zotero-db/storage/74DX5HVR/.zotero-ft-cache

1k

AD A 065 762 UNCLASSIFIED

COeUTER SCIENCES CORP HUNTSVILLE ALA VIRTUAL STATE ENGINEERING AND ITS IMPLICATIONS. (U )
1975 tE. SEARDCN

P/S 20/10 P4.

END

DA T E

FFLDE

—

5 —79

DDE

a

~~~~~
~~~

EL
I. TITLE ( i d SubUtI..)
Virtua l State Engineering and Its Implicat~~~~~~~
-~~~~~
___________
~~~~~ j Bea~~~~~~~

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

/ ~ TYP E a’ ~~~~~~~~~~ £ O c D l r Co

R

Technical

f
~~~~~~~~~

6 P E R F O R M I N G O R G R E P O R T IJM R

N/ A

OR G R A N T NUMBER (.)

N/A

9. P E R F O R M I NG ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Computer Sciences Corporation 6022 Technology Drive Huntsville , Al 35807 (205) 837—7200

to. P R O G R A M ELEMENT. PROJECT .TASK A R E A 6 W oR K UNIT NUMBERS N/A

II. CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME A N D A D D R E S S
T. E. Bearden
1902 Willis Road S. E.

/__I, /
‘~.. -4

DATE ~~~~~~~~~~~
1978
-.~~ . ~~ 1l dEROF PAG ES

-

Huntsville , Al 35801 (204) 533—3682

1 + 22

14. MONITORING AGENCY NAME & AOD RESS(II dl ff.t.n t from ControlUná Of (Ic.) IS. SECURITY CLASS. (of thu. t.p ort)

Same as 11.
IS. DISTRIBUTION S T A T E M E N T (of thu. R.porl)

—iI .1

Un classified
ISa D E C L A S S I F I C A T I O N / D O W N G R A D I N G
SCHEOULE N / A

. ~ ~~~~~~~~ tI
~~~~~
LU

Approved for Public Release. Distribution Unlimited.
17. DISTRIBUTION S T A T E M E N T (of th. abatracI .at. r.d In Block 20. If dIfI.r.n t from R.pon)

DDC
II[
~~ MPR 15 ]~79

C.3

LA!~U U 1~

IS. SUPPLEM ENT A R Y NOTE S
T. E. Bearden 1979. Reproduced by permission of the copyright holder .

IS. KEY WORDS (Continua on r.v .ra. aid. If n.c.aaary id I d . n t if y by block numb.r)
Action , amplification of virtual state , anenergy 8 annihilation operators , anti—ballistic missile systems , antiradiation systems , antiaircraft systems , binding energy , biological transmutation , change , coherent superposition , complementarity , deinaterialization , dielectric , diffusion , Dirac sea ,
key words (continued)
~ @. ABSTRACT (Caat~~u. ro v.rs . .S~~ If n~~~~~wy d Idmul fy by block numb.~)
~~~~~ Experimental evidence of zero—point energy of vacuum has been established beyond question. Soviet direct measurement of this energy has been reported. Prigogine’s Nobel Prize work confirms that in theory a highly disordered , chaotic, virtual state , zero—point energy can be cohered to crosstalk into observable quantum change and even macroscopic energy production . Several simple devices can be demonstrated to observably tap zero—point energy .—~~~~~
Abstract (continued)

~~~~ DO

1473 EDITION OF INOV 65 5 OBSOLETE

Unclassified
SECURITY CLA SSi FICATIO N OF THIS PAGE (W)i.,i B.f. EnI.r. ~~

— . 1I

—

—

, ~~~

— -

£i~d ;~J~~ .t.&..i
SE C U R I TY CL 1~~ r IC A T I O N

OF

THIS

PAGE(W?i~~i DaIa En~.r.d)

Key Words (Concluded)
electromagnetic field , electromagnetism , electron current dissolution , Fermi length , fine structure constant , foundations of physics , free energy devices , gravitationa l field , hyperframe , hyperspace , Lamb shift , lethal mechanisms , logic , many—worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics , mass , materialization , negative entropy, neutrino , nonlinear therodynamics , objective state , observation , orthogonal frames, particles , particle beams , particle beam weapons , partons , perception , photon , photon interaction , Planck length , pions , protons , quantum , quantum change , quantum field theory , quantum geoinetrodynamics , quantum mechamlcs , quantum physics , reality, relativity , simultaneity, spacetime , speed of light, strong force , subquantum , superspace ,time , transmutation , uncertainty princip le, virtual nx dulation , virtual particle , virtual photon , virtual state , zero—point energy .

‘ Abs t ract (Con c luded)

Extension of the theory onto even a simplified hyperspace model indicates

direct applications in certain specialized amplifiers . Consideration of

multiple simultaneous observation (Everett ’s interpretation of quantum

mechanics) ties together virtual and observable states into the same time

change, allowing superposition of virtual state into observable state. By

considering virtual state patterns to be carried by the individual photon ,

then superposition effects can be obtained upon a target radiated by a

radar beam if each and every photon of the radar beam contains one virtual

state pattern in common , added into its other (incoherent) virtual state

patterns . Sufficient superposition of the coherent pattern in the target

produces real observable changes which may have significant app lications.

Such applications include electron current dissolution (dudding of electro-

magnetic circuits), cancellation of electromagnetic fields , de—activation

(dudding) of nuclear warheads by transmutation of fissionable materials ,

and simple production of particle beams of enormuous power density. Electron

current dissolution is also effective against the nervous systems of

biological targets. radars could possibly

Ibtetmhausdeaipnpteoarsunitvheartsaelle,ctarlolm—apgunreptoisée~wreaadpioantsorsefsfucehctiavse

against every major battle element. A mechanism and a theory for direct

amplification of the virtual state into observable state is given. At

least one known device , Moray ’s free energy apparatus , successfully applied

virtual state engineering to produce 55 kilowatts of power from a 55—pound

device by tapping zero—point energy .

/
1*
0
—

I Is

-

P1W IN,1I*1~.M~ m

unclassified

...A- S(CU~~ITV CLASSIF ICATION OF T

~~~~~~ ~~~~

VIRTUAL STATE ENGINEERING AND ITS IMPLICATIONS I.E. Bearder i 1978 I.E. Bearden

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
•

T

~~~~~~

-

ABSTRACT

Experimental evidence of zero-point energy of vacuum has been established

beyond question. Soviet direct measurement of this energy has been

reported. Prigogine ’s Nobel Prize work confi rms that in theory a highly
disordered , chaot ic~virtual state,zero-point energy can be cohered to crosstalk into observabl e quantum change and even macroscopic energy

production. Severa l simple devices can be demonstrated to observably

tap zero-point energy. Extension of the theory onto even a simplified

hyperspace model indicates direct applications in certain specialized

amplifiers . Consideration of multi ple simultaneous observation (EveretV s

interpretation of quantum mechanics) ties together virtual and observable

states into the same time change , allowi ng superposition of virtual state

into observabl e state. By considering virtual state patterns to be carried

by the individ ual photon , then superposition effects can be obtained upon

a target radiated by a radar beam if each and every photon of the radar

beam contains one virtual state pattern in common , added into its other

(incoherent) virtual state patterns. Sufficient superposition of the

coherent pattern in the target produces real observabl e changes which may

have significant

applicat ions. Such applications include electron

current dissolution (dudding of el ectromagnetic circuits ), cancellation

of el ectromagnetic fields , de-activation (dudding )of nuclear warheads by

transmutation of fissionable material s, and simpl e production of particl e

beams of enormous power -density. Electron current dissolution is also

effective against the nervous systems of biol ogical targets. It thus

appears that el ectromagnetic radiators such as radars could possibly be

made i nto universal , all-purpose weapons effective against every major battl e

el ement.

—

—.-

—~~~~~

—~

— -.~~~~ ,.~~~~~

~

•
•
- —
4.

VIRTUAL STATE ENGINEERING AND ITS IMPLICATIONS I.E. Bearden

1.0

BACK GROUND

Certain recent theoretical advances in quantum mechanics suggest the possibility of direct eng i neering applications. Several of these new extensions to theory drastically change the present view of physics and of physical effects obtainabl e from mi croscopi c phenomena and macroscopic phenomena and macroscopi c systems. To expla in the importance of these new developments , some background discussion is necessary.

1.1

EVERETT ’S THEORY OF THE UNIVERSAL WAV E FUNCTION

In 1957, working under the renowned John Wheeler at Princeton University , Evere tt1 formulated a totally new interpretation of quantum mechanics and corrected the present interpretation of physics for a severe shortcomi ng: the limitat ion to only a single observer/detector at a time . The new theory of the universal wave function that emerged for multiple simultaneou s observation was startl i ngly unique , but totally consistent wi th the entire experimental basi s of physics2. The new model represented so unorthodox a change in conceptualization that only a handful of U.S. physicists have examined the theory , and almost the entire Free Worl d output on the subject is contained in a single Princeton University publ i cation.3 Nonethel ess, since the principl es of quantum mechanics underlie the whole of physics4 and physics underlies engineering , Everett ’s fundamental work presages the engineering of novel and practical new systems presently not being pursued in the Free World. But because of its extreme theoretical strangeness-which , compared to the accepted Bohr interpretation , is as fundamental a change as was Einstein ’s relativity compared to Newtonian physics--Everett ’s work has not been universally accepted even for further investigation. 5
That such an investigation might be fruitful can be appreciated by noting that the multitude of 3-spaces , in the hyperspace that results In Everett ’s theory, all crosstalk .This is tantamount to stating that ordinary 3-space conservation øf energy--which rigorously applies only to a closed 3-space system--can be and Is surmounted in the time coherent crosstalk , s ince energy in the 3-space frames orthogonal to the laboratory frame (whIch orthogonal energy may be referred to as anenergy) uncloses or “opens ” the la boratory frame by the amount of crosstalk translated to and from it.

1978 I.E. Bearden

1

—.

. -- -

—~~~~~ - —-

~~~~~~~~~~~

~~:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

-

~~T~~T - -

Further , the random crosstalk normall y occurs at so hi gh a frequency (e.g., at wav eleng ths near the Planck length , or on the order of meters)and in such short and incoherent bursts that it appears in the virtual state wi th respect to the laboratory observer. Thus , this energy is not normally detected, although it can be physically demonstrated to be present in enormous densities in vacuum. Anenergy , however , in its own hyperspace framework is essentially infinite energy and it may be taken as one way to model zero-point energy of vacuum .
Thus a ready model of nested orthogonal virtual state anenergies is ininediately availabl e to represent both Wheeler ’s superspace6 and zeropoint energy of vacuum , in a manner consistent with Everett’s fundamental interpretation of quantum mechanics.
1.2 HYPERSPACE ASPECTS
A simplifi ed model of one hyperspace in which calculat ions are particularly direct is shown in Figure 1.1 . Since Everett ’s model is consistent with experiment7, and the model in Figure 1.1 is a subset of Everett’s theory , then this nested virtual—state anenergy model is also consistent with the experimental basis of physics. Note, however , that the model offers a mechanism by means of which el ectromagnetic energy in the laboratory frame can be created and destroyed , and gives physical substance to the creation and annihilation operators presently used in quantum mecjianics .
In the model , the time axis (time dimension in four-space) is shared simultaneously by an infinite set of orthogonal 3-spaces. An object’s intersection in a specifi c 3-space determines how it is detected or observed by an instrument or observer in that frame . Accordingly, in this model an “object” has more than one kind of “reality ” it evidences; spatially a 3-dimensional physical object in the S frame is a 2-dimensional wave or photon in the S. frame, a one-dimensional line in the S’’ frame , and a zero-dimensional point in S’’’ and higher hyperframes. Vice versa , spatially a 3-dimensional object in a higher frame is a quite different object to an S-frame laboratory observer. An electron serves as a good example: when in the S’ frame, it is seen in the S frame as a photon; when in the 5” frame it Is seen by the S-frame observer as a fl ux line; when in the 5’’’ frame, it is simply a point in the S frame . The major
2

____

-

-

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

• •
0)
E
‘5 Na, C S- I
r

4.,

U 5I

C ‘0

4->s~

~•-‘0uC 5E0~C .‘I--~,1~0~W C44U USU(-I)J)..)’II.—wE5sC1.4U~4wC W$0 O~.)4~—~.~u.4CJ0> O~WJ~~JC~~~>40 U E t~L5Lw ~~~~~~.J91... o r5LsoCE-W ~)~W4.~C~4 o4~(~~~~I-u)~~>l’~~~OE~0- 4U . ~C WE0.)’

U)

__

O
4-I

0~~~~0I4)

—J

U)
I—

~~
~~

~~~~~~

C

.s ‘I-

’.U

o

i.. #

‘.u ~~

>,
S-

.C
4-

0)
’E

CU)~.~C~

ww
O.C
0E4 ’

..- ..- 0

/ ( I U)

IS

I)l 5

45.’~~S~~

Ø . ’ ~~~~~ 0 ‘~I5-~1~ >s0..-.,oC

0 U) 4-~ ..CCW 1— 0 ’-—

~~I ~I ~~~~ / .t~f~l .-~~~~

~/ ~\J 51
~ ~o~~0>,..C W
‘i\~~I It~~lI~ // ~ ~~ .C .1~

4’ ISW C .C = 4)

o w. . 0 0. dO 0) _ ~~

.-WC 4J...

~~~

)( 0)

S0~..

0~~C~.,, ‘

~, ~l~~l , ~~oz ’ ‘1

.~ 1~~4--II

~D % ’ p , j

.. ‘ -i/ ‘~ ~

cx!: +z ~~~~~

~

~

~~~

~

~Di Q °io

I I~~~

Is
-I -4 4. ’

~~II I

Q .‘-4 ~~~

~~~~~~~
~~~~o.

,?;-1

‘-‘

L41 ~~

w

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

0~~

3 s/ ~/
(I,

0 w_U_JJw_ L1-~~. ~c0~:.

0

E

w

.~1 i.’I
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

LU~~~~

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

—

~~~~~~~

--~~~~~

3

~~~~~~~• •

•

-

L
• •

point is tha t, by sufficient time coherent collection of “points ” in the S-frame , one can collec t and produce pho tons and even par ti cl es by “lifting ” them from the higher hyperfram es tha t const itute nes ted v i r tual fr ames to the S-frame observer. Several fundamental experiments and concepts in phys ics are alread y merely spec i alized cases; l i fting a r eal elec tron from the Dirac sea of negative energy electrons is one exampl e in solid state physics , while the most universal examples are simply photon absorption and emission whereby , to the S-frame observer , 2-dimensional wave energy and 3-dimensional corpuscular mass may be turned one into the other. Further , any fundamental mass particle is actually a dynamic hyperspatial entity and not just a static corpuscle; a fraction of its time the S-frame particle spends in higher dimensional spaces. As is wel l known , e.g., a free electron is a wave for a fraction of time given by the fine structure constant
1 (1)

Thus materialization and dematerialization (creation and annihilation ) of particles by conventional modes may be modeled in the hyperspace model shown in Figure 1.1. In addition , new modes are opened up whereby instead of photons being produced , a dematerializing particle may radiate fl ux lines, neu tr i nos , or simply dimensionless points--in sharp contrast to conventional modes such as pair annihi lation , in which photon radiation accompanies the process.

1. 3

AN EXAMPLE

One statement of the Heisenberg uncertainty principl e is:

L~E~t

>

, where $ -

= -_

~~

~~

(2)

As written , this principl e is fundamental to the basis of quantum physics
and engineering and applies for monocular (one-at-a-time) detection. If
one now app lies the principl e to simultaneous coherent detection (as prescribed by Everett’s theory)of superposed quantum and virtual (subquantum) changes , one has 8

1~EL~t = n ~~~, n = 0 , 1 , 2, 3, ”

(3)

-

•

~ ~• -

—

which becomes a generatrix for quantized change itself in the S-frame . Stated in reverse , any observabl e quantized change in the S-frame may now be regarded as an ensembl e of unobservabl e, hyperd imensional , virtual S-fram e changes (where thesc? are observabl e changes in their own hyperframes), just as a sing le vector may be regarded as the ens emble of it s projections onto orthogonal coordinate axes.
To show a simplified example of the feasibility of direct engineering with this effect, one rewrites equation (2) for a change in electromagnetic energy as:

hv~t = n~~ , n = 1, 2. ~~~~

(4)

RelativiStica lly converting equation (4) to wavel ength considerations by

means ~

— Ct~L and factoring out h ,

4irv~~ - = n , n = 1 , 2, 3,~ ”

(5)

Treating t~L as the classical radius of a fundamental particl e, and letting 4irr2 = S where S is the classical surface area ,

v -_ -c-~n-r-- , n — ., 2, 3,

6

As an initial approximation (which is sufficient due to the uncertainty in
the specific radius to be assumed), let C 3 ~ ~ 8 m and r = lO~~5m
(the Fermi length). We then have:

= ,~

io22 , n = 1 , 2, 3, ”

(7)

and

p = n [2.3873 X 1022] hz , n 1 , 2, 3~”

(8)

As can be seen , the theory predicts a series of harmonic oscillator frequencies which may be taken to be the vectorial hyperspat ial projection components of the particle itself , i.e., there are certain “window

______

~~~~~~~~~~~

•

•

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I ••.#e~~•-$/-4~-

• t • ~• ~ ~~~••~

frequencies ” tuned into and through hyperspace by virtue of the geometrical

41

si ze of the particle. By adding consideration of doppler shifts due to

movement of the particle , specific hyperspatial “window frequencies ” can be

calculated for a given free particle moving at a given velocity . Engineer ing

aspects emerge from the consideration that the particle ’s window frequencies

represent resonant coupl i ngs between virtual state and observable state.

Thus , theoretically through and from the particle at its window frequencies ,

and possibly at subharmonics , real observabl e energy is extractabl e from

cohered , superposed ; virtual state zero-point energy of vacuum hyperspace.

1.4

AMPLIFIER THEORY

Calcula tion of the hyperchannel effect in a multi-staged amplifier can be established as shown in Figure 1.2, which schema may be visualized as similar to a Class F amplifier using state-of-the-art feedforward and feedback techniques. In the first hyperframe 9 given by v = c , all stages of the amplifier appear superposed due to Lorentz-Fi tzgerald contraction. For a particle at a particu lar location in any stage n the corresponding location in any other stage m will have an exceedingly small but finite probability of having the same energy state, i.e., there is a small but finite and real possibilit y that the particle exists in both locations simultaneously during a given small increment of time . That probability may be taken to be an identity coefficient between the two locations and regarded as the probabilit y of a wormhol e connection in spacetime itself-i.e. , as the fraction of time that spacetime is mul tiply connected in the first hyperframe .* Figure 1.3 shows the setup of the calculation of the gain availabl e by cohering the collection of the hyperspatial component. For stage i of n stages , where E1 = initial input to stage 1 ,

E E0(1) = A~E~ + A0

A~E I I k

(9)

or
E0(1) = A~E1 + AOEI Ik(A O + A~ + ... + A~)

(10)

For stage n:

I I = E0(~ ) = A0nE1 + AOEI Ik

I~l _ A n+•)~I L T - Ao J

*The identity coefficient determines the “crosstalk” between hyp erframes .

Certain frequencies (e .g ., 38—4 0 kH z) have large Ik ’s and thus constitute

“magic windows ” between hyperframes . 6

•

(11)
••

••

-

0
N

4
S S

4 -

L

~~~

~~~

4÷,... ~~

t~t.
__

• ~~~~~~~~~~~~ •— -

—~~~~~~~~~

J

— - - ~~~~~~,• •--~~

— •~

—~~~ - - •~

__

•

•

••

. •~~~~~~~•i~ •~~~•• • •- • ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

.•

-

1 ,

0 w

U

-‘

-IUi

w
•1~~
0

0

4

a,

,

; ~~~~ 1 1

)

à. ~~~

~

S S S

-— _ _ _ _ —I.- -~~~~~ ~~

___
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

- •.-

—

8

••

—

_ ____ ___ ____ ___ __ _

— _ — _

_

__
4• ’~~

_

___
,S,*.I,~~

_

_

•

1 =

A~E1

+

AOEI Ik

IA ~ l~1 _
[A ~ — ]

(12)

~

For n>>l , A0>>l

LA : ] E0zA ~E1 + AOEi Ik [Afl+l 1

(13)

=

A~

+

A1 ~~

Ik

(14 )
-

where A~ represents the gain factor in the ordinary 3-space channel by

standard theory of inert hyperchannel gain factor

oafmpthliefielirnse,aar ndarrAa~y~~.*Ik

represents In general ,

the exponential it is readily seen

that the total gain factor , consideri ng all higher hyperchannels , will be of

the form:

= A~ + A~~’Ik + A~~2 I~ +

+ A~~r_II~ -l +

( 15)

Further , due to the minute size of- Ik(e.g., < 10-50 ), for normal A0 gains the hypercha nnel effect wi ll be completely negligibl e unless a very large
number of stages are used .

At least one device--T . Henry Moray ’s radiant energy amplifier--was successful ly built , demonstrated the effect , was repeatedly tested , and produced kilowatts of power1.° Due to the lack of any theory at the time to explain its operation , the device was not deemed credibl e, but was regarded in the same category as the ordinary perpetua l motion machine. With the most recent advances in theory--and specifically with Prigogine ’s 1977 Nobel Prizewinning work -- a good theoretical foundation for the Moray device has now been established.

Because of the rapid , exponential falloff of the input amplitude from

hyperchanne ls above the first , all hyperchannels two orthogona lities and

*Tsheecopnrdoc(em~daugreic

is to block windows)

the term

first (normal energy) term but leave open . Thu s one could build , e .g ., a direct

the

generator for a particle beam of any desired energy . The same amp lifier

should also be ca pable of amplifying thought energy, life en ergy, psycho—

6

kinesis , etc.

9.

- ——— •-,-••----•— —

—b - ~

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~~

fur ther away from the la boratory fr ame may normally be neglected unl ess an extreme number of stages are used . But 20-100 stages can be sufficient to produce the effect in the first hyperchannel , as can be seen from equation (14). Since the firzt hyperchannel is electromagnetic fi el d with respect to an S- frame observer , then useful electromagneti c energy in the S-frame is produced by the ampl ifier , directly from zero-point hyperframe energy of vacuum. Further , because of the exponential function of n that results in the gain factor , the addition of only a few extra stages past the level required for breachi ng the quantum threshold has the potential of yi elding enormous amounts of energy, subject only to practical materials l imitations and failures. Further , by coupl i ng the cohered energy to el ectron emission from a cold cathode material , the amplifi er can produce a direct flow of electrons into external loads , rather than emitting electromagnetic radiation.

1. 5

ZERO POINT ENERGY OF VAC UUM

It is well-known tha t zero-point energy of electromagnetic fi eld in vacuum

is:

(I) =

ka ~~ “ak

•
(16)

The zero-point energy is essentially infinite because there are essentially an infinite number of field oscillators . For most purposes this infinite energy of the vacuum can be taken as a constant , and thL~s cancels out by definite integration when any physically meaningful quantity is cal ’.ulated . For thi s reason , zero-point energy may usually be ignored in ordinary quantum el ectrodynamics.

However , the absolute value of zero-point energy is physically significant

in general relativity , since it determines the curvature of spacetime. Thus

in quantized relativistic systems the energy must be taken into account.

(Note that in the hyperspat ial amplifier theory of Section 1.4, relativistic

effects were i nvoked by going to the first hyperframe). Calculations of

the spatial density of this z~ro-po int typically yield densities on the order

vacuum of the

energy (expressed in E/C2 equivalent of

mass

units )

1080 - 10120 grams /cm3. Further , it can be positively demonstrated that

very simple devices can yi eld direct “tapping ” of zero-point energy ,

~~~ :

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

10
••
~~~~~
~~

e.g. take a cubical box of yolume Q = L3 as shown in Fi gure 1.4, and

then put conducting planes at X 0 and .X = R as shown . Let I become
infinite but keep R finite. ‘.et WL be the energy i n the box when the conduc ting plane at X = R is absent. When the conducting plane is present ,

the energy in between and X

the = 0

box and

can X =

be R;

divided and WL_

R

into , the

two parts : WR~ energy between

the X =

energy R and X

=

L.

•

Although each of these energ i es is infinite and divergent , the difference

between the energy WR + WL R wi th the conducting plane at X = R , and the

energy WL_ R difference

without AW can be

this conducting shown11 to be:

plane , is

finite.

This finite energy

= )lCii212.

(17)

720 R

which gives a force per unit area of:
F = $Cii2
240 R

(18)

Thi s attractive force between conducting surfaces depends only on the separation R and on the universal constants ~1 and c. The energy in equation 17 also depends directly on the plate area . Nei ther the force nor the - work produced depends on the coupl ing of the electromagnetic field to matter (of which coupling e is a measure ). Thus even very simpl e devices may actually tap zero- point energy of vacuum.
The fact that the zero-point energy exists and has observabl e consequences has been established by Casimir)2 Lifsch i tj~3 extended the theory to describe the attraction of dielectric bodies and to include finite temperature effects. Two Soviet physicists , Deryagin and Abrikosava ,14 have reported direct experimental measurement of real forces generated by this energy .
Further , the Lamb shift in the hydrogen atom is a well-known phenomenon • which rigorously establishes that zero-point vacuum energy can be “tapped”
to yi eld observabl e energy results. In the Lamb effect a small energy difference between the 2s and 2P1/2 energy l evel s of the hydrogen atom is
11

.— ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

_____

—

~1 ~1~~~~’?m~’: ~

ii —

•
_

/ /

_ - L_ _

f~~Muerteal1.4P.lateFsorcbey

Exerted Between Two Conductin g Zero- Point Vacuum Energy

L I

12
______

_ _ _ _ _

___

____

created by zero-point energy . The energy has been experimentall y measured , yielding a photon frequency of 1057 megahertz .

In fact , a major recasting of quantum mechanics itself appears in the

offi ng as a resul t of the increasing importance of zero-point vacuum energy , as typified by the work of Boyer.~ 5

1.6

CORRECTION OF THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS

In 197 7, Dr. Ilya Prigogine was awarded the Nobel Prize for correcting and expanding the second law of thermodynamics to show how certain systems may evolve from randomness toward order. 16 ’17 Thi s is a fundamental change to
the entire statistica l basis of physics; specifically, the old second law of thermodynami cs applies only to linear systems. For highly nonlinear sys t ems , the former law of entropy need not appl y. Specifically, if such a nonline ar system is allowed to vary in an absolutely random fashion ,
large scale order will start to emerge and stabilize. The more degrees
of freedom allowed in the variation , the more stable these emerg i ng orders
become. Thus it is now known that from utte~ chaos there can and will arise large-scale order. Highly nonlinear systems now are known to follow a different kind of entropy law , and often to exhibit negative entropy .

The experimental verification of the new theory has been found in turbulent plasma s , and thi s verification of Prigog ine ’ s work led to the 1977 award of the Nobel Prize to him.

Applied to zero-point virtual energy of vacuum--which is highly nonlinear and turbulent--it is now evident that the new thermodynami cs pred~ct$ the rise and presence of large , ordered energy structures , even sufficiently large to breach the quantum threshold and result in observabl e change. Indeed , this very fact may account for the infinite Di rac sea of negative
energy electrons and a corresponding neutrino sea. Further , were it not for the practical existence of the new second law and negative entropy in highly nonlinear systems , the ordered macroscopic world itsel f could not emerge from the chaotic zero-point energy . Space is not emptiness; instead It is a plenum filled wi th violently fluctuating energ ies and energetic particles in hyperspatial frames , and in these nonlinear energy fl uctuations large scale orders--such as fundamental particles of every possible sort-are continually emerg ing and submerging (bei ng created ana destroyed).
1~

13

- -

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Indeed , a s imi lar chaotic maelst rom of ac ti ons and i nterac tions are occurring in vacuum as are occurring at a larger scale level in a glass of water. Thus there now exists a substantial theoretical basis to allow coheri ng thes e repeti tively appearing , ordered virtual energy structures into s tabi li zed observabl es . Further , there is ev idence that v i rtual effects can be modula ted i nto elec tromagneti c carr i ers and dumped onto macrosco pi c targets at a distance , diffusing and accumulating the superposing virtual structures throug hout the target material and structure. If sufficient superposition of the virtual structures occurs in the target , the quantum threshol d is breached and observabl e change occurs in the target.

1 .7

PHOTON CARRIER OF THE VIRTUAL STATE

Bearden 18 has presented a new logic which establishes that a mass particle

dimensionally imposes a time-differentiating operation upon 4-dimensional

Minkowski spacetime as:

~/~T (L~T) ~‘ L~

( 19)

The new logic successfully explains the two-slit experiment , fundamental to all quantum mechanics. A fundamental new defining equation for mass has also been given)9 Since a mass is spatial by virtue of its conception , and the photon (~ EAT)contains time by definition , a direct model of quantized physical change itself has been proposed by Bearden as shown in Figure 1.5. In this model , it can be seen that virtual entities which exist in time must of necessity be carried by the photon , i.e., “time” may be considered a special sort of box into which everyth ing is simultaneously fitted . Si nce detection occurs only singularly, by ana l ogy “detection ” is simply the lifting of a si ngle thi ng from the time box by the process of time-differentiation . As can be seen from Figure 1.5, the photon interaction accomplishes this process , and continually connects and disconnects the virtual state to the particles wi th which interaction occurs . Thus the virtual state pattern on an absorbed photon is diffused throughou t the elemental mass of a macroscopic object by succeeding internal interactions , as a function of time of the sor t gi ven by:

N = N0e~~t

(20)

14

-

—i

—•

~—•-

—.- --

.I~~~~~~~

— •—— -•

A

w

c~J

4~~

I- ,-

•
0I
•

CO (D

I

— LL~~~~L~1~~

I

_

_

I ~_j

I— .4

0~~

~~~~~~~ ~~

1 ~~. )

°-

V

~~, > 0

•

2

-
4_ LIL !

.~~~ ! —

J
q

L~~/ E~

. u~•

L)

•

•

.

C

-

.

~4

F

—
0

~~~
U..

_

•
•

<0
J .. U) Lii (~~~c/) Q
zu_ z

.3
_
__ ‘- __-,v.-__• ___ a
L) UJ (I) ~~~~~W

_ ii

—v —

15
— ——•--•• —-

•-•

••— —-— —•-

4

p 4 ?~~~.t

—

— —

~~~

-

•

where A i s the d i ff us ion cons tant for the element considered , N0 is the number of atoms of the element initially in the object’s mass , anci N is the number of atoms which have not yet interacted with the diffusing v irtual pattern at time t.
When an elec tromagnetic sig nal is being cont inually absorbed by a radi a ted body and each photon absorbed contains an identical virtual pattern in and among its collection of transported incoherent virtual state patterns (which randomly vary from photon to pho ton), then an accumulation of the repeated coherent virtual pattern occurs by superposition as shown in Figure 1.6. The superposing pattern will diffuse throughout the absorbi ng mass in accordance wi th equation (20). The mass is rather like a lea ky capacitor now being charged up by the superposing virtual pattern. When the superposition reaches the quantum threshold , real observabl e change occurs in the absorbing object mass . This process is called kindling , and it is a fundamental process whereby a virtual state pattern may be modulated into an electromagnetic carrier , delivered to a target mass , and superposed into observabl e change in that mass. The type of observabl e change which can be kindled would appear to be almost unl imi ted , being dependent only on the type of vi rtual pattern modulated into the carrier photons . Specifically, referring to Figure 1.1 , the kindling effect passes progressively from the third hyperframe (S-frame points) to the second hyperframe (S-frame flux or force), to the first hyperframe (S-frame el ectromagnetic field) , to the zeroth hyperframe (S-frame particulate matter).
1.8 FUNDAMENTAL UNITY OF ELECTRICAL FIELD AND GRAVITAT ION
In 1974 Santil li 2° proved that one of the cornerstone assumptions of physics-the assumption that el ectrical field and gravitational field are mutually exclusive things--is wrong . What is then left is either a strong assumption or a weak assumpt ion : the strong assumption is that electrical field and gravitational field are totally one-and-the-same thing , and the weak assumption is that electrical field and gravitational field are partially the same thing . Since either a gravitational change or an electrical change can be comprised of the quantity action, then the ability to kindle and engineer the virtual state may be expected to yield gravitational effects as well as el ectromagnetic effects. Virtual state engineering - the engineering of virtual subquantum r
16

• -

S

-

-

•

•

•

.-

Z LLJ
uJ -J

3 :> 0

Cw)~wF~~-

•

(J W

-J F - a :

U)

~W ~

a
0

F-’~—

< tr tzil < D

(!) W

O J

wU)

Fa-:

-

C/) .~~~ CD CD F-- CD

•

a: .J (~) <

~ — ~~

0

0>
z~~_-

Cl) CD ~~
~ : ~~- . ~

F~~
— U)
•

— _—_ CD
U~ __J

LC~U~

Lu F--

F-L•~U~:

Co ~~D~:

F c~~~-

0.. LU
~~

F U~-J

-
C’)

>- >_ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~~~~~~~~~~

4-) 4.)
w
-I-
4.)

I
C)

~-s
A
A

.~J ~~ F~~- CD

~~~~~
—
I—

C-)
. ..-
1—

u~~J~
LcU~

~~~
~C~D

LU
-~~

Li~J
~.—~ ~

C)
L.)

C’) ~~

-~~~
4-,

F -U)

•

~~~~w

<a:

3.-

~~

a-

jI
II V

—- _- -

-~~---~~~~-~~~~~~~~~

_

_

I-

•

•

effects into observable quantum change--may well yiel d a potential for

practical antigravity devices and effects.

2.0

SOME POTENTIAL WEAPON EFFECTS

•

-

While the path from theory and experimentally ver ifi ed basic effec ts to oper ational sys tems obv iously requires considerabl e time and effor t , the

potential for eventual systems can be seen. In fact , there is at least

tenuous evidence that the Soviet Union is engaged in devel oping these types of we apons .

2.1

Cancellation of Electromagnetic Fi el d

By kindl i ng photon frequencies 1800 out of phase with an existing radiated

field , the existing fiel d could be cancelled. This would have substantial

anti-radar and anti-ConiTluniCatiOns applications . While cancelling EM field

outside the laboratory with ordinary electromagnetic techniques is presently

impractical , on the other hand it may prove to be quite practical by

coherently kindling (collecting )virtual state directly i nto the field to

quench it.

2.2 - Quenching of El ectrical Currents in Electronic Circu i ts

By kindling the virtual state pattern of a positron , el ectrons flowing in electromagnetic circuits in the target absorbi ng the carrier could be quenched and extinguished . Further , thi s would occur without photon emission , since the electrons will be extinguished at the second hyperframe level (flux or neutrinos). Effectively, a conventional quantum mechanical picture would be that the virtual photons emitted and absorbed by each fl ow i ng el ectron--and which create its electrical field--would be quenched. Since these photons create the charge , the el ectron loses its charge, being converted thereby into neutrinos which radiate away i nto deep space , with essentially no further interaction . Thi s effect is useful against biological systems (nerve currents), veh icles , tanks , missile el ectronics , aircraft electrical systems, nuclear warhead el ectronics , communications systems, etc. If the effect can be obtained , it could conceivably make a powerful radar beam an all-purpose weapon against every sophisticated battle el ement.

2.3

Transmutation of Active Nuclear Material Elements

Inside the nucleus of an atom the protons and the neutrons are continually

_ exchanging positive charge back and forth on pions.

18

.

Thus , the proton is

.L ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

•_ _ -

•.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~~~ ~~~~~~~

••. •

continu ally turning into a neutron and vice versa , and a very high , positive , pionic current continu ally exists in the nucleus. Further , a specific frequency spectrum is involved for this current in each specific el ement.
By pla cing a 1800 pha se-inverted pion current pattern for plutonium and one for U235 on ea ch photon of an ABM radar beam, the fissionabl e material in a warhead , inside an incoming tracked re-entry vehicle , could have its nuclei disrupted and transmuted by the quenching of the positive pion currents binding the nuclei together. This could dud the warhea d without any concern for decoys, maneuvering re-entry vehicle , chaff , jamming , availabilit y of interceptor mi ssiles , etc. (In fact , biological systems presently have a limited capability to transmute elements , as established by Louis Kervran .21’221n 1977 Kervran was nominated for the Nobel Prize for his pioneering work).

2.4

Production of Intense Particle Beams

In theory, each particular kind of fundamental particle will have its own unique hyperspatial frequency spectrum , in acco rdance with equation (6). If one corrects this spectrum for the doppler generated by the particle ’s

velocity , then a particular particle of a particular energy has a unique

“hyperspace spectrum .” By using a bank of hyperspatial single-frequency

amplifiers tuned to produce a given doppl er spectrum , a beam of the

desired type of partic les at the desired energy level (velocity) could

be directly generated . The intensity/density of the beam can be varied over

a normal range by varyi ng the gain (A0)in ganged fashion. To create far higher orders of intensities , the number of stages--n--can be in:reased .

Thus in theory it would seem possible to produce far more energetic

particle beams than can presently be obtained , and to do so wi th relatively

small and i nexpensive amplifier devices needing little or no power supplies. The imp lications to antisatellite and antimissile defense--or even to offensive use in a satellite-to-earth mode--are irr~ ediately apparent.

3.0

SUMMARY

Experimental evidence of zero-point energy of vacuum has been establ i shed

beyond question. Soviet direct measurement of this energy has been

reported . Prigogine ’s Nobel Prize work confi rms that in theory a highly

disordered , chaotic virtual state zero-point energy can be cohered to

•

crosstalk into observabl e quantum change and even macroscopic energy

19

- — —--—

- .•---

—~

--

-

•.-—-——

-- --• ~

•— ~~

. -

•

•
~ -

•

-• ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

•p;•

-..- -

•

— ‘ ~~; : .

~~~~~~~~ •

-

~~~~~~~
•

• .• •

~~
production. Several simple devices can be demonstrated to observably tap zero-po i nt energy. Extension of the theory onto even a simplified hyperspace model indicates direct app lications in certain specialized amplifiers . Consideration of multip le simultaneous observation (Everett’s interpretation of quantum mechanics) ties together virtual and observable states into the same time change , allowi ng superposition of virtual state into observabl e state. By considering virtual state patterns to be carried by the individual photon , then superposition effects can be obtained upon a target radiated by a radar beam if each and every photon of the radar beam contains one virtual state pattern in common , added into its other (incoherent) virtual state patterns. Sufficient superposition of the coherent pattern in the target produces real observabl e changes which may have signific ant BMD applications. Such applications include electron current dissolution (dudding of el ectromagnetic circuits ), cancellation of electromagnetic fields , de-activation (dudding )of nuclear warheads by transmutation of fissionable material s, and simp le production of particle beams of enormous power -density . Electron current dissolution is also effective against the nervous systems of biological targets. It thus appears tha t electromag netic radiators such as radars could possibly be made into universal , all-purpose weapons effective against every major battle element.

I — •_ - ~~ ~~ i;

-_-

--—---

~~~~~

— — _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _

— _ _ _ _-_ —_ •.-_— _ _ - _ _ —

20

9~ •~!’;~ — _

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_ —_— _ _

_

_

_
~

_

________
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

__
‘~

_

_

_

_

_

_

_____
_ ~~~~ t~~~

_

_

_

_

_

_

_•_ —••_ •-_ •

_ -•_

_

•

- •-

•

NOTES AND REFERENCES

•

1. Hugh Everett , I I I , “‘ Relative State ’ Formulation of Quantum Mechanics ,” Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 454-462, July 1957. See also

John A. Wheel er , “Assessment of Everett’ s ‘Relative State ’ Fo rmulation of

•

Quantum Theory,” Reviews of Modern Phvsics, Vol . 29, No. 3, pp. 463-465,

July 1957; Bryce S. DeWitt , “Quantum Mec hanics and Reality ,” Physics Tod!y,

Vol . 28, No. 9, September 1970; B.S. DeWitt , “The Many-Univers es Interpretation

of Quantum Mechanics ,” in Foundations of Quantum Mechanic s, Academic Press ,

Inc ., New York , 1972; and Leon N. Cooper and Deborah Van Vechten , “On the

Interpretation of Measurement Within the Quantum Theory ,” American Journal

of Physics, Vol. 37, No. 12 , pp. 1212-1220 , December 1969.

2. See Robert Krotkov ’s review of the book , The Ma ny Worlds Interpretation ~JfanuQaurayntu1m97M5e.c hanics , in the American Journal of Physics, Vol . 43, No. 1 ,

3. The Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , eds. Bryce S. DeWitt and Neil ] Graham , Princeton Series in Physics , Princeton University Press ,
1973.

4. Bernard d’Espagnat , Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics , W.A. Benjamin , Inc., 1971 , p. 368.

5. Ibid , p. 468.

-

6. See John Archib ald Wheeler , “Strange Matter ,” in Properties of Matter Under Unusual Conditio ns , Hans Mark and Sidney Fernback eds., Interscience
Publ i shers , 1 969.

7. See Note 2.

8. Thomas E. Bearden , “Restatement of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principl e for the Condi tion of Superposition ,” 8 October 1975 , Defense Documentation
Center.

9. Einstei n once pointed out tha t the linear velocity of an object in the S frame is simply a measure of the rotation of the object in hyperspace away from its S frame velocity vector. See Thomas E. Bearden , “A Postulated Mechanism that leads to Materialization and Demateria lization of Matter and to Antigravity ,” 8 October 1975, Defense Documentation Center , for interpretation of the Lorentz transformation as a hyperspatia l rotation. To the S-frame observer the velocity c , the speed of light in vacuum , represents a full orthogonal rotation in hyperspace.

10. T. Henry Moray in Salt Lake City , Utah in the late 1930’s produced 50 kilowatts of power from such a device weighi ng 55 pounds. Moray ’s device used
29 stages of highly specialized tubes . Dr. Harvey Fl etcher , Director of Resea rch at Bell Laboratories at the time , personally examined the device ,
disassembl ed it , checked it against fraud , and observed its operation. Dr. Harvey Fletcher is the father of James Fletcher , former Chief Administrator of NAS A and is still alive. See T. Henry Moray ,The Sea of Energy, fi ft h edition ,History and Biography by John E .Moray, Foreword by Torn Beard en ; Cosra y Research Institute , 2505 South 4th Ea st , Salt Lake City, Utah 84115 , 1978.

•

21 .

- •

-.—-- ‘~~- .-•

— --•--.- - — — — - • • — —

- ------- — -S

~~.4~~~~~~~ __ ’_ _ _ • _• _ •

•~~

—.4

11. Edwa rd G . Harris , A Pedestrian Approach to Quantum Field Theory, Wiley Interscie nce , New York , N .Y .~ 1972 .
12 . H.B .G. Casim ir , Proc. Nederlands Aka. Wetten sha7pen , Amsterdam 60, 793 (1948).

13. E .M. Lifschitz , Soviet Phys. JETP 2, 73 (1956) .
14. B.V. Derya g in and 1 .1. Abrikosaya , Soviet Phy s . JETP 3 , 819 (1957); 4, 2 (1957).
15. T.H. Boyer , Phys. Rev. Dll , No. 4, 790 (1957), “Random El ectrodynamics: The Theory of Classical Electrodynamics with Classical Electromagnetic 2ero-Point Radiation. ”

.

16. P. G1 ansdorff , I. Prigogine , Thermod ynamic Theory of Structure , Stability and Fl uctuations , Wiley Interscience , N.Y., 19)1

17 . I. Procaccia , J . Ross , Science , 198, 716 (18 Nov 1917) describes Prigogine ’s Nobel Prize-Wi nning Work .

18. Thomas E . Bearden , “Solution of the Fundamental Probl em of Quantum Mechanics ,” January 3 , 1977 , Defense Documentation Center . See also

N~~ot~e

den ,”

, “Photon 20 April

Quenching of 1977 , Defense

the Paranormal (Time) Channel : Documentation Center .

A

Brief

19 . Thomas E. Bearden , “Qu iton /Percep tron Physics: A Theory of Existence ,
Percep tion , and Physica l Phenomena ,” March 1973 , Defense Documentati on Center , p. 11.

20. R .M. Santi ll i , “Partons and Gravitation: Some Puzzling Questions ,” Anna ls of Physics, Vol . 83, No . 1 , March 1 974 , pp . 108-157 .

21 . See Louis Kervran , Biolog i cal Transmutations , Binghamton , New York : Swan Publishi ng Company , 1 972 .Just as biolog ical systems used el ectricity and electromagnetic effects long before the existence of modern science , they also appear to have used virtual state amplification into observabl e state (i.e. , kindling )to accomplish limited transmutation of elements.

22 . M ind and cons ciousness , and the Interaction of mind and matter , can also be modeled in the schema advanced . The resulting model can be ‘ hown to fit
a wide variety of parapsychological and paranormal phenomena . See Thoma s E. Bearden , The Excali bur Briefing, Strawberry Hill Press , 616 44th Avenue , San Franc isco , California , 1979 , in publication . A significant prediction of the model is that the past can be changed; Wheeler has shown a family of “delayed choice”
experiments which show that , when observation on a system is delayed until after
the system ’s essential interactions have occurred , the outcome of the occurred
intera ctions still depends on the later choice by the observer . Thus In at least one sense the “ past” can be changed after the fact . (See Wheeler ’s discussion in Mathematica l Foundations of Quantum Theory, Papers from a meeting , New Orleans , June 1977, A .R . Marlow , Ed ., Academic Press , Ne w York , 1978.)

22

- - ——I