zotero-db/storage/WHDZBIGE/.zotero-ft-cache

BY DAVID W. THOMSON III AND JLM D. BOURASSA
Unified Force Theory, Dark Matetr and Consciousness
Illustrations by Jon Lomberg

SECRETS OF .THE
Cover Illustration
Pictured here is the Aether Unit. The "surface of distributed frequency' represents by the double sphere, and relates to electrostatic charge. Forward, linear time is but one aspect of quanttun frequency. Forward time and space come together when dark matter enters the rotating magnetic field of the Aether, and produces the subatomic particles of visible matter. Subatomic "particles" exist at various levels of geometry. Mass has circular geometry. The electrostatic charge is spherical in geometry. The strong charge (or electromagnetic charge) has toroidal geometry. All physical existence comes together in the Aether, which has double loxodrome geometry.

QUANTUM AETHERDYNAMICS INSTITUTE
Secrets of the Aether
Ue.av Anliol l3e51 W,'rhe5 I<> y6ur 51-Vel,! of Itze
4<EFBFBD> fiAe I pit 'I 5"(<28>5 //Iode !.
Unified Force Theory, Dark Matter and Consciousness
Third Edition 2007 ISBN: 0-9768128-2-7 2004,2005 - TXul-224-594 © Quantum AetherDynamics Institute
518 Illinois St., Alma, IL 62807
Published by The Aenor Trust
POBox 4706 Salem, OR 97302

SECRETS OF THE AETHER
A special thank you goes to Angelyn Ray forher invaluable volunteerediting of the Secrets of the Aethermanuscript,
and forpolishing it from draft fonn to final copy; and to Lorisa GanlinerofThe AenorTrust
forherassistance with editing and publishing. We also thank ColleenThomas
formaking it hermission to get the AetherPhysics Model out to the public.

Table of Contents

PREFACE IX •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

The Crisis in Physics ....................... ix Re-discovering the Aether............... ix Einstein's Question An swered......... ix QADI's Aether Physics Model........... x

QUANTUM STRUCTURE ........ 13

Not Just for Physicists . . . . . .. . . . .. ... . 15

Scope

of

the

APM

. .. ..... . .. ....

.

..... .

16

A New Dimensional Analysis ...... 19

Systems

of

Measurement

. . .. . .

.....

20

Units of Dimensions..... .. . .. ... .... .. . 23

Quantum Constants........... .. ... . . . . 24

ONTOLOGICAL FOUNDATION 27

The

Aether

............ ..........

. .. . . . . . .

..

30

Einstein's Aether . ... 32 ...... ................

..

Dyn amic Space . . . . .. 34 ... .............. . . .. ...

Geometric Structure of Aether ....... 35
The Physical Universe .. .... . . ........ 37

Unified

Force

Theory. . .. ...... ...

.....

38

Primary Angular Momentum . . .... . 39

Zero

Point

Energy

... .. . .. . 42 .

......

.. ...

.

GFORCE 43 .................................

What

is

the

Gforce?

. . . .. . . . ... .

.

... ...

43

Gforce in Three Manifestations . .. 45

Quantum Measurements .. ........ ... .. 46

Electromagnetic Structure . ..... ....... 48

Electrostatic Structure . . . . .... .... ..... ... 50

Gravitational Structure. ... ........ . ..... . 51
The Cause of Existence. .. ... ..... ... 52

AETHER 55 .................................

The Shape of "Emptiness".... .. .. .. 59

What

the

Aether

is

. . . .. . not . . .

.

... ...

61

Aether

Unit..

..... .. . . . .. . . .

.

... . . .

....... . .

63

Spin Structure ............................ 65

Aether Dipoles............................ 66

Aether Structures ....................... 67

Granular Aether Structures ............ 71
Golden Ratio .............................. 79

Pythagorean Concepts ............... 79

Structure of Atomic Nuclei .......... 83

Science of Complexity.......... .. .. .. 86

DIMENSiONS 89 ..........................
Definition of Dimension............... 90 . Miscon ception s of Mass ..... . ......... 91
E does not equal m . . 92 ........ ....... .......
Nature of Dimensions ................. 93 Linear and . . . . Distributed. . ...... . . .. . 94 Length and Reciprocal Length.... 95
Single Dimension Length .. ...... ....... 95 Distributed Dimension Length........ 96

Three Dimensional Length 96 ..............
Time and Reciprocal Time ..........96 . Single Dimension Time . . ...... ... ..... ..97
Distributed Time . . . . . 99 . ..... .. ........ ... ......
. Distributed Frequency. ......... . 100 ... .... . . 102 Static Frequency . ...... ..... ............ . Mass and Reciprocal Mass ....... 102
Single Dimension Mass . . . 104 . ... .........
Charge and Reciprocal Charge. 105
Single Dimension 105 Charge . . ..... . .....
Distributed Dimension Charge......106
Geometry.................................. 106
Spherical Constant . . . 106 .. .. .. ..............
41t in Unified Charge Equation. ... ..108
Distributed Spherical Constant 109 .....

UNITS 111 ....................... 11 ••••••••••

Quantum Units.......................... 111

Converting Charge Dimensions 112 ....

Magnetic Moment. .. 113 ........ ... ...........
Comparing Magnetic Moments.. ...115 Changes . . . . 116 ..................... ... .. .. .......
New Units ................................. 118 Photon . . .. . . . . 118 ... ........ ....... ... ..... ..... ... Light. . . . .. 119 ..... . ................ ............ ...... Eddy Current .. . . . . . 119 .. ............ ..... ... . .. Gyration . . .. . . 123 . .............. ......... . . ........
Friction .. . . . .. 123 .. . ............ .. .. ................
Drag 124 ..............................................

Reson ance . . . . . 124 ......... . ... .. ....... ........

Diverging Electric Field. . 129 .......... .....

Irradiance . . . ... . .. 129 . . . ................

. ....... ..

. . 129 Temperature.. . . . ... ... . .. ..... .

...........

Units Grid.................................. 130

Supportive Electromagnetic Units.131

Opposing Electromagnetic Units...132 Electric Units 1..............................133

Electric Units 2 .............................. 133

Electric Units 3..............................134

Inertial Units 1...............................135
In ertial Units 2 . . . .135 . ..... ................ .....
Inertial Units 3...............................136

Length/Frequency Units 1.............137

Length/Frequency Units 2.............137
More Example Calculations....... 138 Kinetic Energy . .. . . 140 ....... . .......... ... ....

CONSTANTS 147 ........................

Analyzing the Constants ...........148
Electromagnetic Constant... . ... 148 ...... 148 Coulomb's Constant . ....................
Constant Speed of Light.. . . .... ... 150 .... C2 Constant . ... ..............,...............152
. . . . 156 Orders of Motion . . ......... .... ...... .. . Conductance Constant .. .......... . .. .157
Permeability Constant...................160 Permittivity Constant.. . 160 ................ .. Planck's Constant.. . .. 161 . . ........... ..... .. Newton Gravitational Constant.....163 Fine Structure Constants .. ... . . . 1 ...... 65

SECRETS OF THE , AETHER
g-factor Constants ........... "...........166 Gyromagnetic Ratio . . 171 ... ..... ......... ... Aether Pressure and Density . ...... .172
ANGULAR MOMENTUM........ 173
General Structure......................175 The Electron ............................. 175 The Proton................................178 The Neutron..............................180
Proton -Neutron Angular Momenta 182 The Neutrino 182 ................................. Further Neutrino In sights 184 ..............
The Photon...............................188 Graviton....................................191 Positron .................................... 191 Anti-Proton................................ 192 Exotic Collision Effects..............192
UNIFIED FORCE THEORY .... 193
Elementary Charge...................195 Strong Charge ..........................196 'Weak Interaction".....................198 Force Laws...............................200 Electrostatic Force Law.............200 Gravitational Law ......................201 Strong Force Law......................201 Relative Force Strengths...........204
More on the Stron g Force 205 ............. Casimir Effect 207 ...............................
General Relativity Theory..... .....210 . Special Relativity Theory ... 211 ..........
Natural Log ...............................212
ATOMIC MECHANICS 213 •••••••••••
Photon Mechanics ....................217 Light Radiation..........................219
Absorption 221 .................................... Emission 221 ....................................... The Dimensions of Light.. 222 ............. Power 222 ................................... ........ I rradiance 222 ...................................... Gravitation Generated Photons 223 ....
Fields........................................223 Magnetic Field . 224 ........ ................. ....
Magnetic Field Intensity 225 ................
Electric Field . . . 225 .. ..... ............. .. ........ . . Electric Field Strength.. ...... 225 .........
Field Interactions 226 . ........... ..............
Nuclear Binding Force...............228
Nuclear Binding En ergy 229 ...... . . ........
Electron Binding Energy............234
Meaning of Kinetic Energy 235 ............ Toroidal Structure of the Electron .235
. Hydrogen Binding En ergy ......... ...235
Helium Binding Energy 236 ................. Other Binding En ergies 238 . ................ Sample Detailed Calculations.......241
Conclusion .. 243 .................. ................
Addendum 243 . . ....................... . . . . . . . . . . .
Energy from the Aether ...... .. .....246
Expanding Un iverse 249 ...................... 250 Big Bang - Slow Bang .................. Magnecules 250 ............. .....................

PHILOSOPHY 253 ....................... What is Reality? ....................... 253 Motion ...................................... 257 Flow ......................................... 258 Orgonomy ................................ 259 Health and Healing ................... 261 Form and Beauty...................... 262 God.......................................... 265 Consciousness ......................... 266 Truth ........................................ 269 War and Peace......................... 270
BIRTH OF THE APM 273 ............. Discussions .............................. 276 Partnership............................... 279
THE BEGINNING 289 ..................
APPENDICES 292 ........................ Appendix I - Known Constants. 292 Appendix /I - New Constants..... 293 Glossary................................... 297 APM Highlights......................... 300
New from Aether Physics Model...300 Corrections to Standard Model 300 ..... New System of Quantum Units 300 .....
CREDITS 301 ...............................
INDEX 302 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

Quantum AetherDynamics Institute owns the Aether unit related graphics in Secrets of the Aether, which may not appear in any other publication or commercial work without the express permission of Quantum AetherDynamics Institute. All the new physics terms, marks, and names presented in the Aether Physics Model are released to the public domain and may not be trademarked, patented, or copyrighted by any other individual or entity.

The new concepts, new methods, and new theories presented in the Aether Physics Model are also released to the public domain. Concepts, methods, and theories originating with the Aether Physics Model and released to the public domain may not be patented, trademarked, or copyrighted. The work comprising the totality of "Secrets of the Aether" is called the Aether Physics Model and no chapter of the Aether Physics Model may be substantially reproduced or distributed by any means possible without the express written permission of the Quantum AetherDynamics Institute. Quotations and citations of the Aether Physics Model may be reproduced within the limits of the Fair Use guidelines of the United States copyright laws when proper credit is given.

vii

SECRETS 0 F THE 'AETHER vIII

PREFACE
The Crisis in Physics What a complicated puzzle the world of phy.5ics is now! There are endless
generations of particles, dark energy that seemingly causes the universe to expand, MTheories, string theories, super symmetry, and on and on. Quantum mechanics, domain of the very small, and general relativity, domain of the very large, are the pilsarl of modem phy.5ics. However, they can't be unified within the curernt Standard Model. It seems that the search for a "Grand Unification Theory" is leading to a reevaluation of the very fundamentals of phy.5ical science.
Re-discovering the Aether What if the ancient and universal idea of Aether proved to be the true
foundation of reality? Acknowledgment of the Aether solves many problems in phy.5ics. A dynamic Aether would explain some of the most complex difficulties in the Standard Model.
Imagine that the universe is an ocean of living energy. As the search for the true nature of space-time gains momentum, we are seeing that new discoveries and theories in space-time look more and more like the ancient concept of the Aether. Instead of space being emptiness, a void of nothingness, it begins to appear that space is the mother of everything. The "Quantum Foam" of the modem phy.5icist is a vibrant and dynamic caldron.
Vacuum Energy is being explored for potential as a source of endless energy. As Dark Energy, it is explaining how the universe expands at an increasing rate. Because of breakthroughs in the precise measurement of the amount of mass in the universe (measurements of cosmic background radiation, galactic distribution, and supernovae speed), we now know that ordinarymatter and energy play a minor part. The Aether could explain the "missing mass" in the universe.
The major paradigm shift is that space-time is a thing. Space-time is like a fluid. We give space-time a name, to differentiate it from the concept of a void of nothingness. That name is Aether, a tnbute to the ancient term for the firmament above Earth. Once you understand that all matter obtains its nature within the active "stage" of the Aether, then a holistic explanation appears that could be called nothing other than a Theory of Everything.
Einstein's Question Answered Maxwell's phy.5ics suggested that space is occupied by a light-conducting
medium, which he called the "Aether." In 1887 Michelson and Morley
Ix

SECRETS OF THE AETHER
designed an experiment (the MMX} to find this Aether. They used an
interferometer to compare the speed of light in the direction of the
earth's 30-km/sec motion around the sun with that at right angles to this
motion. To their smprise, they found no fringe shift, indicating that the
speed of light was the same in all directions. This result is known as the MMX null result. In spite of the null result of the MMX, :Michelson remained a firm believer in the existence of Aether until his death. The
problem was they were searching for an Aether they assumed was at absolute rest, a stationary and solid Aether. That incorrect assumption and the inability to find an "Aether wind" caused physicists to dismiss the Aether for over a century.
A recent Scientific American article called "An ECHO of Black Holes" (December
2005 issue) postulates that space-time is literally a kind of fluid, like the
ether of pre-Einsteinian physics. In the article, Professors Jacobson and Parentani state: "The unification of general relativity and quantum mechanics may lead us to abandon the idealization of continuous space and time and to discover the atoms of spacetime."
The greatest discovety in science was the verification that all matter is composed of atoms, first proposed in 1803 by English chemist John Dalton. All disciplines of science are derived from that fact. The second greatest theoty came in 1905 when Einstein published general relativity,
showing that the presence of mass and energy "curves" space-time, and
this curvature affects the path of free particles (and even the path of
light). We believe that the third greatest theoty, which is introduced in
this book as the Aether Physics Model, is that all particles and fields have
their basis in a dynamic, quantum-scale Aether.
Einstein tried unsuccessfully during the last 30 years of his life to develop a
theoty that would represent forces and material particles by fields only, in which particles would be regions of vety high field intensity. As a "knot" in space-time, a toroidal vortex of Aether explains the spin, charge, and mass of fundamental particles and provides the answer that Einstein
searched for. In this book, we define the Aether Unit's geometry-and spin structure. As shown on the book cover, this 5-D representation includes three dimensions of length and two dimensions of frequency. We call this
"space-resonance", and the parameters were induced directly from empirical measurements of electrons, protons, Coulomb's constant, the Newton gravitational constant, Planck's constant, the speed of light, and the penneability and permittivityof space.
QADI's Aether Physics Model In February, 2002, David Thomson III discovered the Aether Physics ModeL
I was seeking a mathematical basis for my Planck-scale Aether hypothesis. We decided to join our research, resources, and talents to fully develop the model, and incorporated the Quantum AetherDynamics
Institute in 2004, with my position as Executive Director and Mr.
Thomson as Science Director. Since then, our combined efforts have
x

produced substantial progress in the field of quantum physics and we are poised to create the next major revolution in physics.
Our Aether Physics Model is mathematically viable and bases on the same empirical data as established physics. However, the theory goes much further, becoming the "Grand Unification Theory" by unifying the four known interactions, or forces - the strong, electromagnetic, weak and gravitational forces. Using the principle of reductionism, the forces are unified by a simple set of genernllaws explainable by the fabric of space­ time itself. Among other accomplishments, from first principles the Aether Physics Model accurately predicts the relative strengths of the forces, and the 1s 'orbital' electron binding energy for all the elements. We show that the fundamental constants in physics are not just random values, but have an exact value based upon a quantum-scale, dynamic Aether (the Aether unit has a precise value equal to Coulomb's constant times 161t2). The Aether Physics Model is stunnig in that it mathematically predicts and explains the measured values of physics with striking precision.
If you are educated in the traditional Standard Model of Particles and Fields, I urge you to put aside your natural tendency toward automatic rejection of the revolutionary ideas in this book Open your mind to the Secrets of the Aether, for the riches you find here will be worth the effort of changing your opinion about the Aether. Understanding of the Universe can only start with an appreciation of the Aether. Within the chapters of this book, we will show that the Aether is a fabric of quantum rotating magnetic fields with electromagnetic, electrostatic, and gravitational dipole structures. Our theory identifies subatomic particles as angular momentum encapsulated in a quantum, rotating magnetic field With this model, all quantum, atomic, and molecular processes can now be precisely modeled, leading to discrete physics with new understandings . and insights. The theory is testable, coherent, mathematically derived, empiricallybased, and uses easY'to-understand Newtonian equations.
Since the first edition of this book appeared in 2004, we have achieved many major milestones. We were invited to present our flagship paper, A New Foundation for Physics, before distinguhis ed scientists at the Physical Interpretations of Relativity Theory conference held in London, in September, 2006. Our presentation was also covered by the American Association for the Advancement of Science. The paper was published in the September/October 2006 edition of Infinite Energy :Magazine. A favorable editorial appeared on United Press International. Two more papers, Calculating the Unified Force Theory and Electron Binding Energies, have been accepted by the Hadronic Journal, a peer reviewed physics journaL We are in ongoing communication with dozens of physics PhD's. We now have an Executive Board, a growing Advisory Board, and a dedicated team of volunteers.
Now that the Aether Physics Model quantifies the quantum structure and we
xl

SECRETS O F THE AETHER
have produced our fIrst set of equations, the analysis must develop further unril it explains all aspects of the atom We should then be able to quantify the structurla aspects of asos ciated molecules. No other theory has ever come close to matching the scope and promise of the Aether Physics ModeL Beyond a revolutionary paradigm of the fundamental laws and taking all the disciplines of science to a new level, prnctical applications of availing the Aether could include benefits to humanity such as anti-gravity, clean energy, and fully developing biotechnology and
nanotechnology. Welcome to the Aether Age!
Jim D. Bourassa
Executive Director Quantum AetherDynamics Institute
xii

QU A N T U M S T R U C T U R E
QUANTUM STRUCTURE
Tlx:AakrPhy;i£s Mali is a dislYf!term:Jd ifquaniWns/:iu(Jf:(IJ? While this book
will showalternative explanations of certain Standard Model concepts of quantum structure, it is a tribute to the genius of the thousands of physicists and engineers contributing to the Standard Model theories and data. The Aether Physics Model depends on the empirically derived data that made the Standard Model useful.
standard Model - Definition
A model of fundamental forces and parricles that explains their behavior and interactions in terms of symetmire s and the destruction of symeeritm s.' The Standard Model of Parricle Physics, generally referred to as "Standard Model," is the name given to the curernt theory of fundamental parricles and their interaction. This theory includes:
• Strong interactions due to the color charges2 of quarks and gluons.
• A combined theory of weak and electromagnetic interaction, known as electroweak theory, that introduces W and Z bosons as the carrier parricles of weak processes, and photons as mediators to electromagnetic interactions.'
I The American Heritage@ Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright C 2003 by Houghton Miflinf Company. 2 QUANTUM CBROMODYNAMICS (QCD), quantum field them}' that describes the propeeries of the strong interactions between quarks and between protons and neutrons in the framework of quantwn theory. Quarks possess a distinctive property called color that governs their binding together to form other elementary particles. Analogous to electric charge in charged panicles, color is of three varieties, arbitrarily designated as red, blue, and yellow, and-analogous to positive and negative charges-three anticolor varieties. JUSt as positively and negatively charged particles form electrically neutral atoms, colored quarks form particles with
no net color. Quarks interact by emitting and absorbing massless panicles called gluons, each of which careris
a color-anticolor pair. Eight kinds of gluons are required to tranSmit the strong force between quarks, e.g., a blue quark might interact with a yellow quark by exchanging a blue-antiyellow gluoIL "Quantum Ouomodynamics," TheColumbjaEDQ$lopedai. 6th ed. 3 WAND Z PARTIaES elementaryparticles that mediate, or can]", the fundamental force associated with
13

SECRETS OF THE AETHER
The Standard Model includes (or excludes) many other theories concerning particle snucture and behavior, depending on which authority is consulted In general, at least as far as this book is concerned, the Standard Model includes all accepted modem theories contributing to the understanding of particle behavior insofar as particles are labeled photons, electrons, protons, neutrons, muons, pi mesons, quaffis, tau, and there are numerous others. Moreover, since the "mass equivalence to energy" paradigm is often a part of the explanation of Standard Model theory; the Standard Model may sometimes be interpreted to include Einstein's Special Relativity theOlY.
TJx: Standard Mall is a ailaticn if interprftaims! <20> quantum jiJ;sUd do<64>, Wile tkAeJkrPbps Mallis at tim:s a wy rJjij!n}£r interpreamit iftk sam data. Therefore, we will refute some of the paradigms of the
Standard Model and replace them with different paradigms from the Aether Physics ModeL
The process of the Standard Model, more often than not, predicts subatomic behavior based on macro object characteristics (bildrlia ball particles with momentum, mass equals maner, fuel equals energy, force equals mass times acceleration, etc). The Aether Physics Model begins with quantum constants, looks for fundamental patterns, and then mathematically and dimensionally develops the theoty of subatomic snucture while allowing for new paradigms (primary angular momentum, non-material existence as the ultimate source of physical existence, geometric snucture of charge, Unified Force Theory, etc).
This book is a foundational introduction to the Aether Physics Model, which, including a completed Unified Force Theory, already explains many previously unanswered physics questions. Nevenheless, there are at least a few unfinished concepts presented in this book as welL The Aether Physics Model is so fruitful in revealing the nue nature of the world that it will require decades to complete it in every aspect. So in some cases the reader receives as much of the theory as has been so far developed, with occasional suggestions for funher development of a specific newphysics concept. There is no claim that the Aether Physics Model is complete or
that this book provides all the answers a physicist could ask
The reader will not want to throwaway their Standard Model texts and rely solely on the Aether Physics Model, at least not Jet. Much work remains to bring the Aether Physics Model to par with the Standard Model. As part of our ongoing research and the fruitfulness of the Aether Physics
Model, this third edition contains significant adodit ns to theory, and it
drops some sections that were included in the first and second editions.
weak interactions. The discove'Yof the W and Z particles at CERN (the European Laborato'Yfor Panicle Physics) in Geneva, Switzerland, in the early 1980s "WaS an impoltant confinnation of electroweak theory, -which unifies the electromagnetic and weak forces. The W and Z panicles are quite massive for elementary" particlesj they are roughly 100 times as massive as the proton. "Wand Z Panicles," The Columbia
En<EFBFBD>lopedai 6th ed.
14

-- -- - ----- ---
QUANTUM STRUCTURE
It is important to point out that the Standard Model is also not complete.
And while the Standard Model may presendy provide numerical answers to problems not curnre dy addressed by the Aether Physics Model (half­ life of atoms, for example), the Aether Physics Model already provides key solutions to physics not presendy solved by the Standard Model (a
Unified Force Theory, for example). It Wlllikrly <20> mmyph;sUists am errsngiE to an{iete tl:-eAetherPh;5i£s Maid, just as it ta:k mmyph;sUists mmy )WS totkuiq;tl:-eStardvriMail.
The foremost difference betwene the Standard Model and the Aether Physics Model is in the systems used to analyze the data The Standard Model often removes all dimensions from the data and treats the data as numerical entities. This allows physicists to intentionally or inadvertendy stretch the rules of reality, invent unfounded rules, convert one physical order of reality into another, or skip over poorly understood natural physical structures. In the Aether Physics Model, the data collects in its dimensional and geometric form, processes in its dimensional and
geometric form, and the equations materialize in dimensional and
geometric form There is no room for rnisintetpretation of the physical structures or the data since we always account for the dimensions and geometry.
Also, by keeping the dimensions and geometry with the data and the equations, the physicist is forced to give up old concepts of quantum structure when the dimensionally and geometrically analyzed processes don't allow for the maintenance of old conceptual structures. For example, the Aether unit and its geometry influence the physicist's guenodmeresttrayndreinmgam.ofporetsheenrtempirical constants, since the dimensions and
One cannot convert the truth of the Aether's existence to non-existence "just because," as Albert Einstein reportedly did If the measurements and
data show that the Aether unit exists, then the Aether unit exists whether
or not modem physicists and engineers are clever enough to detect it direcdy.
Not Just for Physicists This Aether Physics Model appeals to a wide rnnge of readers. Unlike the
Standard Model of particle physics, nearly all the key equations in the Aether Physics Model flow with a basic understanding of algebra The Aether Physics Model has a potential audience of philosophical and religious communities, as well as the scientific community. Scientists,
philosophers, and others will have an opportunity to explore this
remarkably coherent, mathematically derived, and empirically based theory of quantum structure that unifies all of physical existence as well as certain aspects of consciousness.
15

S E C R E T S OF T H E A E T H E R
There is an absolute truth regarding the nature of the physical world, and as will be seen in these pages, the physical world appears to have a non­ material origin. The physical world precisely quantifies because the underlying dimensions and geomeuy that make up the physical world measurements are real. In addition, since the dimensions and geomeuy are real, then the origins of the dimensions and geomeuy must be real. Nevenheless, as we progress in reductionism, we eventualyl run out of physical things to observe. Therefore, just as it is appropriate to look for the physics themselves, it is appropriate to look for the origin of the
physical world even if it is non-material.
Interspersed ","th the physics in this book are metaphysical hypotheses. As is
the case for all metaphysics, whether of science, religion, or philosophy, it is up to the reader to evaluate whether the metaphysical concepts have
any meaning at all. Ultimately, if some part of us belongs to this
Universe, and it appears it does since we interact ","th it, then the quest for the metaphysical origin of the Universe might also be a quest for the metaphysical origin of ourtrue existence.
Just as we will see how physical existence never becomes a definite reality though we follow the progression from the level of dimensions toward the level of human existence, we also will understand how"self" apswp to share this inability to find definite reality. It would appear that our personal identity materializes from our complex perception of the physical world Perhaps as we explore the experience of our mind as it relates to each level of physical existence, we might fmd courage to familiariez ourselves ","th the non-material origin of our existence and experience a true and complete metaphysical experience.

Scope of the APM
Many structural concepts from the Standard Model sub-theories, such as
wave-particle duality, color forces5, flavors', up and down characteristics',
and the equivalence of energy and mass' have no meaning ","thin the Aether Physics Model. These concepts and others fade behind a single
structural theory of angular momentum and Aether units, revealing a fresh paradigm for understanding physical structures, which is self-

, "Light," Theo,

6th ed.

s nQuarks possess a distinctive property called color that governs their binding together to fonn other elementary particles" "Quantum Chromndynamics," TheColumbiaEn"p"adQIei 6th eel

6 "'This panicle, a meson, was made of a fourth flavor of quark. called charm. (Since then two more flavors have been added to the menu: bottom, in 1976, and tOp, in 1995. Each of these six quarks has a corresponding 'antiquark,' bringing the total to 12)," Alex R Dzierba, Cutis A Meyer and Eric S. Swanson, "The Search for QCD Exotics,· American Scientist Sept. 200::>: 406

7 <20>The quarks found in ordinary mattre are the up and dovm quarks, from which protons and neutrons are

made. A proton, for instance, consists of two up quarks and a dovm quark, and a neutron consists of two

down quarks and an up quark." "Elementary Particles," Theo,

6th ed.

S "According to the law of mass - energy equivalence, developed by Alben Einstein as pan of his theory of relativity, a quantity of matter of mass m possesses an intrinsic rest mass energy E given by E = mcl, where c is the speed of light." "Matter," TheCAlumbiaEns;yclopedja 6th eel

16

consistent throughout.

QU A N T U M S T R U C T U R E

Note

The foundation for the Aether Physics Model is the same

empirical data used by the Standard Model However, we

1 must understand the Aether Physics Model within its own

context and not necessarily within the context of Standard

Model concepts.

,

"

e

<EFBFBD>.

""

Most of modem physics laws also cany over to the Aether Physics Model Ohm's law, the force laws, conservation laws, and nearlyall other physics laws operate the same in both models, although the dimensions of the units maybe different where charge is concerned

The Aether Physics Model (APM) begins as an ontological' structural model
based on empirical data. The ontology of the APM begins with the
proper understanding of dimension and measurement, and with the understanding that space-timelO is equallyas important as the matter that resides within it. In tum, space-time is just one aspect of the Aether unit. Aether implies more qualities to space-time than merely the dimensions
of length and time. In addition to length and time, the Aether also
includes the dimensions of mass and charge. And as odd as it may initiallysound, charge has solid angle geometry. Space-time is actually space-resonance, as will be discussed later.

The Standard Model of Particle Physics describes electrons, photons,
protons, neutrons, and even things like gluons and qualisl as "particles."
In the Aether Physics Model, these "particles" are not solid, nor are they pieces of something solid The verybasic form of physical existence is
termed "primary angulat momentum" when discussing its mechanical structure. \1V'hen discussing a stable form of primary angulat momentum in general, we will call it "ann" (onta when plural)11. \1V'hatever process it was that first thrust onta into existence, it is the Aether that maintains the ann spin, and accordinglythe structure of all physical matter. Though it may sound counterintuitive at first, physical matter, as we know it, is actually a trace of the Aether. In other words, physical shape actually comes from non-material Aether, and is not an inherent property of
matter.

· . . .' . z

9 Deftnition: Ontological" "Of or relating to essence or the nature of being."
10 Definition: Space-rime - "The four-dimensional continuum of one temporal and three spatial coordinates in which any event or physical object is located" Space-resonance is the five­ dimensional continuum of two temporal and three spatial coordinates.
11 "There was a time when physicists regarded protons and electrons as particles, photons as waves. As we shall see later, this distinction can no longer be maintained. They are still often called "elementary particles," but as we shall also learn neither the word "elementary" nor the word "particle" fits the case. Let me name them simply onta (singular: on) after the Greek word for being (Ov, plural OV'[(l)." Hemy Margenau,.Qpm VistaS, PhilosophPcial erspectivesof ModemScience (New Haven, Cf: Yale UniversityPress, 1961) 118.
17

SECRETS OF THE AETHER
F<EFBFBD> sirxE rn:Itetr is cm1J1inrl WthinAe1kr, rn:Itert dre; ra rrme in sp1lE-tir.rP
Ratkr, sp1lE-tirrP. rrIJ1l5 rdLttri:e to itsdf Matet r is carired through space-time like dust is carried in the wind and algae is carir ed in ocean currents.
Aether has a fluid characteristic such that one region of space-time can flow past another region, like the Gulf Stream can flow past the Sargasso
Sea in the North Atlantic Ocean. Strictly speaking, neither time travel
nor space travel is possible. Only the reargrain of the Aether is
possible, and hence, certain relativistic-like effects seem to occur.
A distinction rises between stable matter and collision effects in the Aether Physics Model Electrons and protons are two stable forms of matter, as well as their anti-particles, the positron and anti-proton. Neutrons are composite particles of a proton and electron and they remain stable as long as the bound pair remains in an atomic nucleus. However, the muon, tau, quarks, and other extremely short-lived "observed particles" are merely collision or "unbinding" effects. The collision effects offer some insights into the processes of physics, but are of little more use for
quantum structural science than crash tests are for automobile
manufacturers. Although particle accelerators are useful technology, one
has to question just how many we need It would be far more productive to focus our scientific inquiry- on the actual physical structures of stable
matter, than to focus too much attention on collision effects.
The Aether Physics Model is science that lends itself well to ontological philosophy. The ontology of the APM is perfect in that it reveals
absolute knowledge at the quantum leve<76> is based on empirical data, and
it appeals to common sense. The APM is a kind of creation theory that
shows a logical evolution of non-material, but re<72> dimensions into complex forms of physical existence.
Conversely, one could also look at the Aether Physics Model as a perfect reductionism of physical structurse . Each physical form ultimately manifests as a collection of molecules, which in tum are collections of atoms. The atoms construct from units of angular momentum, and these units are composed of quantum measurements, which of physical perception arise from dimensions. Undoubtedly, the dimensions arise from a yet more primary, albeit non·material Source.
This book focuses on that range of physical existence from dimensions to molecules. This book also explains how consciousness interfaces with
physical existence.
The reader should question whether reductionism should proceed as Zeno's
paradox, whereby merely mathematical division reduces systems.
However, if this were the case, what would be the physical principle for
mathematically dividing something entity. If we reduce the entity, we find it builds from bodily organs and patts such as heart, liver, skeleton, and skin. We do not say that humans build from smaller humans. Similarly, the organs build from cells, which have a level of existence that is verydifferent from the organs. Moreover, the cells build from molecules, whih c are a more basic order of reality
18

Q U A N T U M STR U C T U R E
than the cells. The atoms that make up the molecules are a }et more
simplified order of existence than the molecules. The subatomic particles are yet a simpler order of existence than the atoms. :Moreover, the
dimensions that make up the units of subatomic particles are a still more
fundamental order of existence.
So one needs to question whether the Standard :Model interpretation of so­ called "particles" is accurate since atoms are truly the smallest particles of physical matet r. :Molecules are systems of particles; and electrons,
protons, and neutrons are subsystems of particles. By labeling everything
a particle, the Standard :Model completely ignores the various observable taxonomies of existence.
A New Dimensional Analysis
The Aether Physics :Model makes extensive use of quantum measurement analysis, which is very similar to dimensional analysis12• Calculus equations are not necessary for understanding the essential structures of quantum existence. Therefore, the Aether Physics :Model is easier to comprehend than the Standard :Model concepts o f quantum structur.e
Because the Aether Physics Model is fully compatible with dassical
Mechanics Qogically modeled physical prr15xS(5), the APM is inherendy discrete. Theoretical,ly if a computer could compute faster than the speed of light, a computer model of the entire Universe could develop from the Aether Physics Model
Just as the Standard :Model improperly classifies all forms of existence as
particles, it has an ambiguous lexicon in other areas, too. In order to better use quantum measurement analysis, APM offers specific definitions for "unit," "measurement," "dimension," and "constant." Regardless of the variant definitions for these terms in our present
culture, this bookwill use these words as defined in the following pages.
There are two different uses of the term "unit" common in physics, namely
units of measurement and units of dimensions. The differences between the two uses are significant when examining the structure of equations.
Unit Definitions 1. Unit of Measurement - any division of quantity accepted as a standard of measurement or exchange; "the kilogram is the MKS unit of mass"; "a unit of frequencyis the Hertz" 2. Unit of Dimensions - an individual, group, structure, or other . I entity regarded as a structurla or functional constituent of a whole; "velocity is a unit equal to the dimensions of length per time"; "the dimensions of charge divided bytirne equal the unit of c=nt."
12 "The expression of any panicular quantity in terms of fundamental quantities is known as dimensional analysis and often provides physical insight into the results of a mathematical calculation." "Dimension, in Physics," TheColumbia Enc;ydqpedia, 6th ed.
19

S E C R E T S OF T H E A E T H E R
In the case of the "unit of measurement," it would be far more logical if we simplycalel d it measurement, and not unit For example, we should call the kilogram the MKS "measurement" of mass, not its "unit" of mass.
The term "unit" best defines, with regard to phy.;ics, a specific
arerang ment of dimensions. This clarification would eliminate a lot of confusion.
Systems ofMeasurement There are three generally accepted sy.;tems of measurement used in phy.;ics;
cgs measurement, MKS measurement, and SI measurement. The hther Phy.;ics MOdel utilizes a new sy.;tem of measurement, based on quantum measurements.
The SI definition here quotes verbatim from its original so= (unlike the
MKS defmition just belo<6C> because the SI sy.;tem is an unriu1.tan sy.;tem of measurement, which consists of units (the Ampere) as basic
measurements. It is largelythe SI sy.;tem of measurements, and generally
the lack of clear definitions for "measurement," "dirnension," and "unit," that petpetuate confusing terminology in our present sy.;tems of measurement
Here is a brief overview of the various sy.;tems of measurement:

r<EFBFBD>""c'<27>o"'"s

MalaU& amelits
==-'"

A sy.;tem of measurement based on the metric sy.;tern,

having the centimeter of length, the gram of mass, and the

second of time as its fundamental units. Some cgs units are

the dyne of force and the erg of wolk or energy. The

measurements of the cgs sy.;rem are generally much smalel r

than the comparable measurements of the MKS sy.;temn

-,

.. <20> .

MKS Measurements

1I1:5<><35>II'<27>'"
A sy.;tem of measurement based on the metric sy.;tem and

having the meter of length, the kilogram of mass, and the

second of time as its fundamental ·measurements. Some

MKS units include the newton of force, the joule of wolk or

energy, and the watt of power. The measurements of the

MKS sy.;tem are generally much larger and of a more

practical size than the comparable measurements of the cgs

sy.;tem The MKS sy.;tem provides the basis for the

International Sy.;tem of Measurements (S1)14 and the new

hther Phy.;ics MOdel quantum measurements.

-

J:.

-

_

. <20> ._ . __<5F>

13 Paraphrased from "C{;s System ,It The Columbia EnC)dopedai. 6th ed. 14 Paraphrased from "Mks System," The ColumbiaEnQlClo<6C>dai . 6th ed.
20

QUANTUM STRUCTURE

81 Malsaramet.bs

-

<EFBFBD>

INIERNATIONAL SYS1EM OF UNITS officially called

the Sysreme International dUnites, or SI, system of units

adopted by the 1 1th General Conference on Weights and
Measures (1960). It is based on the metric system The basic
units of length, mass, and time are those of the MKS system
of metric units: the meter, kilogram, and second Other basic

units are the ampere of electric curner t, the kelvin of
temperature (a degree of temperature measured on the
Kelvin temperature scale), the candela, or candle, of

luminous intensity, and the mole, used to measure the
amount of a substance present. All other units are derived

from these basic unitsl'.

Oment Definitions of SI Measurements by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIS1) as follows:

The meter is the length of the path traveled by light in
vacuum during a time interval of 1/299,792,458 of a
second

The kilogram is the unit of measure for mass; it is equal to the mass of the international prototype of the kilograml6•

The second is the duration of 9,192,631 ,770 periods ofthe
radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfme levels of the ground state of the cesium 133 atoml7•

The ampere is that constant curtner which, if maintained in
two straight paralle conductors of infinite length, of

negligible circular cross-section, and placed 1 meter apart in

vacuum, would produce between these conductors a force

equal to 2 x l0-7 newton per meter of length. The kelvin,
unit of measurement for thermodynamci temperature, is the

1/273. 1 6 fraction

of the thermodynamic temperature of the

triple point of water.

The mole is the amount of substance of a system, which
contains as many elementary entities as there are atoms in
0.012kg of carlxJn 12; its symbol is "mol» Wben the mole
is used, the elementary entities must be specified and may be
atoms, molecules, ions, electrons, other particles, or specified
groups of such particles.

15 "International System of Units ," TheCplumbiaEncyclopedia , 6th ed.
16 "fundamental unit of mass in the metric sy.>teIll, defined as the mass of the International Prototype Kilogram, a platinum-iridium cylinder kept at 5evres, France, near Paris." "Kilogram," The Cplbajlw Enrn:;lopeclai , 6th ed.
17 "1 sec <20> 1/31,556,925.9747 of the length of the tropica l }"'U' for 1900. In 1967 the second was redefined to be 9,192,631,770 periods of vibration of the radiation emitted at a specific wavelength by an atom of cesium 133." "Second," TheColumbia EnQ'1;lopaied 6th ed.
21

SECRETS OF THE AETHER

u.J<><4A>_

<EFBFBD>

<EFBFBD><EFBFBD>

The candela is the Iwninous intensity, in a given direction, of

a source that emits monochromatic radiation of frequency

540xlOI' Hz and that has a radiant intensityin that direction

of 1/683 watt per steradian.

Quantum Measurements: &cause the MKS system of measurements is most practical for everyday observations, it occurs frequentlyas the basic
system of measurements throughout this book unless otherwise stated
As already mentioned, the Aether Physics Model produces yet another system of measurements, devised so that all measurements base on the quantum length, quantum frequency, quantum masses, quantum charges,
and the spherical constant.

Quantum Meastlremelislt n APM
<EFBFBD>
The quantum length is the Compton wavelengtht. and is
equal to 2.4263 10238xlO·I'm t,. The symbol for the
quantum length is lambda suire (Ad.
&cause nearly all human-scale energy interactions at the subatomic level take place via the electron, the quantum mass is usually the mass of the electron and is equal to
9.1093826xlO·31kg 20• The symbol for the quantum mass ' is m suire (m.). When transactions occur with the proton,
neutron or Aether, the symbol for the quantum mass is m
sulrp, m sub-n, or m sub-a respectively ( ) mp ,m. ,m' .
Consult Appendis I for the mass values of the proton, neutron, and Aether.
The quantum frequency, symbol F sulrq (F,,), is equal to the
speed of light divided by the quantum length and is
1 .23558998xlO,oHz . The reciprocal of the quantum frequencyis the quantumtime (symbol T sulrq, T,, ).

'I1 The quantum charges are the electrostatic charge (elementary
charge squared) and electromagnetic charge. The electrostatic charge notates as . e' and is equal to

2.566969633xIO·38coul' . The electromagnetic charges :

calculate from onn angular momentum and are equal to

angular momentum times the conductance constant of the

VAJIe1.tthteenr.

The values are as eemax' , epmax" ,

shown later in this book and
enmax , and ea' forthe eIectrou,

are

.

---

18 "The Compton 'Wavelength of any particle is given by the relationship. )"0 = h / roO c, where ).Q. is the Compton 'Wavelength, h is Planck's constant., mO is the rest mass of the panicle, and c is the velocity of light." Van Nostrond Company, Inc., VanNostrand's ScientificEOG)£lopaedi (Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1968) 395.
19 http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-binlcuulValue?ecomwl l search_for-compton+wavelength
20 http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin!cuulValue?me I search_for-mass+electron
22

Q U A N T U M STR U C T U R E

proton, neutron, and hther, respectively.

Units such as temperature and light intensity base upon

dimensions. For example, the unit for temperature is

i.equivalent to the Sievert in the MKS system, and one degree

Kelvin is equal to 286.966 Sieve<76>.

.1

Because this new system rests on the Compton wavelength (quantum length),
mass of the onta, and quantum frequency, we could refer to it as the system of quantum measurements.

Units of Dimensions
The Aether Physics Model distinguhsi es between units of measurement and
units of dimensions. Nearly all of the units of dimensions in the Aether
Physics Mldel are four letter variables that suggest their unit function.
For example, cwrent is denoted as am; potential is pa:n, and resistance is rem.

Ohm's lawwntten in Aether Physics Mldel units of dimensions is:
potn = curr . resn
The quantum measurements and quantum units can also serve as quantum
constants. (The units from other systems of measurement are also
constants, but they are not quantum constants). Two common quantum constants already in wide use are the quantum velocity and quantum
angular momentum The quantum velocity is the speed of light and
notates as the variable c . The quantum electron angular momentum is the Planck constant" and notates as h .

(Ll)

Units of dimension build from quantum measurements. For example, the unit of potential (pom) is a unit of dimension made up of quantum
measurement:

potn

(1 .2)

In the case of velocity, when the APM unit of dimension for velocity is used (velc) it can also be substituted with c .

velc = AC · Fq = c
Another exception to the four-letter rule is the quantum unit for energy. 1be
Tibetan word "tshankha" means "energy with fon:e and power." Tshankha ceremoniously represents energy in the hther Physics Mldel,
as the energy of stable onta has a sacred nature to it.

(1.3)

21 "The first direct measurement of the quantum of action was obtained by J. Franck and G. HeltZ by liberating quantities of light through electronic impulses." W'here Is Scei nce Going? James Mmphy, Max Planck (NewYork, W.W. NortOn & o,mpanyInc., 1932) 59-60
23

SECRETS OF THE AETHER
enrg = m, . Ae' . F,,' = tshankha
also:

( 1 .4)

tshankha = h . F"
Since the electron quantifies as its angular momentum, tshankha is the
angular momentum of the electron replicating (perpetuating) each
quantum moment. Tshankha is thus the amount of energy expended
each quantum moment by the Aether to keep "alive" one electron. Considering the number of electrons there are in the Universe, the
Aether is indeed quite powetful and forceful to keep the spin of all onta perfectly consistent throughout all space and all time. Tshankha is also a
reminder that the concepts of space and time as components of the physical world are highlydeveloped in the Tibetan Buddhist literature.

( 1 .5)

In the Standard Mode<64> where variables such as m (for mass) and E (for ene<6E> are used, the variables have dimensions but no values. As such,
E = me' is not a true equation, rather it is an expression (or formula). If E and m had inherent values, as does the constant e , then E would equal a single unit of energyand m would equal a single unit of mass.

E = me'

joule = kg · 8.988x l 016 - smec- ',

joule

kg

·

­ m' sec'

8.988x l 016

1 * 8.988x l 016

E is not mathemarically equal to me' , which in tum means that the "equarion" so often atbnt uted to Einstein, that is E = me' , is not a true
equality. In the Aether Physics Mode<64> constants appear in place of variables. A valid equation describing a unit concerning quantum physics would also appear in terms of quantum measurements. For example:

( 1 .6)

E * mc'
but
tshankha = m, . Ae' . F,,'
In the APM, all quantum units have a quantum measurement representarion.

(1 .7)

Quantum Constants
As previously mentioned, all quantum measurements and quantum units in
the Aether Physics Model are also constants. Most essential constants in

24

Q U A N T U M STR U C T URE
the Aether Physics :Model alreadyexist in Classical physics22•
Coulomb's constant (kc ) , the gravitational constant (G) , the speed of light (c) , permeability of free space (f.Lo ) , permitivity of free space (co ) ,
Planck's constant (h) , fine structure constant of the electron (a) , and
the Compton wavelength (Ac ) retain the same values, dimensions, and
nomenclature as in the Standard :Model The values and dimensions for
each of these constants appear in the Appendix.
New constants, based on the known constants of the Standard :Model, are identified, their putpose defined, and their utility revealed (page 1 18).
New constants and quantum units also appear in the Appendix.
One important new constant from the Aether Physics :Model is the conductance of the Aether (page 157), which is essential for calculating
and understanding the nature of strong charge.
There are many important new constants, new equations, and new understandings provided by the Aether Physics :Model Taken as a whole, these physics additions result in a new foundational paradigm diffeting significantlyfrom several Standard :Model paradigms.
We remind the reader that the Aether Physics Model as presented in this book is no more complete than the Standard :Model The value of the Aether Physics :Model, however, lies in the fact that its paradigm begins with a firm foundation of quantum suuctural existence and develops in complexity toward the macro structural existence wtih which we are familiar. The APM also quantifies the metaphysical pre-existence of the physical world and the nature of consciousness. The Standard :Model, on the other hand, successfully discovered subatomic existence, but incorrectly concluded that collision effects and forces were elementary particles.
Therefore, we move forward with the understanding that the Aether Physics :Model is a fresh begingni , based on a logical framework, which in tum
derives from empirical data. We pursue the Aether Physics :Model, not
because it is the answer to all our questions, but because it leads us to
answers regarding quantum structure more readily than the Standard :Model with its discontinuous sub-models.
22 "Classical physics includes the traditional branches and topics thatvrere recognized and fairly-well developed before the begingni of the 20th century; mechanics, sound, light, heat, and electricity and magnetism." "Physics," The ColumbiaEru:;vcldpoe ia. 6th ed.
25

SECRETS OF THE AETHER 28

O NTO L O G I C A L F O U N D ATI O N
ONTOLOGICAL FOUNDATION
Ontology defmes as, "the branch of metaphysics that deals with the nature
of being23." Physics defines as, "The science of matter and energy and of interactions between the two"." Physics is the study of mechanics and
until now provided little insight into suucrte; however, the Aether
Physics Model reveals physical structure and that its existence has a non­
material cause. The APM reveals a true ontology based upon physical data.
Scientists claim that their physics models predict the data, a recurer nt theme throughout the Standard Model and Special Relativity Theory. However,
the data is the result of the truth of existence, not of the creation of
experiments and theory. The experiments rrT?dSure existence; they do not
iltS1l Mt it. Theories and models merely explain the data. If the theory
does not appeal to common sense, then what prevents us from replacing
it with a better theory that does? The Aether Physics Model is that better
theory.
Scientists claim the Standard Model is convincing despite the fact that the
model itself defies common sense when explaining quantum structure. There is no attempt to correct the logic of Standard Model structural theories, as the underlying physics assumptions will not allow it. Instead of finding better explanations for quantum structure, we hear the only
important factor is a useable result with regard to quantum mechanics.
The Standard Model of physics lists the elementary particles as quam, leptons, and force carrier particlesu. Quarks seem to appear to scientists when two stable protons or neutrons slatn together. The protons and
neutrons break apatt with the same behavior each time, and the resulting pattern of debris results in what physicists call quam. The qua1ks have a
2l The American Heritage@ Dicrionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright " 2000 by Houghton Miffnli O>mpany. Updated in 2003. Published byHoughton Mifnlfi O>mpany. 24 "•.. This evidence allo-wed scientists to develop the Standard Model theory of matter, which states that all matter is made up of combinations of six quarks and six leptons that interact with three types of force particles."' " Taylor, Richard E.," The O>lumbiaEnG)'dopedia, 6th ed.

SECRETS O F THE AETHER
life span of about W12 second and an isolated quark has never been
found25. Protons bave a "half life" of loJ2 years or more". Is it likelytbat such extremelyshort-lived quarks produce extremelylong-lived protons?
If neutrons are made of quarks, then what about observations of neutrons
decaying into protons and electrons27 and protons and electrons binding to produce neutrons"? Likewise, there are the force carrier "particles." Physicists speak of gluons29 as though theywere real particles", but what evidence is there for a gluon particle? Does it really make sense for force to manifest as a particle?
Quantutn Theory'l (Quantutn :Mechanics) exarernu s the structure and
bebavior of atoms and molecules. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle32 states tbat subatomic particles only exist as probability functions. Wave-particle duality theoty (complimentatity principle")
states tbat subatomic particles can bebave like both particles and waves.
Einstein's E = me2 has been interpreted as stating the dimension of
mass and the unit of energy are equivalent.
Of course, in recognition of the imu:ional nature of many Standard Model
25 "Quarks appear to alway.; be found in pairs or triplets with other quarks ard antiquarks- an <20>olated quarlc has never been found." "ElementaryPanicles," TheCplnmbiaEJ1C$:loidepa, 6th ed.
26 BanyParker. Einstejn's Dream· TheSearchfora1JojfiedTheoryofthe1Jnjverse (NewYork: Plenum Press, 1986) 257·8.
27 nIn beta decaya neutron within the nucleus changes to a proton. inthe process emitgnti an electron and an antineutrinon "Radioactivity," The Columbia EnQ'Clopeida 6th ed.
28 "Other, less common, types of radioactivity are electron capture (capture of one of the orbiting atomic
electtons by the unstable nucleus) and positron emission- both fonns of beta decayand both resulting in the change of a proton to a neutronwithin the nucleus- an internal conversion... .. "Radioactivityn , Thecnlumbia
Eo<EFBFBD>IQpedai, 6th ed.
29 Definition: Gluon - A hypothetical massless, neutral elementary panicle believed to mediate the strong interaction that binds quarks together.
JO "Gluons are massless, travel at the speed of light, and possess a property called color. Analogous to electric
charge in charged particles, color is of three varieties, arbitrarily designated as red, blue, and yellow, and­ analogous to positive and negative charges- three anticolor varieties. Quarks change their color as they emit
and absorb gluons, and the exchange of gluons maintains proper quarlc color balance." "GllIOn," lk
CphnnbiaEru;yr:IQ12edia, 6th ed
31 "Modem physical theol]' concerned with the emission and absorption of energy by matter and with the motion of material panicles; the quantum theoryand the theoryof relativitytogether fonn the theoretical basis of modern phy.;ies." "Quantum Theo'}'," TheGolumbiaEn<;e;Ip<:dQa,i 6th ed.
}2 " ••• on the scale of atoms and elementary panicles the effect of the uncertainty principle is vel]'important. Because of the uncertainties existing at this level, a picture of the submicroscopic wodd emerges as one of
scacistical probabilities rather than measurable certainties." "Uncertainty Principle," The Columbia EOQ"Clopaj,de 6th00.
" OOMPLEMENTARI1Y PRINGPLE . phy.;icaI principle enunciated by Niels Bohr in 1928 stating that
certain physical concepts are complementary. If twO concepts are complementary, an experiment that clearly
illustrates one concept will obscure the other complementary one. For example, an experiment that illustrates the partiele properties of light will not show any of the wave properties of light. This ptiociple also implies that
only certain kinds of infomution can be gained in a particular experiment. Some other infomution that is
equallyimportant cannotbe measured simultaneouslyand is lost. "ComplementarityPrinciple," TheColumbia
Enc<EFBFBD>IQped.ia 6th ed.
28

ONTOLOGICAL F O U N DATION
principles, any respectable physicist will tell you not to take Standard Model physics concepts literally with regard to quantum struture. We hear that physics models are merely abstract concepts of a poorly
understood topic.
Modem physics ignores any hint of a non-material, creating force for the Universe; it too closely resembles Deity as described in many world
religions. Yet modem physics invents hypothetical particles with color,
flavor, up down characteristics, and gluons, that mayor maynot exist due
to probabilities. It is as though the Standard Model exists to deny the
Universe has a Oeator, onlyto spread belief in its own myths.
As we enter the 2 1<> century, our measurement equipment and the materials
we work with have reached a very high level of sophistication. We now know the constants of the subatomic realm to a much greater degree of
accuracy than did the briltlani minds of the 19m and 20m centuries.
Beginign with a fresh look at the precise values and dimensions of the
quantum realm, the Aether Physics Model gives the world a real quantum
structural physics, and thankfulyl , a real physics based on a real non­
material existence, which some might call God.
It is not enough to point to the weaknesses and inconsistencies of an established or a proposed theory. A convincing argument requires the enumeration not only of the questioned theory's weaknesses but also a
bettertheoryto take its place.
And therein rests the general purpose of this book Presented are the weaknesses and inconsistencies of the Standard Model with regard to quantum structures as well as a bettertheoryto take its place. 1his better
theory; however, is not necessarily new. For thousands of Jears prior to Albert Einstein, it was widely accepted that the physical Universe constructs from the existence of Aether in one manifestation or another.
Albert Einstein ddi not disprove, nor did he atnpte to disprove, the existence
of the Aether. In fact, on May 5, 1920 at the University of Leyden,.,
Einstein gave a lecture in which he defended the existence of Aether.
What Albert Einstein set out to do in his eadier work was to explain the
observed physical phenomena without invoking the Aether. Einstein found limited success, but he was not able to develop a Unified Force
Theory or Grand Unified Theory based on his Relativity theories. 1his
was because the forces are inherent to the structure of existence, whereas the Relativitytheories could onlyexplain the mechanics.
Einstein was successful enough to advance science to its present condition,
34 MichelJanssen, Robert Schulman,nJ6zsef Illy, Ouistoph Lehner, and Diana Konnos Buchwald, THE Q)Il.ECIED PAPERS OF Albert Einstein VOLUME 7, THE BERUN YEARS. WRITINGS , 1918 1921 (princeton Universti yPress, 2002) 305-309; 321
29

SECRETS OF THE AETHER
but with today'S developments in nanotechnology and interplanetaty and
interstellar explorations, we are in desperate need of a more accurate
description of quantum structur.e As it turns out, this more acaurcet
theory of quantum structure once again invokes the existence of the Aetber.
The Aefher
'The concept of the Aether was dominant in the physics theories from ancient Greece and India until the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The concept
of the Aetber took many different forms. Frustrated because no
convincing evidence of the existence of Aether was emerging, Alben
Einstein developed a new approach based on his now famous E = me' expression. Mr. Einstein did not totally give up on the Aether, but he did
usher in a new physics that excluded the Aether from science".
Some early theories of the Aether presupposed a stationary particulate
medium. Light seemed to travel as a wave in the Aether medium much
as water ripples travel on the surface of water. When Michelson and
Morley conducted an experiment to identify the particulate medium as
absolute space-time, resulting in Aether drifting through the Earth as the Earth moved through space, they found no overwhelming evidence for
the magnitude of Aether drift theyexpected However, they did measure an Aether drift. Dayton Miller later conducted extensive tests that
verified an Aetber drift relative to the Earth at about ten kilometers per
second". 'The results indicated that if Aether exists, it must drag relative
to the Earth", which Augustin Fresnel also posited';. Since the prevailing understanding did not allow Aether to drag along with the Earth, many touted this as evidence against the existence of the Aether. This prejudice
towarlr a draggni Aether also caused many to proclaim the erroneous assumption that the Michelson-Morley experiments showed absolutely
no Aether drift.
With the Aether Physics Mode<64> the existence of Aether is an essential aspect for explaining the phenomena within the Universe. Now that we have exact measurements of certain constants, we can deduce that the Aether
is not in the form of a physically detectable particle, but in the form of a
35 "However, all attempts to demonstrate its [Aether's] existence, most notably the Michelson-Morley experiment of 1887, produced negative results and stimulated a vigorous debate among physicists that "WaS not ended until the special theOl}' 01 relativity, proposed byAlbert Einstein in 1905, became accepted. The theoty of relativity eliminated the need for a lighHIansmitting mediwn, so that todayme term ether is used only in a historical context." "Emer, in Physics and Astronomy," TheCpluwbja ED(.:$lqpedaj , 6th ed.
" Da}Wn C Milel r, <20>, New Series, VoL 63, No. 1635 (Apr. 30, 1926), 433·443 It is also noted in an article by Robert S. Shankland, Science, New Series, VoL 176, No. 4035 (May 12, 1972), 652·653 that at the soong encouragemem 01 Albert Einsrein, the Miller data was re-examined posthwnously and judged to be
questionable due to the claim that Miller's results correlated with the temperature gradient across the interferometer table. For all of Milel r's extensive experience, it seems lllghly suspect that Miller did not notice what should have been an obvious flaw in the results, were it true.
37 "The outcome of the Michelson - Morley experiment would, therefore, suggest that the ether is drageg d along with the earth, as far as the inunediate neighborhood of me earth is concerned." Introductiontotbe TheoryofRelaciviPty eter Gabriel Bergmann (New York, Prentice Hall Inc., 1947) 27
30

ONTOLOGICAL FOUNDATION
non-material Aether unit of 2-spin rotating magnetic field. A quantum
Aether unit has the precise value equal to Coulomb's constant rimes 1 6K' .

A" = rmfd = kc · 1 6K'
The rotating magnetic field concept of the Aether presented in this book is not much difef rent fromJohn Bernoulli's "whirlpool Aether" concept:

(2. 1)

John Bemoulli's Whirlpolo Aether

",..., ."",

=

""-"

All space, according to the )Uung Bernoulli, is permeated by

,! a fluid Aether, containing an immense number of excessively
small whirlpools. The elasticity which the Aether appears to

I possess, and in virtue of which it is able to transmit

vibrations, is really due to the presence of these whirlpools;

for, owing to centrifugal force, each whirlpool is continually

striving to dilate, and so presses against the neighboting

whirlpools".

The Aether has a non-material nature revealed through Coulomb's constant, the gravitational constant, the speed of light, the permeability constant,
and the permittivity constant. The newly defmed and important
conductance constant of the Aether relates directly to the electromagnetism of onta, as well as to consciousness.

As for evidence proving the existence of the Aether, it does exist. An}body can do these two simple experiments to see visual proof of the Aether. The frrst experiment requires a magnet and cathode ray tube. The cathode ray tube could be )Uur computer monitor, lV, or oscilloscope screen. Just make sure )Uur cathode ray tube has a degaussing feature before doing this experiment, or )UU may permanently disfigure )Uur viewing screen.

Place the magnet against the cathode ' ray

tube with the north or south pole facing

''-'0

the screen. You will notice a pattern seemingly caused by the magnetic

flux of the magnet as it reorganizes the electron beams. Once the magnet

is flush against the screen, twist it back and forth. You will notice that the

pattern on the screen does not change. Had the magnet been the source

of the magnetic flux, the pattern would have changed since the magnetic

flux would link. to the molecules and atoms of the magnet. However, the

magnetic flux arises from the Aether and thus exists relative to the

Aether. Twisting the magnet will not afef ct the magnetic flux of the

38 SirEdmund Whitrtaek AHistoryoftheTheories of Aether and Electricity;The dassical Theories (London; NewYork, AmericanInstitute of Phy.;ics, 1987) 95-96
3t

SECRETS OF THE AETHER
Aether. This experiment will work regardless of the shape of the magnet.
The same experiment works with ferrofluid Ferrofluid is a liquid substance that reacts to a magnetic field Position a magnet below a dish of ferrofluid and twist the magnet back and forth, as in the above experiment. The magnetic flux will not move as observed by the ferrofluid not moving. Once again, the magnetic flux associated with the magnet is coming from the Aether and not from the magnet.
In the Michelson-Morley experiments, the Aether <20> follows along with the matet r of the Earth and the atmosphere. The Aether is not a wind that blows freely through matter, except as matter becomes less dense. This is contrary to the expectations of scientists in the 1800s. In addition, Aether gives form to matter, but matet r also occupies and manipulates Aether. The situation is a bit more complicated than an assumed fIXed Aether with an independendyexisting matet r.
An important early prediction of Einstein's general relativity was the advance of the perihelion of Mercury's Olbit, whose measurement provided one of the classical tests of Einstein's theory. The advance of the orbital point-of-closest-approach also applies to a biruuy pulsar s<>m and to an Earth­ orbiting satellite. General relativity also predicts that the rotation of a bodylike Earth will drag the local inertial frames of reference around it, which will afef ct the orbit of a satellite".
"Frame drag"ngi is another euphemism of the Standard Model intended to acknowledge the properties of Aether, but without callgni it Aether. Essentially, the frame draging of General Relativitytheotyis the same as the Aether moving with matet r.
Einstein's Aether In the previous section, we provided an experiment for proving the existence
of the Aether using a permanent magnet and a CRT. Although cathode ray tubes did not exist in the late 1800s, Albett Einstein wrote a paper at the age of 16, which essentially made the same observations about magnetic fields and Aether. In The GoldenAge of Theoretical Physics'" by Jagdish Mehra, Mehra translates Albert Einstein's first paper from German. We provide the full text of the paper as it supports and relates to the Aether PhY-'ics Model
39 Letrte 5 toNature,Nature 431,958 - 960 (21 O:tober 2004); doc10.1038/nature03007
40 Jagdish Mehta, The Golden Age ofTheoreticalPhysci s (March 2001,WorldScientific Publishing CompanY) pp 9-10
32

ONTOLOGICAL F O U N DA T I O N

Conceming the Investiganoit of the State of

I, o<> Aether in Magnetic Fields: by Albert Einstein

The foll

fures are the fir.;t dst expressi<73>n of so;;; simple

thoughts on this difcif ult subject. With much hesitation I am !

compressingtheminto an essaywhich looks more like a programthan

a paper. Since I completely lacked the materials to penetrate the ,

subject more deeplythan was permitdte byreflection alone, I askthat J

:1 11

this cin:u: mstance should not be ascribed to me as superfIciality. I
hope the indulgence of the interested reader will correspond to the
!rumblefeelings withwhich I offerhimthese lines.

I

I When the electric cwrent comes into being, it immediately sets the
I surrounding aether in some kind of instantaone us motion, the nature I
of which has still not been exactly determined. In spite of the continuation of the cause of this motion, namely the electric curer nt,
the motion ceases, but the aether remains in a potential state and
produces a magnetic fIeld. That the magnetic field is a potential state
[of the aetherJ is shown by the [existence of aJ permanent magnet, ,
'I since the princpi le of conservationofenergyexcludes thepossibilityof a state of motion in this case. The motion of the aether, which is
caused by an electric current, will continue until the acting [electro-J
'I, motive forces are compensated bythe equivalent passive forces which arise fromthe defonnation caused bythe motion ofthe aetheritself.

• The marvellous experiments of Hertz have most ingeniously
illuminated the dynamic nature of these phenomena - the
propagation in space, as well as the qualitateiv identity of these " motions with light and heat. I believe that for the illdl erst.mding of electromagnetic phenomena it is important also to illldenalse a comprehensive experimental investigation ofthe potential states of the
'I aether in magnetic fields of all kinds - or, in otherwords, to measure
i, the elasticdefonnations and the acting defonning forces. Evety elastic change of the aether at any (free) point in a given
,I direction should be detenninable from the change which the velocity of an aether wave illdl ergoes at this point in that direction. The '
J velocity of a wave is proportional to the square root of the elastic
forces which cause [itsJ propagation, and inverselyproportional to the
, mass ofthe aethermovedbythese forces. However, since the changes
I of density caused by the elastic deformations are generalyl
I insignificant, they may probably be neglected in this case also. It could
therefore be said with good approximation: The square root of the ratio ofthe change of velocityof propagation (wavelength) is equal to , the ratio of the change of the elasticforce.
'I I dare not decide as to which type of aether waves, whether ligbt or
: electro-dynamic, and which method of measuring the wavelength is
most appropriate for studying the magnetic field; in principle, after al,l this makes no difef rence.

If a change of wavelength in the magnetic fIeld can be detected at all in any given ditection, then the question can be experimentally decided
l whetheronlythe component of the elastic state inthe direction of the propagation of the wave influences the velocityof propagation, orthe
components perpendicularto it also do; since it is known a priori that
II in a unifonn magnetic [",ld, whether it is cylindrical or pyramidal in fonn, the elastic states at a point perpendicular to the ditection of the lines of force are completely homogeneous, but difef rent in the ditection ofthe lines of force. Therefore if one lets waves propagate

33

SECRETS OF THE AETHER

'"""'''- .<2E><>""

_

"" ",£'Fa'5'

that are polarized perpendicularlyto the direction ofthe lines of force,

then the direction of the plane of oscillation w:lUld be important for

the velocity of propagation - that is if the cornpot>ent of the elastic

fon:e perpendicular to the propagation of a wave at all influences the

velocityof propagation. H:J""ver, this probablymightnotbe the case,

although the phenomenon of double diffraction seems to indicate this.

Thus after the question has been <20>red as to bow the three cornpot>ents of elasticityafef ct the velocityof an aether wave, one can
proceed to the study of the magnetic field In order to understand
properly the state of the aether in it [the magnetic fieldl three cases
, ought to be distinguhis ed:

L The lines of force come together at the North pole in the shape of a pyramid

2. The lines of fon:e come together at the South pole in the shape of a pyramid

3. The lines of force are parallel

In these cases the velocityof propagation of a wave in the directionof
the lines of force and perpendicular to them has to be examined
There is no doubt that the elastic deformations as ""n as the cause of their origin will be detennined [by these experiments1 provided
I sufficiently accurate instruments to =ure the wavelength can be
constructed

The most interesting, but also the most diffICult, task ""uld be the

I

direct experimental studyof the magnetic fdd which arises around an
electric current, because the investig.toit n of the elastic state of the

, aether in this case would allow us to obtain a glimpse of the

mysterious nature of the electric current. This analogy also permits us

to draw definite conclusions concerning the state of the aether in the

magnetic field which surrounds the electric cwrent, provided of

cour.;e the experiments mentioned above yield any result.

I believe that the quantitative resean:bes on the absolute magnitudes of

the density and the elastic fon:e of the aether can only begin if qualitariev results exist that are cont>ected with established ideas. Let

me add one more thing. If the wavelength does not tum out to be

proportional to ,JA + k [sic1 then the reason (for that) has to be
loko edforinthe change of densityof the moving aethercaused bythe

I

elastic deformations; bere A is the elastic aether force, a priori a

I constant which we have to cletennine empirically, and k the (variable) strength of the magnetic field which, of cour.;e, is proportional to the

elastic fon:es in questionthat are produced'

Above all ti must be demonstrated that there exists a passive resistance to the electric cwrent forthe production of the magnetic field, that is
proportional to the length of the path of the cwrent and inclependent
of the cross section and the material of the conductor.
"

Dynamic Space
Three axes of length in three-dimensional coro dinate systems generally
represent the concept of space. This implies that space is equal to
volwne. And for general purposes, if we talk about a room with space, we are indeed onlytalking about volume.

114

O N T O L O G I CAL F O U NDAT I O N
In the Aether Ph<50>ics Model, space-time is more than just the three
dimensions of length and one dimension of time. Space is united to time
in such a waythat the two are inseparable, producing a single unit called double cardioid (dcrd). However, the coordinate <20>rns still in use
today only include dimensions of length. We need a coordinate s<>tem
that includes both space am time. Further, whereas perception of space­
time through our bodies' senses gives the appearance of just one
dimension of linear time, linear time is an illusion. In reality, the time
dimensions of Aether are actualyl frequency dimensions, and there are two of them Together these two dimensions of frequency produce a
spherical unit of resonance. While in reality the quantum Universe has
the qualities of space-resonance, we perceive the ph<70>ical, macro
Universe with the qualities of space-time.
,Another intriguing notion of Aether is that space and resonance integrate
through a shared geometry. In other words, space and resonance are the
same entity but viewed from two perspectives, which are orthogonal to each other.

Geometric Structure of Aether
Non-material Aether having geometry might seem a bit strange. However, this is exactly what empirical data suggests. In fact,
after one has reviewed the Aether Ph<50>ics Model in totality; it
is not possible to think of the Aether without geometry.

gravitational polarity.

The geometrical constant of the
Aether induces to be 16JZ"' ,
translating to a geometrical shape of a tubular loxodrotne'l distributed over two adjacent spheres. Further induced is that the spheres have
electrostatic polarity, the whole structure has
magnetic polarity, and the spin directions have

One fourth of the total loxodrome surrounding both spheres is a tube with a
surface constant of 4JZ"' , the toroid constant- Because toroids have two
radi,i the small radius and large radius, theycan have varying radii lengths but still have the same surface area. The toroids in the above left image
have difef rent radi,i but identical surface areas. This is whyall onta share
the same quantum surface area as the Compton wavelength squared It is because all onta have the same surface area that we can graphically
represent them as twin tubular loxodromes (referred to simply as
"loxodromes") while making use of the quantum distance squared as
their surface area.

41 Dr. Lester Hulett raises the point that the loxodromes of the Aether unit are not exactly the same as loxodromes on a Mercator map. He suggests they be called something else to clarify the subtle differences in geometry.
3S

SECRETS OF THE AETHER
The perfectlysymmetrical representation onlyapplies to the surface areas and to the electrostatic charges. The mass, distnbuted frequency, and strong
charge dimensions are not symtem rical in a given Aether unit. The
unequal distributions of quantum distributed frequencyafef ct the general form of the physical Universe and give us shapes like flowers, butret flies, tree branching, leaf patet rns, snail shells, skeletal sucuestr, body organ composition, and every other patet rn that arises from growth processes. The unequal mass division reflects in the obselVed difef rence between electron and proton masses and their proportional strong charges.
The toroid constant (4JZ"' ) represents the surface geometryof ",-spin onta.
The electron and proton are examples of ",-spin" onta. Half of the
double loxodrome has the geometrical constant of 8JZ"' , and is either the
loxodrome around a single sphere or half a loxodrome around two spheres. A full loxodrome represents 1-spin, such as the photon possesses. The full ioxodrome around both spheres represents 2-spin, such as the Aether unit and supposed "graviton" possess.

1/2 Spin
4lt<EFBFBD>

2 Spin
1 61t<31>

4JZ" 16JZ"' is the square of , which is the spherical constant. The 4" spherical
constant is also related to the c' (speed of light squared) constant and
describes the c' geometrical qualities (page 152). The mathematical function of the loxodrome path over the spheres is:

f(8) = JZ" sin 82

(2.2)

All physical existence ultimately derives its geometry from the Aether. The
geometry, as shown in the images above, represents the tt1I1ilaeIl: spin paitims for the angular momentum to reside in the Aether unit. The

42 Wolfgang Pauli was possibly the most influencial phy;icist in the theory of spin. Spin was first discovered in the context of the emission spectnun of alkali metals. In 1924 Pauli d introduce what he called a "two-valued quanrum degree of freedom" associated with the electron in the outermost shell. This allowed him to formulate the Pauli exclusion principle, stating that no two electrons can share the same quantum numbers.
W.kipedia http';/en.wikipedia.o.g/wiki/Spm_(ph»ics)# Hstory
38

ONTOLOGICAL FOUNDATION
Aether images do not represent some kind of a particle or otherwise solid
entity. The color-coding is intended to showthat each spin position is a
unique "pathway"; the blue path is for the electron, gold is for the positron, aqua is forthe anti-proton, and red is for the proton.
It is important to remember that the tubular loxodrornes shown in the drawings are aceaucrt only in relation to the surface constant. The
surface area of each half-spin loxodrome is always equal to the Compton
wavelength squared However, the small and large electron and proton
radii vary in length, and therefore so do the sphere radii. The Aether,
being a 2-spin rotating magnetic field, is flexible in this regard and allows for the centrifugal expansion as envisioned byBernoulli.
The Aether is thus a "field" in which subatomic particles can exist. It is
because of this geometry of Aether that it is possible to model the
s. tructu.rse of electrons, photons, protons, and neutrons and their
mteracnons.
Further, the Aether includes the dimensions of mass and charge. An
enonnous force (Gforce) emanating from a non-material Source acts upon the strong charge dimensions giving rise to the Aether.
The Physical Univel'Se
The preceding section is about the non-material Aether. To present the physical Universe in coherent tenus, we must understand the non­ material "field,» or enviromnent, in which physical matter exists. Once we have knowledge of the non-material Aether suucture, we can easily produce a mathematically correct and discrete view of the physical world The reader should understand that the phrase "mathematically correct" in the Aether Physics Model means that not only the values and operators
are correct but also the dimensions. In other words, all of the
mathematics used in this book reflects real world suuctures.
Ax the core of the Aether Physics Model is a mathematically correct Unified
Force Theory, the first such theory to exist in modem science. The
Unified Force Theory develops from the concept of distnbuted charge and fine suuctures of the onta (fine suuctures are proportions of spherical elementary charge to equivalent spherical strong charge). The strong force is mathematically (since 1950) and experimentally (since 1996) proven to have a charge that complements, but is different from,
elementary charge. But, the theory and the experiments that proved the
existence of electron strong force were not seen for what they were because of the investment in the pi meson (pion)147 hypothesis of a strong
force carrier. The Casimir equation is the proof that the electron has a
strong charge and that it obeys a strong force law.
When examining the Newton gtavitational law, Coulomb electrostatic law, and the strong force law, what seemed to be four distinct forces
demonstrate to be three different manifestations of the Gforce with three
37

SECRETS OF THE AETHER
difef rent dimensions. The Gforce is comparable to the sun and the three aspects of onta (electrostatic charge, electromagnetic charge, and mass) are comparable to three different color.; of glass. We see three different forces in the physical world, but they are all manifestations of one Gforce, as three difef rent color.; of light emanate through three different colored panes of glass, even though they are manifestations of one light source. This is an example of how force evolves into complexity similar to the way subatomic particles bind to become atoms. The so-called "weak force" is really a proportion of electrostatic charge to electromagnetic charge.
Primaryangular momentumexplains the structure behind all matter and light interactions, thereby eliminating the mysterious wave-particle duality theory. Primary angular momentum is the primary form of material existence and explains the photoelectric effect, pair production, and Compton Effect in units that directlyrelate to the electron andphoton.
We hypothesize new equations that predict the nuclear binding forces and electron binding energies of all isotopes (page 228). In addition, the preliminary steps toward the discovery of an atomic spectral equation, which predicts the spectra of all isotopes and their ions, becomes apparent. The electron and nuclear binding energyequations and atomic spectra equations are destined to be the new "holy grail" of physics and we have already had significant success with the electron binding energy equation. From these three equations, we will likely develop molecular equations, which can predict the propenies of any substance before it is known to exist.
Unified Force TheOIy The llified Force Theory is the foundation upon which the Aether Physics
Model rests. The UFf will appear in detail later, however, an introducoit n to the core concepts follows here.
The Standard Model of physics recognizes only one type of charge, the elementary charge, which has a single dimension of charge. The tor.;ion balance devised by Charles Coulomb is an electrostatic apparatus, which demonstrates elementary charge". Therefo're, it is appropriate to identify elementary charge as the carrier of the "electrostatic force," since that is what the torsion balance measures in this instance.
In the Aether Physics Model, we notate all charge as distnbuted, just as it appears in nature. Charge is not a point, and we ignore its structural characteristics by treating it as a point. Charge always appears over the surface of an object, even if the object is a single electron. Therefore, the correct dimensions of charge are charge squared
43 Morris H Shamos, Great Experiments in Physics "Firsthand Accounts from Galileo to Einstein" (New York, Dover Publications Inc., 1987) 62-3
38

O N T O L O G I C A L F O U N DATION
Instead of presenting elementary charge as e, elementary charge should present as e.

e = 1.602xlO-19caul 44

(2.3)

e' = 2.567xlO-38 caul'

(2.4)

According to the Standard Model, gluoni' cany the strong force in quarks, and pions!47 cany the strong force in nuclei. In the Aether Physics Mode<64> the strong force carries by strong charge. Strong charge is related to elementarycharge, butit has a different geometry, spin and magnitude.
Strong charge notates as e,<2C>for the electron, epm<70> for the proton, and
enm<EFBFBD> for the neutroIL But as in the case of elementary charge, strong
charge is always distributed So, for example, electron strong charge
would notate as e'm<>2 •

The weak interaction is the proportion of the elementary charge to the strong
charge. The weakinteraction is equalto 8rr times the fine structure of the
OllIL The relationship of the elementary charge, strong charge, and weak
interaction for each onn appears as follows where a , p , and n are the
fine structurse of the electron, proton, and neutron, respectively:

Electron onn:

e' - eem- ax,

=

8Jra

(2.5)

Proton onn:

e' - epm- ax,

=

8JrP

(2.6)

Neutron

onn:

e2 - enm- ax,

=

8Jrn

(2.7)

Later we will examine the relative strengths of the forces between the electrostatic charges, strong charges, weak interactions, and masses in order to see how close the calculated forces agree with empirical
measurements (page 204).

PrimaryAngular Momentum

Wave-Particle Duality

-

IEUIOV

_

'"

=-

Quantum Mechanics states that onta such as electrons, protons,

and neutrons can appear as particles of matter or as waves".

'""

-

"--'=

-

- '"

44 NIST CDDATA Value, e1emenrruy chatge, May 27, 2004 http)lphysics.nisLgov/cgi­ binicuulValue?e I searchjor<6F>elemenrruy-Kharge
45 "Quantum mechanics, the final mathematical fonnulacion of the quantum theory, was developed during the 1920s. In 1924. Louis de Broglie proposed that not only do light waves sometimes exhibti paniclelike properties, as in the photoelectric effect and atomic spectra., but particles may also exhibti wavelike properties." "Quantum Theory," TheCplllwbiaEOQ}'Cloped.aj 6th ed
39

SECRETS OF THE AETHER
The problem with the wave-particle duality theOlY is that the dimensions of onta are neither dimension of waves (frequen<65>, nor of solid matter. (The Standard Model does not quantitatively define maner16.) Since the dimensions of onta are not the dimensions of matet r or of waves, the Aether Physics Model does not equate electrons, protons, and neutrons with either solid matet r orwith waves.

In a 1996 journal article", Phil Berardelli reportS:

.... '_l i l d . '!!U _a-""
It turns out that

atoms,

far

from

being

the

tiny

bil"" rdlai b<> a"' lsl ,

we commonly see in illustrations, are more like multilayered, ,

discrete, shimmering clouds. Each layer contains

proportionately enonnous amounts of energy and shimem rs

- a different but precise electromagnetic frequency. Only

when atoms interact with one another in large numbers do

they behave as expected in their "classical" state, as scientists

call the visible world

In the Aether Physics Model, these multi-layered clouds are the angular
momentum of individual onta. And since these onta are the smallest stable fonn of material existence, it is proper to viewthe onta as primzry angular momentum

The angular momentum of a two-body system, such as a satellite in Olbit around a planet, involves two distinct bodies. Free electrons, protons, and neutrons are single body systems, and yet they have angular momentun1" . Therefore, consistent with
the earlier discussion concerning the relationships among different orders of existence, we can propose that primary
angular momentum has a different
structure than two-body angular
momentum

When we take the liternl dimensions of ' primary angular momentum we find that there is a mass dimension, there are two length dimensions, and there is a frequency dimension. Expressed in terms of quantum measurements, angular momentum is:
-46 Matet.r Something that has mass and exists as a solid, liquid. gas. or plasma. The American Herir.ag<61>e
Dictionaroy f the English<73>e Founh Edition Copyright 0 2003 byHoughton Mififnl Company,
47 Phil Berardelli, "Physicists Prove That Matter Can Be in Two Places at Once," InsightontheNews 15 July
1996, 36, Questia, 19 July2004 <http}/ww.wquestia.com/>.
48 "We find that photons and also other panicles canyan intrinsic angular momentum or spin." Paul Adrian Maurice Dirac, "10 Quantum Mechanicsn Determinism to Probability," 'The Great Desgi n· Particles Fields andCreation (NewYork: Oxford University-Press, 1989) 177.
40

O N T O L O G I C A L F O U N DAT I ON

h = m, . Ac' . F.

(2.8)

One way to visualize this is to see a line of mass moving petpendicular at a velocity. Take a straight object, like a pencil, and hold it in front of }Qu. The pencil represents a mass times length. In one quick motion, now move the pencil at a velocity petpendicular to its length. The blurred image }QU see represents the graphic nature of primary angular momentum.

Of course, an electron is not literally a straight line moving sideways. It is
necessary to take into account the curvature of the Aether double loxodrome structure. Since the onn mass has to fit in the small circumference of the loxodrome "tube," the line of mass would appear as a circle. LifF1Z1!- ci:ra!hJus (Lq names this line of mass. The petpendicular path of the line of mass as it moves sideways also traces
out a circularpath. The resulting geometryis toroidal The toroid, however, traces on a sphere and from
pole to pole, when viewed in space-resonance
coordinates. When viewed in space-time coordinates as with human perception, the shape is actualyl that of a cardioid, as in the image to the left.

The Aether imparts, and thus accounts for, the spin in the loxodrome
structure of the onn. We will viewthe equations that support the toroid­
like geometry of primary angular momentum and its relationship to spin
later (page 196).

For now, let us explore the general characteristics of primary angular momentum. Since primary angular momentum is a circumferential line (Jigarnen circulatu)s moving sideways, the onta have onlytwo dimensions of length. The curvature of Aether acts as a mold and imparts geometry to the onta. The ligamen circulatus moves in time, which means that the onn exists as a function of time between one moment and the next moment. Tune is consequently a component of onta. In fact, we could not perceive time and space if our bodies and senses were not composed of primary angular momentum. Primary angular momentum is the first­ cause of physical perception, intimately related to the distributed frequency (or resonance) of the Aether.
Tubular lo)(odrome seen flom perspective of space only. (Human's eyes)

41

SECRETS OF THE AETHER
Because the ligamen circulatus moves perpendicular to its circumference in
order to scan an area (strong charge), the onta are not solid Theymore closely resemble a cloud, as does the scanned area of a pencil moving back and forth in our vision. It is the scaning of primary angular momennun, which gives onta the appearances of a wave and particle.
So primary angular momentum explains why onta can appear as particles when we look at their strong charge, and can appear as waves when we look at the moving LC Yet these are only appearances. The particulate and wave natures of primary angular momentum are illusions having meaning only from our macro perspective. The reality of the onn structure is primaryangularmomentum and nothing else.
Interesting1y, photons can also appear as primary angular momennun, except that they are also exploding outward at the speed of light. A detailed exploration of the photon follows later (page 188).
Zero Point Energy Finally, we briefly explore the purpose for which the Aether Physics Model
was initially developed We leam how photons constantly propagate from the datk matterthat exists throughout the Universe, conmbuting to the visible Universe's accelerating physical expansion"; and then we learn how human beings can tap this natural process in order to realize an unlimited supply of fuelless energy (although this is not recommended as "free energy" also qualifies as a "pollutant").
The equation for zero point energyalso provides us wti h a mechanism and a clue as to how a "Big Bang" type of event is constantly occur.inrg As such, the observation of neutrinos can reveal a coherent explanation of
the expansion and contraction of the physical Universe. It is interesting to note that out of whatever process generates physical existence, only
twO forms of stable matter emerge, the electron and proton (aside from anti-matet r). If the zero point energyequation (also a form of the strong force law) is correct, then the ZPE equation should be a part of the so­ called Big Bang explanation.
However, not too much attention will apply to ZPE in this book The focus of this book is the foundational theoryof quantum structur.e
" Wendy Freedman, "The Hubble CoDStant and the Expanding Universe, A Newly Refined Value of [H$uh.O] the Expansion Rate of the Universe, May Herald a First Step toward a New Era of "Precision" Cosmology," AmericanScientistJan.-Feb. 2003, Questia, 27 May2004 <http://ww.wquestia.coml >.
42

G FORCE
a.." .

GFORCE

What do you call a force equal to 1 .2lxl044newton that seems to arise
out of nowhere and is responsible for the forces that hold the Universe
together?
We must first contemplate the nature of force50• Generally, we think of force
as pressure exened over an area. If you press your finger on a table, you feel pressure over the area of your finger in contact with the table. The
pressure can be either positive or negative. A suction cup applies a negative pressure (vacuum) over an area. Force applies to either pushing or pulngli something.
The Gforce operates in the same way. The Gforce both pushes and pulls masses together or apm (matter and anti-matter gravitationally repel each other), and pushes or pulls charge together or apm. Oddly, these are the only two manifestations of force in the Universe. The only manifestation of force is either a push or a pull, relative to mass or charge. Even more
surprising, this Gforce is a frrst cause, as far as the visible Universe is
concemed
What ;s the Gforce? Science, it seems, forbids discussion of God It is as though God were some
kind of illusion and that direct empirical observation with human senses
is the only mature authority for reality. Yet science is unable to define the
origin of gravity and of electromagnetic "fields." In the Standard Model,
the so-called "four basic forces" describe as though mediated by particles

50 FORCE: commonly. a " push" or " pull," more properly defined in physics as a quantity that changes the

ureme motion, size, or shape of a body. Force is a vector quantity; having both magnitude and direction. The

magnirude of a force is measured in units such as the POWld, dyne, and newton, depending upon the system of

meas

nt being used. An unbalanced force acting on a body free to move will change the motion of the

body. The quantityof motion of a body is measured byits momentum. the product of its mass and its velocity.

According to Newton's second law of motion (see motion), the change in momenrum is directlyproportional

to the applied force. "Force," TheCp}umbia EJ1(<28>ydopie.da 6th ed.

43

SECRETS OF THE AETHER
that have the inherent property of push and pull, as though it were possible for a particle to manifest such a characteristic. And indeed,
Quantum Field Theory is filled with tenns that are intended to hide the fact of non-material existence, such as "conversion constants," "fields,"
"vacuum," "free space," and others.
What is it that modem science is suppressing, or failing to admit? Is there a
rational excuse for not interpreting scientific evidence in favor of the
existence of God? What would we see if we analyzed the so-called
"conversion constants" of Newton and Coulomb, which are essenrial to
the force laws?
The Gforce is equal to 1 .2 1 x 1 044 newton . Tbat quantity of force extends
as: 121,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0OOnewton or 121 million, billion, billion, billion, billion newtoIL
1'h:it is (17! en:mrns:fora! It is truly the only force in the Universe and it acts
directlythrough the primaryangular momentum and charge of each OnIL
We need to examine this one and only force in order to learn how it
directly affects the world we perceive.
The Dimensions chapter describes the properties of reciprocal mass. The
inertial mass of the Aether exists reciprocal to the dimension of mass we
familiarly apply to visible marrer. Reciprocal mass is a relatively unexplored concept in physics and has difef rent properties from familiar
mass, just as frequency has different properties from rime. In addition to
being a more primary order of reality, the non-material nature of Gforce likely relates to the Aether's reciprocal inertial mass.
As we saw in the previous chapter, primary angular momentum is the
physical description of the electron, photon, proton, and neutroIL Physical strong charge is the result of primary angular momentum
spinning within the Aether unit Essentialyl, primary angular momentum
and ph<70>ical strong charge describe the same onn, but from orthogonal perspecuves.
The Gforce is everywhere in the Universe and is singularly responsible for holding the entire Universe together. Every individual quantum of
Aether has the full effect of the Gforce acting through it This Gforce acts upon the three physical qualities of onta (angular momentum, strong
charge, and electrostatic charge). Thus, the quantum Aether units and onta can perform individualyl or collectively as fields and marrer . The results of their intetactions are a dynamic Universe.
An all-powerful, all-pervading force, creating, binding, and maintaining the existence of the entire physical Universe could easily be described as the
effect of God Of course, God is ascribed to be so much more than a
physical Universe (such as unconditional love, unbounded wisdom, and
44

G F O RCE
unlimited compassion) that the Gforce should more appropriately be called "the Handof God on the Universe," and not Godp:rse
It is not as though the Gforce is an aIlegOlyfor God The Gforce is veryreal and already fits the description of an all-powerlul, all pelVading force of the Universe. It comes down to one of just two possibilities. Either there exists a non-material, creative force in the Universe, which some
might call God, or such a creator does not exist. If God exists as creator
of the Universe, then atirtbutes of God must be present in the physics that describe the Universe. So why should we be surprised when clear evidence for a creative force appears which some might call God?
Gforce in Three Manifestations
GmitjardC7:wAw tmrtim&pism
What are the odds that the same Gforce constant could be extracted from both Isaac Newton's constant of universal gravitation and the Coulomb constant of electrostatic attraction-repulsion? There is no record that Charles Coulomb used what we nowknow as Coulomb's constant in his equations, or even that he was aware of such a constant".
Therefore, Coulomb likelywas not aware of a constant of proportionalitythat mediates the force between charges, and he certainly could not have devised his system so that it would resolve to the same unit of Gforce, as does Newton's gravitational constant. Moreover, Newton was not aware of the Compton wavelength or the exact speed of light, so he, too, could not have known about the Gforce.
Yet, it is there, an enormous unit of Gforce, derived from Coulomb's electrostatic constant, from Newton's gravitational constant, and from a newly defined Aether unit constant also known as the rotating magnetic field unit of measurement, or the Aether electromagnetic constant.
These three manifestations of Gforce directlyrelate to the three force carriers: electrostatic charge, electromagnetic charge, and the mass within primary angular momentum The Coulomb electrostatic constant is the interaction constant of the Gforce with electrostatic charge. The unit of
rotating magnetic field is the interaction constant of Gforce with
electromagnetic charge. And the Newton gravitational constant is the interaction constant of the Gforce with mass.
51 The proponionalityof quantitywas not proved byCoulomb bymeans of special experiments, since he rakes the forces from the start as a measure of the quantities of the unknown electricti ies and magnetisms, but not without having previously proved that this assumption can be carried out consistently, by numerous experimentS, for example on the division of quantities of electricity between conductors brought in contact with one another. Philipp Lenard, Great Men of Science' A Historyof Scientifci Progres,s trans. H Stafford Hatfield (NewYork: The Macmilanl Q,mpany, 1933) 150.
45

SECRETS OF THE AETHER
Quantum Measurements
It will repeatedly come to our attention in the Aether Physics Model that
there is a quantum length to the Aether, as well as a quantum frequency.
The quantum length is equal to the well-known Compton wavelength. The quantum frequency is equal to the speed of light divided by the
quantum length. The reciprocal of the quantum frequency will give the quantum orne.

The value of the Compton wavelength is:

..1,c = 2.426x10-12 m

The Aether unit is like an individual piece of real estate in the quantum
Universe and it represents a specific space that oscillates at a specific rate between forward and backward time. The specific space produces the

..1,/ . volume of

While the structure of the Aether unit is not a cube, it

has the same effect as a cube for mathematical pwposes (to understand

how Aether resolves to cubic appearance see the 4,,' constant on page
264). As any onn moves between Aether units, it moves one quantum
distance (Compton wavelength) along its trajectory.

(3. 1 )

The speed of light constant is:

c = 2.998xl0' <20>
sec
The speed of light is explained quite simply in the Aether Physics Model as
the quantum distance times quantum frequency (or quantum distance per
quantum time). Since Aether encapsulates onta, the quantum parameters of Aether limit the speed of onta. The maximum speed at which any onn can move is one quantum distance times the quantum frequency. But for
?nta to move, its encapsulating Aether must displace the Aether around It.

(3.2)

This does not mean that higher frequencies or shorter lengths cannot exist in the Universe. Wave interference patterns can appear as shorter lengths or higher frequencies. However, the production of such apparent lengths
and frequencies would require the interference of two or more sources.

The limitation imposed bythe speed of light does not applyto the movement
of Aether units among themselves if the Aether units vibrate. Therefore,
it is quite possible to send faster than light communications by directly
modulating Aether units, rather than sending photons through space or electrons through conductors. The Aether units can modulate via the
strong force bymagnetic pulses - a topic for later discussion.

It may even be possible to modulate a stream of neutrinos to achieve faster than light communications, although it remains to be determined whether
48

----<2D> <20>-<2D><> ... .

or not neutrino modulation would be ptaetical, even if possible. The quantum frequency is:

GFORCE

.!!.
A c

=

F q

(3.3)

Almost all units in the Aether Physics Model express in terms of frequency; ratherthan time. Measured time is merelya perception of one of the two time directions. In each quantum moment, an Aether unit is actualyl moving in the forward time direction and then in the backward time
direction, oscillating a full cycle at the quantum frequency. For whatever reason, onta only exist in the forward time direction. Onta do not
experience the backward time direction, therefore the larger structures made from onta (planets, animal bodies, plants, etc) also do not experience the backward time direction.

Because onta do not experience the backward time direction, they appear to have a propertycalled \6 spin.

The quantum time is:

Ac
c

=

T q

(3.4)

As far as normal quantum structurse go, the smallest interval of forward (or backward) time is equal to the quantum time, since quantum time is the reciprocal of quantum frequency.

Percepcionof LinearTnre
Due to the \6-spin nature of onta, we do not experience the backward time direction. So time appears to be a succession of quantum, forward time inrervals. In "God's Eyes," there is a quantum frequency, which always exists in the present. Through human eyes, since bodies are made of \6-
47

SECRETS OF THE AETHER
spin onra, time appears to move from the past toward the future. Thus, linear time is an illusion due to the perception that arises from physical
embodirnem.
The Pulsed Tune graphic on the previous page, depicting forward time,
shows consecutive pulses, without blank spaces between pulses.
However, the image does conveythe general concept that time is a series of forward time half-cycles. To our perception, however, forward time
appears to be uniformly linear.

Electromagnetic Structure The Gforce is essential to the construction of the quantum Aether unit, which is also the electromagnetic constant. The
Gforce acting on toroidal electromagnetic charge produces
the rmfd constant, or rotating magnetic field, and it has the
geometrical constant of 16,,' . Rmfd manifests as a double
loxodrome, as seen at left.

DOuble: Loltodtome: rmfa Corut.,nt

In terms of quantum measurements, rmfd notates as:

rmfd

m, · ,l,c1 . F.'
eemax ,

Note that the quantum measurements making up the rotating magnetic field
unit can factor as a mass to strong charge ratio and a space-resonance
constant. The mass to strong charge ratio is the same for all onta and
Aether, and the space-resonance constant names «double cardioid"
because from the perspective of space-time, the space-resonance constant looks like two adjacem cardioids.

(3.5)

The mass to strong charge ratio for all onta and the Aether is:

mchg = 6.508x10, - cakug- l,
Examples of the mass to strong charge ratio:

(3.6)

eemma"x = 6.508x10' cokugl,

(3.7)

epm_p , = 6.508x 1 0' cakgul,

(3.8)

enmaxm" = 6.508X10' <20> couP

(3.9)

48

m<EFBFBD>
e,

=

6.508

x

1

06

kg , coul

rmfd Therefore, the

also notates as:

GFORCE
(3. 1 0)

rmfd

m a

.

;LC' ea 2

.

pq

'

The double cardioid constant is equal to the three dimensions of length rimes
the two dimensions of frequency:

(3. 1 1)

dcrd = ;LC' . pq'
Below is a graphic representation of the double cardioid constant as viewed
from nearly half-spin perspective and seeing only normal matter. True
half-spin perspective would view straight down and only one cardioid would appear.

(3.12)

With Anti<74>Matter

Without Anti-Matter

Since matret and anti-matter cannot co-exist as separate onta, and because we
see from half-spin perspective, the full Aether unit appears to us only in one-foutth its full form. It is essential to understand the double cardioid
geometryof Aetherunits when working with binding force equations.

N

Loko ing at the Aether unit from space-resonance, the electromagnetic charge dipole is above and below
the cardioid shape as seen at right. What this
means is that if you wrap a wire around a nail and
place a curner t through the wire, the magnetic
poles will be at the head and tip of the nail This
also means that electrons travel through wires
sideways, offering significant insight as to how
electrons behave in a wire coil and other electrical
structures.

s Electromagnetic Dipole

Keep in mind that at the quantum level, onta are only two-dimensional.
There is a surface area, but there is no "thing" underneath the surface. There is no solid matter at the quantum level, just cardioid rings of strong
charge. It is through these cardioid rings of strong charge that Gforce
acts when producing physical strong force.

49

SECRETS OF THE AETHER
The cardioid shapes of the quantum Aether unit impan the spin path and
structure the ligarnen circularus must take. The area scarmed is real, as is the strong charge it produces. However, as far as the string of mass goes, it distributes through the cardioid at different times. It is similar to the
pencil moving back and forth in front of our eyes. We perceive the pencil as existing in several places at once, although we know better. Yet,
there is only one quantum moment for the ligarnen circulatus to spin
from pole to pole. In one quantum moment, the ligarnen cin:ularus scans a full spin position of the Aether unit.
The area per strong charge, through which the Gforce manifests, could name as the "stroke" of the Gforce:

strk = _A_c,'
a eo
Thus, the quantum Aether unit quantifies as:

(3. 13)

rmfd = strko . Gforce
The Gforce thus pulses in forward and backward time, driving the ligar:nen circu1arus into a spin. The stroke has toroidal geometry since the strong
charge has steradian solid angle, therefore the Gforce must have toroidal
geometry:

(3 . 1 4)

Electrostatic Structure The electrostatic constant is widely known as Coulomb's constant, which is
equal to:

kc = 8.988x109 seckg, ··cmo3ul,
and can represent as a force acting through surface per charge:

kc

=

8.988x109

m' - cau- l ,

newton

which in tum is equalto:

(3. 1 5) (3. 1 6)

k c

=

strko . Gforce
1 6Jr'

( ) Note that the geometrical constant 16Jr' divides out the double loxodrome

constant of the Gforce times stroke, giving it a solid angle of 1. The solid angle of 1 is spherical, thus Coulomb's constant mediates the forces with regard to spherical electrostatic charge. The electrostatic charge dipoles
of the Aether unit are within the spheres around which the
electromagnetic charge exists, as shown in the graphic below. Onta,

(3. 1 7)

50

GFORCE
which exist witllln an Aether unit, pick up the donated electrostatic charge. The electron and anti-proton pick up the negative electrostatic charge and the proton and positron pick up the positive electrostatic charge.
Distributed frequency is the unit of resonance, which the Gforce causes by reciprocating its inertia back and forth in time. The quannun frequency is the oscillation rate. Thus electrostatic charge, resonance, time, and the CUlVed geometry of the Aether are likely related

Gravitational Structure
We have just examined the dipole structures of
electromagnetic and electrostatic charge as caused bythe Gforce. NowVIe will see how the Gforce creates a dipole of a gravitational nature. Electrostatic Dipole It is worth noting that the Standard :Model does not acknowledge gravitational repulsion, onlygravitational attraction.

The Gforce pushes the ligamen circulatus of matter through the Aether unit in one direction, and pushes the LC of anti-matrte in the opposite direction around the spherical resonance.

Whether onta will attract or

repel gravitationally depends

upon whether any two are

matet r or anti-matet r. The

proton and electron are

both matter, so they

expen<EFBFBD>nce gravitational atoUtarc n. Similarly, the

Gravitational Dipoles

anti-proton and positron are

both anti-matet r and so they

experience gravitational attraction. HoVJeVer, the electron is matet r and

the positron is anti-matet r, so they experience gravitational repulsion.

The same goes forthe proton and anti-proton.

The mechanics of gravity are thus dependent upon spin patity. Both the
electron and proton spin in the same direction, and the anti-proton and positron spin in the opposite direction. Remember that onra, whether matter or anti-matet r, cannot exist in the backward direction of time. All of the spin positions are unidirectional with regard to time.

Similar to the structure used in the electromagnetic constant and electrostatic constant, the gravitational constant is equal to:
51

SECRETS OF THE AETHER
G = 6.672xI0-1i rn3 kg · see2
and can be represented as:

(3. I S)

G = 6.672x I 0-11 _ krgn22 newton
Once again, we see that force exerts from a surface. This time the surface is a
surface of area per distributed mass. :Mass is a linear dimension, as opposed to the distnbuted dimension of charge. Nonetheless, the Gforce still pulses its own reciprocal LC to create the hther unit causing its mass dimension to scan an area The mass associated with the Gforce
IS:

(3.19)

rna = 3.26SxI01'kg
Since mass is linear it can only extend a push or a pull, but not both such as charge does. We can call this extension of push or pull "reach." The reach constant is equal to:

(3.20)

/I. 2 Rch = -rn­Ca2

Rch

=

5

.

5

1

3

x

I

0-SS

rn2 kg 2

Therefore, the gravitational constant of the hther expresses as:

(3.21) (3.22)

G = Rch . Gforce
The Gforce acts on surface per distributed mass to produce the Newton gravitational constant, which has been empirically determined to a high degree of accurac:f2. The precise symeytrm of the electromagnetic constant, Coulomb's constant and Newton's gravitational constant is astonishing. All base on the same, exact quantutn length dimension and Gforce. The Gforce itself is quantutn in th<\t it also expresses in quantutn measurements:

(3.23)

Gforce = rna · /l.e . F.2

(3 .24)

The Cause ofExistence
The most skeptical of scientists will brush aside the Gforce and blithely state that the Gforce is merely a mathematical aberration. In addition, the same scientists will have no explanation for the existence and structure of the Newton gravitational constant and the Coulomb constant except to say that they are mere constants of proportionality; which only selVe the

52 Arthur 1. Robinson, Sdem; NewSerie, va: 222, No 4630. (Dec. 23, 1983), pp. 1316-1317.
52

purpose of making the force laws work

GFORCE

However, an honest view is that the Gforce is no aberration and that it is the
cause of Newton's gravitational constant, Coulomb's constant, and the electromagnetic constant, not by chance, but as a matter of grand design.
The fact that a very specific Gforce exists not only in the two previously known "constants of proportionality;" but also in a third "constant of
proportionality," proposed in this treatise to govern the strong force law,
is substantial evidence in favor of a higher universal order.

The apparent pulsing nature of the Gforce, as evidenced by the spherical resonance producing the electrostatic charge, reminisces of a heartbeat.
Although the Gforce looks nothing like a human life form, it has manyof
the characteristics associated with a living being. The Gforce is self­
dynamic, it gives rise to the fabric of space-resonance, and gives existence to and maintains visible matter.

H we could indulge ourselves for a moment, and accept that Gforce is living,
then reflecting on the fact that cel,ls organs, and the animals and plants
they compose are also living, it is reasonable to postulate that the orders of reality in between are also living. In other words, what rationale could
there be for life existing at the level of Gforce and everything from the
level of cells to more complex levels, and then have Aether, onta, atoms, and molecules not also be alive?

MasatU Emoto has done research on water molecules that suggests water has
qualities of a living beings). Water considers by modem science to be nothing but an inert molecule. However, the Aether Physics Model
appears to suggest there is no level of existence where life does not also exist. To date, scientists have held a sterile attitude toward life, while
harnessing science almost gleefullyto build weapons of mass destruction.
Now that a deeper and more fulfilling aspect of quantum physics is emerging in the form of the Aether Physics Model, what would prevent us from seriously investigating the living qualities of the Universe at all of
its levels? Where would such an endeavor lead us?

The sheer magnitude of the Gforce is beyond human conception, even
though its value derives easily and to a good degree of accuracy. The
Gforce is non·matetial in origin and ;et it governs physical mechanics.
Aside from ignoting the Gforce in physics, there seems no other way to
approach it than with gratitude, humility, and awe. For out of the void comes a solitary force that govems the entire physical Universe.
Everything that we experience in this world manifests and maintains by
the Gforce through the electromagnetic constant, Coulomb's electrostatic
constant, and Newton's gravitational constant.

53 :Ma.saru Erooto, TheHiddne MessageipWater (Beyond Words Publishing, Inc., Hilslboro, OR, 2004)
53

SECRETS OF THE AETHER

::t

/nd>..:

_...

In the begining God creared the heaven and the eanIt

And the eanh was withOut fonn, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the depe . And the Spirit of God moveduponthe face ofthe ware".

And Godsaid, Letthere be lightandthere was light

And God saw the light, that it was good and God divided the light from the . darkness.

And God caIJed the light Day, and the darkness he caIJed Night And the evening

and the morning were the fim day.

<EFBFBD>1I!'fi<66>'!!'" I"UI'I=IIIr6: J,

" ...

Replace heaven with "Aether," andeanh with "prirnatyangular momentum.»

In the begin,ing the Gforce created the Aether and prirnaty angular momentum. The prirnaty angular momentum was without form (datk matter), and void, and darkness was upon the face of the deep (empty
space). And the Gforce moved upon the Aether. And the Gforce gave light (prirnaty angular momentum expands on the sudace of Aether units to produce photons). The light illuminated the darkness.

Perhaps it is a mere coincidence that the Aether Physics Model sounds similar to the begining of Genesis. Then again, perhaps it is not.

S4 Genesis, King James Veu;ion 54

AETHER

AETHER

Albert Einstein said:

-

-

... there is a weightyargumentto be adduced in favour ofthe

ether hypothesis. To deny the ether is ultimately to assume

that empty space has no physical qualities whatever. The

fundamental facts of mechanics do not harmonize with this

,

view. For the mechanical behavior of a cOlporeal hovering freely in empty space depends not only on

system relative

positions (distances) and relative velocities, but also on its

state of rotation, which physically may be taken as a

characteristic not apep rtaining to the system itself. In order

to be able to look upon the rotation of the system, at least

formally, as something real, Newton objectivises space.

Since he classes his absolute space together with real things,

for him rotation relative to absolute space is also something

real .

... inercia! resistance opposed to relative acceleration of
distant masses presupposes action at a distance; and as the
modem physicist does not believe that he may accept this
. action at a distance, he comes back once more, if he follows Mach, to the ether, which has to serve as a medium for the effects of inertia But this conception of the ether to which we are led byMach's way of thinking differs essentially from
the ether as conceived by Newton, by Fresnel, and by Lorentz. Mach's ether not only conditions the behaviour of
inert masses, but is also conditioned in its state bythem

Mach's idea finds its full development in the ether of the
general theory of relativiry. According to this theory the
metrical qualities of the continuum of space-time difef r in the environment of different points of space-time, and are pardy conditioned by the matter existing outside of the territory under considerationss.

The Aether Physics M:>del produces an Aether hypothesis as seen by

55 Alben Einstein. Sidelightsof Rehcivity (CourierDoverPublications, 1983) 16-18
55

SECRETS OF THE AETHER
Descartes, Newton, Bernoulli, Fresnel, and Lorentz in that it agrees with
cenain aspects of their obselVations and hypotheses. Through the unified charge equation, the APM also agrees with Mach in that the
Aether acts on matrte , and matet r in tum acts upon Aether. MOreover,
the Aether Physics Model agrees with Einstein in that it also explains General Relativity Theory, though from the perspective of Aether electrostatic charge and the strong charge of matet r. We will look into these ideas in detail later in this chapter.

Nkola Tesla": The technical editor of the New York Herald Tnbune's radio
section responded thus to an article by Laurence M CoCkada}"7:

,-<2D><>,,<2C>,<2C>-
"I have read

the

article,

and

1

quite

agree

with

the

....
opinion

expressed - that wireless power transmission is impractical

with present apparatus. This conclusion will be naturalyl

reached by any one who recognizes the nature of the agent

by w.'lcl h the impulses are transmitted in present wireless

pracuce.

I I

"When Dr. Heinrich Hertz undenook his experiIrents from
1887 to 1889 his object was to demonstrate a theoty

I postulating a medium filgnil all space, called the ether which

I I was structureless, of inconceivable tenuity and yet solid and

f! possessed of rigidity incomparably greater than that of the

I hardest steeL He obtained cenain results and the whole

world acclaimed them as an experimental verification of that

cherished theory; But in reality what he obselVed tended to

prove just its falal.yc

"I had maintained for manyyears before that such a medium
as supposed could not exist, and that we must rather accept
the view that all space is filled with a gaseous substance. On repeating the Hertz experiments, with much improved and very powerful apparatus, 1 satisfied myself that what he had
obselVed was nothing else but effects of longitudinal waves in a gaseous medium, that is to say, waves, propagated by
alternate compression and expansion. He had obselVed , waves in the ether much of the nature of sound waves in the :

air.

"Up to 1896, however, 1 did not succeed in obtaining a

posiUve experimental proof of the existence of such a

medium. But in that year 1 brought out a new fonn of

u

,,__<5F>

S6 1ESLA, NIKOLA 1856-1943, American electrician and inventor, h. Croaria (then in Austria.H<>. He
emigrated to the United States in 1884, worked for a shon period for Eruson, and became a naturalizde
American citizen {1891}. A pioneer in the field of high-voltage electricity, he made many discoveries and
inventions of great value to the development of radio transmission and to the field of electricity. These include a system of an:: lighting, the Tesla induction motor and system of alternating-curtrne transmission, the Tesla coil, generators of lllgh-frequency curner ts, a transfonner to increase oscillating curtners to high potencials. a system of wireless communication, and a system of tranSmitting electric power without wires. He produced the
first power system at Ntagara Falls, N.Y. There is a museum dedicated to his wotk in Belgrade. Yugoslavia. "Tesla. NikDla,h TheColumbia Em"<ydopeda.i 6th ed.
" Lawrence M Cockaday;New YorkHeraldTribune, Sep" 22, 1929,pp. 1, 29.
5&

i vacuum rube capable of being charged to any des;d
I,'I potential, and operated it with effective pressures of about 4,000,000 volts. I produced cathodic and other rays of transcending intensity. The effects, according to my view, were due to minute particles of matter canying enormous elecuical charges, which, for want of a better name, I
I designated as matet r not further decomposable. Subsequentlythose particles were called electrons.58

"One of the first striking observations made with my rubes was that a putplish glow for several feet around the end of the rube was formed, and I readily ascertained that it was due

to the escape of the charges of the particles as soon as they
passed out into the air, for it was only in a nearly perfect

vacuum that these charges could be confmed to them The

I coronal discharge proved that there must be a medium besides air in the space, composed of particles immeasurably smaller than those of air, as otherwise such a discharge would

I

not be possible.
gas was so light

On further investigation I found that this
that a volume equal to that of the earth

I

would weigh onlyabout one-twentieth of a pound

'I

"The velocity of any sound wave depends on a certain ratio
between elasticity and density, and for this ether or universal
gas the ratio is 800,000,000,000 times greater than for air.
This means that the velocity of the sound waves propagated
through the ether is about 300,000 times greater than that of
the sound waves in air, which travel at approximately 1,085
Lfeet a second Consequently the speed in ether is 900,000 x
1,085 feet, or 186,000 miles, and that is the speed of light.»

AETHER

Nkola Tesla observed that electrons transmitted through a near perfect vacuum in his vacuum tubes only to appear as corona several feet
through the air surrounding the tube. His observation is quite simple. If there is nothing in the rube betwene the electrode and the glass tube, then
it remains a question how the electrons convey through the vacuum and
into the surrounding air. Tesla then deduced that there must be a gas much finer than air molecules through which electrons could traveL

Tesla does not explain how he arrived at the elasticity-density ratio of Aether
to air. If he had provided evidence of direct measurement, it would have
been a major milestone in support of the Aether theoty. Yet even if
Tesla back calculated the Aether to air ratio, he did theorize the Aether as
"gaseous.»

Other researchers have attempted to quantify the existence of the Aether.
Around 1644, Rene DesCatet s was the ftrst to propose an all-pervading

58 "In 1874 the Irish phy.;icist George Johnstone Stoney ( 1826·1911) had also suggested the idea of a panicle
or atom of electricity, and in 1891 he suggested that the unit of negative electricity should be called the
electron , which is what it has been called since." Keith]. Laidler, To I.ightSuch a Candle· Cbaptersjnthe
Historyof Science and Tecimo}oyg (Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress, 1998) 149.
57

SECRETS OF THE AETH E R
Aether -with mechanical properties.
Descartes assumed that the Aetherparticles are continuallyin motion. As however there was no empty space for moving
particles to move into, he inferred that they move by taking
the places vacated by other Aether particles, which are
themselves in motion. Thus, the movement of a single particle of the Aether involved the motion of an entire closed
chain of particles; and the motions of these closed chains
constituted vortices, which performed imponant functions in his picture of the cosmos".
As such, the Aether was considered to be incredibly solid (it fills all space), but also incrediblyfluid These are the ideal conditions to support waves.
The theoty of Aether presented in this book will show a quantum Aether that
is simultaneously solid-fluid-gaseous, which looks like tubes, called "spin
positions.» These spin positions are cardioidal structurse curved by spherical distributed frequency. The Aether unit acts like a vessel for containing onta, which are the basis of all matet r.
Physical matter views like dust particles suspended in an aqueous solution.
The Aether unit provides the space-resonance environment for the onta.
Thus when onta appear to move, it is actualyl Aether moving and
carirngy the onta -with it. Matter never really travels at all Matter always
occupies the same space and time. In acruality, space-time moves relative only to space-time.
As for whether electromagnetism transmits in transverse or longitudinal
form, Tesla was correct in that Aether units could oscilealt as longitudinal
waves. However, this does not preclude Aether from also cargryni the
electromagnetic efef ct of the photon as it passes through the Aether
units. The Aether could then have a mechanical effect Qongitudinla
wave) as well as an electromagnetic effect (Henzian wave) .
In the case of the longitudinal wave, the Aether unit itself moves back and 'forth like a gas molecule. In the case of Henzian (transverse) waves, photons physically pass through the Aether units. Since
longitudinal waves in the Aether are actual Aether
displacements, longitudinal waves also have the potential to create unusual effects such as those manifested by John Hutchison in cold-melting
aluminum, and by John Keely in molecular
dissociation of Water.
59 Six Edmund W1ltl taker A Historyofthe Theoriesof Aerberand Electricity;The dassicalTheories (London; New YorK. American Institute of Physics, 1987) 6
!ill

AETHER
The Shape of"Emptines"s Aether is a dynamic fabric of space-resonance composed of independent
quantum units. Each quantum unit of Aether contains three dimensions of length and two dimensions of frequency (distributed frequency is the
unit of resonance). In addition, Aether also contains one dimension of
mass, four dimensions of charges (two dimensions of electrostatic charge
and two dimensions of electromagnetic charge), and spin. Each of the
above named dimensions produce a quantum unit of rotating magnetic field
The Aether unit itself exists within a greater and Jet more primary «space­
time" continuum. It is hard to say at this point whether this greater space-time has the same three length and two frequency dimensions as
the Aether unit. Greater space-time is not necessarily limited to the
space·time dimensions that "We perceive in the physical world
Observations of neutUnos reveal evidence of the existence of a greater (or more primar)? space-time, since theyexist outside of quantum Aether units.
Because each quantum unit of Aether is independent, the Aether unit manipulates just like gaseous matter. As onta bind and unbind, they
manipulate physical space-resonance to some degree. This manipulation
occurs through Aether unit folding; the Aether units literally flip over to electrostatically and electromagnetically bind with each other. The effect of Aether folding is that Aether condenses where matter is present. Augustin Fresnel observed such an effect:

There are other points concerning the action of matter upon

the ether which are perhaps in a fair wayto receive a clearer

solution. The observed fact that light travels in water with a

i speed of about three-fourths of what it has in air, apparendy ,

means that the transmitting medium is either more dense or

less rigid in water than in air. Fresnel's hypothesis is that its

rigidity is the same in the two media His formula, as

, developed byEisenlohr, forthe relative motion of ether and

matter which it permeates, when the matter is set into

<EFBFBD>il: motion, assumes, clearly and baldly, that the ether is more dense inside of matter than in free space. The amount of ether occupying a volume of one cubic centimeter will

: condense to nine·sixteenths of a centimeter on passing into

I water. It is compresseduntil its densityis nearlydouble.60

=

-

All alternating curer nts also distort the Aether as the expansion and

contraction of electrons occurs. Electrons can expand and contract by

changing their toroidal radii As the smaller electron radius shrinks, the

larger radius grows, thus conserving the angular momentum.

Nevertheless, the Aether radius (related to spherical resonance) changes

with the large radius of the electron. Thus as the electron expands and

60 The Ether, ScienT, Vol. 18, No. 447. (Aug. 28, 1891), pp. 1 19-122.
59

SECRETS OF THE AETHER
contracts, so does the Aether, making it possible to modulate Aether
units directly, just as Tesla proposed
As demonstrated in the spacetime graphic below, forward time and backward
time have different directions within a past-future oscilotail n. Just as
length has two directions, time has two directions. If primary angular
momentum could see both time directions, we would not perceive any
progress in time, as we would always remain in the present. However, as it is, primary angular momentum only sees the forward direction of time
and thus onta appear to have only half-spin.
The four colored tubes in the spacetime image are in the shape of a loxodroffie61 and represent the four possible spin
positions available to onta. The anist's
representation of an Aether unit is actcuar e to the
extent that each of the four tube sections has the
same surface area However, in actuality the
electron tube is considerably different in proportion from the proton tube. Further, the radius of the spheres can expand and contract considerably depending upon which physical processes are occur.ring A simple hydrogen atom
would be wide with thin tubes, but a deuterium atom would be tight with thick tubes (nearly
spherical).
Neutrons would have nearly the same properties as
protons, being wide with thin tubes in their free state, and tight with thick tubes (nearly spherical) in their bound state. Thus, the instability of the neutron would seem to occur when the
neutron is in its free state, but not in its bound state. The instabilityis due
mostly to the neutron's bound electron magnetic moment sprearling over a greater radius.
This would suggest further that the protons and neutrons are constantly shifting positions within the atomic nucleus. In certain isotopes there would be a free neutron passing among atomic shells, thus creating the possibility for neutron decay. The more time a neutron spends as a free
neutron within the nucleus, the less the half-life of the atom will be. When the neutron structure is such that all neutrons remain fixed in place with minimal movement within the isotope, it has a longer half-life.
The blue spin position is where the electron would exist within the Aether unit, the red spin position is where the proton would exist, the green spin
position is for the anti-proton, and the J-ellow spin position is for the positron. When the electron or proton exists in forward-time space-
61 Rhumb Line - The path of a ship that maintains a fixed compass direction, shovm on a map as a line crossing all meridians at the same angle. Also called /aux}rar.e The American Heritage@ Dictij?ruo:uy f the EnglishI.angna<6E> FQurrh Edti ion Copyright C 2003 byHoughton Mifflin Company.
110

AETHER
resonance, the onta appear to be spingni in one directiOIL When the antiproton or positron exists through forward-time space-resonance, they appearto be spinnig in the other directiOIL
It appears that the most stable forms of onta (electron and proton) depend on a specific spin direction of space-resonance. "Space parity'2" in the Standard Model is a preferred spin directiOIL However, this stability is due more to the preponderance of a given spin direction than to its inherent quality. It is quite possible that the Universe possesses both matter and antimatter galaxies. Since the photon is its own anti-particle, it could easilytraverse either type of galaxywithout antnhail iOIL If a galaxy constructs from anti-matter, we may be able to obselVe it as though it were normal matter.
The Aether is also the source of elementary charge. As the angular momentum of an electron exists within the Aether, it picks up the negative charge of the Aether electrostatic dipole. As the angular momentum of a proton exists within the Aether, it picks up the positive charge of the Aether electrostatic dipole. Similarly, the anti-proton and the positron pick up the charges of the portion of Aether in which they reside.
A key to understanding the Aether geometry is the realizatoi n that the spheres do not pertain to dimensions of length, even though, in order to represent time, the spheres appear as lines on paper. Tune and frequency do not have length dimensions, but their effect on space gives them the appearance of having length dimensions. Likewise, phy;ical space is toroidal (cardioidal, reall:0, but because phy;ical space orthogonally connects to time and frequency, the effect is that of a cube when plotted in spherical coordinates. A further explanation of this conversion of toroidal angularmomentumto Cartesian geometryis on page 264.
What the Aether is not
The Aether is not a phy;ical particle as Heinrich Hertz and others have thought. When looking at the geometry of the Aether, one is looking at the spin positions available to maner. The spin positions are like holes, but with reality. We may nonnally think of holes as the absence of matter, but in the Aether, holes are units of rotating magnetic field that act as containers for angular momentum Further, these angular momenta must be exactly the same magnitude as the Aether spin
62 PARlTY or space parity, in physics, quantitythat refers to the relationship between an object or process and the image that ti can produce in a mirror . For example, any right-handed object will produce a mirror-image counterpart that is identical to it in every way except that the mirror image is left-handed. A moving particle that spins in a clockwise manen r, as would a right-handed screw advancing through space, will possess a mirror-image panicle that is identical to ti in evezyway except that it spins counterclockwise, as would a left­ handed screw advancing through space. The law of conservation of parity implies that evezy real object or process has a mirror image that can also exist and that obeys the same physical laws. Although this concept has little significance in classical physics, ti is of great importance in atomic and nuclear physics. From this Jaw scientists inferred that all elementary particles and their interactions possessed mirror image counterparts that also exist. However, in 1956 T. D. Lee and C N. Yang published a paper in which theyargued that paritywas not conserved in weakinteraccions. "Parity," The ColumbiaEnQIClo.peiad, 6th ed.
81

SECRETS OF THE AETHER
positions, or they will wander betveve n Aether units, unable to interact with the physical world (as in the case of neuninos).

The Aether is not a wave. However, the Aether units can produce waves, even without photons traveling through them In addtiion, these waves
can carry real signals if the Aether is magnetically pulsed. The Aether waves are longitudinal waves of gaseous Aether movement, much as NIkoIa Tesla envisioned. Tesla also suggested that longitudinal waves in the Aether might travel faster than the speed of light. Sir Edmund Whittaker made similar observations:

oU'

.!01!I_. __

Stokes's explanation harmonises in a curious way with

Fresnel's hypothesis that the velocityof longitudinal waves in

the Aether is indefinitely great compared with that of the

transverse waves; for it is found by experiment with actual

substances that the ratio of the velocity of propagation of

longitudinal waves to that of transverse waves increases

rapidlyas the mediumbecomes softer and more plastic",

The Aether is not a fluid, although it behaves like one; just as sand is not a
fluid, but can behave like a fluid when agitated. When the Aether is agitated, molecules and atoms rearenarg without a direct effect on the binding forces of the atoms and molecules. In his experiments, John Hutchison rearegnar s molecules and atoms of aluminum by generating a high
frequencyrotating magnetic field with electrons...

An Aether unit is neither motionless, nor is it always in
motion. Massive objects require more Aether units than low-density
space. If the object is in motion, a certain amount of Aether will follow it". This is possible due to the independent nature of Aether units.

AetMr Canies Along With Mattre
. <20>
"In 1904, Morley and Miller were the first to do a hilltop experiment: 'Some have thought that [the Michelson-Morley] experiment only proves that the ether in a certain basement room is carderi along with it. We desire therefore to place the apparatus on a hill to see if an effect can there be
detected'. "E. W Morleyand D. C Miller, Phil Matg 9, 680
(1905)."66

63 SirEdmund WhittakerAffistoryoftheTheoriesofAeWerandElectriciTyt; heClasacis l Theories (London;
New York, American Institute of Phl'ics, 1987) 128
.. PhotO fromThe HutChison Effect, http}/www.hutchisoneffect.orgl
65 "Fresnel further assumed that, when a body is in motion, part of the Aether within it is carirde along­ namely, that part which constitutes the excess of irs densityover the density of Aemer in'UOU; while the rest of
the Aether within the space occupied by the body is Statioruuy." Sir Edmund Whitraket A Historyof We
Theories of Aetber andElectricir;yThe dassicalTheories (London; New York, American Instirute of Physics,
1987) 110
66 Quoted from Abraham Pais, Subtle Is the Lord?· TheScience and the Life of Albert Einstein (Oxford:
112

---

- --

AETHE R
With regard to the Morley and Miller experiment, even the atmosphere
constructs from onta encapsulated in Aether. 1he unexpected result of measuring Aether movement with an interferometer was that while Aether units are independent of each other and are extremelywilingl to move, they are also individualyl extremelydense and behave like a solid. Therefore, since even the windiest atmosphere has relatively low intermolecular speeds, the Aether behaves as a solid clump within it. As far as the light beam traveling through it is concerned, there is practically no Aether movement. However, as matter becomes less dense, so does the density of the Aether, thus less dense matter will have a greater proportion of background Aether drifting through it than will dense matter.
Since Aether units can move independently of each other, the Aether fabric across the Universe is not absolute. However, because of the independent and fluid nature of Aether units, clumps of Aether can form
isolated regions of more or less absolute space-time. This must be true
since space-time bends around massive bodies and allows for the observed lensing of light. Moreover, with this understanding, the Michelson-Morley, and Morley-Miller Aether experiments were a success, because they provided evidence that Aether units move with physical matter (the basement and air molecules). 1he experiments were also a success in that theydidshow an Aether drift, even though it was of a lower magnitude than anticipated.

Aether Unit
In the Aether Physics Model, the Aether has a quantum unit dimensionally
equal to a 2-spin rotating magnetic field (rmfd ). The rotating magnetic
field appears to be manifested by the Gforce and appears to be the "container" in which ontaexistin space-resonance.

The value and dimensions of rmfd are:

sec ·coul rmfd = 1.419xl012

kg · m3

2

2

(4. 1)

It is due to the nature of Aether, which allows onlyone onnperspin position,

that one onn cannot pass through another, fashioning the appearance of

"solid marrre ." Moreover, it is due to the multiple Aether units that they

eventuallyproduce cubic and other forms, which translate as solid matter (this is further discussed on page 262).

In the Aether unit, there are only two possible spin positions for normal, stable matter. There are two other spin positions for anti-matter, but the matter and anti-maner cannot exist near each other, because opposite spins with the same mass tend to collide with each other. There are two dimensions of length on the cardioid spin positions, and there is one
Oxford UnivmityPress, 1982) 113.
63

SECRETS O F T H E A E T H E R
dimension of length between the Aether units. These three dimensions
of length all intersect at right angles from each other, just like the three
dimensions of length in a Gmesian coordinate.

The double cardioid geomeuy represents the shapes produced by the non­
material Aether unit. The onlytime there are literallytwo cardioid objects adjacent to each other is when two onta are bound to each other, or
when a photon fonns.

The rmfd constant fulfills the same function for strong charge that
Coulomb's constant filsl for electrostatic charge and Newton's constant
fulfills for mass. The rmfd unit would name the "constant of
proportionality" for the strong force law, if we were to use the same method of ignoring non-material physical structure as the Standard
Model.

Since the mass to strong charge ratio is the same for all onta and for the
Aether, the rmfd unit is the same when expressed in tenns of the
proton and neutron and Aether, as well as the electron.

e ' rmfd = m, . A,c' . F,' Aether a

epmax, rmfd

m p

.

,1,C3

·

Fq '

Proton

en<EFBFBD>, rmfd mn . ;tC3 · Fq' Neutron
The value of rmfd is "magickal" in many ways. It is equal to Coulomb's

constant times 1 6n' .

(4.2) (4.3) (4.4)

rmfd = 1 6n' . kc
The dimensions of rmfd are equal to magnetic field times frequency; thus providing evidence that the unit of rmfd is indeed a rotaring magnetic
field

(4.5)

rmfd = mfld . freq Like energy; rmfd is a common unit from which many other units convert.

(4.6)

Rmfd equals photon per strong charge. This is the manifestation of rotaring
magnetic field occurngir in the Hutchison effect. High-energy photons (microwaves) bombatd electrons (strong charge) and produce a rotating
magnetic field
84

AETHER

rmfd

=

phtn chrg

(4.7)

Rmfd equals magnetic flux times velocity. This is the manifestation of
rotating magnetic field found in electric motors. The static magnetic flux associated with a fixed magnet or electromagnet spins mechanically at a velocity.

rmfd = mflx . velc

(4.8)

Rmfd equal potential times length. This manifestation of rotating magnetic
field appears in the streamers of high potential discharges, such as in Tesla coils. The rotating magnetic field causes helices in the streamer.

rmfd = potn ·leng

(4.9)

Rmfd equal surface tension per charge density. This manifestation of
rotating magnetic field appears in Chukanov's spheres".

rmfd

=

sten chgd

Some of the greatest advances in technology are yet to materialize, and will utilize the rotating magnetic field in one form or another. NIkola Tesla
already gave us one form of this rotating magnetic field technology with his polyphase AC motor. We can easily see just how significant the polyphase ACmotorhas been in transforming civilization.

(4. 1 0 )

John Hutchison srumbled upon the manifestation of the rotating magnetic
field, which bears his name, the Hutchison effect. The Hutchison effect can cause heavy objects of any material to accelerate away from the Earth, can cause metals to "melt" without getting hot, and cause dissimilar materials such as aluminum and wood to fuse without chemically changing.

There are likely many medical advances waiting for discovery with the rotating magnetic field ofAetheras well.

Spin structure
Onta get their spin from the oscillating nature of time. It is common to
think of time as the "normal" dimension, and frequency as the reciprocal
of time, but it is the other way around Tune is really a frequency that
oscilsaelt one quantum moment toward the future and one quantum moment toward the past.
However, phy.;ical matter only moves forward in time, with the effect that

67 OlUkanov Energyhttp;/Iww.wchukanovenergy.comlindex.htm 65

S E C R E T S OF T H E A E T H E R
physical matet r acts like a time diode and presents a version of time
similar to rectified AC curer nt. We see half-spin onta from the perspective of half-spin onta, and thus the illusion of forward, linear time_ In reality, time pulses and causes physical existence to take on the nature of frames, like frames of a movie_
The spin snucture has spin like a top, but in time it also has spin like a corkscrew. As a stable onn traces its spin position in the Aether unit, it moves forward in time and appears to rotate. After the onn advances through forward time, it reverses toward negative time. Negative time is a completelydifferent time direction which onta cannot see. As far as the existence of physical matet r goes, the two time directions are mutually exclusive of each other. However, as far as the Aether and Gforce go, there is no net forward or backward direction of time, there is only the present. Lineartime is strictlya phenomenon experienced bymatter.
An exact understanding of Aether spin is not yet complete. In the images of
Aether units presented in this book, the endpoints of the loxodromes go
through the poles of the spheres. However, the electron and proton g­ factors suggest that the endpoints may offset from the poles when moving through Aether units. The possibility that the time dimension may be egg shaped due to the charged spheres anracting each other also needs investigation.
Fortunately; good documentation of the half-spin nature of onta exists in the scientific literature even though the precise geometty of the Aether does
not. This allows us to further our understanding of the spin of the
Aether.

Aether Dipoles
r 'Snn5IES in recent years of the dielectric properties of gases

and electrolytes show that electrical forces and inductions in

such media depend upon the polarized ions or "dipoles" of

the medium Whynot extend the same concepts to electrical

forces and inductions across a vacuum, that is, through the

ether? We must then conceive of the etheras a mediumwith

! a snucture, that is, with "ether dipoles." By such a concept,

. we would obtain an explanation of "electric forces acting at a

distance," something that has been vety vague, or lacking,

since the discard of the Maxwell ether displacement theoty of

electric charges and electric forces. The discovety of the

electron disproved the ether displacement theory of electric

charges, but it did not remove (for many physicists) the need

of the ether concept in explaining electric waves, whether

luminous or non-luminous. The actual structure of the ether

will be a speculative problem until expetiments have given us

, more facts in ether physics; but in view of the above, we can

1.

1t;hi1n<31>k uof,t:h!e.<2E>

ether as having an "ether dipoles."" -

indefinitely large number of

<EFBFBD> Albert P.

I
I<EFBFBD>' _ _ _ _ _ <20>

" Albert P. Canna, Sdem; New Series, VoL 71, No. 1834(Feb. 21, 1930), 214-215.
ee

AETHER
As shown in the image on the next page, the quantum Aether unit models as a dipole structure. Not only does the Aether unit have an electrostatic dipole, but the Aether encapsulated onta also has an electromagnetic dipole as well. Just as Albert Canna envisioned, the Aether fabric can visualize as an indefinitelylarge numberof quantum Aetherdipoles.
Aether Stl1lctures As we look into atomic structure, it becomes apparent that Linus Pauling's
spheron model" accurately describes the fill pattern of atomic nuclei. The fill pattern rests on a peculiar system of half-spin numbers. As it
turns out, this system of half-spin numbers is the actual "numbering
system" used bythe Aether.
How can there be a half-spin numbering system in the Aether? Because human senses perceive that one onn occupies one unit of space-time. However, onta cannot fill an entire Aether unit, which leaves three spin positions unaccounted for. The Aether unit divides into four portions
of spin positions in forward time. Of these four
spin positions, onlytwo occur in left hand spin, meaning there are only two possibilities for stable matter, the electron, and proton. Each spin position has exactlyhalf-spin.
It is the half-spin onn per Aether unit, which distorts physical structures relative to Aether structures. This distortion is apparent wherever Aether interacts directly with onta. The logarithmic scale is a direct result of the interaction between half-spin onn and Aether (although one-spin photons also cause a distortion with regard to Aether).
The left hand spin characteristic of stable onta supports Tsung Dao Lee and Chen Nmg Yang's violation of paritytheOlY ". The left-hand-only spin characteristic of onta appears when free electrons eject during beta decay or when stteaming as free electrons in a current. In electrostatic binding or strong charge binding, the onta are moving toward each other and spinign in opposite directions and so exhibit both left hand and right hand spins.
The Aether further evidences a preferred spin direction as obsetved in the asymrnettyof matter/anti-matter existence. Nature does prefer matterto anti-matte!"'o, at least in our pat! of the Universe. The Aether Physics :Model attributes this apparent preference to the gravity repulsion effect
" Linus Pauling, S<> NewSerk<, va: 150, Na 3694. (Oct. 15, 1965), pp. 297-305.
70 "'The experimental work of Val 1. Fitch and James W. Cronin in 1964 demonstrated an asymmeny in matter!antimatter reactions that may explain why the universe is composed mostly of matter. For their discoveI}', theyshared the 1980 Nobel Prize in Physics. " "Antiparticle," The ColumbiaEncjl;lopedja 6th ed.

SECRETS OF THE AETHER
of matter to anti-matter. Matter and anti-matter collide and produce photons when they encounter each other, but they gravitationally repel
each other at a distance. The gravitatoi nal repelling effect is the antithesis of gravitatoi nal atoctria n. Since matrte in our part of the Universe
happens to be left-hand spin, and since for practical reasons there is no anti-matet r within atoms or molecules, for purposes of quantifying
material structure the Aether essentiallyis a two-spin-position unit.

The proton spin position is equal to half the Aether unit, plus \h spin for the proton spin position itself. The electron spin position is equal to half the
Aether unit, minus \h spin.

y + ! = proton spin position
2 2
x---1 = eIectron Spi. ll posi.tI.On
2 2
Andsince the Aether units are polar aligned (negative is attracted to positive), the electron spin position could just as easily be thought of as half the
Aether unit, plus 3/2-spin:

(4. 1 1) (4. 1 2)

x-2 +

-3
2

=

e I ectron

Spi.ll

posl. u. on

Electron Spin Positions

(4. 1 3)

x 1 2 2

+, 3

-

-

2 2

In the above image, the electron spin poslnon represents by the blue
loxodrome and the proton spin position is the red loxodrome. In either
case, the electron and proton spin positions provide the only possibilities for real matter to manifest in our part of the Universe.

Since the electron and proton spin positions are part of the spheres of
Aether, and since the Aether constant is equal to 1 6,.' (4,. · 4,.) , which
implies the two spin positions are orthogonal to each other, we can assume that the proton and electron spin positions are also orthogonal to
each other. The arar y determines the full range of spin positions available to a given number of Aether units.

88

AETHER

G(x,y)

x+ 1 Y - 1
: = - 2- · - 2-

(4.14)

In the above equation, x and y are integers representing the total number of proton and electron spin positions available for a given structure as
viewed from the macro world

Using the G-eateMesh function of MathCAD, the Aether numbers can be surface plotted When first investigating Aether numbers, we
arbitrarily assumed a fixed mesh of 80 x 80. We also assumed a complete
(t) h cycle of data would be half the odd whole number times 7r •

h := 63

mesh := 80

G(x,y)

:=

x+ l y- \
_ .-

2

2

h t := -·n
2

S := CreateMesb(G,-t,t,-t,t,mesh,mesh,cy12xyz)

Aether Number Surface Plot S

We have since found the above assumptions were incomplete. In nature, the

mesh is infinite, being a perlectly curved surface. Also, at the quantum

level there are five dimensions of space-resonance, rather than our four

dimensional macro perspective of space-time. WIth the discovery of the

electron binding energy equation for ground state electrons, the number

.Jx' of

Aether

.
UIltl s

m .

fI' ve

dimensl'Ons

empm. .calyl m. duces

as

+1

2

reinforcing the notion that Aether suuctures have a spital nature to them.

It remains to mathematicallyprove this hypothesis.

Notice in the above image the shallow image (red) is 1800 out of sync with
the deeper half of the image (blue). The shallow half of the image
appears to represent the forward time portion of the Aether structure and
the deeper half the backward time portion.

Let us change the function of G to reflect Aether suuctures indicated by the
variable 1s orbital electron radii in the electron binding energyequation;

89

SECRETS OF THE AETHER

<EFBFBD>-l

G(x, y)

=

2
<EFBFBD>+1

2

We will also change the mesh to be proponional to h by a factor of ten. 1his eliminates the distracting anifactS of different shapes caused by different proponions of h to the mesh. (Although different meshes may
not apply to the quantum level, they may still have relevance to macro
structures.) Consequently, we now see a nearly curved structure, which
we imagine as perfectlycurved Because the mesh is now proponional to
h , all generated images will showthe same proponion of "nearlycurved"
structure.

(4.15)

l!,.:= 63

mesh := h·l0

Sl := Creat.eMesh(G,-t.,1.,-t..1.,mesh,mesh, cy12xyz)

C lindrical Coordinates
31
In the preceding two views of the Aether structures, we are looking down the time axis (z axis) of the Aether units. In the former view on the preceding page, the forward time ponion is discordant with the backward time ponion. In the latet r view above, which modifies according to the electron binding energy equation, the two views are coordinated, which is
whythe blue image is not visible.
We can now view graphical representations of the ground state electron in
each atom We will also change our perception from four dimensions to
five dimensions so we can see more detail of how quantum structurse operate. Keep in mind that the pictures shown here are only static, twcr
70

AETHER
dimensional representations of a dynamic, five-dimensional structure.
Electron Ground State Graphical Representations
40 V.".

50
View

1 . Hydrogen

2 · Helium

3 · Lithium

.4 Beryllium

-5 Boron

•
6 · Carbon

As the ground state electron structure grows in complexity, its proportion of
minor radius to major radius spirals inward.

Whereas the mesh for quantum structurse is infinitely smooth, that is not the
case for macro structures. As atoms bind to produce molecules, and
molecules bind to produce structurse of greater complexity, the mesh
becomes grainer. 1he patterns formed for a particular granulation will
differ from others. 1he coarseness of the granulatoi n is likely variable
according to size, mass density, temperature, pressure, and other
considerarions.

Granular Aether Structures Our original investigation conducts as a general exploration of Aether
structures for a mesh of 80 x 80. We provide this earlier view to show
the general direction a more detailed analysis of macro Aether structure might follow.
starting from a very simple data set, assume there is a space-resonance cluster
containing 1t: number of Aether units. We produce a contour graph of the spin positions in the Gtrtesian coordinate system To see what the
contour actualyl looks like we can examine this graphic, which represents
the function of G ( x, y ) from three different angles within five­ dimensional existence. This characteristic of the Aether demonstrates its <20>.

A

G 71

SECRETS O F THE AETHER

Image A is a view of the contour plot directly down the Z-axis (linear time

axis) and looking at the X and Y-axis in a Cartesian coordinate system

Image B is from a different perspective in the same coordinate system

0aned<EFBFBD> showsdatthaatsetht eapcpoenatroiunrgpalsotaicsuar3veDfrimomagae

overtime. Image C shows position orthogonal to the

ttme axIS.

This representative view of the data demonstrates the orthogonality of the
Aether. In other instances, the Aether appears to be electromagnetic from one view and mechanical from a different view. The Aether appears angular from one view and curved from another view. This is
what we mean when we saythe Aetherhas orthogonality.

Applying a range of -7r to 7r to equation (4.14), the following contour data
generates in the Cartesian coordinate system (it is the same as the image
above).

X ·1.51

1.51 3.14

Using the same equation, but applying it to a C}£ndrical coordinate system, the data appears as a spiral cone.

Now we will present the abcve image with a color map scheme so it will be easier to visualize the data. The bluer colors are deep and the redder colors are shallow. The deep blue represents an earlier time than the shallow red
>-
72

AETHER

In

the

image

below,

the

range

is

increased

from

1( to

<EFBFBD>1( .
2

In the

cylindrical coordinate system, each full cycle of revolurion is equal to 21( .

By choosing the negative and posirive values for a given range, we are
essentiallyusing twice the range. Thus bykeeping units in mulriples of 1(

we alway.; have a full cycle (27<) of data. Similarly, since we are viewing

x the Aether structurse in the fonn of ± 1 it is necessary for the
2 numeratorto be an oddinteger if we are to get a whole cycle of data

The angle of the image above does not change from the previous images and

neither has the view angle of the few succeeding images (all images view

looking down the Z-axis). The image below represents a range from

--1 9 1( to +-19 1( •

2

2

The appearance of the flower pattern is interesring, but is not the object of

this m· vesu.gan.on. Chang'mg the range from --3 1 1( to +-3 1 1( , the

2

2

geometrycompletelychanges while maintaining a similar order.

Now we begin to see the importance of our invesrigarion of Aether

structures. Although these images are number generated, they base on

the prop0rUon of Aether to half-spin onta For the next image, the range

.
lS

set

for

--53 1(

to

+-53 1( .

2

2

73

SECRETS OF THE AETHER

Six polygonal shapes are generated as Aether structures, ranging from 3-sided
to 8-sided polygons. There are also a number of star shapes varying from 5 points to 13 points and more. The range of the following image was

sedor

-

73
-

J!"

to

+-73 J!"

.

2

2

In all of the cylindrical coordinate images presented here, the red-orange colors represent a georneuyfacing the forward time direction, while there
is also a similar but slightly different shape facing the backward time
direction. The blue colors are the backside of the red shape. This 13point star is just one of many stars generated in this sequence of Aether structures, including near perfect 5 and 7 point stars.

The shapes do not morph ceaselessly, however. Just as musical tones
continually repeat as harmonics in logarithmically increasing octaves, the

Aether shapes also repeat themselves, albeit in a miror red type of

manen r.

For the

range 0f

- - 1 57 J!"

to

+

1 57
-

J!"

this

.
unage

appears:

2

2

However,

the

next

.
unage

i. ll

the

sequence

forthe

range

-- 159 J!"

to

+

1 59
-

J!"

2

2

74

miror rs the above image.

AETHER

From here, the images repeat themselves. Forexample, the image

determined

by the

range

for

53 2

1/:

is

replicated

in the

range

of

_

lOS 2

1/:

to

+- 1 025 1/: .

The range forthe next replication of the triangle is twice the previous triangle range base plus the current range base:

2 · 53 +105 =211

So

the

next

range

that

will

produce

the

ttiangle

would

be

21 2

1

1/:

.

(4. 16)

Going backto

the two

consecutive

images that

miror r each other,

1 57 2

1/:

and

1

59 2

1/:

,

the

image

in

between

must

represent

the

"maximum"

of the

overall image cycle. This is the point where the progression of the images

reverses itself.

The

image

for the

exact

range

of

-

1

58 2

1/:

to

+

1

58 2

1/:

takes

on

a

completelydifef rent

form

than

the

slightest

depatreut

from - 1528 1/: .

75

SECRETS OF THE AETHER

The above image is a very precise crossing point, providing evidence for the
realiry of the Aether structures. In other words, the hther structures presented here are not a fantasy of numerology and pictures; this
presentation represents a very real geornenical cycle of half-spin onn and
hther units.

As it turns out, the value 158 is veryclose to the hther geomenical constant

of 16n' (157.914). The surlace plot for the range using 1 6n' instead of

1 58 ,

-- 1 6n- ' n

to

+- 1 6n-' n

,

.
IS

shown below:

2

2

The above image views from the same angle as the previous image. Another view made by rotating the 16n' data presents the image in the shape of
an e<>.
The e<> is a fining symbol for the 16n' Aether geomenical constant, which is already associated with the dynamic and living hther unit. As a side
note, the ancient Egyptians and modem Freemasons use the "all-seeing e<>" as a symbol for God. In fact, the all-seeing e<> appears on every American dollar bill, over a pyramid
Just forfancy, the hther numbers applied to the spherical coro dinate system can produce reflecting pyramids, too. The image below is produced in the sphen·cal coordinate systemWI·th the range base 0f 41 · 105 n : 2
78

AETHER

When 16Jr2 is applied to the surface plot, it gives a slighdy different value than when 1 5 8 is applied The ratio of the Aether half-spin value to the
Aether constant value is the offset.

- 1528 Jr

16Jr2 2 --

Jr

1.00055

We see an offset wherever the Aether interfaces with half-spin onta. For example, the offset of the onta with regard to the Aether is the onn g­ factor. The offset of the Aether-based Pythagorean scale of music and
the physical tempered scale of music is the tempered semitone71_ Undoubtedly, there are other examples.

(4.1 7)

Whether or not there is a direct relationship, it is interesting to note that the Aether structure offset is approximately equal to the square root of half
the electron g-factor.

<EFBFBD><EFBFBD> <20> = 1.00056
where Phi is the Golden Ratio and the g-factor equation is that of the
AetherPhysics Model (page 166).

(4. 18)

Just as octaves increase logarithmically in the tempered music scale, the
Aether structures also increase logarithmically, further establishing the

realityof the structurse . In the Aether structure series, 1 5 8 Jr is an exact
2

"octave."

Each successive "octave" calculates by the fonnula

Y

·1 2

58

Jr

where x is the number of octaves ascending from the base octave of zero.

(The word "octave" does not truly applyto Aether structures since there

are more than 8 "whole tones" in each octave; here it indicates a

complete set of steps within a cycle). To illustrate that each octave of

- 2X..·21,.5--8 Jr produces the same u. nage, see the random octaves below:

71 Backus, John The AcoU'itica1 FoundatiOn<> of Music- Musical Sound:itspmperries production.behavior andreproduction (NewYork. W.W. Norton & Company. Inc., 1977) 147
77

SECRETS OF THE AETHER

211 .158
1l ---

The

many

ill

But

within these forms we see patterns. Flowers tend to have petal or spike

patterns, as seen in the above graphics. Flowers even seem to reflect the

Fibonacci sequence, which is also a manifestation of Aether numbers.

Seashells and other exoskeletal creatures tend to have the shapes found in

Aether structures when applied to the spherical coordinate system The

bell pepper, seeds, and numerous other shapes model after Aether

structures in the spherical coordinate system So the world of seemingly

infinite form is really a symphony of shape, repeating at various octaves,

sometimes harmoniously, and sometimes not.

These forms originate in the independent nature of Aether units. After
examining Aether units with respect to half-spin onta, it is very easy to
see how the ph<70>ical Universe can have so much variety in all its forms.
Yet it is quite rernaJ:kable that all the variations of forms that we see arise
from just two discrete onta, the electron and proton, and their relationship to the Aether.

Below is a table showing the progression of the square root of Aether numbers. Notice the product of the proton and electron spin position numbers equal an even interval of \4. The curvature of Aether implies
that the "quarter phases" refer to a C}cie. The implication is that a full
C}cie consists of 5 Aether units. It is likely that there is a trigonometric
connection to the Aether numbers. Notice that zero has a real place in this progressioIL

x-

,[x + l
2

.

,[x - l <20>
2

,[x + l ,[x - l

2

2

l

I

0

0

0

2

1 .207

0.207

0..25

3

1 .366

0.366

0.5

4

1.5

0.5

0.75

5

1.618

0.618

6

1 .725

0.725

1.25

7

1 .823

0.82.3

1.5

8

1 91 4

0.914

9

2

I

1.75 2

10

2.081

1.081

2.25

II

2.158

1.158

2.5

12

2.232

1.2.32

2.75

13

2.303

I.E

3

14

2.371

1.371

3.25

15

2.436

1 . 436

3.5

78

AETHER
The electron and proton spin positions, which determine the structure of the physical world, have both a Phi and a phi component. We could think of these components as square roots, but theyare square roto s withinthe Aether structure. Both Phi and phi are series numbers and generate bythe formulas:

J;+ 1 Phi 2

(4.19)

- J;- - 1 = phI. 2

(4.20)

Golden Ratio
In equations (4.19) and (4.20), the variable x denotes as the sequence number of Aetherunits. It is here that we learn fromthe Aethersomething very tel.glin When five Aether units make up a cycle, Phi is the Golden Ratio and phi its inverse.

.J5 +1 = 1.61803398874989 2

(4.21)

.J5 -1 = 0.61803398874989 2

(4.22)

Whereastheproduct of Phi and phi givethephase ofthe cycle, the sumof Phi and phi give the square roto of the sequence. This explains why Phi and phi show up continually in the physical world, wherever
growth occurs and living forms appear. Growth occurs in cycles, and therefore we wouldexpectthe cycles to reflecttheFibonacci sequence.

There are many good sources of information about the Fibonacci sequence and its appearance in living and growing systems. If the reader is not familiar with the Fibonacci sequence, Internet web sites can give an introduction. A good place to start is
http://www.goldennumber.netl
and Ron Knott's web site.
http://www.mcs.surrye.ac.uklPersona1/RKnottiFibonacciifib.html

TI:-e Gd?dnRatia TI:-eStory {Phi, TI:-e Worlds MatAstilhsl irf,NureribyMario Livio is also a good read.

Pythagorean Concepts
The Aether numbers also determine harmony in music. Pythagoras gets credit for developing a scale of tones still known as the Pythagorean scalen. However, other sources indicate the Pythagorean scale mayhave
72 Backus, 101m The Acoustical Foundations of Music{New York - London, W.W. Norton & Cbmpany,
79

SECRETS OF THE AETH E R
originated much earlier. little information about Pythagoras exists, but there are accounts that he either learned directly from the Egyptians or else from the students of Thales. Thales himself learned geometry from
the Egyptians.

...ft"_ "I! __
Beginnig with the discovery that the relationship betwene musical notes could be expressed in numerical ratios, the
I Pythagoreans elaborated a theory of numbers, the exact
meaning of which is stiJl disputed by scholars. Briefly, they

taught that all things were numbers, meaning that the essence of things was number, and that all relationships - even
abstract ethical concepts like justice - could be expressed
munerically. They held that numbers set a limit to the

unlimited - thus foreshadowing the distinction between

form and marter that plays a keyrole in all later philosophY".

,.., '1,

' .!l."._ . _

.- __ """

,..'. -=<3D>

There are many today who believe that mathematics is only a language, and

that mathematics of itself does not reflect reality. With regard to calculus, they are probably correct. Electrons and protons are primary angular momentum and the basis of all physical marter, but the spin positions taken by this primary angular momentum are purely numerical Thus, it
issppmopssoibsi.l<>Uofno.r a physical entity to have a numerical representation via its

Using the onta spin positions of the Aether, a relationship of hannonic notes
emerges. From this relationship, it is possible to calculate the next note
up or down the musical scale relative to a reference frequency.

The basis of the formula is the musical fifth, as taught by Pythagm<ls. If we
take a guitar string and place a bridge at the middle, the string on both sides of the bridge produces the same note. This is unison and its ratio is

1:1.

When we place the bridge so that the ratio is..!. , the two resulting
2

notes are one octave apart. The next division of the string is the ratio <20> .
2
In this case the notes produced, one on either side of the bridge, are a

fifth apart from each other. The fifth, having a ratio of <20> becomes a
2 constant, which produces each succeeding fifth.

Let us asesmu we wish to find the fifth to a note, which we will specify as C at the frequency of523.25Hz . C can be expressed in terms of fifths as,

o 3· 2

x

5

23 . 2 5 Hz

,

which

equals

l x 523 .25Hz

or523 .25Hz

.

To calculate

1977) 138
7J "Pythagoras /' The Columbia En<<3C>ydQpedia , 6th ed.
80

AETHER
: <20> the fifth to C, which is G, we multiply32 X 2 X523.25Hz . When
multiplying exponentials we add the exponents, and so the formula becomesQ23:°j+T1 x523.25Hz or784.88Hz .

To calculate the value of the second fifth above C we follow the same

procedure, except that we multiplyby .2!. in orderto acquire the value of

the D that is in the same octave as the initial C Hence

o23° Xi231 xi231 xi21 x523.25Hz whi.ch

.
IS

the

same

as

-23'3 x523.25Hz or

588.66Hz . Using the above method, computation of ratios for each

note relative to C result:

C C# D D# E F F# G G# A A# B

3° 20

231'1

-32''

- 3- 9 i4

- 324- '

2311'1

3' 29

-3211

38 - i2

33 24

310 - i'

-23''

When we give our starting point a variable instead of the note C, a simple
equation results for calculating the frequency (F) of anynote relative to
anotherfrequency (K) , where n is equal to anyinteger representing the
numberof notes to increase or decrease fromthe reference frequency:

F = K- 3"']
r2 2"'-
It is easy to see that octaves increase logarithmically, just as do the Aether numbers of form. Figuring for the frequency of 440Hz , the succeeding
octaves are equal to n = 1 2 , n = 24 , n = 36 , etc.. The resulting
frequencies are 880Hz , 1 759.67Hz , and351 8.02Hz . The calculations are not exact due to the rounding of exponentials.

(4.23)

II Pythagornea Triples
A Pythag<61><67><EFBFBD> triple is a triple of positiv<69> intt;gersaa <20> b , and
c such that a right triangle exists with legs a ,b , and hypotenuse c . By the Pythagorean Theorem, this is equivalent to finding positive integers a , b , and c satisfying
a2 + b2 = c2 74
When I was a student in high school, mymath teacher, Mrs. Connie Kimbal,l gave a lecture on calculating Pythagorean triples. The method she
74 Eric W . Weisstein. "Pythagorean Triple." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource.
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/pythagoreanTriple.html
81

SECRETS OF THE AETHER
described on the blackboard was long and tonuous. Almost immediately;
I recognized a pattern in the table of Pythagorean triples that she had
wriuen, and I statedt wolking on a different equation than the one she
was showing.

Recognizing that I was busy in my own world while she was lecturing, she curtly called me, as teachers do when they think someone is not paying attention. She asked if I could explain what she had just said I told her I could not, but that I had found a new equation for generating Pythagorean triples that was far simpler than what she was teaching.

Seizing on the moment to teach me a lesson, she called me to the front of the
class to give a demonstration of my equation. When I finished my brief
presentation, she was quite impressed She asked me to stay after school
and help her see if such an equation could be found in the professional
literature. After a couple of days, we found that Joe Roberts from the Massachuserts Institute of Technology had published the same equation
in a mathematics journal just 9 months earlier. It was at this time that I
realized there was much left to be discovered in the worlds of math and
sCience.

Here is the equation I had discovered for Pythagorean triples during class that day. For any integer a , the other two values b and c are:

b = -a' --1
2 2
c = -a' +-1
2 2
A table of Pythagorean triples then generates:

(4.24)

.=
2 3 4 5 6 7 8

.2 1
- -- =
2 2 1 .5 4 7.5 12
17.5 24
31.5

- .2 + -1 = 2 2 2.5 5 8.5 13 1 8.5 25 32.5

Pythagorean triples cannot have fractions, so for all values of "a" that are
even, two multiplies the full set. The resulting table then appears as:

82

AETHER
The relevance of Pythagorean triples to the Aether numbers is the form of
the equation. The equations for b and c express as in the table below.

a

b

c

4

3

5

3

4

5

8

15

17

5

12

13

12

35

37

7

24

25

16

63

65

9

40

41

20

99

101

11

60

61

24

143

145

13

84

85

evaluation in this light.

In (425), the value a is the integer value of the Aether numbers, and the values
b and c are the half-spin onn values
based on the square of a . Therefore, in adnodit to the Golden Ratio and growth cycles, it appears we also find the origin of the Pythagorean triples in the Aether.
Certainly, the forms of living and growing things represent numerically whether or not "ethical concepts like justice" do. The Aether Phy.;ics Model is
consistent with the work of
Pythagoras, which itself merits a re-

b =- a2 - -1 2
c = a2 + 1 -2
stmcture ofAtomic Nuclei The Aether detennines the structures of atoms. That is, the structure of the
Aetherbecomes the structure ofthe onta, andtherefore ofthe atoms.

(4.25)

There is a pattern to the development of the nucleus, just as there is a pattern to the development of the electron orbital structure. Wolfgang Pauli discovered that no two onta, in either the nucleus or the electron orbital structure, share the same placements in atomic structure7S. The Aether
Phy.;ics Model is in full agreement with the Pauli Exclusion Principle.

Similar to the electron orbital structure, the nucleus follo"WS a pattern in shell structure. The structure of the nucleus appears to be due to the structure
of the Aether. Linus Pauling deduced that in addition to the orbital shells having the magic numbers of 2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, and 126, the nucleus builds into three spherons.

7S EXCLUSION PRINGPLE - phy.;ical principle enunciated by Wolfgang Pauli in 1925 stating that no two electrons in an atom can occupy the same energy State simultaneously. The energy StateS, or levels, in an atom are described in the quantum theolY by various values of four different quantum numbers; the exclusion principle holds that no two electrons can have the same four quanrum nwnbers in an atom. One of these quantum numbers describes one of the two possible directions for the electron's intrinsic spin. k a result of the exclusion principle, two electrons that are in the same energylevel as described bythe other three quantum numbers are difef rentiated from each other because theyhave opposite spins. This principle applies not only to atoms but to other systems containing particles as well, and it applies not only to electrons but also to a large class ofparticles colleccivelyknown as fennions. "Exclusion Principle ," TheColwnbia EnQ'Clopedia
83

SECRETS OF THE AETHER
Pauling called these three spherons the "mantle," "core or outer core," and "inner core." Each spheron has the same pattern for filngil with protons
and neutrons. In the Aether Physics Model, the protons bind with
protons and the neutrons bind with neutrons. Both protons and neutrons follow the magic number sequence. Both proton and neutron structures followthe same panern Jet remain separate structurse .
This means, for example, that in the first spheron and its frrst shell there can
be up to 2 protons and 2 neutrons. Atoms produce the largest "binding
energies" after filglin both the proton and neutron portions of the spheron.

Following Pauling's patet rn of nucleus development, the next magic number
in the sequence is 184. Just before the element 184 creates, a fourth
spheron occurs in the center of the atomic nucleus begingni with
elements 167 or 168. Therefore, the complete sequence of magic numbers is 2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, 126, and 184.
Below is a table of Pauling's spheron configurations forthe magic numbers.

Magic Number
2 8 20 50 82 126

(})re or

Mantle

Outer (})re

152

ls2 1P'

2s2 1p' ldlO 1£14

152

2s22P' 1dlO 1f14 (1g9/2)10

ls2 1P'

3s22P'2d10 1£14 1g18 (lh ll/2)12

2s2 1P'ldlO

352 3p62dlO2f141g18 1"" (li 13/2)1. 252 2p61d10 1£1' Nucleon ConfIgUTaUODS for the Magic Numbers fromPrinciples ofRadioisotope Methodology1967 p.4,4
byGrafton D. O!ase andJoseph L RabinOwlzl

Inner (})re
152 ls2 1p"

The values from Pauling's charts layout byspheron and shell number. In the
chart below, Pauling's chart expands to include the magic number 28 and an additional magic number, 184.

C h a rt A - Pa u l i ng's N u cleon Configu rations

2 2

Mantle

Core or Outer Core

Inner Core etr

82 6

20 2 6 10

2

28 2 6 10 8

2

5C 2 6 10 14 10

2 6

8, 2 6 10 14 18 12

2 6 10

2

12E 2 6 1 0 14 18 22 14

2 6 10 14

2 6

184 2 6 1 0 14 18 22 26 16 2 6 10 14 18 2 6 10 2

Shell # 1 2 3

4

5 6

7 812 3

4

5 12 3 1

PauEngs<EFBFBD> NucleontCoomncfliugduer" acnoi s"fort", 2h8eaMnadgi1c84N.umbeos

Below, chart B shows the spin associated with each spheron and shelL

Beyond shell one there are two "halves" to each shell, which are

designated a and b . The spin changes for each half shell. The panem

84

AETHER

begins with <20> spin in shell one of the Mantle. We add to shell two,
2

i spin in shell 2a and <20> spin in she1l 2b. The third sequence continues

2

2

with <20> spin in shell 3a, then <20> spin in the Outer Core shell 1, and then

2

2

i spin in the Mantle at 3b. The fourth sequence has added, 7.. spin in

2

2

Mantle shell 4a.

Then

in

the

fifth,

i spin
2

adds

to

the

Outer

Core

shell

2a, <20> spin in Mantle shell 4b, <20> spin Outer Core 2b, and 2. spin is added

2

2

2

to Sa.

The sixth sequence expands with

7.. spin in Mantle shell Sb,
2

-3

spm"

m

Outer

Core

3b,

l - spm"

m r nner

Core

l ,

and

- l l spm"

m

Mantle

2

2

2

shell 6a. The remaining additions follow the same pattern.

2 1/2

Chart B - Soin oer S )hero n Su bshell

Mantle

Core or Outer Core

Inner Core ct

8 1/2 3/2 1/2

20 1/2 3/2 1/2 5/2 3/2

1/2

2 1/2 3/2 1/2 5/2 3/2 7/2

1/2

5 1/2 3/2 1/2 5/2 3/2 7/2 5/2 9/2
I 1/2 3/2 1/2 5/2 3/2 7/2 5/2 9/2 7/2 11/2 82
12 1/2 3/2 1/2 5/2 3/2 7/2 5/2 9/2 7/2 11/2 9/2 13/2

1/2 3/2 1/2 1/2 3/2 1/2 5/2 3/2 1/2 3/2 1/2 5/2 3/2 7/2 5/2

1/2 1/23/21/2

184 112 3/2 112 512 3/2 7/2 5/2 912 712 1112 912 13/2 1112 15/2 1/2 3/2 1/2 5/2 3/2 712 512 912 7121123/2112 512 312 112

Shell # 8 2a 2b 3a 3b 4a 4b Sa Sb sa 6b 7a 7b 8 1 2a 2b 3a 3b 4a 4b Sa Sb 1 2a 2b 3a 3b 1

Chart C - N ucleus Fil l Sequence

IJ Mantle 2 3 4 6 7 9 1 1 13 16 17 22

23

29

Core or Outer Core 5 8 10 12 14 18 19

24

25

15

Inner Core 20 2 1 26

27

Ctc 28

Shell# 1 2a 2b 3a 3b 4a 4b Sa 5b 6a 6b 7a 7b 8 1 2a 2b 3a 3b 4a 4b Sa 5b 1 2a 2b 3a 3b 1

Chart D - N ucleons per Spheron S h e l l

Mantle

Core or Outer Core

Inner Core

Ctc

184 2 4 2 5 4 8 6 10 8 12 10 14 12 16 2 4 2 6 4 8 6 10 8 2 4 2 6 4 2 Shell # 1 2a 2b 3a 3b 4a 4b Sa 5b 5a 6b 7a 7b 8 1 2a 2b 3a 3b 4a 4b Sa 5b 1 2a 2b 3a 3b 1

C h a rt E - C u m u l ative Tota l N u cleons

Mantle

Core or Outer Core

Inner Core

etc

1 2 6 8 1420 28 38 50 64 82 92 126 138 184 16 32 40 56 58 100 106 148 156 70 110 112 162 166 168
Shell # 1 2a 2b 3a 3b 4a 4b Sa 5b 6a 6b 7a 7b 8 1 2a 2b 3a 3b 4a 4b Sa 5b 1 2a 2b 3a 3b 1
Cban C shows the series order of the nucleus fill sequence. Chatt D shows
the number of nucleons per spheron shell. The values calculate by
Pauling's formula 2j +1, where j is the spin as shown in chart B. Cban E
shows the cumularive total of the nucleons per spheron shell as the
nucleus filsl .

85

SECRETS OF THE AETHER
The equations for calculating the nuclear spin per sub shells a and b are:

a = s --1 2

b = s --32

where a and b belong to the shell number s. Applying the nuclear spin

equations to Pauling's formulaforthe maximumnumber of nucleons in a

nuclear shell we get:

22((SS

--%<25>

)+ )+

1 1

(4.26) (4.27)
(4.28)

Each spheron of the Mande, Outer Core, and Inner Core follows the same structural sy.;tem
If the total number ( tn) of nucleons that can fit on a spheron shell are

tn = a + b

(4.29)

then the total number of nucleons on a spheron shell can be as high as

tn = 4s - 2
Science of Complexity The purpose of showing Aether numbers, the ratio of musical tones, and
atomic structure in this chapter is to ilul strate a few of the way.; in which
the Aether unit influences the structure of the phy.;ical world No doubt,
all dynamic and living processes, such as the patterns of seed development in flowers, the growth of plant structures, skeletal and extra­ skeletal structures, and population growth patet rns, are manifestations of Aether units.

(4.30)

The concept of Aether structure was introduced and quantified as the
relationship of 2-spin Aether units to '12 spin onta. We show that a
cenain number of whole cycles produce specific geometrical structures
and that these structurse are themselves cyclical and appear in octaves. Images produced by Ghim Wei Ho under the tutelage of Prof. Mark
Weiland of the University of Cambridge Nanoscale Science Laboratory­ share a remarkable resemblance to the purely mathematical Aether structures.

76 Nanotechnology Now http}lnanotech<63>now.comlAn_Gallety/ghim<69>wei-ho_htm: Discover, The Secret Gan:len, October2004 http}Iwww.discover.comlissues/oct<63>04Ird1secret<65>gardenl
88

AETHER
The above images were produced using chemical vapor deposition and taken with a scangni electron microscope. Notice the spike and petal formations, two dominant Aether structures. It wartran s further research to investigate the precise quantification of Aether structures and nano structures within the context of the Aether Physics 1fudel. If the APM does accurately quantify the structure of growing things, it will not only quantify the physical Universe, but also precisely quantify the living structures within it.
. The quality of our knowledge proves itself in the quality of our lives. A knowledge constructed of concepts that identify and manipulate preestablished s structure yields a world that is crowded, rigid, compressed, and impenetrable. Human suffering is built up in la}ers of increasing solidity, each la}er a further misreading of a fluid dynamic.77
-Tarthang Tulku
1fudem physics attempts to describe the quantum structures in terms of macro structures. In our macro world, things seem solid, rigid, and impenetrable. Yet, at the quantum level of structure, the Aether Physics Model reveals a more fluid and dynamic structure for existence. When we more closely study the seemingly rigid physical world, we see it is constantly changing according to processes of growth and decay, which mayexist over extremely long times. Our science would be simpler and more accurate if it reflected the true nature of existence, rather than our limited and preconceived notions of rigidity.
From this brief introduction into Aether numbers, a new branch of science emerges. It is the Science of Complexity. Given an ordered reality consisting of objects and their environment, objects can bind bythe three forces and give rise to a more complex and granulated reality. The three forces of electromagnetism, electrostatics, and gravity are themselves evolved from the Gforce acting on the dimensions of onta The electrons and protons within the environment of Aether, bind by the forces, which give rise to neutrons and atoms. The neutrons remain at the level of subatomic patticles, but the atoms make up a completely new order of reality.
Whereas electrons, protons, and neutrons have two spatial dimensions, atoms
77 Tarthang TuIku, Knowledgeof TimeandSpace (Dhanna Publishing, Dhanan Press, Oakland, CA, 1990) 87

SECRETS OF THE AETHER
have three inherent spatial dimensions. The two-dimensional onta bind to one another and the distance betwene them produces the third dimension of length. Thus, atoms are the true quantum particles, as they are the first order of realitywithin spatial, thre-edimensional existence.
As the complexity of the material structwes develop, so also do the
complexity of the forces and environment. The strong force that binds onta becomes the Van der Waals force that binds molecules. The strong charge of the onta, when polar aligned, produces magnetism As atoms produce molecules, theydevelop increasinglyversatile charactetisrics. All along, while orders of reality become more complex, the structwes build in the environment of Aether. Because Aether encapsulates onta, the Aetherbinds as well, changing the geometryof the space-rime fabric.
Therefore, force, matet r, and environment progress from very simple states to states that are more complex. They become cells, organs, living beings, communirie,s and narions. They become minerals, rocks, mountains, planets, stars, solar systems, and galaxies. 1bere are numerous taXonomies of complex existence spannig many orders of reality.
As we quantify and understand the progressions of complexity, computer
programs will model each system at their various levels of reality and predict evolurions not before imagined The understanding of the binding of onta, atoms, and molecules will lead to designer materials where the desired characteristics are input and computers reveal the blueprints that meet the requirements.
Endeavors such as these are possible only when the root cause of force,
matet r, and environment properly quantify. The physics of the 20m
Century focused only on matet r, was not aware of the Gforce, and neglected the Aether. Modem physics reached a dead end when protons and neutrons viewed as being two forms of nuclei. The misperceprion resulted that smashed nuclei revealed smaller building blocks of matter called quarks, which are mere collision effects. Scientists neglected the Aether because it presented problems regarding Einstein's Special Relarivity Theory, as Aether provides the basis for an absolute reference frame. Is it mere ignorance that the Gforce remained undiscovered? Or could there be prejudice against any evidence that might suppon the existence of a creator God?
In any case, it takes a physics model that can explain the evolution and interaction of force, matret , and environment in orderto give an accurate and true account ofthe Universe's existence.
1be Standard Model bases upon confusion beginngi with the ambiguous
definirions of dimensions, which are the physical world's first order of
reality. 1be next two chapters laythe foundarions required to correct this confusion and properlypresent the AetherPhysics Model.
BB

o (

DIMENSIONS
a_ .lal

DIMENSIONS
It is essential to have a good definition of «dimension" in physics.
Dimension is the most elementary characteristic of both physical matter
existence and non- matetial Aether existence. From the dimensions of
length, frequency; mass, charge, and spherical geometry come Aether,
primary angular momentum, and all other units of dimension.
The physical structure of the Universe that we recognize originates from
Aether units and primary angular momentum. Other units make up the
Universe, such as velocity, magnetic flux, resistance, potential, flow, pressure and many more. We may not be aware of it, but each one of
these units is a t)pe of reality in itself. Units are not just abstract concepts; they are a significant foundation of the physical world. It is important to understand each t)pe of physical existence as clearly as
possible. To do this we must understand the t)pe of existence that
precedes the level we are examining.
Dimension is an unfamiliar concept to ponder; yet like our heartbeat it
undergirds our veryexistence. We are acmtcsuo ed to thinking that reality
is the physical world we perceive. However, if the world we perceive is
real, then the molecules and atoms that make up the world must be more
real, having pre-existed the more complex structures. In addition, the
onta that makes up the atoms must be yet more real. Moreover, as we
proceed to the most fundamental existence of dimension we must approach even closer the Source of reality.
Likewise, as we progress in structure from dimensions to the reality we
perceive, the structurse themselves become more complicated and less
like their Source, while founded on the previous levels all the satne. For these reasons, as we pursue an understanding of reality at the level of
dimension, the terminologymust be clear.
89

SECRETS OF THE AETHER

Definition ofDimension

Dimension - (Common Definition)

<EFBFBD><EFBFBD>

<EFBFBD>

In physics, dimensions is an expression of the character of a

derived quantity in relation to fundamental quancicies,

without regard for its numerical value. In any system of

measurement, such as the metric system, certain quantities
are considered fundamental, and all others are considered to
be derived from them Systems in which length L , rime T , and mass M are taken as fundamental quantities are called
absolute systems. In an absolute system force is a derived

quantity whose dimensions are defined by Newton's second
law of motion as ML/T' , in terms of the fundamental quanuues. Pressure (force per unit area) then has

dimensions ML/T' ; wOIk or energy (force times distance)

has dimensions ML'/T' ; and poV!er (energy per unit rime)

has dimensions ML'/TJ • Additional fundamental quantities

are also defined, such as electric charge and luminous

intensity. The expression of any particular quantity in terms

of fundamental quantities is known as dimensional analysis

and often provides physical insight into the results of a

mathematical calculatioIl" .

Dimension - (Aether Physics Model Definition)

,

<EFBFBD>

W'='

"

, ,..

_

According to the Aether Physics Model, the dimensions of

discrete natural units (quanta) are length, frequency, mass,

charge, and spherical geomeoy. Dimension is the

fundamental attnbute of measurement, but is not itself

measurable. Absolute dimension is a quality of reality seemingly arising from the ulcimate Source of all existence.
When quantity is associated wtih dimension, then the two

together forms a measuremtn.e

Through the lack of coherent understanding of dimensions and units, it has
become standard practice to view measurements as units. For example,
the kilogram defines a unit of mass". It would be far more coherent if the kilogram defined a rrmsU"tf!J1Wl of mass, wti h the deifnti ion of "unit" reselVed for compound dimensions (units are defined in chapter 6). It is not so much that the choice of words is important, but that the concepts
of measurements and units are quite different from one another. Using
the same word to define two different concepts, which often appear in
the same sentence or paragraph, easily leads to confusion.

78 "Dimension , in Physics,n TheColumbiaEm;ydopedja, 6th ed.
" "KILOGRAM abbr. kg, fundamental unit of mass in the metric sy.;tem, defined as the mass of the International Protot}pe Kilogram, a platinum-iridium cylinder kept at Sevres, France, near Paris. Copies of this
standard are deposited at bureaus of standards cluoughout the world, and other units of mass are defined in
tenns of it." "Kilogram ," The Columbia Eru<72>ydQpedai, 6th ed.
90

--- --- - - - - - - - - - <20> <20> <20> <20>- <20><> <20> - - --

DIMENSIONS
There are fewer dimensions at the quantum level than in the macro world Like force, matter, and environment, dimensions increase in complexity as the orders of realitybecome more complex. Color, flavor, and texture are examples of complex dimensions as perceived at the level of human beings.
The ph<70>ical world, at the quantum level, follows a vety simple and easy to understand set of rules. It is much easier to understand quantum ph<70>ics through the Aether Ph<50>ics Model than the ph<70>ics of auto mechanics or bread making because the rules are so precise and the dimensions are so few. However, the key to understanding the quantum level of existence lies in more precise and simple definitions of the terms "dimension," "measurement," and "unit.»
There are four commonly known, fundamental dimensions in the MKS <20>em of measurement: mass, charge, length, and frequency. In our macro frame of reference, we prefer to speak of frequency in terms of its reciprocal of time. Also at the quantum level there is a fifth t}pe of dimension, spherical geometry, as explained shortly.
It is from the fundamental dimensions that units are constructed The unit of area is equal to the length dimension squared The unit of volume is equal to the length dimension cubed Volume then has three dimensions of length.

ACJ = volm

(5. 1)

However, there are also three dimensions in a unit of momentum (mass times length times frequeneJ?

m, ' Ac · F, = momt
So it is more actaucr e to call "3D" objects "volumetric" than three­ dimensional. Technically, an object with three dimensions of length is three dimensional, but three-dimensions need not mean "three dimensions of length."

(5.2)

Misconceptions of Mass In a weightless environment, devoid of noticeable gr.witatoi nal effects, what
happens to mass? Does mass change to zero? No. When mass is near a large planet, does mass become greater? No. When an object with mass is acceleratedto nearthe speed of light, does mass increase? No.
Nothing ever happens to mass. There is nothing to happen to. :Mass is
merely a dimension. Of itself, it has no material existence, although it is
one of the defining qualities of material objects.
There is mass in resistance. There is mass in potential. There is mass in
91

SECRETS OF THE AETHER
energy. 1bere is mass in angular momentum. It is all the same mass, but manifested differently. It might help to realize that there is time in units too. There is time in resistance, there is time in potential, there is time in energy, and there is time in angular momentum. You can perceive time as change, but }UU cannot isolate time from a unit Similarly, }Uu can perceive mass as inercia and length as distance, but }UU cannot separate the dimensions of mass and length from units. In the same way, }UU cannot remove the bricks from a brick building without also removing the building.
Once we stop thinking of mass as equal to matter, and realize that mass is neither physical nor is it something convemble, then it becomes easier to see what mass really is and how mass "behaves." How it behaves is not the same as the "is-ness" of mass. You cannot "put }Uur hands" on mass. You cannot see mass. You cannot truly weigh mass (but }UU can weigh matterthat has mass). You cannot make mass tum into energy.

The whole issue about converting energy from mass clearly reveals itself when realizing the indestructbi le and unchangeable nature of dimensions. You cannot convert mass, length, rime, or charge. They are absolutes. Mass is a/:uay; m1S5. Once again, and it will be repeated often, mass (inercia) is onlya dimension.

E does not equal m
Energy is a unit Mass is a dimension. Energy is composed of the dimensions of mass times length squared times frequencysquared.

L F E = M · ' · '

(5.3)

Mass is not converted to energyand energyis not convertedto mass. Mass is
merely a dimension from which the units are constructed. This is
repetitive, but understanding mass as merely a dimension is pemaps the greatest intellectual physics challenge for most people coming out of the 20m Centuty.

We often refer to nuclear reactions on the Sun, nuclear power plants, and nuclear bombs as examples of mass to energy conversion. In the nuclear
power plants the United States has been operating for 60 years, a high
degree of precision applies to the measured amount of energy and
material mass passed through the reactor. And yet, there is not one
report available anywhere (that this writer was able to obtain) that presents the data from a nuclear power plant and shows that the mass of
the fuel was exactly converted to energy according to E = me' . One
would think that to prove Special Relativity Theoty, the data from a precisely monitored nuclear power plant would provide an abundance of evidence. Nevertheless, such data apparentlydoes not exist
In fact, there is evidence to suggest that more energy comes out of a nuclear power plant than the mass of fuel that goes in. A Liquid Metal Fast
92

DIMENSIONS
Breeder Reactor once operated for 25 years and produced more fuel in its
byproducts than it consumed during its operation80• A violation of energy
conservation seems to result, tberefore a government employee or
academic will not admit tbis. In practice, tbe scientific establisbrnent
fOlbids tbe suggestion of any violation of tbe energy conservation law
even if tbe data suggests it. However, tbe Aetber Physics Model shows
tbat tbere is no violation of energy conservation, as tbe extra energy is angular momentum of dark matet r converting to photons tbrough tbe Casimir effect.
W'hen it comes down to trutb, mass cannot be converted to energy because mass is a dimension at one level of reality, and energyis a unit made up of
dimensions at a different level of reality. Any tbeory based on tbe
assumption tbat a dimension of mass converts to a unit of energy has no
foundation in tbe Aetber Physics Model
Just as Einstein did not atet mpt to prove tbe Aetber as non-existent when he
presented his Special Relativity 1beory, it is not necessary to prove
Special Relativity Theory right or wrong while presenting a matbematically correct tbeory of tbe Aetber. 1be Aetber tbeory
presented in tbis book stands on its own and has no obligation
whatsoever, to support or refute Special Relativity 1beory. According to tbe foundation ptinciples of tbe Aetber Physics Model, tbe mass!energy equivalence ptinciple of Special RelativityTheoryis non-sequitur.

Nature of Dimensions
What causes a dimension to come into existence? Why would tbere be such
absolute dimensions as mass, charge, lengtb, frequency; or curved
geometry? Contemplating tbe nature and origin of dimensions requires
an ability to "see be}Ond" botb non-material and material existence.
Dimensions are truly miracles of physics.

The esotericism continues when contemplating why dimensions interact at
all Why should mass times lengtb times frequency equal a unit of
momentum?

M · L · P = Momentum
The interaction of dimensions to fonn units is merely an empirical observation; tbere is presently no known explanation for why dimensions should produce units.

(5 .4)

Non-material units such as force have dimensions, and so does tbe primary
angular momentum that ultimately composes physical marter. There must be sornetbing about tbe reality of absolute dimensions, which pre-

80 "EBR-II is, by definition, a Liquid-Meral-Cooled Fast Breeder ReactOr (LMFBR). It is cooled with molten sodium metal, its chain reaction is perperuated with extremely energetic (fast) neutrons, and ti -was designed with the potential for breeding more fuel than it consumes." Argonne National Laboratory - West EBR·II: Sixteen Years of Operation (Idaho Falls, ID, Argonne National Laborato')', May 1980) 1
93

SECRETS OF THE AETHER
exists both physical maner and non-material Aether existence. Science
has traditionally ignored the source of absolute dimension, taking the
origin of dimensions for granted Some scientists are even so bold as to emphatically state that humans created dimensions as a means for
Wlderstanding physics. If we are to Wlderstand the Source of our
existence, then we must Wlderstand the fOWldation of our existence, as it
is, and not pretend material realityhas no metaphysical fOWldation.
Contemplating the level of reality where physical rnaner and non-material
Aether appear as Wlits of dimensions, and directing our awareness
toward a more primaryexistence, we might experience a sense of floating.
There is no-thing left to observe, Jet logic tells us that some undnaem
knowledge of a greater reality exists there. From this undmena
knowledge emerged dimensions, Wlits, atoms, molecules and ultimately
the world we experience. Additionally, as we bring our awareness back to
our present situation, we realize that everything we experience ultimately
develops from that undenam knowledge. At a veryfWldarnentai level, we '?fl n:alize a linkbetween the knowledge of greater reality and our curer nt
Sltuanon.
There is nothing wrong or harmful about science admining to the existence
of God or our relationship to God, especially when that is what the data
and theory present. The closer one approaches the most fWldamentai
levels of existence, the closer one approaches the Source of all Cleation.
If in our mind we look toward the Source of dimensions, we drift toward a
simpler and more unified existence. However, if in our mind we look from the various manifestations of dimensions, toward the Wlits constructed from dimensions, the atoms construCted from Wlits, the molecules constructed from atoms, and their macro structurse , we fmd complexity.
Through dimensions, we fracture our perception of existence into myriad pieces, reargiran realityin a waythat seemingly adds to the depth of our
experience. On the other hand, because there are so many different pieces to comprehend, and our mind is only capable of one focus at a time, the world ends up becoming shallower in our perception. The
more detail we identify, the less we can see at a given time. This is not to
say that there is something inherently wrong about studying the complex
world The pUIpOse of acknowledging God in science is to realize that it
is okayto study the path to a simpler reality, as well
Dimensions also have a reciprocal quality. For example, the reciprocal of
time is frequency. TIme and frequency are related, but they are also two
distinct manifestations of a given dimension.
Linear and Distributed Along with dimensions, there is another important observarion conceming
the primary state of existence. There is both a linear and distributed

DIMENSIONS
aspect. For example, length can be linear (a line) and distributed (a surface). Similarly, other dimensions and their reciprocals have both linear and distributed aspects.
However, it would appear thu mass is specifically a linear dimension, and charge is specificallya distributed dimension. There is a constant mass to strong charge ratio for all existence, which indicates that mass and strong charge are two aspects of the same thing. Mass is the linear view of this
"thing" and charge is the distnbuted view. This is easy to visualize by
using the analogy of a sheet of paper. Charge would be the view of the paper looking at is surface, mass would be the view of the paper looking at its edge.
Furthermore, dimensions govern by math, which also has both linear and distributed aspects. Adotdi n is a linear operator in the positive direction, while subtraction is a linear operator in the negative direction. Multiplication is distributed adtiid on, and division is distributed subtraction.
Length and Reciprocal Length Length is the dimension that measures distance when given a quantity.
Because length is something we think about often as we walk, drive, and generally function in the world, it is for most people easy to understand. The reciprocal of length is the measurement of repeating curved lengths. We call the repeating curved lengths a wave number. The wave number is differem from the wavelength. A wavelength defines as the distance between two consecutive common features of a wave (peak to peak, or trough to trough for example). The wave number is the reciprocal of the wavelength.
Just as frequency is cycles per time, wave number is cycles per length. A bicycle wheel with a certain radius appears as having a certain wave number for a given distance. Change the radius of the wheel (its amplitude) and the wave number will change accordingly. In general, if the wave number increases, then the atnplitude decreases, although this is not a strict rule since other factors can affect the atnplitude of a wave. Theunit ofwave numberinthe MKS system ofunits is cycles permeter.
Single Dimension Length When the dimension of length denotes a quantity, then we have a
measurement for distance. The single dimension of length represents as a line. Although a ruler generally has four edges plus a top and bottom totaling about 12 edges with length, we are only concerned with a single edge of the ruler, which is a graduated line. To clarify the concept of length as dimension we could say that a measuremem with length dimension, measures distance. It would be better to avoid saying that we are «measuring length."
95

SECRETS OF THE AETHER
Because space-time as we perceive it is a direct result of the Aether, length and time are inseparable. Since length and time in the Aether are inseparable, the speed of light is constant The speed of light is equal to the quantum distance times the quantum frequency. At the quantum level, length can be expressed in terms of frequency (reciprocal time) just as frequency can be expressed in terms of length (usualyl called "wavelength").
Distributed Dimension Length
Length in two dimensions is distnbuted Specifically, the lengths are at right angles to each other. We normally call distributed length an area. The physical manifestation of an area is a surface. A plane is a special case of a distnbuted area that occurs on a flat surface. However, distributed area can also occur on curved surfaces such as toroids and spheres. Even though a surface curves, the length dimensions are still at right angles to each other.
Three Dimensional Length
We often refertothree dimensions of length as "three dimensional." As with distributed length, all three length dimensions are at right angles to each other. We call these three right-angled length dimensions a volume. The physical manifestation of a volume is space.
Three dimensions of length can also be two length dimensions at a right angle over a curved surface with the third length dimension extending to another curved surface. In other words, we would normally think of the third dimension of length as extending inward to the centerof the sphere or toroid (as in a solid), but at quantum levels the third dimension of length extends outward from the surface, and between two identical toroids. For example, the double cardioid unit has the appearance of two adjacent cardioids separated by a distance. An instance of this double cardioid geometrymanifests inthe binding mechanics betwene onta.
Quantum maner has only two dimensions of length, that is, it only has surface characteristics. There is no solid quantum matter. Distance between surfaces provides the third dimension of length resulting in the appearance of "solid maner" as we perceive it at the macro level of exIStence.
Time and Reciprocal Time
When the dimension of time denotes a quantity, it becomes a measurement of intervals. We are accustomed to viewing time as the nonna! manifestation of the time dimension, with frequency as its reciprocal. At the quantumlevel, it appears tobe just the opposite.
We perceive time as nonna! and frequency as the reciprocal because onta move only in the fotward dimension of time. In reality, the onta are acting like "time diodes." What we really see is a pulsed fotward motion
••

DIMENSIONS
of time, not unlike a pulsed DC current produced by a rectified AC
current. Since all subatomic matter pulses to the same rhythm in forward time, time appears linearto our perception.
While visualizing forward and backward time, it is possible to see how time and space curve so that distributed time appears spherical and space appears as a loxodrome over the surface of spherical distributed
frequency. Once again, this geometrycan onlybe seen frombeyond the
material world (such as through visualization in meditation). 'When the
material world is viewed from within the material world, i.e., from the
body's senses, we are viewing from half-spin perspective and can see only
three dimensions of space and one dimension of pulsed, linear time (nonnallycalled 4D realit}1.
Usually frequency represents as a sine wave drawn on a flat surface (such as
the surface of paper or a computer screen). 1his representation is just an
artifact of representing frequency as a line. Frequency at the quantum level is not the up and down line we see in a cross section of a wave on the surface of a fluid Quantum frequency is strictly an artifact of time dimension, not length dimension.
Think of it this way. Length has two directions. There is length extending in
one direction, and if the point of reference turns 180 degrees, length has a
second direction. Similarly, frequency has two directions. There is time toward the future, and time toward the past. However, frequency, unlike
length, is dynamic. Therefore, frequency is circular in that it constantly
moves with a certain spin toward the future and then curves around
toward the past, and curves around toward the future, etc. In reality,
there is no future or past, only the present. Nevertheless, there is the illusion of moving toward the future because our physical world atises
from matter that cannot "see" the backward time direction.
1his in no wayprevents the forward time direction from exhibiting apparent
changes totally within the context of forward time. A swinging
pendulum alternates between two directions. 1his alternation of
direction manifests as a variable velocity. The variable velocity is a result of the changing time dimension within the velocity of the pendulum and not the quantum time dimension of the onta from which the pendulum constructs.
So although frequency can be represented by a line on a surface (such as a
graph) for systems occurgrni within the forward-pulsed, linear time
dimension, the frequency of forward and backward time cannot be accurately depicted on paper. Even so, for conveying the concept of
forwardand backwardtime,we will attempt it in our drawings.
Single Dimension Time
Single dimension time is linear time. We quantify linear time with clocks,
calendars, and similar devices. Duration is associated with growth and
97

SECRETS OF THE AETHER
decay, and determines the boundaries of binh and death. For example, a tree begins life at a specific time, duration rnatks the tree's growth and decay, and it dies at a specific time. All physical objects (and the concepts about the physical objects) appear to come into existence at a specific moment, to have a period of growth and decay, and then to cease to exist at a specific moment.
When speaking of measurements of rime it vvould enhance our understanding
to speak rather of "interval," "duration," "moment," and similar
references to time measurement, reserving "rime" as a term for "time as dimension" when possible.
FREQUENCY
The reciprocal of rime is frequency. Single dimension frequency curves. We measure frequency as C}cies per time. When frequency manifests in a graph, it usually depicts as a circle or a sine wave. The continuous sine wave depiction (like a snake) is merely an artifact of convenience to show the various cycles without overlapping them In reality, quantum
frequencyC}cies forward and then cycles backwardin a circular "path."
It is helpful to realize there are various qualities for which frequency is
measured For example, a radio wave's frequency is a measurement of alternating electromagnetic potentials. A sound wave's frequency is the measurement of alternating molecular pressures. These examples of frequency are not frequencies of forward and backward time, but of increasing and decreasing potentials and pressures.
AI the quantum level, Iengt:h and frequency are not separate. Each is an aspect of the same quantum velocity. Length in its first two dimensions
curves. The ftrst dimension of curved length comes from the ligamen circularus. The second curved length comes from the direction the
ligamen circularsu moves about the spherical resonance of frequency
squared Together the two curves produce the small and large radius of the onta as shown in the image on the adjacent page.
••

Structure ofTime and Space

DIMENSIONS

As noted in the discussion of single dimension length, quantum length and quantum frequency (reciprocal time) are different perspectives of the same entity. Length and frequency unite as evidenced by the constant speed of light and the Aether unit geometry: Ax the quantum level, length expresses in terms of frequency, and frequency expresses in terms of length.
The sameness of length and frequency is due to motion (velocitY) being a primary characteristic of existence from which the dimensions of length and frequencyarise. In the AetherPhysics Model, the speed of light is as much a qualityof the Aether as is the Aether's conductance, permeability, and permittivity.

Distributed Time
Distributed time appears to be a form of reciprocal resonance. This can be
seenfromthe expression of inductance times capacitance:

indc . cape = time'

(5.5)

where time is equalto the quantum time constant (time = 8.093X 10-21sec) .
Single dimension time has a linear characteristic, just as all single dimensions do. Distributed time is the set of all time points generated by two perpendicular time lines. A real world example of disttibuted time is the Olbital period of planets, as inJohannes Kepler's third iaW:81

81 Added the meaning of time squared 9/18/5.
99

SECRETS OF THE AETHER

T2

=

4n2
GM

a3

where T is time, G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of a large body, and a is the semi major axis of an elliptical orbit or radius of a
cin:ular orbit. Using quantum measurement analysis, we see that the 41t'
tenD, although empirically derived, is anomalous.

(5.6)

Tq 2

=

__ 1
G.m

..1,C3

a

Distributed Frequency
Distributed frequency is similarly structured The equation for determining
the resonance of a tank circuit is:

(5.7)

and this is the same as:

1

F

(5.8)

F2

=

1 4n2LC

Frequency squared 15 thus resonance. The 41t' term 15, once agam,
anomalous:

(5.9)

rson

1
indc · capc

Of course, pointing out the anomaly of the 412 term does not solve any
problems. In order for the Aether Physics Model to maintain its
syrnmeuy and be a useful physics, it must offer an alternative explanation
for the 412 term

(5.10)

It would appear that the anomalous 41t2 term tells us distributed frequency
(resonance) and distributed time (orbital period) measures incorrectly.
Since the resonance would be off by a factor of 41t', it would seem that
frequency squared measures as a toroidal surface and not as a linear
frequency. Similarly, the orbital period would envision in terms of a
macro version of the quantum system

It seems that when electrons are resonant in a circuit they produce a macro structure of the electron's angular momentum. Since the angular momentum of the electron traces out a cardioid strong charge over the surface of the spherical Aether, the measurement of resonance should be designed to receive the resonance in that geometry. Because we live in a
half-spin Universe, our measuring device "antenna" will not look like the
loxodrome shape in the full space-resonance of Aether, but instead it will
100