106 lines
6.6 KiB
Plaintext
106 lines
6.6 KiB
Plaintext
Toby's Flat Earth Presentation Mar 2 2024 Three Globe Claims
|
||
- Motion - Curvature - Geophysics
|
||
The Paradoxical Globe
|
||
Particle/Wave Duality The Twin Paradox Ehrenfest Paradox Einstein-Podalsky-Rosen Paradox Shrodinger's Cat Heisenberg Uncertainty Neumann-Seliger Gravitational Paradox The Information Paradox Newton's Shell Theorem Violation Maximum Momentum/Minimum Energy Rotation Violation Curved Visual Space Violation ...and many more!
|
||
Motion
|
||
|
||
We feel no motion All flight on Earth utilizes a stationary baseline
|
||
Planes Missiles Helicopters Commercial Flight Simulation
|
||
Dynamic Positioning Equations of Motion
|
||
|
||
Helicopter Equations of Motion
|
||
|
||
Question:
|
||
If pilots have to treat the Earth as stationary, and we can't perceive any motion, is there any way we can measure it?
|
||
Answer:
|
||
Yes, using the induction rate of light, we can measure absolute velocity, as understood since at least 1818.
|
||
1865 JC Maxwell
|
||
Worked upon Faraday's experiments Used known values of the electric constant (ε₀) and the magnetic constant (µ₀) in his electromagnetic wave equations Light behaves as an electromagnetic wave, which requires a substantive medium, aka the aether
|
||
|
||
Michelson-Morley 1887
|
||
Interferometry
|
||
Used an interferometer to detect the absolute motion of the Earth
|
||
|
||
Should have measured the orbital motion of the Earth around the Sun Based on the premise of a substantive medium, necessary for electromagnetic waves propagation Dependent Variable: “c” or the “speed of light” Independent Variable: Orthogonal Vector Direction Result != Copernican Principal No orbital motion was detected, though a small fringe was registered But the result can be explained with a stationary Earth and an aether wind
|
||
|
||
...Enter Einstein!
|
||
No aether One-way "speed of light" is always constant No invoking absolute space or absolute time
|
||
"Imaginary physical experiments" and the lack of measurable motion used as the sole "experimentation" from which Einstein derives Special Relativity.
|
||
|
||
.9c + .9c < c aka 2 + 2 does not equal 4
|
||
|
||
Sagnac 1913
|
||
=> "Speed of Light" = c +|- v
|
||
*Violates SR (Special Relativity)
|
||
Dayton Miller 1920's
|
||
There is a preferred direction of the "speed of light" There is also a periodicity of this effect "Aether flow" matches the motion of the sky Measurement is greater at altitude Related to the **motion of the solar system
|
||
|
||
Michelson-Gale-Pearson 1925
|
||
They claim to have measured the rotation of the earth Based on the anisotropic propagation of light Claim is they can only measure "rotational motion" Linear motion is "undetectable" "Closed loop"
|
||
Galaev 2001
|
||
|
||
Generalized Sagnac Effect
|
||
Date: Sep, 2004 Author(s): Ruyong Wang, Yi Zheng, Aiping Yao Institution: St. Cloud State University - St. Cloud, Minnesota
|
||
Belief that the Sagnac test of 1913 only applied to rotational motion was discounted when Ruyong Wang found the same results for linear motion in 2004. The Sagnac result has never been credibly explained, despite its wide application in modern technology. In turn the Wang paper has been virtually ignored in the last ten years [...] Analysis of Wang’s result in the conveyor and lab frames with the premise of aether drag logically leads to identification of preferred motion in an absolute frame of reference […] the earth-bound laboratory frame!
|
||
|
||
- Robert Bennett, 2014: A Landmark Experiment: The Linear Sagnac Test of Ruyong Wang
|
||
|
||
The Allais Effect and the Anisotropy of Space
|
||
Solar eclipse of 1954
|
||
|
||
Nobel laureate Maurice Allais observed anomalous behavior of his pendulum Effect was named “The Allais Effect” Observed it again in 1956 and 1959
|
||
Maurice Allais, 1997: The Anisotropy of Space: The necessary revision of certain postulates of contemporary theories
|
||
|
||
Pendulum precession rate relative to the sidereal motion of the Sun and Moon (their annual sky movements):
|
||
|
||
Translation:
|
||
“It is therefore appropriate to consider that the current laws of gravitation are in no way the perfectly verified, definitive, and immutable laws, on which one bases the assertion that my experimental results are contrary to all the experience
|
||
|
||
acquired in the field of astronomy. These laws, like all experimental laws, are only verified with a certain approximation.”
|
||
|
||
ctrl+f brake?
|
||
|
||
Curvature
|
||
2018 FE Core Laser Test
|
||
Laser tests taken in Hungary and The Netherlands
|
||
|
||
But don't we see boats go over the horizon? Where does the Sun go at night?
|
||
Optics and Curved Visual Space
|
||
|
||
We have a resolution limit (we can't see forever) We perceive from a single point in 3D space Angular resolution imposes a non-linear drop-off in our ability to resolve items as they move away from us Your ability to ascertain objects dissipates into an unresolvable angle, in a non-linear fashion
|
||
Sixth Grade Art Class and Perspective
|
||
The train tracks do not actually converge This is a result of perceiving from a single point in 3D space
|
||
|
||
Geophysics
|
||
|
||
Globular Plate Techtonics
|
||
A Rotating Globe
|
||
What should a maximum-momentum, minimum-energy state look like?
|
||
Semi-liquid interior should accentuate lack of uniformity in rotation The continents should "drift" outward to align the equator
|
||
Pangea
|
||
|
||
Would cause great instability Paired with a semi-liquid interior, uniform rotation is impossible Foundational to geophysical assertions of the globe
|
||
Magnetogeology
|
||
Rely on magnetic striping across ocean floor Unsubstantiated assertions Relating to events hundreds of millions of years in the past
|
||
Pole Reversals do not match geodynamo "predictions" Geodynamo is built on numerous ad-hoc assumptions and offers no predictive value
|
||
|
||
Geodynamo Model
|
||
Convection currents in the outer core Not aligned with Earth's axis, despite "coriolis" being invoked as the central cause of the currents
|
||
|
||
P and S Wave Shadow Zones
|
||
|
||
S wave shadow zones clearly work on a flat earth P wave shadow zones might be explainable by numerous phenomenon, and rely on incremental layering models that cannot be substantiated or falsified
|
||
In so far as a scientific statement speaks about reality, it must be falsifiable; and in so far as it is not falsifiable, it does not speak about reality.
|
||
Sir Karl Popper (Philosopher)
|
||
|
||
How to "compute a globe"
|
||
|
||
Newton's Shell Theorem
|
||
The Earth's "dense iron core" is located at the point of 0 gravity Ad-hoc iron core is necessary for the globe to invoke pointspecific gravity, which is required for a uniform downward bias, across the earth
|
||
|
||
This is of course better explained with a uniform downward bias, which would align with the downward electrical current from the atmos which is objectively measured. This is why the voltage gradient lines across the earth are parallel to each other, and perpendicular to the ground. They are not oriented as concentric spheres.
|
||
Apollo 17
|
||
|
||
Thank you
|
||
|