toby
/
zotero-db
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
zotero-db/storage/2H9I5SR9/.zotero-ft-cache

3213 lines
78 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

ARMY RESEARCHLABORATORY
Path-Loss Measurements in a Forested Environment at VHF
Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.
20001002055 ’
The findings in this report are not to be construed as an official Department of the Army position unless so designated by other authorized documents.
Citation of manufacturer’s or trade names does not constitute an official endorsement or approval of the use thereof.
Destroy this report when it is no longer needed. Do not return it to the originator.
Army Research Laboratory
Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-5425
ARL-TR-2156
Sentember 2000
Path-Loss Measurements in a
Forested Environment at VHF
Robert J. Tan and Suzanne R. Stratton
Sensors and Electron Devices Directorate
Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.
Abstract
Designing a radar system capable of detecting objects concealed by foliage requires path-loss data and the development of path-loss prediction models. The challenge is to design a system with antenna elements of manageable size, while keeping foliage signal attenuation as small as possible. We took a series of measurements to characterize path loss in a mostly deciduous forest. Results show that the parameter values that give the least attenuation because of the intervening woods are the lowest frequencies and transmit horizontal, receive horizontal polarization (HH).
ii
Contents
1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................
1
2. Methodology ......................................................................................................................................
2
2.1 Propagation Measurements .............................................................................................................
2
2.2 Multipath Measurements.. ..............................................................................................................
2
2.3 Tree-Line Proximity Measurements ................................................................................................
3
2.4 Statistical Measurements ................................................................................................................
4
3. Experimental Setup and Measurements .......................................................................................
5
3.1 Instrumentation ...............................................................................................................................
5
3.2 Measurement Procedures ................................................................................................................
7
3.3 Perryman Test Site ..........................................................................................................................
7
3.4 Calibrations .....................................................................................................................................
9
4. Data Analysis ...................................................................................................................................
10
4.1 Multipath Data .............................................................................................................................
10
4.2 Propagation in Clearing ................................................................................................................
23
4.3 HH Propagation Through Woods .................................................................................................
14
4.3.1 Frequency Effects .................................................................................................................
24
4.3.2 Polarization Eflects.. ............................................................................................................
25
4.3.3 Transmit Antenna Height ...................................................................................................
25
4.3.4 Receive Antenna Height ......................................................................................................
26
4.3.5 Summer Versus Winter Propagation Measurements.. ........................................................
27
4.3.6 Tree-Line Effects ...................................................................................................................
27
4.3.7 Statistics for a 7- by 7-m Grid Sample of Data ...................................................................
27
Conclusions ............................................................................................................................................
29
Acknowledgments
.................................................................................................................................
30
References ...............................................................................................................................................
30
Distribution ............................................................................................................................................
53
Report Documentation Page ................................................................................................................
55
Appendices
A.-Phase I Measurements ..................................................................................................................
31
B.-Phase II Measurements .................................................................................................................
43
C.-GPS Positions .................................................................................................................................
51
.. .
111
Figures
1. Multipath measurement setup.. ......................................................................................................
4
2. Tree-line proximity and statistical measurement area ................................................................
4
3. Simplified block diagram of transmitter .......................................................................................
5
4. Simplified block diagram of receiver .............................................................................................
5
5. Transmit antenna mounted to crane boom, transmit antenna raised to 22 m ......................... 6
6. Mobile receive antenna station .......................................................................................................
6
7. Test area at ATC Perryman.. ............................................................................................................
7
8. Perryman test site .............................................................................................................................
8
9. Comparison of measurements to theory for transmission loss over flat earth for a
range of 410 m and a receive antenna height of 2.7 m for 145,223,300,435, and
910 MHz ............................................................................................................................................
11
10. Transmission loss as a function of transmit antenna height at 145,223,300, and
910 MHz and a range of 410 m through woods in summer with a receive
antenna height of 2.7 m.. ................................................................................................................
12
11. Measured path loss, theoretical loss given by equation (2), and free space loss given
by equation (3) versus range at 145,223, and 910 MHz for transmit and receive heights
of 22 and 5 m ...................................................................................................................................
13
12. Scatter plots of propagation loss through woods versus range for HH polarization
data in tables 2 and 3 compared to an analytical model at 145,223,300,435,
and 910 MHz ...................................................................................................................................
15
13. Measured average propagation through woods versus range compared to an average
generated by model in equation (4) .............................................................................................
18
14. Measured average propagation loss through woods versus frequency range compared
to an average generated by model in equation (4) ....................................................................
18
15. Comparison of measured propagation loss, loss over flat earth, and an analytical model
for HH polarization in decibels plotted as a function of range for 145,223,300,435,
and 910 MHz ...................................................................................................................................
19
16. Percent probability versus propagation loss at 145, 223, 300, and 900 MHz ......................... 21
17. Percent probability versus propagation loss for 410, 1000, 1930, and 4700 m ....................... 23
18. Scatter plot of propagation loss for a sample of data ................................................................
28
Tables
1. Measurement matrix ........................................................................................................................
2
2. Phase I propagation measurements (all polarizations) ...............................................................
3
3. Phase II propagation measurements (all polarizations) .............................................................
3
4. Average propagation loss through woods ..................................................................................
17
5. Probability of least transmission loss by polarization ...............................................................
25
6. Probability of least transmission loss at HH polarization ........................................................
25
7. Average propagation loss for HH polarization ..........................................................................
26
8. Probability of least transmission loss and average loss for HH polarization ........................ 26
9. Probability of least transmission loss and average loss for HH polarization ........................ 26
10. Average difference and standard deviation between propagation loss with and without
leaves ................................................................................................................................................
28
11. Average and standard deviation for 49 samples in woods ......................................................
28
iv
1. Introduction
Quantitative knowledge of path loss due to foliage is essential for designing a radar system that can detect objects located in or near wooded areas, and for developing and validating path-loss prediction models. The Army Research Laboratory (ARL) is engaged in a research and development effort to design and demonstrate the feasibility of a phased-array system that could detect personnel and vehicles in woods. The frequency would require the antenna elements to be of manageable size, yet still provide optimum system performance by keeping foliage signal attenuation as small as possible.
We conducted a literature search that revealed that few data sets have been collected for the frequency range and antenna heights and distances of interest. The sparse data we found suggest that foliage attenuation increases with frequency [l-5]. This indicates that to ensure a high signalto-noise ratio (SNR), the frequency of a system should be as low as practical. Yet, this might mean a physical antenna size impractical for a fielded system. Therefore, design trade-offs between attenuation and frequency, as well as polarization, will be required.
The dearth of path-loss data at the frequencies, polarizations, and antenna heights of interest prompted this investigation. ARL conducted a series of measurements in two phases to characterize the propagation path loss in a mostly deciduous forest. We were particularly interested in determining the attenuation due to the trees and vegetation along the propagation path as a function of transmission frequency, polarization, transmit and receive antenna heights, and range.
Measurements were taken in phases. Phase I measurements were taken from January to March and again in May 1999. Phase II measurements were made in September 1999, mainly to determine the attenuation due to 4700 m of trees and to add the 435-MHz measurements. Since the trees in this study are almost all deciduous, we took measurements both when the trees were bare and in full leaf. We compared the results to determine if leaf mass contributes significantly to path loss.
2. Methodology
Our objective was to determine how transmit and receive antenna height, polarization, frequency, and proximity to a tree line affect the propagation loss through a wooded area. To do this, we developed a test plan with several sets of experiments, listed in table 1.
2.1 Propagation Measurements
Propagation measurements determine the propagation loss for path lengths from 410 to 4700 m. The variables in our experiment were transmit and receiver antenna height, frequency, range, and polarization. Table 1 shows the frequencies used. We used transmitter heights of 7.6, 14, and 22 m. We chose these heights to get positions at approximately half the tree height, the tree height, and above the trees to determine the effect on propagation loss. We used receiver heights of 1,2,2.7,3.6, and 5 m to simulate the height of personnel and vehicles. Our choice of frequency ranges was based on the penetration of forested areas demonstrated by these frequencies in the literature [l-5]. The specific frequencies chosen were based on the permission to use them in our test area. We made the propagation measurements at ranges of 410,1000,1930, and 4700 m. We chose only four ranges to give us enough data to extrapolate to other ranges while keeping to a manageable number of measurements. We chose the ranges based on access to specific positions in the woods. To study the polarization effects, we measured all linear polarizations: HH (transmit horizontal, receive horizontal), HV (transmit horizontal, receive vertical), VV (transmit vertical, receive vertical), and VH (transmit vertical, receive horizontal). We included propagation measurements in a relatively flat clearing and used these as a baseline to compare with theory as well as with the woods measurements. To determine the difference in propagation loss of a deciduous forest with and without foliage, we made measurements both in summer and winter. Tables 2 and 3 show the propagation measurements completed in phases I and II, respectively.
2.2 Multipath Measurements
We made multipath measurements to provide confidence in the data and to get an idea of how well our measurements of the clearing represented an ideal flat earth. We measured the path loss at a range of 410 m with the
Table 1. Measurement matrix.
Measurement
Propagation Propagation Propagation Multipath Tree-line proximity Tree-line proximity Statistical
Location
Clearing Wooded Wooded Clearing/wooded Wooded Wooded Wooded
Frequencies (MHz)
145,223,910 145,223,910 145,223,300,435,910 145,223,300,910 145,223,910 145,223,300,435,910 145,223,300,910
Season
Winter Winter Summer Summer Wiriter Summer Summer
2
Table 2. Phase I propagation measurements (all polarizations).
Frequency (MHz)
145,223, 910 145,223, 910 145,223, 300,910
Transmit height
Cm>
7.6,14, 22
7.6,14, 22
7.6,14, 22
Receive height
tm)
2.7,3.6, 5
2.7, 3.6, 5
2,2.7,4
Range (4
410,1000,1930
410,967,983, 1000,1930
410,967,983, 1000,1930
Clearing x -
Woods x X
Summer Winter
-
X
-
X
x
-
Table 3. Phase II propagation measurements (all polarizations).
2.3
Frequency
(MHz)
145, 223, 300,435, 910 145,223, 435,910 145,223, 300,435, 910 145,223, 300,435, 910
Transmit height
Cm)
7.6,14, 22
Receive height
W
1,2.7
22
1,2.7
7.6,14 1,2.7
7.6,14,22 1,2.7
Range Cm) 4230
1000 1930
4700
Clearing Woods
x
-
-
X
-
X
-
X
Late summer
X
X X
X
receive antenna 2.7 m above the ground, varying the transmitter height
from 6 to 21 m in l-m steps. Figure 1 depicts this setup. We also used the
multipath,measurements
to determine the effective combined gain of the
antennas on their respective mounts. We compared this gain with both
the manufacturer’s antenna gain specifications and gain measurements
made in an anechoic chamber.
Tree-Line Proximity Measurements
Tree-line proximity measurements are propagation data we took with the receiver placed in various positions in a clearing in the woods to study the effect of the tree line on the propagating signal. We used two different geometries, which are depicted in figure 2. The phase I measurement positions shown in figure 2 were made at ranges of 1000,983, and 967 m. At 967 m, the receive antenna is up against the tree line, and at 1000 m, the receive antenna is 33 m from the tree line. Phase II measurements are shown as a “T’‘-shaped geometry where we made four measurements spaced 10 m apart parallel to the tree line at a range of 967 m (top of the ‘IT”), and six measurements 10 m apart moving away from the transmitter. The measurement farthest from the transmitter was against the back edge of the clearing.
3
Figure 1. Multipath measurement setup.
Theoretical propagation, Lp =
H,
Figure 2. Tree-line proximity and statistical measurement area.
Transmit antenna
o Phase I l Phase II
2.4 Statistical Measurements
We made 49 statistical measurements in a 7- by 7-m Cartesian grid to determine the variation that could be expected in the data in l-m increments within this grid, which was located with its farthest side from the transmitter at 1000 m. This was the same location as the tree-line proximity measurements depicted in figure 2.
3. Experimental Setup and Measurements
We made propagation measurements of both wooded and cleared areas at Aberdeen Proving Ground, using a continuous wave (cw) transmit receive system. The maximum range measured was 4.7 km.
3.1
Figure 3. Simplified block diagram of transmitter.
Instrumentation
The transmitter block diagram shown in figure 3 consists of a synthesized sweep oscillator, a 50-W amplifier, an antenna, a bidirectional coupler, and a spectrum analyzer. The bidirectional coupler and spectrum analyzer were used to monitor output power, frequency, and antenna voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR). A cw signal of about 5 W was transmitted at 145,223,300,435, and 910 MHz. The receiver, shown in figure 4, consists of an antenna, a low-noise amplifier, and a spectrum analyzer and was used to measure received power. The transmit and receive antennas are identical log-periodic antennas with linear polarization and a 4- to 7-dB gain from 145 to 910 MHz. We used a crane boom to position the transmit antenna between 2.7 and 22 m high, as shown in figure 5. The receiver was housed in a truck with the receive antenna mounted on a fiberglass pole fastened to the bumper of the truck, as shown in figure 6. The fiberglass pole is adjustable and we set it to 2-, 2.7-, 3.6-, and 5-m heights during the measurements. For the Phase II measurements, we replaced the fiberglass pole with a photographer’s tripod to get the l-m receive height.
Synthesized sweep oscillator
v Bidirectional coupler
f VSWR
test port \
Figure 4. Simplified block diagram of receiver.
5
Figure 5. (a) Transmit antenna mounted to
(4
crane boom, (b) trans-
mit antenna raised to
22 m.
PO
Figure 6. Mobile receive antenna station.
6
3.2 Measurement Procedures
We surveyed all positions of the transmit and receive antennas beforehand using the global positioning system (GE). This allowed us to determine the ranges and positions of the equipment so that the experiments can be repeated at a later date. Appendix C gives the latitudes and longitudes. We determined the antenna heights using a tape measure. We did azimuthal alignment of the antennas before each measurement using compass headings derived from the GPS measurements. We aligned both receive and transmit antennas with 0” elevation relative to the horizon. We made all the measurements by recording both transmit and receive power.
3.3 Perryman Test Site
Figure 7 is a photograph of the propagation path area (the Perryman area of the Aberdeen Test Center (ATC)). The straight cleared area we used in the measurements is 5 km long. To the right of this area lies a wooded area cut through with dirt access roads. We used these access roads to set up the receive/truck antenna system for the wooded site propagation measurements. We chose the wooded sites to give path lengths of 410, 1000,1930, and 4700 m through the woods. We positioned the transmitter at one end of this wooded area and left it in place while the receive/truck antenna system was moved to multiple locations. Figure 8 is a map of the area, with transmit and receive sites marked as follows: Tl and T2 are the transmit positions for the wooded and clearing measurements, respectively; Rl, R2, R3, and R4 are receive positions for the wooded measurements at 410-, lOOO-, 1930-, and 4700-m ranges, respectively; and R5, R6, R7, and R8 are receive positions for the clearing measurements at 410-, lOOO-, 1930-, and 4230-m ranges, respectively. Note that the transmitter used for the wooded measurements (Tl) is located 27 m from a patch of trees 20 m deep, followed by a clear area 40 m wide; the remaining propagation areas are wooded.
Figure 7. Test area at ATC Perryman.
’ ,
;i
,
Figure 8. Perryman test site. 8
1 GEODETIC MEASUREMENTS
Calibrations
We measured the gain of the two identical log-periodic antennas used in the measurements described in section 2.1 in the field (the procedure was the same as that used for the multipath measurements, sect. 2.2). A separate measurement was made with an 8510 network analyzer system in an anechoic chamber and the results were compared to data on the manufacturer’s specification sheet. All three of these measurements were within 2 dB of each other. We consider the field measurements the most reliable because they reflect the actual antenna mounts used in all the measurements. We then calculated the gain from the measured transmit and receive power using
(1)
where
G=dd9
P, = power received,
P, = power transmitted,
h, = power received, h, = power transmitted, R = range, and
il = wavelength.
This gain was used to determine propagation loss. We calibrated the transmit and receive chains, including all cables and connectors, using a vector network analyzer, both before and after the measurements, and noted no significant changes. We checked the transmit VSWR before and after changing the transmit antenna height to ensure there were no problems with the rf cabling to the transmit antenna.
9
4. Data Analysis
Propagation measurements for phase I consisted of 108 combinations of polarization, range, and transmit and receive antenna heights for each frequency in the clearing and 180 combinations in the woods. For phase II, there were 24 combinations in the clearing and 108 in the woods. The following sections present data for propagation loss versus antenna height, range, and frequency; average propagation loss versus range and frequency; and percent probabilities for obtaining specific propagation losses. All phase I and II data are tabulated in appendices A and B, respectively.
4.1 Multipath Data
In this section, we discuss the data for the measurements described in section 2.2. Figure 9 plots the transmission loss as a function of transmit antenna height for 145,223,300,435, and 910 MHz, respectively. The receive antenna height was 2.7 m and the range was 410 m for all frequencies except 435 MHz, where the receive height was 3.6 m and the range was 200 m. The expected transmission loss in decibels over a flat earth is given by
(2)
where P, = power received, P, = power transmitted,
h,.= receive antenna height, h, = transmit antenna height, R = range, and
il = wavelength,
and is plotted in figure 9 for comparison [5]. The measurements agree well with the theory, as indicated by the similar slopes of the curves. Because of the geometry, only at 910 MHz do we see a peak in the transmission loss, and the 2-m displacement of the peak from theory is because we measured antenna heights relative to the ground at their location, and the ground was not level. Figure 10 plots the same data as figure 9 except that figure 10 is data for woods. Comparing figures 9 and 10, we conclude that woods adds attenuation, which essentially eliminates the large peaks caused by complete cancellation, as seen in the multipath results of figure 9(e) for 910 MHz. The multipath data is tabulated in appendix A, tables A-29 and A-30.
10
Figure 9. Comparison of measurements to theory for transmission loss over flat earth for a range of 410 m and a receive antenna height of 2.7 m for (a) 145, (b) 223, and
(c) 300 MHz.
Cal 8o
E -
$ 75 9 s ‘TI f 70
2 2
65 5
7 .9 11 13 15 17 19 Transmitter height (m)
0) 80
-W- Transmission loss (dB)
-
Theory
++ Transmission loss (dB)
-
Theory
65 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
Transmitter height (m)
u Transmission loss (dB)
-
Theory
9 11 13 15 17 19 Transmitter height (m)
11
Figure 9 (cont’d). Comparison of measurements to theory for transmission loss over flat earth for a range of 410 m and a receive antenna height of 2.7 m for (d) 435 and (e) 910 MHz.
1622
I=
60 1 4
8 8 1’0 12 14 Transmitter height (m)
---Ez- Transmission loss (dB)
-
Theory
1’6
(e>100
95
90
85
80
75
7U’ 5
7 ’
1 9 1’1 13 15 I?
1’9
Transmitter height (m)
Jt Transmission loss (dB)
-
Theory
Figure 10. Transmission loss as a function of transmit antenna height at 145, 223,300, and 910 MHz and a range of 410 m through woods in summer with a receive antenna height of 2.7 m.
--t-145 MHz d-223 MHz --t-300 MHz +910 MHz
70 1
I
5 j 6 1 1 1’3 1’5 1’7 1’9
Transmitter height (m)
12
4.2 Propagation in Clearing
Figure 11 compares measured path loss in the cleared area depicted in figure 7 with free space loss, in decibels, given by
2 = 10 log (&)’ ,
andwith loss over the earth, in decibels, given by equation (2) (theory). Equation (2) assumes a flat, lossless, and perfectly reflecting ground. The measured data in figure 11 are for a transmit height of 22 m, a receive height of 5 m, and for HH polarization. Agreement within about 5 dB is obtained between theory and measurements. The difference between the theory for propagation over flat earth given by equation (2) and the measurements is because the measurements were made on an irregular lossy ground with obstacles on both sides.
Figure 11. Measured path loss, theoretical loss given by equation (2), and free space loss given by equation (3) versus range at (a) 145 and
(b) 223 for transmit
and receive heights of 22 and 5 m.
(a) 100 95 90
g 85 g 80 2 75
70 65 60
400
900
1400
1900
2400
Range (m)
+
Measurement
Theory
Free space
l ~
Measurement Theory Free space
400
900
1400
1900 2400
Range (m)
13
Figure 11 kont’d). Measured path loss, theoretical loss given by equation (2), and free space loss given by equation (3) versus range at (c) 910 MHz for transmit and receive heights of 22 and 5 m.
I
I
I
I
9bo
do0
1900
2400
Range (m)
4.3 HH Propagation Through Woods
+
Measurement
In taking the HH polarization propagation data through woods both in winter and summer, we observed local fluctuations up to 20 dB. We avoided these large dips in receive power by minor repositioning of the receive antenna; it is important to note, however, that the multipath from the local trees and brush can cause such variations. After the data were inspected, it became apparent that they tended to agree with the theory given by equation (2), plus some fixed attenuation, and therefore allowed us to develop an analytical expression based on flat earth theory. This fixed attenuation is independent of range but varies with frequency. Tewari [ 11 also noticed this phenomenon at ranges above 400 m and attributed it to the characteristics of the lateral-wave mode, where the lateral waves encounter foliage only while traveling between the two antennas and the treetops. The rest of the time, the wave is traveling above the trees in open air. We modeled the added attenuation caused by woods by selecting a curve fit that performed well on average compared to all the data in wooded HH polarization data (see tables 2 and 3). The resultant expression for determining the propagation loss in decibels is given by
Lp=-lolog[(~)2(&J+1010g(/5~4)-loR
,
(4)
where
h,, = receive antenna height, h, = transmit antenna height, R = range, a = wavelength, and f = frequency in megahertz.
The first part of equation (4) is based on equation (2), where the sine of
the argument has been replaced with the argument. This approximation,
sin x = x, is valid where x < n/4. This will be true when d is much greater
than h,. x h,, as in our ground-to-ground
situation. The rest of equation (4)
represents the added attenuation of woods. All the HH polarization
propagation data taken through woods for all transmit and receive
heights (see tables 2 and 3) are plotted in figure 12, along with data
generated by the analytical model given by equation (4). The means are
14
Figure 12. Scatter plots of propagation loss through woods versus range for HH
polarization data in tables 2 and 3 compared to an analytical model at (a) 145 and (b) 223 MHz.
calculated from the loss in decibels and are plotted for comparison. The means of the data and model agree very well, but the scatter in the actual data tended to be larger. The data points having much greater loss than modeled at 145 and 223 MHz (see fig. 12(a) and (b)) were taken with the receive antenna 1 m from the ground. Table 4 shows the tabulated means
(a) 140
130
lOO-90 -80 --
+ HH data f: Mean A Model X Model (mean)
60 -.50-
0
(b) ISO-
4000
6000
Range (m)
130
67 g 120 $ P 5 110 .5 iQi?. 100 $2 a
90
80
+ HH data D Mean
Model X Model (mean)
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Range (m)
15
Figure 12 (cont’d). Scatter plots of propagation loss through woods versus range for HH polarization data in tables 2 and 3
compared to an analytical model at
(c) 300 and (d) 435 MHz.
(c) 160
150
140
iiiz- 130 2 0 g 120 ‘E x
100 90 80 (d) 170 160
--A Range (m)
+ HH data 17 Mean A Model X Model (mean)
g 150
ii -0 .5 140 ?i I% 8 ; 130
+ HH data z Mean i Model X Model (mean)
120
110 0
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Range (m)
for the data shown in figure 12, along with the standard deviation in parentheses. The statistics were calculated from the values in decibels and are shown in decibels.
16
Figure 12 (cont’d). Scatter plots of propagation loss through woods versus range for HH polarization data in tables 2 and 3 compared to an analytical model at (e) 910 MHz.
(e)190
180
170
g 160 ‘;; 2 150
1-1:20 10 00 0 1000
2000 3000 4000 5000 Range(m)
+ HH data Z Mean a Model X Model(mean)
Table 4. Average propagation loss of woods.
Range Cm>
410 967 983
1000
1930 4700
Mean propagation loss (dB) and standard deviation
145 MHz
79.4(7.4) 94.4 (4.6) 94.2(6.3) 94.0 (10.8) 104.9 (8.7) 128.7(5.1)
223 MHz
88.4(8.4)
95.8 (5.1)
93.7(6.4) 97.9 (9.6) 114.5 (7.8) 135.8 (8.1)
300 MHz
94.1(7.3)
111.5 (5.4)
108.2 (5.6) 110.0(6.7) 122.6 (6.9) 145.4 (8.2)
435 MHz
-
-
127.1 (9.1) 146.0 (4.1) 161.6 (8.4)
910 MHz
127.0 (7.3)
144.6 (8.9)
132.6 (13.1) 133.8 (11.6) 153.1 (11.8)
174.9 (5.4)
Figure 13 shows the average propagation loss through woods (table 4) plotted as a function of range. Figure 14 plots the same data as a function of frequency Figures 13 and 14 compare the measured average propagation loss with the model with the use of the same transmit and receive heights, frequency, and ranges. The data appear as data points whereas the results generated by the model are shown as curves. Figure 15 plots propagation loss data in decibels for selected antenna heights as a function of range (transmit height of 22 m and receive height of 2.7 m). The data in figure 15 compare loss over flat earth (theory) given by equation (2) in section 4.1 and the analytical model given in equation (4). The analytical expression models the data with good agreement and provides a convenient way to determine the propagation loss through wooded areas, given frequency, range, and transmit and receive height. The large scatter in the data (fig. 12) indicates that relatively small variations in transmit and receive positions can cause large changes in the propagation loss; therefore, it may be more useful in some applications to consider the propagation loss in terms of a probability distribution. Figure 16 plots the
17
propagation loss data as a percent probability for specific frequencies. Figure 17plots the propagation loss as a percent probability for 410-, lOOO-1, 930-,and 4700-m ranges.Becauseof the large variations we observed during the project, we suggest that more measurements be made to obtain a better statistical distribution. This would allow specific plots for transmit and receive heights like those shown in figures 16 and 17.
Figure 13. Measured
190
average propagation
through woods versus
range compared to an
average generated by
model in equation (4).
‘” I
0
Figure 14. Measured
average propagation
loss through woods
170
versus frequency
range compared to an
% ‘;; 150
average generated by
m 5
model in equation (4). .fj 130
iii
i? a 110 g a
90
70 6
I
20bo
4000
Range (m)
+ 145 MHz
223 MHz
: 300 MHz
x 435 MHz
>/: 910 MHz
I
6000
X X __---__/--- _-..--
+410m 1000 m
.: 1930m X 4700 m
2bo
4bo
660
860
do0
Frequency (MHz)
18
Figure 15. Comparison of measured propagation loss, loss over flat earth, and an analytical model for HH polarization in decibels plotted as a function of range for (a) 145, (b) 223, (c) 300 MHz.
~
ineory
145 MHz (summer)
X 145 MHz (winter)
++c+ Model
(b) 130
Range (m)
120
g 110 2 0 100 s ’ w 2E go 2 $ 80
-.---.-.--Theory
223 MHz (summer)
X 223 MHz (winter)
+
Model
70
60
b
Id00
2600
30bo
40bo
5600
Range (m)
Theory
300 Hz (summer) + Model
80 /
,
,/ i
.- 0
1000 2000
3000
4000
5000
Range (m)
19
Figure 15 (cont’d). Comparison of measured propagation loss, loss over
flat earth, and an analytical model for HH polarization in decibels plotted as a function of range for (d) 435 and
(e) 910 MHz.
(d) 150
140
130 3 g120
4 110 E ‘25 100 E g 90
’ 80
60 I 6
-Theory
m 435 MHz (summer)
+X- Model
I
lob0
20bo
30bo
40bo
50bo
Range (m)
(e) 170 ,
I
160 1
I
I I
I
I
- >
-Theory
l SloMHz (summer)
X 910 MHz (winter)
_.._x_ Model
+‘f;i
0
do0
2doo 3000 4000 5doo
Range (m)
20
Figure 16. Percent probability versus propagation loss at (a) 145 and (b) 223 MHz.
(b) loo
100 Propagation loss (dB)
+
410m
*
1000 m
+-
1930 m
--O--- 4700 m
60
80
100
120
140
Propagation loss (dB)
+410
m
.*
1000 m
>K.. , 930 m
-+-- 4700 m
21
Figure 16 (cont’d). Percent probability versus propagation
loss at (c) 300, and (d) 900 MHz.
(c) loo 80
$ 60
z 2 gg 4400
20
--+--410m *lOOOm -++1+9-3-109m30m .....*--. 4700 m
80
100
120
140
160
Propagation loss(dB)
80
60
--t-410
m
*lOOO
m
+1930m .* 4700 m
100
120
140
160
180
200
Propagation loss (dB)
22
Figure 17. Percent
probability versus
propagation loss for
(a) 410 and (b) 1000 m.
80
70
90
110
130
Propagation loss (dB)
+145
MHz
,+223
MHz
+FL300
MHz
+- 91 0 MHz
+I45
MHz
e-223
MHz
..x_ ._...3..0. 0 MHz
+ 9, 0 MHz
80
100
120
140
160
30
Propagation loss (dB)
23
Figure 17 (cont’d). Percent probability versus propagation loss for (c) 1930 and (d) 4700 m.
(4
80
60
40
I\L
I
I
I/// f
2:O: H
>f< >f: 1, d
80
100
120 A0
160 ho
Propagation loss (dB)
(4 100
80 60
i i i ; /
II
;,:’
+145
MHz
---X--223 MHz
+300
MHz
-910
MHz
+
145 MHz
+223
MHz
+
300 MHz
+ 910MHz
120
140
160
180
2bo
Propagation loss (dB)
4.3.2 Frequency Effects
Average propagation loss for woods increases with frequency as is shown by the data of table 4 plotted in figure 14. As the figure shows, the propagation loss increases approximately with frequency to the 5th power. This result dictates that the lowest possible frequency be used for the best penetration through woods.
24
4.3.2 Polarization Effects
With data taken in woods during both winter and summer, we used the data points for which polarization was the only variable to statistically determine which polarization resulted in the least propagation loss. Table 5 shows the percentage of time each polarization resulted in the least propagation loss (the percentages do not total 100 because two polarizations have the same loss). The number of data points in the table indicates the number of measurements used to calculate the percentages.
Clearly, HH polarization results in the least propagation loss through a wooded area. The lower frequencies increased the probability that HH would have the least propagation loss. The other parameters, range and transmit antenna height, do not appear to have a statistically significant relationship with the polarization that has the least propagation loss. In phase II, when the receive antenna was only 1 m from the ground, VV polarization showed the least propagation loss; however, with the antenna this close to the ground, the antenna’s electrical properties are uncertain and therefore the propagation loss calculated at this antenna height is unreliable.
4.3.3 Transmit Antenna Height
We made transmission measurements at three transmitter heights, 7.6,14, and 22 m, with the tops of the trees mostly between 14 and 22 m. Of 215 HH polarization transmission measurements through woods where transmit height was the only variable 82 percent of the time, a transmitter height of 75 ft, the highest position, resulted in the least transmission loss. The model developed in section 4.3 results in the least transmission loss for the highest transmit/receive product. Table 6 shows the probabilities of the least propagation loss as a function of transmitter height. The number of data points indicates the number of measurements used to calculate the percentages.
Table 5. Probability least transmission loss by polarization.
of
Polarization HH VH vv HV No. of data points
145 MHz
99.0% 0.0% 1.0% 0.0%
102
Probability of least transmission loss
223 MHz 300 MHz 435 MHz
92.2% 0.0% 5.9% 2.9%
80.7% 12.3% 5.3% 0.0%
50.0% 16.7% 42.0% 8.3%
102
57
12
910 MHz
57.8% 26.5% 14.3% 2.9%
102
Table 6. Probability least transmission loss at HH polarization.
of Transmitter height (ml
22 14 7.6
No. of data points
Probability of least transmission loss
145 MHz
42% 40% 17% 52
223 MHz
86% 6% 8% 52
300 MHz
100% 0% 0% 37
435 MHz
95% 5% 0% 22
910 MHz
97% 3% 0%
32
25
Table 7 shows the average propagation loss for multiple transmit heights and frequencies. The propagation loss decreases with increasing transmit height. Above 145 MHz, this propagation is given by
(plJLq~)2.5 .
On average, an increase from 25 to 46 ft (tree height) resulted in a decrease in attenuation of 1,3,3, and 5 dB for 145,223,300, and 910 MHz, respectively. At 145 MHz, the transmit height did not significantly affect the transmission loss, but at the higher frequencies, the higher transmit heights resulted in less transmission loss. In the model, the effects of transmit and receive height are independent of frequency.
4.3.4 Receive Antenna Height
We made propagation measurements at receive heights of 1,2,2.7,3.6, and 5 m. For HH polarization, we made 105 measurements where receiver height (2.7 and 3.6 m) was the only variable. Table 8 shows the probability that a specific receiver height will result in the least transmission loss for these 105 measurements (the percentages do not total 100 because multiple polarizations have the same loss). The average propagation loss is also shown in parentheses. Table 9 shows the same data for 24 measurements where receive height was the only variable (1 and 2.7 m).
Neither the transmit height nor the presence or absence of leaves made a significant difference in the probabilities in tables 8 and 9. Generally, the higher the receiver, the less the propagation loss. The average
Table 7. Average propagation loss for HH polarization.
Transmitter height
22 14 7.6
No. of data points
Average propagation loss (dB)
145 MHz
95 94 95
32
223 MHz
94 101 104
32
300 MHz
107 114 117
17
910 MHz
129 143 148
32
Table 8. Probability of least transmission loss and average loss for HH polarization.
Receiver height
Cm)
2.7 4
No. of data points
Probability of least transmission loss and (average loss in dB)
145 MHz
223 MHz
300 MHz
17 % (93 dB) 27% (98 dB) 67% (107 dB) 93% (91 dB) 80% (98 dB) 33% (110 dB)
30
30
15
910 MHz
37% (139 dB) 67% (137 dB)
30
26
Table 9. Probability of least transmission loss and average loss for HH polarization.
Receiver height
Cm)
145 MHz
Probability of least transmission loss and (average loss in dB)
233 MHz
300 MHz
910 MHz
1 2.7
No. of data points
0% (129 dB) 17% (130 dB) 100% (118 dB) 83% (124 dB)
6
6
50% (138 dB) 50% (134 dB)
3
67% (167 dB) 50 % (165 dB)
6
transmission loss difference between 2.7 and 3.6 m was only 1.8 dB and it was 5.6 dB between 1 and 2.7 m.
4.3.5 Summer Versus Winter Propagation Measurements
We made measurements in both winter and summer to study the effect of leaves on propagation loss. Table 10 shows the average and standard deviation of the difference in decibels between the propagation loss with and without leaves for HH polarization. Positive averages indicate greater loss with leaves. All antenna heights and ranges were used in the averages. The leaves resulted in an average increase in attenuation of 8.9 and 6.2 dB for 145 and 223 MHz, respectively, and a 1.8-dB average decrease in attenuation at 910 MHz; this is probably insignificant at 910 MHz because of the lo-dB standard deviation. These results are the opposite of what we expected: we thought that the leaves would have less effect at lower frequencies and more at higher frequencies.
4.3.6 Tree-Line Ejyrects
For the tree-line proximity measurements described in section 2.3, we made measurements at 1000,983, and 967 m; at 967 m, the receive antenna was up against the tree line, and at 1000 m, the receive antenna was 33 m from the tree line. Little difference was evident in attenuation for the three antenna sites at 145 and 223 MHz. At 910 MHz, the data suggest that the farther the receive antenna is from the tree line, the lower the attenuation due to foliage, especially for lower receive heights. On average, there was 12 dB more loss at 910 MHz for 967 m than for 1000 m. We made the phase II measurements in a “T” shape with 10 m between measurement sights. We obtained similar results in this phase: at 910 MHz, there was about 10 dB more attenuation in the positions close to the wood line. No such trend was evident for the other frequencies.
4.3.7 Statistics for a 7- by 7-m Grid Sample of Data
Table 11 presents the statistical data (average and standard deviation) taken (as described in sect. 2.4) for 49 positions at 1000 m in woods spaced in l-m increments in a 7- by 7-m grid. These measurements were made in the same location as the tree-line proximity measurements depicted in figure 2. We took data with a transmitter height of 14 m, a receiver height of 2.7 m, and HH polarization. The statistics in the table were calculated from the propagation loss in decibels. The results show a
27
smaller standard deviation for lower frequencies. The average transmission loss ranged from 96 dB at 145 MHz to 145 dB at 910 MHz, with standard deviations from 1.2 to 4.3 dB. Transmission loss for the 49 positions is presented in appendix A, table A-28. Figure 18 plots the transmission loss at all positions in the “T” (see fig. 2) for a 22-m transmitter height and a l-m receiver height. Of interest here is the 20 to 30 dB spread in the data, which is thought to be caused by the complex multipath and scattering caused by the woods. This spread again supports the earlier conclusion that this kind of data should be considered as probability distributions.
Table 10. Average difference and standard deviation 1bOeStSwewenith parnodpawgaitthioonut
leaves.
Measure Average Standard deviation No. of data points
Value at various frequencies
145 MHz
223 MHz
910 MHz
8.9 dB 3.7 dB
6.2 dB 6.8 dB
-1.8 dB 9.9 dB
45
45
45
Table 11. Average and standard deviation for 49 samples in woods. Measure
Average Standard deviation
145 MHz
96 dB 1.2 dB
Value at various frequencies
223MHz
300 MHz
103 dB 2.6 dB
108 dB 2.5 dB
910 MHz
145 dB 4.3 dB
Figure 18. Scatter plot
160
of propagation loss
for a sample of data.
150
is
= 140
$
z _o
+
.E 130
$
*
@
+
5
ti?
+
f
100
l
/
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Frequency(MHz)
28
Conclusions
The measurements we made in the clearing area agreed with theory to within about 5 dB, and the deviations are largely because the clearing was not perfectly flat nor without obstacles. Because HH polarization clearly gave the best penetration through woods, all the following conclusions are based on HH polarization only. The propagation loss through woods tends to agree with the theory plus a fixed attenuation; therefore, we developed an analytical expression by adding an attenuation to the theory of loss over flat earth. The resultant expression for determining the propagation loss in decibels is given by
irwkd2 1 L,=- lOlog
+ 10 log (f5.4) - 108 )
(4)
where
h, = receive antenna height, h, = transmit antenna height, R = range,
il = wavelength, and f = frequency in megahertz.
The first part of the above expression is the predicted path loss over flat earth [6]; the second part is the fixed attenuation caused by woods at a given frequency. This equation models the propagation loss through the moderately dense deciduous forest at Aberdeen Proving Ground in the state of Maryland, USA. The model showed good agreement with the measured data from 145 to 910 MHz and ranges from 500 to 5000 m. It is unknown how well it will work outside these parameters. The expression provides a convenient way to determine propagation loss through woods, given frequency, range, and transmit and receive height. Average propagation loss of the woods increases approximately to the 5th power with frequency as shown by the data of table 4 plotted in figure 14. Trees with leaves, as compared to trees without, resulted in an average increase in attenuation of 8.9 and 6.2 dB for 145 and 223 MHz, respectively. At 910 MHz, no significant difference was evident. The large differences in propagation through woods resulting from relatively small changes in antenna position (see figs. 12(a) to (e) and 18) indicate that it may be more useful to consider the propagation loss as a probability distribution as depicted in figures 16 and 17.
29
Appendix A.- Phase I Measurements
31
Table A-l. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for 22-m transmitter height in clearing at 145 MHz, for HH, VH,
VV, and HV.
Receiver height
b-4
2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6
5 5 5 5
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
410-m range
74.8 85.9 81.1 91.6 69.8 85.8 75.9 99.9 68.8 82.8 75.9 96.8
1000-m range
88.8 109.8
93.6 104.6 85.6 104.8 89.6 99.6 83.6 106.6 88.6 104.4
1930-m range
103.3 118.4 108.4 120.4 99.4 114.4 102.4 112.4 97.4 110.4
99.4 111.4
Table A-2. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for 14-m transmitter height in clearing at 145 MHz, for HH, VH,
VV, and HV.
Receiver height
h-4
2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6
5 5 5 5
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
Table A-3. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for 7.6-m transmitter height in clearing at 145 MHz, for HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Receiver height
Cm)
2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6
5 5 5 5
Polarization
HH
VH
vv
.
HV
HH
VH
vv
HV
HH
VH
vv
HV
410-m range
76.1 85.1 81.27 92.1 73.1 87.1 79.9 93.9 71.6 82.27 77.9 93.9
1000-m range
93.1 110.3 96.1 106.8 89.1 111.1 93.1 104.27 86.1 109.1 92.9 102.1
1930-m range
105.1 122.9 103.9 115.9 102.9 116.1 102.8 113.9 100.1 113.9
99.9 115.9
410-m range
77.6 93.6 84.6 94.8 77.6 93.6 80.6 92.6 75.6 87.6 80.6 87.6
1000-m range
97.4 113.4 95.4 105.4 93.4 118.4 94.4 104.4 91.4 116.4 94.4 108.4
1930-m range
110.4 122.4 108.4 128.4 107.4 123.4 107.4 126.4 104.4 117.4 106.4 123.4
32
Appendix A
Table A-4.
Transmission loss (dB) measurements for 22-m transmitter height in clearing at 223 MHz, for HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Receiver height
Cm>
2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 5 5 5 5
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
410-m range
71.7 83.7 74.1 89.9 68.6 101.8 69.7 95.7 66.6 92.7 67.7 99.7
1000-m range
85.6 99.6 89.4 99.4 82.6 102.6 84.4 99.4 81.6 96.4 81.4 99.4
1930-m range
102.4 113.4 112.4 116.4 98.4 112.4 101.4 119.4 97.6 110.4 101.4 113.4
Table A-5. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for 14-m transmitter height in clearing at 223 MHz, for HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Table A-6. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for 7.6-m transmitter height in clearing at 223 MHz, for HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Receiver height
04
2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 5 5 5 5
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
Receiver height
Cm>
2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 5 5 5 5
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
410-m range
75.1 88.2 73.4 86.2 72.2 88.2 73.2 95.1 70.2 86.1 71.2 91.2
1000-m range
86.2 96.1 93.1 105.2 85.1 101.9 87.2 103.1 82.1 97.9 83.9 106.1
1930-m range
104.9 113.9 105.9 112.9 100.9 114.9 101.7 111.9 97.9 108.9 100.9 110.1
410-m range
75.7 99.6 79.9 100.9 76.6 100.6 75.9 87.7 73.1 91.2 73.7 87.7
1000-m range
89.7 102.7 89.7 112.6 88.7 103.7 90.6 100.4 85.7 105.6
87.6 100.6
1930-m range
107.6 114.6 115.6 121.6 103.6 113.6 111.6 120.6 101.4 111.6 105.6 120.6
33
Appendix A
Table A-7. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for woods in winter, 22-m transmitter height at 145 MHz, for HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Table A-8. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for woods in winter, 14-m transmitter height at 145 MHz, for HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Table A-9. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for woods in winter, 7.6-m transmitter height at 145 MHz, for HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Receiver height
b-4
2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6
5 5 5 5
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
410-m range
78.2 84.2 78.2 82.2 60.2 79.2 73.2 79.2 65.2 81.2 73.2 76.2
967-m range
94.8 112.8 100.9 110 93.8 108.8 99.9 113.1 92.9 106.8 96.8 113.1
983-m range
94.6 110.93 104.9 116.3 92.6 111.1 102.8 112.3 89.1 109.8 100.8 109.9
1000-m range
94.6 133.6 105.1 121.6 90.6 104.1 103.1 109.1 86.6 102.1 101.1 110.9
1930-m range
99.9 115.8 112.1 133.1 100.8 130.4 134.3 126.1 100.8 118.6 111.8 117
Receiver height
W
2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6
5 5 5 5
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
Receiver height
6-4
2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 5 5 5 5
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
410-m range
78.27 95.27 91.27 92.27 75.27 99.27 92.1 92.1 74.27 98.27 90.27 89.1
967-m range
90.27 121.27 105.27 103.27 88.27 122.27 101.1 106.27 86.27 122.27 101.27 102.27
983-m range
88.4 110.4 113.4 106.1 85.4 108.8 109.4 105.3 84.3 107.9 105.4 103.4
1000-m range
87.1 121.4 110.4 112.4 84.4 121.4 107.4 104.4 82.4 116.4 108.4 117.4
1930-m range
94.8 125.3 116.3 115.8 94.8 125.9 122.3 116.3 94.8 126.8 118.3 113.3
410-m range
83.6 105.6 93.93 99.8 81.6 102.6 92.8 101.8
80.8 98.6 92.8 97.8
967-m range
91.4 107.4 108.4 107.3
90.4 107.3 107.4 108.3 88.4 106.3 106.4 109.3
983-m range
92.3 112.3 117.4 112.4 88.3 109.3 116.4 114.4 86.3 106.3 111.3 107.4
1000-m range
88.6 108.6 110.4 111.4 86.6 108.4 112.4 105.3 85.4 107.3 112.3 117.3
1930-m range
96.3 116.3 118.4 107.3 95.3 115.3 117.3 106.3 96.1 117.3 117.3 104.3
34
Appendix A
Table A-10. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for woods in winter, 22-m transmitter height at 223 MHz, for HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Table A-11. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for woods in winter, 14-m transmitter height at 223 MHz, for HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Table A-12. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for woods in winter, 7.6-m transmitter height at 223 MHz, for HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Receiver height
(m) Polarization
2.7
HH
2.7
VH
2.7
vv
2.7
HV
3.6
HH
3.6
VH
3.6
vv
3.6
HV
5
HH
5
VH
5
vv
5
HV
410-m range
78.4 123.4 89.4 98.4 75.4 98.4 91.4 92.4
74.4 98.4 89.4 93.4
967-m range
89.4 116.4 103.4 124.4 86.1 122.1 100.4 110.4 88.1 116.1
96.4 101.6
983-m range
1000-m 1930-m range range
90.7 113.8 101.1 107.1 90.07 106.9 99.07 100.07 89.7 109.7 98.7
96.9
94.23 132.07 107.57 111.47 93.07 119.07 117.57 111.4
93.07 114.07 110.9 119.9
103.1 114.9 125.9 121.9 102.9 121.1 121.7 116.9 104.2 122.1 115.7 109.6
Receiver height
(m)
2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 5 5 5 5
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
410-m ’ range
86.1 98.1 92.1 100.1 83.1 100.1 93.9 106.1 79.1 99.1 93.1 95.1
967-m range
92.9 110.9 108.1 111.1 92.1 107.1 104.1 111.1
93.1 110.1 104.1 127.1
983-m range
92.1 109.9 104.1 112.1 92.2 110.2 102.1 107.1
94.1 112.1 104.1 105.2
1000-m range
97.4 115.2 123.1 110.1 95.2 111.2 107.9 111.1 94.1 113.9 105.2 109.2
1930-m range
109.23 120.4 121.4 125.6 107.2 122.2 130.6 122.4 108.2 128.2 118.4 118.4
Receiver height
(ml
2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 5 5 5 5
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv l-w HH VH vv HV
410-m range
97.4 102.4 94.9 98.7 95.1 111.6
93.73 99.6 91.4 108.4 94.6 96.73
967-m range
92.4 112.4 114.2 115.2 91.4 111.4 111.4 112.2 92.4 112.4 110.2 106.2
983-m range
93.1 115.1 110.1 114.1 91.2 111.2 108.1 107.4 90.4 111.2 111.4 104.4
1000-m range
97.6 113.4 115.4 114.4 93.4 110.4 114.4 117.4 93.4 108.4 118.4 112.2
1930-m range
109.1 127.1 141.2 122.2 135.1 128.1 130.4 119.4 111.4 126.4 123.1 119.2
35
Appendix A
Table A-13. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for woods in winter, 22-m transmitter height at 910 MHz, for HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Table A-14. Transmission loss tdB) measurements for woods in winter, 14-m transmitter height at 910 MHz, for HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Table A-15. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for woods in winter, 7.6-m transmitter height at 910 MHz, for HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Receiver height
b-0
2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6
5 5 5 5
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
410-m range
113.9 119.9 112.9 119.9 116.9 124.9 116.9 115.9 116.9 119.9 123.9 123.9
967-m range
140.4 139.6 130.9 132.9 137.4 135.6 132.9 142.8 124.4 131.4 135.9 134.73
983-m range
131.9 137.1 142.9 144.1 125.9 140.1 129.9 143.2 122.9 140.1 129.9 145.9
1000-m range
124.4 143.1 140.4 136.9 128.4 146.1 131.9 138.57 125.2 144.4 131.9 139.6
1930-m range
132.2 141.1 139.1 141.1 145.9 141.1 139.6 139.1 141.4 137.4 137.7 138.7
Receiver height
Cm)
2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6
5 5 5 5
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
Receiver height
Cm)
2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6
5 5 5 5
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
410-m range
131.7 130.9 132.1 125.9 130.9 136.9 121.9 127.9 129.9 133.9 125.9 128.9
967-m range
145.57 150.7 149.9 145.9 150.7 149.9 149.9 144.9 137.7 147.7 152.1 143.9
983-m range
154.9 143.9 142.9 142.9 141.9 155.1 141.1 146.9 135.9 154.1 148.1 145.1
1000-m range
137.23 153.23 152.23 148.23 146.23 150.23 142.23 146.23 143.4 147.1 135.9 156.2
1930-m range
144.9 161.1 146.2 151.9 148.4 152.4 149.2 152.1 147.2 157.4 150.9 148.1
410-m range
128.9 133.9 129.4 133.1 132.7 140.9 120.1 131.1 136.9 134.9 125.1 133.1
967-m range
152.6 157.9 154.4 151.4 162.4 164.23 153.4 152.4 145.4 154.4 150.4 158.4
983-m range
146.6 153.6 150.6 160.6 142.4 163.4 144.4 159.4 140.4 160.4 150.6 155.4
1000-m range
141.7 159.7 147.7 159.7 143.7 152.7 145.6 147.6 140.7 148.7 147.7 154.6
1930-m range
150.23 163.4 161.23 157.4 156.23 159.23 162.1 166.4 153.23 164.23 161.1 157.23
36
Appendix A
Table A-16. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for woods in summer, 22-m transmitter height at 145 MHz, for HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Table A-17. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for woods in summer, 14-m transmitter height at 145 MHz, for HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Table A-18. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for woods in summer, 7.6-m transmitter height at 145 MHz, for HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Receiver height
b-4
2 2 2 2 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 4 4 4 4
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
410-m range
82.93 98.93 91.93 97.93 79.1 93.93 89.27 95.27 76.93 92.93 88.27 94.27
967-m range
102.27 130.27 104.27 112.27
98.27 116.43 105.43 114.27 97.27 117.43 102.43 114.27
983-m 1000-m 1930-m range range range
105.27 127.43 109.43 125.43 100.27 122.27 110.43 119.43
99.27 118.27 109.43 117.43
102.6 114.6 106.6 121.4
98.6 110.6 110.43 124.43 96.6 112.6 106.43 126.43
104.93 129.77 115.77 121.77 102.77 123.77 115.77 117.77 100.77 128.77 114.77 121.77
Receiver height
(4
2 2 2 2 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 4 4 4 4
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
410-m range
86.27 100.43
93.43 103.43
82.27 105.27 94.43 113.43 81.67 105.27
92.43 98.43
967-m range
100.43 114.43 107.43 117.43 98.43 113.43 108.43 115.43 96.43 112.43 108.43 111.43
983-m range
101.6 118.27 113.27 116.43 96.43 115.43 117.43 113.43 95.43 113.43 113.43 113.43
1000-m 1930-m range range
98.6 125.6 113.6 112.6 93.6 110.43 112.6 113.77 91.6 109.43 108.6 106.6
111.93 126.77 122.77 131.77 107.77 128.77 120.77 127.77 106.77 128.77 120.77 123.77
Receiver height
Cm>
Polarization
2
HH
2
VH
2
vv
2
HV
2.7
HH
2.7
VH
2.7
vv
2.7
HV
4
HH
4
VH
4
vv
4
HV
410-m range
967-m range
983-m range
1000-m 1930-m range range
90.93 103.93 98.77 103.77 85.93 109.77 92.93
99.93 85.93 114.77 92.93 98.93
99.77 117.77 114.77 116.77 94.77 118.77 115.77 112.77
95.77 116.77 118.77 108.77
103.1 119.93 115.93 115.93 97.1 115.93
129.93 112.93 95.93 113.93 120.93
97.93
98.1 120.77 120.77 110.77
92.93 117.77
121.93 119.93 90.93 113.77 116.77
107.77
108.43 124.6 127.6 123.77 105.77 122.6 125.6 132.77 105.43 121.6 123.6 135.6
37
Appendix A
Table A-19. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for woods in summer, 22-m transmitter height at 223 MHz, for HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Table A-20. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for woods in summer, 14-m transmitter height at 223 MHz, for HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Table A-21. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for woods in summer, 7.6-m transmitter height at 223 MHz, for HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Receiver height
Cm>
2 2 2 2 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 4 4 4 4
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
Receiver height
b.9
2 2 2 2 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 4 4 4 4
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
Receiver height
Cm)
Polarization
2
HH
2
VH
2
vv
2
HV
2.7
HH
2.7
VH
2.7
vv
2.7
HV
4
HH
4
VH
4
vv
4
HV
410-m range
86.4 103.4 89.4 108.1
86.9 103.4 90.4 100.2 82.2 101.4 99.4 99.2
967-m range
101.4 125.2 109.2 116.2 100.4 123.4 111.2 114.2 99.4 119.4 110.4 117.2
983-m range
84.4 110.2 91.4 103.4 85.4 99.2 88.4 103.4 84.2 112.4 86.4 103.4
1000-m range
85.6 101.6 99.6 100.6 85.7 102.6 93.6 103.6 85.6 101.6 100.6 106.6
1930-m range
108.7 121.1 115.1 125.1 113.7 134.9 119.1 124.1 117.9 122.9 127.1 127.1
410-m range
967-m range
983-m 1000-m 1930-m range range range
95.4 98.4 90.4 106.4 95.4 100.4 97.4 109.4 88.4
101.4 101.4 106.4
101.4 123.4 112.4 123.4 101.4 128.4 111.4 113.6 99.4
117.4 110.4 111.4
104.6 125.4 109.4 123.6 103.4 120.4 106.6 120.6 101.4
121.4 105.6 115.6
102.6 123.6 120.6 117.6 102.6 121.6 119.7 120.7 101.6
118.7 117.7 119.7
115.9 122.9 116.9 125.9 115.9 121.9 132.9 125.9 118.9
128.9 135.9 125.9
410-m range
94.9 104.1 94.9 100.7
97.9 112.7 98.9 98.9 102.7 110.7
99.9 99.1
967-m range
100.1 119.1 120.1 120.1 99.1 121.1 118.1 116.1
98.1 115.1 118.1 110.1
983-m range
99.9 119.9 114.9 122.1 99.9 120.9 116.9 119.1
99.9 117.9 112.9 113.1
1000-m range
104.9 117.7 126.9 115.7 103.9 119.9 119.7 114.7 101.9 119.9 119.9 126.7
1930-m range
118.1 130.9 119.9 146.9 120.1 130.1 132.9 136.9 123.1 138.9 137.9 147.1
38
Appendix A
Table A-22. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for woods in summer, 22-m transmitter
height at 300 MHz, for HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Receiver height
(4
2 2 2 2 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 4 4 4 4
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
410-m range
89.1 96.1 92.1 107.1 87.1 96.1 98.1 108.1 83.9 94.9 91.1 103.1
967-m range
102.2 121.2 107.2 117.2 105.2 119.2 107.2 120.2 112.2 115.2 109.2 117.2
983-m range
99.4 119.2 103.2 116.4 100.4 116.2 103.4 114.4 108.2 127.2 104.4 118.4
1000-m range
103.6 113.6 102.4 124.4 102.6 111.6 101.4 125.4 107.6 112.6 101.4 121.4
1930-m range
115.6 134.9 115.9 126.9 111.7 131.9 117.9 126.9 111.7 127.7 118.9 126.9
Table A-23. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for woods in summer, 14-m transmitter
height at 300 MHz, for HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Receiver height
b-4
2 2 2 2 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 4 4 4 4
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
410-m range
94.4 106.2 102.2 107.4
92.4 117.2 104.2 113.4 91.4 106.2 98.4 109.4
967-m range
109.2 126.2 113.2 126.2 112.2 119.4 119.2 117.4 118.2 121.2 122.4 121.4
983-m range
107.6 122.2 112.4 125.4 107.4 121.2 109.4 128.4 114.4 125.2 111.4 135.4
1000-m range
107.6 119.6 114.4 135.6 107.6 120.6 110.6 132.6 111.6 123.6 110.6 125.6
1930-m range
122.7 134.7 128.7 138.7 120.7 129.7 128.7 131.7 119.6 137.7 119.7 149.7
Table A-24. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for woods in summer, 7.6-m transmitter height at 300 MHz, for HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Receiver height
b-9
2 2 2 2 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 4 4 4 4
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH w HV HH VH vv HV
410-m range
100.7 112.9 104.9 104.7 105.9 112.6 107.9 114.7 101.7 124.7 103.7 106.2
967-m range
111.6 122.7 119.7 131.6 113.7 123.7 123.7 123.6 118.7 124.7 126.7 119.6
983-m range
109.7 121.9 117.9 130.7 109.7 119.9 117.9 129.7 116.7 123.9 119.9 128.9
1000-m range
111.7 120.7 120.9 119.7 108.9 120.9 116.7 122.7 111.9 125.9 115.7 123.7
1930-m range
125.6 145.6 130.6 147.6 123.7 142.6 132.2 142.6 122.5 135.6 129.6 138.6
39
Appendix A
Table A-25. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for woods in summer, 22-m transmitter height at 910 MHz, for HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Table A-26. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for woods in summer, 14-m transmitter height at 910 MHz, for HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Table A-27. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for woods in summer, 7.6-m transmitter height at 910 MHz, for HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Receiver height
b-4
2 2 2 2 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 4 4 4 4
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
410-m range
117.4 123.4 119.6 123.6 120.2 122.2 123.6 121.6 125.4 129.4 122.6 123.6
967-m range
132.9 142.7 140.7 143.7 141.7 147.7 136.9 143.7 135.7 139.9 131.7 141.7
983-m range
113.9 141.7 119.9 120.9 109.9 124.7 115.9 121.9 110.7 125.9 115.9 123.9
1000-m range
109.4 124.1 117.9 120.9 112.2 126.1 115.9 121.9 111.1 122.1 114.9 118.9
1930-m range
138.4 146.6 145.9 146.9 141.4 149.6 140.9 149.9 141.6 150.6 140.9 148.9
Receiver height
Cm)
2 2 2 2 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 4 4 4 4
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
410-m range
130.9 138.9 121.9 136.1 131.9 134.9 126.9 128.1 123.9 160.9 148.1 156.1
967-m range
143.9 161.1 148.1 156.1 150.1 156.1 149.1 154.1 150.1 160.9 146.1 153.1
983-m
range
127.9 140.4 136.6 142.6 124.9 139.6 137.7 141.6 126.6 138.6 133.7 139.6
1000-m range
137.4 149.4 154.4 152.4 138.4 156.2 140.4 142.4 137.2 149.1 140.4 143.4
1930-m range
149.7 152.7 160.6 158.6 156.6 159.6 149.6 155.6 151.7 157.6 145.6 156.6
Receiver height
Cm>
2 2 2 2 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 4 4 4 4
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
410-m Range
137.2 134.1 129.2 132.2 134.2 135.1 130.4 144.1 126.1 135.1 126.2 133.2
967-m range
151.9 157.9 151.9 163.9 152.9 163.9 152.9 156.9 147.9 161.9 151.9 149.9
983-m range
146.2 156.2 155.2 158.2 144.2 164.2 161.2 154.2 140.2 156.2 156.2 149.2
1000-m range
140.2 160.2 159.2 148.9 139.2 162.2 156.1 152.9 139.2 158.1 142.9 148.9
1930-m range
174.9 167.7 170.9 172.7 163.9 169.7 164.9 169.7 167.7 163.9 160.7 175.7
40
Appendix A
Table A-28. Statistical 96.1 96.1 96.1 95.1 95.1 93.93 96.1
transmission loss data 96.27 96.1 96.1 96.1 96.1 95.1 96.1
in decibels (as
98.27 96.1 96.1 97.1 97.1 96.93 96.1
described in sect. 2.4). 98.27 9Te1 97.1 97.1 97.1 96.93 96.93
98.27 96.1 97.1 96.1 96.1 95.93 95.93
96.1 96.1 97.1 95.1 95.1 95.93 95.93
96.1 96.1 95.1 96.1 94.04 96.1 93.93
Table A-29. Multipath measurements (dB) in clearing.
Transmit antenna
height (m)
6.2 7.2 8.2 9.2 10.2 11.2 12.2 13.2 14.2 15.2 16.2 17.2 18.2 19.2 20.2 21.2
145MHz
77.9 77.23 76.4 74.53 73.53 72.56 71.9 71.03 71.23 70.4 70.07 69.9 69.73 68.73 70.57 69.57
223MHz
76.77 75.6 75.43 72.6 72.07 71.1 70.1 70.07 70.47 69.73 69.07 68.77 68.6 68.6 68.27 69.77
300MHz
74.73 73.74 73.74 71.74 71.77 71.07 70.57 70.24 69.57 69.4 69.23 68.74 68.9 68.74 69.07 68.9
910MHz
73.07 74.24 74.07 76.07 79.4 93.4 83.9 78.57 74.37 73.24 72.87 72.43 72.74 73.9 74.43 78.37
Table A-30. Multipath measurements (dB) in woods.
Transmit antenna
height (m)
6.2 7.2 8.2 9.2 10.2 11.2 12.2 13.2 14.2 15.2 16.2 17.2 18.2 19.2 20.2 21.2
145 MHz
85.23 85.23 84.93 83.06 81.93 81.43 79.93 78.53 77.9 77.53 77.2 76.2 75.4 74.9 74.9 75.2
223 MHz
93.13 93.23 93.13 88.93 86.93 85.93 84.73 85.23 83.8 82.9 81.8 80.8 80.3 79.4 79.3 78.9
300 MHz
99.7 100.73 103.77 117.4 110.07 108.4
98.2 92.2 91.77 90.57 89.37 87.87 86.77 86.07 85.74 85.57
910MHz
121.27 117.77 121.73 122.43 114.43 114.27 119.77 115.23 116.57 110.23 104.1 103.5 102.03 107.7 115.7 114.9
41
Appendix B.- Phase II Measurements
43
Table B-l.
Receiver height
Transmission loss (dB)
(m)
measurements for
woods in summer,
1
22-m transmitter
1
height at 145 MHz, for
1
HH, VH, VV, and HV.
1
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
1000-m range
133.47 146.47 111.63 127.47 96.47 107.47 110.47 130.63
4700-m range
128.77 138.97 143.97 144.97 120.8 141.13 132.97 128.13
Table B-2.
Receiver height
Transmission loss (dB) measurements for
(\mj,
woods in summer,
1
14-m transmitter
1
height at 145 MHz, for
1
HH, VH, VV, and HV.
1
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
1930-m range
121.97 136.13 126.13 136.47 118.47 132.13 124.47 132.97
4700-m range
135.13 149.13 143.13 141.8 130.3 149.13 147.47 142.8
Table B-3.
Receiver height
Transmission loss (dB)
cmj
measurements for
woods in summer,
1
7.6-m transmitter
1
height at 145 MHz, for
1
HH, VH, VV, and HV.
1
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
1930-m range
120.13 135.97 125.97 137.97 118.13 132.3 124.13 132.97
4700-m range
132.13 148.13 151.47 143.47 125.13 138.13 149.47 138.13
Table B-4. Transmission loss tdB) measurements for woods in summer, 22-m transmitter height at 223 MHz, for
HH, VH, VV, and H.
Receiver height Cm)
1 1 1 1 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
1000-m range
129.63 137.63 132.63 117.47 102.63 113.97 117.97 105.97
4700-m range
131.97 137.97 133.97 139.97 127.97 132.97 130.97 133.97
Table B-5. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for woods in summer, 14-m transmitter height at 223 MHz, for
HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Receiver height
b-9
1 1 1 1 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
1930-m range
118.13 137.47 130.3 141.3 113.3 118.13 115.47 119.47
4700-m range
131.97 141.97 142.97 140.97 130.97 141.97 134.97 134.47
Table B-6. Transmission loss tdB) measurements for woods in summer,
7.6-m transmitter height at 223 MHz, for
HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Receiver height
(4
1 1 1 1 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
1930-m range
123.13 140.13 129.13 128.13 122.13 137.13 126.3 126.97
4700-m range
143.97 145.63 141.97 152.63 147.97 147.63 139.97 145.97
Table B-7. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for woods in summer, 22-m transmitter height at 300 MHz, for HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Receiver height
Cm>
1 1 1 1 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
1000-m range
128.13 137.13 114.13 127.97 108.47 117.97 109.13 125.13
4700-m range
134.64 155.97 144.97 147.97 136.13 149.13 141.97 145.13
Table B-8. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for woods in summer, 14-m transmitter height at 300 MHz, for
HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Receiver height Cm>
1 1 1 1 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv Hv
1930-m 4700-m range range
129.3 140.3 144.3
133.3 124.3 137.3
131.3 137.3
149.97 158.13 147.97
155.97 153.97 163.97
157.97 154.97
Appendix B
45
Appendix B
Table B-9. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for woods in summer, 7.6-m transmitter height at 300 MHz, for HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Receiver height
Cm)
1 1 1 1 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
1930-m range
131.97 146.8 143.47 146.97 133.63 139.8 154.8 144.8
4700-m range
151.47 158.13 150.47 155.13 146.47 160.13 155.47 150.47
Table B-10. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for woods in summer, 22-m transmitter height at 435 MHz, for
HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Receiver height
b-4
1 1 1 1 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
1000-m range
133.47 146.47 121.97 137.8 120.63 135.47 120.13 138.13
4700-m range
160.47 155.47 146.47 151.47 147.47 153.63 152.47 156.47
Table B-11. Transmission loss tdB) measurements for woods in summer, 14-m transmitter height at 435 MHz, for
HH, VH, VV, and HV.
Receiver height
b-4
1 1 1 1 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
1930-m range
148.97 142.47 145.47 152.63 140.8 145.63 133.63 142.47
4700-m range
168.47 161.47 157.47 158.47 156.97 167.47 154.97 167.47
Table B-12. Transmission loss tdB) measurements
Receiver height w
for woods in summer,
1
7.6-m transmitter
1
height at 435 MHz, for
1
HH, VH, VV, and HV.
1
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
1930-m 4700-m range range
149.63 161.63 150.47 152.97 143.63 155.63 144.3 144.437
169.47 165.47 168.47 165.47 161.47 169.47 168.47 166.47
46
Table B-13.
Receiver height
Transmission loss (dB) measurements
Cm)
Polarization
for woods in summer,
1
HH
22-m transmitter
1
VH
height at 910 MHz. for
1
vv
HHY VH, VV, and HV.
1
HV
2.7
HH
2.7
VH
2.7
vv
2.7
HV
1000-m range
146.37 154.37 143.37 150.37 134.03 151.53 133.37 143.37
4700-m range
166.87 165.87 162.87 169.87 170.03 163.03 171.03 160.87
Table B-14. Transmission loss (dB) measurements for woods in summer, 14-m transmitter
height at 910 MHz. for
HHY VH, VV, and HV.
Receiver height
b-9
1 1 1 1 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
1930-m 4700-m range range
158.87 165.53
158.53 162.87 158.87 162.87 154.53 165.53
176.03 170.87
174.87 173.87 177.87 175.87 173.87 171.87
Table B-15. Transmission loss (dB) measurements
Receiver height b-4
for woods in summer,
1
7.6-m transmitter
1
height at 910 MHz, for
1
HH, VH, VV, and HV.
1
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
Polarization
HH VH vv HV HH VH vv HV
1930-m 4700-m range range
175.87 173.7 169.87 170.87 169.7 170.87 171.87 171.87
178.03 179.87 176.87 183.83 180.83 186.87 183.17 180.83
Appendix B
47
Appendix B
Table B-16. Transmission loss (dB) for tree-line proximity measurements
(described in sect. 2.3).
145 MHz
Receiver height k-4
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7
Position
A B C D 1 2 3 4 5 6 A B C D 1 2 3 4 5 6
22-m transmitter
height
110.63 110.63 110.63 108.63 130.47 131.47 131.47 132.47 124.47 131.53 101.63 98.63 99.47 103.47 122.47 120.47 127.47 122.47 118.47 117.47
14-m transmitter
height
133.63 128.47 126.47 133.67 132.47 130.47 128.13 123.13 126.13 131.63 126.47 125.47 118.97 118.47 118.63 121.47 120.47 113.63 113.63 118.13
7.6-m transmitter
height
132.97 129.13 134.13 133.13 129.69 130.63 125.63 127.63 133.13 130.47 124.13 136.13 129.13 122.47 121.97 121.47 122.47 119.47 123.3 123.13
223 MHz
Receiver height
b-4
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7
Position
A B C D 1 2 3 4 5 6 A B C D 1 2 3 4 5 6
22-m transmitter
height
102.02 110.97 102.97 108.97 126.97 125.97 119.97 121.97 117.63 130.13 101.97 97.97 100.97 103.97 120.97 117.97 126.97 114.97 117.63 115.13
14-m transmitter
height
127.13 129.13 132.13 132.63 129.63 130.97 133.63 125.63 125.63 127.47 126.13 125.13 125.13 121.13 123.3 123.13 131.97 118.63 115.63 122.63
7.6-m transmitter
height
118.97 131.97 138.97 135.63 133.63 131.13 131.63 133.3 133.63 133.13 128.63 132.13 130.63 126.63 126.63 128.63 125.63 124.63 126.63 125.63
48
Appendix B
Table B-16 (cont’d). Transmission loss (dB) for tree-line proximity measurements (described in sect. 2.3).
300 MHz
Receiver height Cm>
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7
Position
A B C D 1 2 3 4 5 6 A B C D 1 2 3 4 5 6
22-m transmitter
height
114.13 107.13 110.13 108.13 126.13 125.13 122.13 125.13 113.47 136.63 110.13 112.13 111.13 106.13 123.13 120.13 127.13 123.13 121.47 122.47
14-m transmitter
height
137.13 129.13 141.13 135.47 136.97 129.97 136.8 135.97 142.8 152.97 135.13 137.13 133.13 130.13 130.63 129.47 136.8 130.97 125.8 126.8
7.6-m transmitter
height
139.13 142.13 144.97 138.97 137.97 135.63 137.8 144.63 145.8 149.63 138.47 146.97 143.13 135.97 136.8 135.8 141.6 137.63 139.63 144.63
435 MHz
Receiver height
b-4
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7
Position
A B C D 1 2 3 4 5 6 A B C D 1 2 3 4 5 6
22-m transmitter
height
122.47 121.47 120.13 119.47 130.47 130.97 132.47 131.47 122.63 131.63 120.47 126.47 121.97 123.63 131.47 128.47 151.47 140.13 134.63 127.63
14-m transmitter
height
141.47 136.47 139.47 144.13 137.13 134.13 138.13 135.13 139.13 134.97 142.47 162.47 144.47 142.47 135.13 138.13 137.47 143.13 136.13 143.13
7.6-m transmitter
height
150.13 161.13 150.13 150.13 146.13 143.13 154.13 150.13 150.97 152.13 149.13 157.97 158.13 154.13 155.13 145.97 155.13 151.13 151.13 160.13
49
Appendix B
Table B-16 (cont’d). Transmission loss (dB) for tree-line proximity measurements (described in sect. 2.3).
910 MHz
Receiver height b-4
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7
Position
A B C D 1 2 3 4 5 6 A B C D 1 2 3 4 5 6
22-m transmitter
height
140.37 146.37 142.37 140.37 154.37 152.37 149.37 146.37 132.03 142.03 144.37 145.37 141.37 151.37 159.37 144.37 147.7 161.37 139.03 143.03
14-m transmitter
height
155.03 167.53 155.53 161.53 172.53 156.03 158.37 155.53 148.53 150.03 164.03 163.87 156.53 164.37 164.53 151.53 149.53 158.87 146.53 160.53
7.6-m transmitter
height
174.03 174.83 173.53 177.83 178.67 169.17 172.53 169.03 174.83 170.37 172.03 183.33 172.37 165.03 173.03 183.17 174.37 173.03 166.33 164.87
50
Appendix C.- GPS Positions
51
Table C-l. Transmitter positions.
Location
Woods Clearing
Lat.
N 39” 26.691’ N 39” 26.698’
Long.
W 076” 12.022’ W 076” 12.284’
Table C-2. Receiver positions.
Location and range (m)
Woods 410 Woods 1000 Woods 1930 Woods 4700 Clearing 410 Clearing 1000 Clearing 1930 Clearing 4300
Lat.
N 39” 26.886’ N 39” 27.204’ N 39” 27.653’ N 39” 27.653’ N 39” 26.893’ N 39” 27.152’ N 39” 27.604’ N 39” 28.757’
Long.
W 076” 11.868’ W 076” 11.810’ W 076” 11.520’ W 076” 11.520’ W 076” 12.145’ W 076” 11.917’ W 076” 11.623’ W 076” 10.770’
52
~--..- .-.
Distribution
Admnstr Defns Tech1 Info Ctr Attn DTIC-OCP .8725 John J Kingman Rd Ste 0944 FT Belvoir VA 22060-6218
DARI’A Attn L Moyer AttnS Welby 3701 N Fairfax Dr Arlington VA 22203-1714
Oft of the Secy of Defns Attn ODDRE (R&AT) The Pentagon Washington DC 20301-3080
Oft of the Secy of Defns Attn OUSD(A&T)/ODDR&E(R) 3080 Defense Pentagon Washington DC 20301-7100
R J Trew
AMCOM MRDEC Attn AMSMI-RD W C McCorkle Redstone Arsenal AL 35898-5240
Dir for MANPRINT Oft of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Prsnnl Attn J Hiller The Pentagon Rm 2C733 Washington DC 20301-0300
NGIC Attn IANG-RSG J Nielson Attn LANG-RSG W Nixon Attn IANG RSC S Carter 220 7th Stret NE Charlottesville VA 22901-5396
SMC/CZA 2435 Vela Way Ste 1613 El Segundo CA 90245-5500
US Army ARDEC Attn AMSTA-AR-TD M Fisette Bldg 1 Picatinny Arsenal NJ 07806-5000
US Army Info Sys Engrg Cmnd Attn AMSEL-IE-TD F Jenia FT Huachuca AZ 85613-5300
US Army Natick RDEC Acting Tech1 Dir Attn SBCN-T P Brandler Natick MA 01760-5002
US Army Simulation, Train, & Instrmntn Cmnd
Attn AMSTI-CG M Macedonia Attn J Stahl 12350 Research Parkway Orlando FL 32826-3726
US Army Soldier & Biol Chem Cmnd Dir of Rsrch & Techlgy Dir&t
Attn SMCCR-RS I G Resnick Aberdeen Proving Ground MD 21010-5423
US Army Tank-Automtv Cmnd Rsrch, Dev, & Engrg Ctr Attn AMSTA-TR J Chapin Warren MI 48397-5000
US Army Train & Doctrine Cmnd Battle Lab Integration & Tech1 Dirctrt Attn ATCD-B FT Monroe VA 23651-5850
US Military Academy Mathematical Sci Ctr of Excellence Attn Madn Math MAJ R Huber Thayer Hall West Point NY 10996-1786
Nav Surface Warfare Ctr Attn Code B07 J Pennella 17320 Dahlgren Rd Bldg 1470 Rm 110 1 Dahlgren VA 22448-5100
Hicks & Associates Inc Attn G Singley III 1710 Goodrich Dr Ste 1300 McLean VA 22102
Palisades Inst for Rsrch Svc Inc Attn E Carr 1745 Jefferson Davis Hwy Ste 500 Arlington VA 22202-3402
US Army Rsrch Lab Attn AMSRL-SE-RM Attn AMSRL-SE-RM
R Bender R Tan (15 copies)
53
Distribution (cont’d)
US Army Rsrch Lab (cont’d) Attn AMSRL-SE-RM S Stratton (15 copies) Aberdeen Proving Ground MD 21005
US Army Rsrch Oft Attn AMSRL-RO-D JCI Chang PO Box 12211 Research Triangle Park NC 27709
US Army Rsrch Lab Attn AMSRL-DD J M Miller Attn AMSRL-CI-AI-R Mail & Records Mgmt Attn AMSRL-CI-AI’ Tech1 Pub (3 copies) Attn AMSRL-CI-LL Tech1 Lib (3 copies) Attn AMSRL-SE-R B Wallace Attn AMSRL-SE-RM E Burke Adelphi MD 20783-1197
54
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE
Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188
‘ublic reporting burden for this collection of information IS estimated to average 1 hour per response. including the time for reviewing Instructions. searching existing data SOUICQS, Jathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewmg the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this :ollecbon of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services. Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Iavis Highway, Suite 1204. Arlington, VA 22202.4302. and to the Office of Management and Budget. Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-01138).Washington. DC 20503.
AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank)
2. REPORT DATE
September 2000
3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED
Final, March-September 1999
TITLE AND SUBTITLE Path-Loss Measurements in a Forested Environment at 5. FUNDING NUMBERS VHF
DA PR: N/A
. AUTHOR(S) Robert J. Tan and Suzanne R. Stratton
PE: N/A
PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS
U.S. Army Research Laboratory
Attn: AMSRL- SE-RM
email:
2800 Powder Mill Road
Adelphi, MD 20783-1197
rtan@arl.army.mil
. SPONSORlNGlMONlTORlNG AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS
U.S. Army Research Laboratory
2800 Powder Mill Road Adelphi, MD 20783-1197
1. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
ARL PR: 9NDYHH AMS code: P3052000.000
12a. DISTRIBUTION~AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approve-J for public release; distribution unlimited.
3. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER
ARL-TR-2156
10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER
12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE
13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words)
Designing a radar system capable of detecting objects concealed by foliage requires path-loss dat;
and the development of path-loss prediction models. The challenge is to design a system with antenna elements of manageable size, while keeping foliage signal attenuation as small as
possible. We took a series of measurements to characterize path loss in a mostly deciduous forest Results show that the parameter values that give the least attenuation because of the intervening
woods are the lowest frequencies and transmit horizontal, receive horizontal polarization (HH).
14.SUBJECTTERPMroSpagation, VHF, foliage penetration
17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF REPORT
Unclassified
ISN 7540-01-280-5500
19. SECURITY CLASSlFlCATlON OF THlS PAGE
Unclassified
19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF ABSTRACT
Unclassified
15. NUMBER OF PAGES
60
16. PRICE CODE
20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT
UL
Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89) Prescribedby ANSI Std.239-18 298-102
55
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink