0.0001 0.0379 5.41E-05 0.943 0.0021 5.53E-05 0.0012 0.0016 ND ND 0.0157
Mixing zonewhole ND 0.9623 ND 0.0376 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Mixing zonefractured ND 0.4447 ND 0.4992 ND ND ND 0.0517 0.0042 ND ND
Saltwaterwhole ND 0.5755 ND 0.4244 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
Saltwaterfractured ND 0.4454 ND 0.5292 ND ND ND 0.0029 ND ND 0.0224
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013334.t003
Biofilms and Soft Tissues
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 4 October 2010 | Volume 5 | Issue 10 | e13334


impact crater [18], where the impact fractured the underlying carbonate bedrock and allowed for increased hydrogeologic processes and resulting karst structures, such as caves and cenotes. The cenote used in this study was chosen based on its availability and well-documented geochemical and hydrogeologic characteristics [18,19]. Cenote Xcolak is approximately 75 m in diameter and 120 m deep [Figure 2], and stratified. The upper boundary of the saltwater interface is located approximately 52 m below the water surface, as indicated by the increase in electrical conductivity.
Dissolved oxygen content decreases below 0.5% at the upper zone of the saltwater interface, indicating an oxic to anoxic condition transition due to sulfate reduction [19]. The stratification of Cenote Xcolak allowed experiments on microbial interaction to be conducted for bones in a variety of environmental conditions. Bone samples from G. gallus were placed in Cenote Xcolak from December, 2008 to March, 2009, and A. mississippiensis samples were placed from July, 2009 to November, 2009. After retrieval, bones were vaccuum sealed and stored on ice until returned to
Figure 5. SEM and EDS results of G.galluscontrol sample. A) SEM image of primary soft tissue in G. gallus control sample with primary blood cells observable. B) EDS results of primary soft tissue in G gallus control sample showing a high abundance of carbon. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013334.g005
Biofilms and Soft Tissues
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 5 October 2010 | Volume 5 | Issue 10 | e13334


Figure 6. Biofilm growth on an extant G.gallusbone. A) Biofilm surrounding surface pore. B) Biofilm partially covering a surface pore and lining the inner pore surface. C) Encrusting biofilm on the surface of a bone. D) Biofilm on the surface of a bone and on the inner pore surface. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013334.g006
Figure 7. Higher magnification SEM images of biofilm growth on extant G. gallus bone. A) Biofilm on inner pore surface. B) Higher magnification of Figure 7A, showing individual bacterial cells and EPS. Debris and diatoms are adhered to the biofilm. C) Biofilm surrounding surface pore and clean bone surface. D) Higher magnification of Figure 7C, showing biofilm on inner pore surface. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013334.g007
Biofilms and Soft Tissues
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 6 October 2010 | Volume 5 | Issue 10 | e13334


Northern Illinois University where they were stored at 270uC until analysis. Bones of G. gallus were lypholized and cut into four pieces and prepared for phospholipid fatty acid analysis (PLFA), Scanning Electron Microscopy-Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) analysis, ethylenediamenetetraacetic acid (EDTA) demineralization, and light microscopy. Sectioning was performed using a laminar flow hood, a set of sterilized forceps, and 20 flamesterilized cutting blades. A new flame-sterilized blade was used for each sample and the forceps were re-sterilized prior to cutting each specimen. All specimens were placed in labeled sterile plastic bags and placed in a 270uC freezer until further analysis. Phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) extraction and analyses were performed on the G. gallus bones retrieved from the cenote to identify variations in active microbial communities in the bones from different intervals of the cenote and under different preservational conditions [20] (slightly modified from the 2006 PLFA training outline organized by Zhanna Yermakov from Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL). Small fragments of dinosaur bone were obtained from three groups of Hell Creek dinosaurs. These specimens include bone samples from a theropod (BRM P2002.4.1), a ceratopsian (BMR P2006.4.1), and a thescalosaur (BMR P2006.4.309). Exact coordinates of the collection sites for the specimens are on file in
the paleontology collections at the Burpee Museum of Natural History, Rockford, Illinois (BMR), where the specimens are housed. Samples were chosen based on two categories; 1) a high volume of trabecular bone in the sample, and 2) specimens that had not been directly treated with polyvinal acetate (‘‘vinac’’), a common field preservant. Tissues were demineralized in plastic containers with 30–50ml of 0.5M EDTA (pH 8.0) for two weeks, changing the acid every three days. EDTA was prepared by dissolving 186.1g of EDTA crystals in 800mL of de-ionized water. The pH was adjusted to 8.0 by adding approximately 20g of NaOH pellets, and brought to 1L volume with de-ionized water. The solution was then autoclaved and stored at room temperature. The pH was measured using a Corning pH/Ion analyzer 455. An initial test was performed to de-mineralize dinosaur bone, however an additional step was added to avoid draining out extracts; samples were centrifuged at 2500 RPM for 3 minutes prior to changing the acid. This process physically broke down the delicate structures extracted from the bones. In the later experiments, this step was omitted. After EDTA demineralization, the specimens were rinsed with a balanced phosphate buffer or Ringer solution (recipe as described in collagenase from Clostridium histolyticum C2799, Sigma-Aldrich) and imaged using a Heerbrugg WILD M3 Stereomicroscope at
Figure 8. Results of thescelosaur specimen BMR P2006.4.309. A) SEM images of thescelosaur samples prior to demineralization. Scale bar equals 10 cm. B) Thescelosaur samples at 3306 magnificaiton, showing bacterial cells filling the surface pores. C) Thescelosaur samples at 22006 magnification, showing the mineralized bacterial cells in fossil specimens. D) EDS results of the mineralized bacterial cells in fossilized thescelosaur samples, showing a Ca- and P-rich signature. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013334.g008
Biofilms and Soft Tissues
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 7 October 2010 | Volume 5 | Issue 10 | e13334


6X- 16X- 40X magnifications with a digital camera. Samples were also prepared for SEM and EDS analysis. Samples were allowed to air-dry and then mounted to aluminum stubs by either SEM Sticky Tabs (Canemco) or polyvinyl acetate glue. Specimens were then gold-coated to a thickness of 300–400  ̊Angstroms, using a Polaron E5150 Film Thickness Controlled Sputter Coater. Specimens were then imaged in a JEOL JSM5610LV Environmental SEM. Elemental scans were obtained with a ThermoNoran Vantage DSI X-ray microanalyzer coupled to the SEM. Because museum specimens may have had some contact with fossil preservatives such as polyvinyl acetate and cyanoacrylate, though not apparent in the sample, a control sample was prepared consisting of a small fragment of dinosaur bone that was intentionally coated in polyvinyl acetate and then demineralized in EDTA and imaged. Polyvinyl acetate was also prepared on an SEM stub for SEM and EDS analysis.
Statistical Analysis
To investigate variation of microbial community structures in bones exposed to different environments and under different taphonomic conditions, a Principle Component Analysis (PCA)
was performed using PC-ORD (MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR). PCA is a statistical technique for identifying patterns in data, and expressing data in a way that highlights their similarities and differences [21]. In order to quantify the degree of modern biofilm infiltration in extant archosaur bone, pores were identified on the surface of SEM samples at a magnification of 3006. Pores were categorized by size (mm) (Table 1) and degree of biofilm infiltration (Table 2, Figure 3). Kolmogorov-Smirnov Goodness-of-fit tests [22] were performed on the pore size/infiltration matrix to identify variation in pore sizes among extant archosaur samples, and to observe variation in biofilm infiltration among samples in different taphonomic conditions at a 0.05 significance level.
Results
The Characteristics of Biofilms and Microbial Communities in Extant Archosaur Bones
Bone samples were analyzed to identify the degree of biofilm growth and infiltration, and to investigate variation in microbial communities with different preservational settings. To investigate
Figure 9. Thescelosaur bone sample extracts after complete demineralization in EDTA. A) Light microscopy image of branching, fragile, semi-transparent vessels remaining after demineralization. Scale bar equals 1 mm. B) SEM image of thescelosaur extract, at 556magnification. C) EDS analysis of frangible thescelosaur extracts, rich in calcium an d phosphate. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013334.g009
Biofilms and Soft Tissues
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 8 October 2010 | Volume 5 | Issue 10 | e13334


the degree of biofilm growth on bones, samples were sectioned for SEM analysis and surface pores were counted, measured, and assessed for biofilm infiltration. Kolmogorov-Smirnov Goodnessof-Fit tests show no significant difference in the distribution of pore sizes among archosaurs (Figure 4A). However, significant differences were found in the degree of microbial infilling of extant archosaur bone pores related to taphonomic conditions (Figure 4B). Variation in microbial community was assessed by PLFA analysis and Principle Component Analysis (PCA) and show significant differences in microbial communities between whole and bisected G. gallus bones in freshwater environments (Table 3, Figure 5). Biofilm growth on bones varies with taphonomic conditions. No discernable differences in biofilm growth were noted between whole-bone specimens of either A. mississippiensis or G. gallus, nor were any discernable differences identified between halved-bone specimens from the two respective taxa. However, as clarified by statistical analyses, the degree of biofilm infiltration into surface pores was significantly higher in whole-bone samples than bisected samples in both taxa. Since both primary soft tissue and microbial biofilms are composed of organic carbon, control samples and biofilm samples possess a similar EDS signature that is unreliable for differentiation. However, primary soft-tissues in control samples are morphologically different from biofilm samples. Primary softtissues analyzed by SEM show red blood cells and vessels at relatively low magnifications (,1006) (Figure 6) whereas biofilms on bones shows smooth, undulating surfaces at similar magnifications (Figures 7, 8). Bacterial cells and EPS are clearly visible at much higher magnifications.
Structures Present in Fossil Dinosaur Bones Before and After Demineralization
Samples of Late Cretaceous thescelosaur bone were sectioned and analyzed in the SEM prior to EDTA demineralization (Figure 9). The surface pores of the fragments were filled with small spheres approximately 1mm in diameter, consistent in shape and size to bacterial cells. EDS analysis of these spheres illustrate and Ca- and P-rich signature, and upon higher magnification, reveal mineralized spheres within the pores. After complete demineralization of thescelosaur samples, small semi-transparent Ca- and P-rich vessels were recovered from the acid baths (Figure 10). These vessels appear morphologically similar to extracts described by previous authors [1,4]. Fragments of theropod bone were demineralized to completion as well. Prior to complete demineralization, fragments were removed from the acid baths and imaged to illustrate the ‘‘etching out’’ of resistant branching, vessel-like structures from the mineral component of bone (Figure 11). These structures are morphologically consistent with previous studies [1,4]. After complete demineralization of theropod bone (Figure 12), the remaining branching, vessel-like structures were analyzed in the SEM and showed a Ca- and P-rich EDS signature. The ceratopsian bone fragments (Figure 13) yielded strikingly different structures from hadrosaur and theropod samples. After complete demineralization, the ceratopsian remains consisted of transparent, pliable, vessel-like structures similar to those described
Figure 10. Results of theropod specimen BMR P2002.4.1. A) Theropod bone sample prior to EDTA demineralization. Scale bar equals
5 cm. B) Partial demineralization of theropod sample, showing ‘‘etched’’ vessels released during demineralization. Scale bar equals 1 mm. C) Release of resistant vessels from fossil bone. Scale bar equals 1 mm. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013334.g010
Biofilms and Soft Tissues
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 9 October 2010 | Volume 5 | Issue 10 | e13334


Figure 11. Complete demineralization of theropod bone. (A) SEM image of hollow, vascular theropod extract at 756 magnification. B) EDS signature of 11(A) vessel, rich in Ca, O, Mn, and P. C) SEM image of theropod vessel at 1206 magnification. D) EDS signature of 11(C) vessel, rich in calcium and phosphate. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013334.g011
Figure 12. Ceratopsian specimen BMR P2006.4.1 bone fragments. A) Bone fragments prior to demineralization. Scale bar equals 5 cm. B) Light microscopy image of ceratopsian sample after demineralization, revealing a network of pliable, how vessels and tubes. Scale bar equals 1 mm. C) SEM image of pliable ceratopsian extracts at 4,5006 magnification. D) EDS signature of SEM image 12(C), high in carbon, iron, and silica. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013334.g012
Biofilms and Soft Tissues
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 10 October 2010 | Volume 5 | Issue 10 | e13334


by previous authors [1,4]. These structures showed an EDS signature that was high in carbon, iron, possessed some silica. Furthermore, the ceratopsian extracts also possessed small, spherical structures with a high iron EDS signature (Figure 14). Similar structures were previously noted in a demineralized turtle carapace from the Hell Creek Formation and identified as pyritic framboids [4].
Discussion
The influence of bacteria on extraordinary preservation (i.e. lagerstatten) has been discussed [23–27]. However, these findings are at odds with traditional inferences of microbes as destructive agents due to biodegradation [10]. Previous reports have illustrated the crucial role of microorganisms in the early stages of fossilization through rapid mineralization of soft-tissues [28]. The ability of microbial biofilms to retard decomposition of delicate soft-tissues by means of mineralization has been documented [29–31], though previous studies have dealt primarily with microbially-mineralized soft-tissues, such as phosphatization of soft-tissues in the fossil record, focusing on the microbial transformation of soft-tissues into authigenic minerals [12].
The preservation of embryonic structures due to early biofilm mineralization has previously been reported [30]. Although the soft-tissue nature of embryos does not normally fossilize well, the mineralization of biofilms in the earliest biostratinomic stages can yield high-detailed textures of the original soft-tissues. Phosphatized soft-tissues in the basal ornithimimosaur, Pelecanimimus polydon, have also been described in the form of muscle and skin [25]. The results of this study strongly suggest that microorganisms play a role in the preservation of primary softtissues in vertebrate organisms, without extensive secondary mineralization. Differences in morphological and elemental characteristics in fossil extracts evaluated here suggest that microbial infiltration into bones may heavily impact internal preservation in fossil archosaur bone. Statistically significant differences are present between microbial communities and degree of biofilm infilling of surficial pores based on whole versus halved bones regardless of taxa, supporting the hypothesis that preservation is strongly influenced by early biostratinomic processes. In this case, halved bones are easier for microorganisms to infiltrate and metabolize soft-tissues; the system is much more open. However, bacteria can only infiltrate whole bones via natural openings (pores or foraminae) [15]. These cavities act as microenvironments in
Figure 13. SEM and EDS results of ceratopsian specimen BMR P2006.4.1. A) SEM image at 6506 magnification of pliable ceratopsian vessels. B) SEM image at 4,5006 magnification of framboids identified in pliable ceratopsian vessels. C) EDS signature of framboids, rich in iron. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013334.g013
Biofilms and Soft Tissues
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 11 October 2010 | Volume 5 | Issue 10 | e13334


which the biofilm establishes, metabolizes available primary tissues, and mineralizes, as evident from EDS analyses of fossil extracts. This mineralization walls off access to more internal organic material, limiting further penetration and metabolization of the interior of the bone in a process we refer to as ‘‘microbial masonry’’. Thus, fractured bones have a less-likely chance of preserving primary soft-tissues because microbial masonry can only occur where access to organic matter is available exclusively via microscopic forminae. Recognizing evidence of the microbial process has implications for reconstructing taphonomic histories. For example, the thescelosaur samples analyzed possessed mineralized biofilms in pore spaces before and after demineralization. However, the bone was discovered fractured in situ, suggesting that fracturing was the result of biostratinomic processes or diagenetic deformation. Fossil vertebrates that possess a large amount of frangible extracts after demineralization could indicate a complex taphonomic history in which the bone was primarily unfractured when microorganisms began establishing biofilms
on the surface and infiltrating surface pores, followed by mineralization and bone fracturing due to biostratinomic processes such as trampling [32] or diagenetic processes, such as compaction due to burial. The thescelosaur and theropod specimens examined were both obtained from fractured in situ bones discovered in fine sandstone facies of the Hell Creek Formation in southeastern Montana, USA. The ceratopsian fragments were from an unfractured bone obtained from a mudstone facies of the same region. The degree of compaction of sediments during lithification could control the rate of post burial diagenetic fracturing and crushing of fossil bone. Mudstone lithification involves more compaction than sandstone lithification, altering fossil bones respectively. As such, one would expect decreased crushing in bones obtained from sandstone facies and thus a higher degree of soft-tissue preservation despite having higher groundwater throughflow. This result is at odds with the raw data from previous studies on T. rex and B. canadensis specimens [1,3]. However, in the experiments reported here, the extracted pliable tissues were obtained from a sample encased in mudstone. Although many of the ceratopsian bones were fractured syndepositionally, the high clay content and decreased permeability of the matrix may have acted as an extra barrier, decreasing available oxygen, groundwater flow, and ultimately retarding microbial action. Although microorganisms are traditionally thought to rapidly metabolize and destroy organic material, decreasing the chances for fossilization, this study has shown that not only may microorganisms play an integral role in the formation of fossils by mineralizing soft tissues, but also that in some cases biofilms may directly enhance the preservation of vertebrate primary soft-tissues. The results of this study indicate that exquisite preservation of pliable soft-tissues may be related to a microbial masonry process whereby the formation of microbial biofilms wall off internal surfaces of bones during early taphonomic stages. These biofilms metabolize organic materials and mineralize, forming resistant structures or microbial masonry wall surfaces across internal pores openings in bones. These results have potential to allow for more detailed taphonomic reconstructions and contribute to a more nuanced understanding of fossil preservation in the form of soft-tissues structures and biomolecules. The claim of the presence of primary soft-tissues in fossil vertebrates has been supported by the identification by mass spectroscopy of biomolecules in the form of collagen and proteins [2,3]. However, these studies have failed to produce a potential mechanism for the preservation of soft tissues throughout geological time. The results presented here suggest an important role of microorganisms in taphonomic processes, notably for the preservation of primary soft-tissues within bone, through a microbial masonry process. Although biomolecular studies on soft-tissue extracts from fossil vertebrates have shown that the proposed alternative interpretation of primary soft-tissue as microbial biofilms is unlikely [2,3], biofilms may play a critical role in the preservation process.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Elwood Briles, Rachel Allen, and the Department of Biology at Northern Illinois University for the donation of alligator and chicken bone samples, and the Burpee Museum of Natural History for the donation of fossil bone samples. We also thank Thomas Kaye and Mary Schweitzer for stimulating discussion concerning biofilm growth and tissues in fossil vertebrates, Lesley Rigg for assistance with
Figure 14. Histograms of (A) pore size distributions and (B) pore infiltration distribution among extant archosaur samples. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013334.g014
Biofilms and Soft Tissues
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 12 October 2010 | Volume 5 | Issue 10 | e13334


statistical methods, Rosa Maria Leal-Bautista and Jean E. McLain for hospitality and field assistance, and Mark Howland and Vicki Brown for figure, table, and formatting assistance.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: JEP MEL RPS. Performed the experiments: JEP MEL. Analyzed the data: JEP. Contributed reagents/ materials/analysis tools: JEP MEL RPS. Wrote the paper: JEP.
References
1. Schweitzer MH, Wittmeyer JL, Horner JR, Toporski JK (2005) Soft-tissue vessels and cellular preservation in Tyrannosaurus rex. Science 307: 1952–1955. 2. Asara JM, Schweitzer MH, Freimark LM, Philips M, Cantley LC (2007) Protein sequences from Mastodon and Tyrannosaurus rex revealed by mass spectrometry. Science 31: 280–285. 3. Schweitzer MH, Zheng W, Organ CL, Avci R, Suo Z, et al. (2009) Biomolecular characterization and protein sequences of the Campanian Hadrosaur B. canadensis. Science 324: 626–631. 4. Kaye TG, Gaugler G, Sawlowicz Z (2008) Dinosaurian soft tissue interpreted as bacterial biofilms. PloS ONE 3(7): e2808. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002808. 5. Dodson P (1973) The significance of small bones in paleoecological interpretations. University of Wyoming Contributions to Geology 12: 15–19. 6. Wolff RG (1973) Hydrodynamic sorting and ecology of a Pleistocene mammalian assemblage from California (U.S.A.). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 13: 91–101. 7. Boaz NT, Behrensmeyer AK (1976) Hominid taphonomy: transport of human skeletal parts in an artificial fluvialite environment. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 45: 53–60. 8. Blob RW (1997) Relative hydrodynamic dispersal potentials of soft-shell turtle elements: implications for interpreting skeletal sorting in assemblages of nonmammalian terrestrial vertebrates. PALAIOS 12: 151–164. 9. Behrensmeyer AK (1991) Terrestrial vertebrate accumulations. In: Allison P, Briggs DEG, eds. Taphonomy: Releasing the Data Locked in the Fossil Record. New York: Plenum. pp 291–335. 10. Child AM (1995) Towards an understanding of microbial decomposition of archaeological bone in the burial environment. Journal of Archaeological Science 22: 165–174. 11. Costerton JW, Lewandoski Z, Caldwell DE, Korber DR, Lappin-Scot HM (1995) Microbial Biofilms. Annual Review of Microbiology 49: 711–745. 12. Briggs DEG, Kear AJ, Martill DM, Wilby PR (1993) Phosphatization of softtissue in experiments and fossils. Journal of the Geological Society of London 150: 1035–1038. 13. Morris NS, Stickler DJ, McLean RJC (1999) The development of bacterial biofilms on indwelling urethral catheters. World Journal of Urology 17(6): 345–350. 14. Schweitzer MH, Wittmeyer JL, Horner JR (2007) Soft tissue and cellular preservation in vertebrate skeletal elements from the Cretaceous to the present. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 274: 183–197. 15. Trueman CN, Martill DM (2002) The long-term survival of bone: the role of bioerosion. Archaeometry 44(3): 371–382. 16. Collins MJ, Nielsen-Marsh CM, Hiller J, Smith CI, Roberts JP, et al. (2002) The survival of organic matter in bone: a review. Archaeometry 44(3): 383–394.
17. Witmer LM (1995) The extant phylogenetic bracket and the importance of reconstructing soft tissues in fossils. In Thomason J, ed. Functional Morphology in Vertebrate Paleontology Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp 19–33. 18. Perry EC, Marin LE, McClain J, Velazquez G (1995) The ring of cenotes (sinkholes) northwest Yucatan, Mexico: its hydrogeologic characteristics and association with the Chicxulub Impact Crater. Geology 23: 17–20. 19. Perry EC, Payton A, Pedersen B, Velazquez-Oliman G (2009) Groundwater geochemistry of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico: Constraints on stratigraphy and hydrogeology. Journal of Hydrology 367: 27–40. 20. Zelles L (1997) Phospholipid fatty acid profiles in selected members of soil microbial communities. Chemosphere 35: 275–294. 21. Davis JC (1973) Statistics and data analysis in geology. New York: Wiley. 550 p. 22. Ebdon D (1991) Statitics in Geography, 2nd Edition. New York: Wiley Blackwell. 240 p. 23. Allison P (1988) The role of anoxia in the decay and mineralization of proteinaceous macro-fossils. Paleobiology 14(2): 139–154. 24. Allison PA, Briggs DEG (1991) The taphonomy of soft-bodied animals. In Donovan SK, ed. Fossilization: the process of taphonomy Belhaven Press: London. pp 120–140. 25. Briggs DEG, Wilby PR, Pe ́rez-Moreno BP, Sanz JL, Fregenal-Martı ́nez M (1997) The mineralization of dinosaur soft-tissue in the Lower Cretaceous of Las Hoyas, Spain. Journal of the Geological Society London 154: 587–588. 26. Davis PG, Briggs DEG (1995) The fossilization of feathers. Geology 23: 783–786. 27. Hof CHJ, Briggs DEG (1997) Decay and mineralization of mantis shrimps (Stomatopoda: Crustacea) - a key to their fossil record. PALAIOS 12: 420–438. 28. Hollocher TC, Chin K, Hollocher KT, Kruge MA (2001) Bacterial residues in coprolite of herbivorous dinosaurs: role of bacteria in mineralization of feces. PALAIOS 16(6): 547–565. 29. Carpenter K (2005) Experimental investigation of the role of bacteria in bone fossilization. Neues Jahrbuch fur Geologie und Palaontologie Monatshefte 2005(2): 83–94. 30. Raff EC, Schollaert KL, Nelson DE, Donoghue PCJ, Thomas CW, et al. (2008) Embryo fossilization is a biological process mediated by microbial biofilms. Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences 105(49): 19360–19365. 31. McNamera ME, Orr PJ, Kearns SL, Alcala L, Anadon P, et al. (2009) Soft-tissue preservation in Miocene frogs from Libros, Spain: insights into the genesis of decay microenvironments. PALAIOS 24(2): 104–117. 32. Behrensmeyer AK (1978) Taphonomic and ecologic information from bone weathering. Paleobiology 4(2): 150–162.
Biofilms and Soft Tissues
PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 13 October 2010 | Volume 5 | Issue 10 | e13334